search
Back to results

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Head and Neck Cancer Pain (HNC) (TENS & HNC)

Primary Purpose

Head Cancer, Neck Cancer, Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
Sponsored by
Jennifer E. Lee
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Head Cancer focused on measuring Head and Neck Cancer, Oral Cancer, Laryngeal Cancer, Oropharyngeal Cancer, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), Oral Mucositis, Pain, Function, TENS, Functional Pain, Non-pharamcologic, Quality of Life

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis
  • Oral mucositis diagnosis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • TENS use ≤ 5 years
  • Pacemaker
  • Pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • University of Iowa

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Active TENS

Placebo (low intensity) TENS

No Treatment

Arm Description

Active high frequency TENS will be use for Active TENS.

Placebo TENS will be applied for one arm of the study

TENS unit in place but not turned on

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Pain Intensity in Head/Neck Cancer Area: 10cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Participants rated 0-10 pain intensity in head/neck cancer area using one number (where their disease was located) by a vertical line on a horizontal 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 "no pain" to 10 "worst possible pain." Possible scores ranged from 0-10 (10=worse pain). VAS was assessed two times each visit: (1) Pre-VAS: start of visit, (2) Post-VAS: end of the visit. The outcome measure was each person's change in pain: Pre-VAS minus Post-VAS, to create VAS change score. An average of all participants' VAS change score was calculated for each TENS condition (Active, Placebo, No TENS) and used as the dependent measure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
September 1, 2010
Last Updated
August 26, 2019
Sponsor
Jennifer E. Lee
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01194466
Brief Title
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Head and Neck Cancer Pain (HNC) (TENS & HNC)
Official Title
The Influence of TENS on Mucositis Pain and Function in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Randomized and Placebo-Controlled Double Blind Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 15, 2011 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 14, 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 14, 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Jennifer E. Lee

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The overall goal of this study is to examine the effect of a single dose of TENS on mucositis pain and function secondary to head and neck radiation therapies. Oral mucositis is an extremely debilitating, unpreventable condition (inflammation, ulcers, bleeding in the mouth, nose, and throat) that causes significant pain, functional impairment, and diminished quality of life. Head and neck cancers pose specific challenges to effective pain management and past studies suggest the use of effective non-pharmacologic strategies such as TENS may be particularly beneficial for avoiding sources of acute and chronic pain, thereby improving quality of life. The investigators hypothesize that a single dose of TENS will decrease pain and improve function and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. This project is particularly innovative because it is the first known study to examine the efficacy of TENS, an established safe, inexpensive and easy-to-use non-pharmacologic pain management intervention, for treating acute oral mucositis pain. The investigators research translates bench (animal model) science to human subjects using an interdisciplinary approach to pain management. Establishing whether TENS is effective for reducing mucositis pain is a critical first step toward establishing an effective, non-pharmacologic pain relief intervention for mucositis.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Head Cancer, Neck Cancer, Pain
Keywords
Head and Neck Cancer, Oral Cancer, Laryngeal Cancer, Oropharyngeal Cancer, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), Oral Mucositis, Pain, Function, TENS, Functional Pain, Non-pharamcologic, Quality of Life

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
41 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Active TENS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Active high frequency TENS will be use for Active TENS.
Arm Title
Placebo (low intensity) TENS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Placebo TENS will be applied for one arm of the study
Arm Title
No Treatment
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
TENS unit in place but not turned on
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
Other Intervention Name(s)
EMPI Select
Intervention Description
Four adhesive electrodes (1.375in x 1.375in) will be placed bilaterally on the: 1) temporomandibular joint (1/3rd of distance between ear and nose); and 2) upper neck area (2cm from spine, i.e., Cervical 1 and 2).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Pain Intensity in Head/Neck Cancer Area: 10cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Description
Participants rated 0-10 pain intensity in head/neck cancer area using one number (where their disease was located) by a vertical line on a horizontal 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 "no pain" to 10 "worst possible pain." Possible scores ranged from 0-10 (10=worse pain). VAS was assessed two times each visit: (1) Pre-VAS: start of visit, (2) Post-VAS: end of the visit. The outcome measure was each person's change in pain: Pre-VAS minus Post-VAS, to create VAS change score. An average of all participants' VAS change score was calculated for each TENS condition (Active, Placebo, No TENS) and used as the dependent measure.
Time Frame
The change in VAS pain score was assessed within one study visit for each of the 3 study TENS conditions

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis Oral mucositis diagnosis Exclusion Criteria: TENS use ≤ 5 years Pacemaker Pregnancy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jennifer E Lee, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Iowa
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Iowa
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Head and Neck Cancer Pain (HNC) (TENS & HNC)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs