search
Back to results

Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) and Robotic Training to Improve Arm Function After Stroke (tVNS)

Primary Purpose

Stroke, Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), Hemiparesis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS)
Sham Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS)
Sponsored by
Northwell Health
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS), VNS, robotic therapy, occupational therapy, motor rehabilitation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals between 18 and 85 years of age
  • First single focal unilateral supratentorial ischemic stroke with diagnosis verified by brain imaging (MRI or CT scans) that occurred at least 6 months prior
  • Cognitive function sufficient to understand the experiments and follow instructions (per interview with Speech Pathologist or PI)
  • Fugl-Meyer assessment 12 to 44 out of 66 (neither hemiplegic nor fully recovered motor function in the muscles of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Botox treatment within 3 months of enrollment
  • Fixed contraction deformity in the affected limb
  • Complete and total flaccid paralysis of all shoulder and elbow motor performance
  • Prior injury to the vagus nerve
  • Severe dysphagia
  • Introduction of any new rehabilitation interventions during study
  • Individuals with scar tissue, broken skin, or irremovable metal piercings that may interfere with the stimulation or the stimulation device
  • Highly conductive metal in any part of the body, including metal injury to the eye; this will be reviewed on a case by case basis for PI to make a determination
  • Pregnant or plan on becoming pregnant or breastfeeding during the study period
  • Significant arrhythmias, including but not limited to, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, sick sinus syndrome, and A-V blocks (enrollment to be determined by PI review)
  • Presence of an electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated implant (including cardiac pacemaker), an intracerebral vascular clip, or any other electrically sensitive support system; Loop recorders will be reviewed on a case by case basis by PI and the treating Cardiologist to make a determination

Sites / Locations

  • Feinstein Institute for Medical Research

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

active tVNS + robotic arm therapy

sham tVNS + robotic arm therapy

Arm Description

Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) will be delivered non-invasively via the ear (targeting the auricular branch of the vagus nerve) during robotic arm therapy sessions lasting ~60 minutes, 3x per week for 3 weeks.

Sham (placebo) transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) will be delivered non-invasively via the ear (targeting the auricular branch of the vagus nerve) during robotic arm therapy sessions lasting ~60 minutes, 3x per week for 3 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Median Absolute Change From Baseline in Electromyographic (EMG) Peak Amplitude of the Bicep/Tricep
The median absolute change in surface electromyographic (sEMG) peak amplitude of the bicep/tricep during gravity-eliminated, unassisted extensor movements was calculated from baseline to discharge at 3 weeks (immediately following the intervention) and again at 16 weeks (3 months follow-up from the intervention) in each training condition (sham tVNS + robotic arm training vs. active tVNS + robotic arm training). Bicep and tricep peak sEMG amplitude scores were calculated as a percentage of the maximal volitional contraction (MVC), with larger values indicating a greater absolute change (negative or positive) in bicep/tricep peak muscle activity during extensor movements.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Median Change From Baseline in Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer Assessment Score
The median change in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Score will be calculated from baseline to discharge at 3 weeks (immediately following the intervention) and again at 16 weeks (3 months follow-up from the intervention) in each training condition (sham tVNS + robotic arm training vs. active tVNS + robotic arm training). The median change in Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer score is reported, with a range 0-66 points, and with higher values indicating better functional status.

Full Information

First Posted
July 5, 2018
Last Updated
June 8, 2021
Sponsor
Northwell Health
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03592745
Brief Title
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) and Robotic Training to Improve Arm Function After Stroke
Acronym
tVNS
Official Title
Evaluating the Use of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) and Robotic Training to Improve Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 9, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 12, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 1, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Northwell Health

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if multiple therapy sessions of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) combined with robotic arm therapy lead to a greater functional recovery in upper limb mobility after stroke than that provided by robotic arm therapy in a sham stimulation condition.
Detailed Description
Promising new animal research suggests that vagus nerve stimulation paired with motor intervention induces movement-specific plasticity in the motor cortex and improves limb function after stroke. These results were recently extended to the first clinical trial, in which patients with stroke demonstrated significant improvements in upper limb function following rehabilitation paired with implanted VNS. Currently, vagus nerve stimulation is being used clinically to treat a number of human diseases including migraine headaches, epilepsy, and depression, and these investigations are expanding to deliver stimulation via a transcutaneous route to potentially improve intervention efficacy and decrease side effects. This pilot study will combine non-invasive transcutaneous stimulation of the vagus nerve with upper limb robotic therapy to investigate the potential of tVNS to augment improvements gained with robotic therapy in patients with chronic hemiparesis after stroke.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), Hemiparesis
Keywords
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS), VNS, robotic therapy, occupational therapy, motor rehabilitation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This is a double-blind, sham controlled treatment study in which patients will have a 50/50 chance of receiving robotic arm therapy with either active transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) or sham tVNS (placebo).
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Both the participants and investigators performing and analyzing clinical and objective outcome measures will remain blind to condition. Participants will be told that they have a 50-50 chance of receiving either active or sham stimulation, but they will not be told which condition they receive.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
36 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
active tVNS + robotic arm therapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) will be delivered non-invasively via the ear (targeting the auricular branch of the vagus nerve) during robotic arm therapy sessions lasting ~60 minutes, 3x per week for 3 weeks.
Arm Title
sham tVNS + robotic arm therapy
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Sham (placebo) transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) will be delivered non-invasively via the ear (targeting the auricular branch of the vagus nerve) during robotic arm therapy sessions lasting ~60 minutes, 3x per week for 3 weeks.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Intervention Description
tVNS is a non-invasive form of vagus nerve stimulation, activating the auricular branch of the vagus nerve transcutaneously through the cymba concha at the pinna of the ear.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Sham Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Intervention Description
tVNS is a non-invasive form of vagus nerve stimulation, activating the auricular branch of the vagus nerve transcutaneously through the cymba concha at the pinna of the ear. Sham tVNS means the patient is wearing the device, but it is turned off and not delivering current during the treatment. This is a placebo condition, which is used as a study control.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Median Absolute Change From Baseline in Electromyographic (EMG) Peak Amplitude of the Bicep/Tricep
Description
The median absolute change in surface electromyographic (sEMG) peak amplitude of the bicep/tricep during gravity-eliminated, unassisted extensor movements was calculated from baseline to discharge at 3 weeks (immediately following the intervention) and again at 16 weeks (3 months follow-up from the intervention) in each training condition (sham tVNS + robotic arm training vs. active tVNS + robotic arm training). Bicep and tricep peak sEMG amplitude scores were calculated as a percentage of the maximal volitional contraction (MVC), with larger values indicating a greater absolute change (negative or positive) in bicep/tricep peak muscle activity during extensor movements.
Time Frame
baseline, discharge at 3 weeks (immediately following the intervention), and follow-up at 16 weeks (3 months after the intervention)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Median Change From Baseline in Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer Assessment Score
Description
The median change in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Score will be calculated from baseline to discharge at 3 weeks (immediately following the intervention) and again at 16 weeks (3 months follow-up from the intervention) in each training condition (sham tVNS + robotic arm training vs. active tVNS + robotic arm training). The median change in Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer score is reported, with a range 0-66 points, and with higher values indicating better functional status.
Time Frame
baseline, discharge at 3 weeks (immediately following the intervention), and follow-up at 16 weeks (3 months after the intervention)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Individuals between 18 and 85 years of age First single focal unilateral supratentorial ischemic stroke with diagnosis verified by brain imaging (MRI or CT scans) that occurred at least 6 months prior Cognitive function sufficient to understand the experiments and follow instructions (per interview with Speech Pathologist or PI) Fugl-Meyer assessment 12 to 44 out of 66 (neither hemiplegic nor fully recovered motor function in the muscles of the shoulder, elbow, and wrist). Exclusion Criteria: Botox treatment within 3 months of enrollment Fixed contraction deformity in the affected limb Complete and total flaccid paralysis of all shoulder and elbow motor performance Prior injury to the vagus nerve Severe dysphagia Introduction of any new rehabilitation interventions during study Individuals with scar tissue, broken skin, or irremovable metal piercings that may interfere with the stimulation or the stimulation device Highly conductive metal in any part of the body, including metal injury to the eye; this will be reviewed on a case by case basis for PI to make a determination Pregnant or plan on becoming pregnant or breastfeeding during the study period Significant arrhythmias, including but not limited to, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, sick sinus syndrome, and A-V blocks (enrollment to be determined by PI review) Presence of an electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated implant (including cardiac pacemaker), an intracerebral vascular clip, or any other electrically sensitive support system; Loop recorders will be reviewed on a case by case basis by PI and the treating Cardiologist to make a determination
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
City
Manhasset
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11030
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26645257
Citation
Dawson J, Pierce D, Dixit A, Kimberley TJ, Robertson M, Tarver B, Hilmi O, McLean J, Forbes K, Kilgard MP, Rennaker RL, Cramer SC, Walters M, Engineer N. Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2016 Jan;47(1):143-50. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010477. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29375915
Citation
Capone F, Miccinilli S, Pellegrino G, Zollo L, Simonetti D, Bressi F, Florio L, Ranieri F, Falato E, Di Santo A, Pepe A, Guglielmelli E, Sterzi S, Di Lazzaro V. Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined with Robotic Rehabilitation Improves Upper Limb Function after Stroke. Neural Plast. 2017;2017:7876507. doi: 10.1155/2017/7876507. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24553102
Citation
Khodaparast N, Hays SA, Sloan AM, Fayyaz T, Hulsey DR, Rennaker RL 2nd, Kilgard MP. Vagus nerve stimulation delivered during motor rehabilitation improves recovery in a rat model of stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Sep;28(7):698-706. doi: 10.1177/1545968314521006. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23954448
Citation
Khodaparast N, Hays SA, Sloan AM, Hulsey DR, Ruiz A, Pantoja M, Rennaker RL 2nd, Kilgard MP. Vagus nerve stimulation during rehabilitative training improves forelimb strength following ischemic stroke. Neurobiol Dis. 2013 Dec;60:80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26671658
Citation
Hays SA. Enhancing Rehabilitative Therapies with Vagus Nerve Stimulation. Neurotherapeutics. 2016 Apr;13(2):382-94. doi: 10.1007/s13311-015-0417-z.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19752297
Citation
Volpe BT, Huerta PT, Zipse JL, Rykman A, Edwards D, Dipietro L, Hogan N, Krebs HI. Robotic devices as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for stroke recovery. Arch Neurol. 2009 Sep;66(9):1086-90. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.182.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34899170
Citation
Chang JL, Coggins AN, Saul M, Paget-Blanc A, Straka M, Wright J, Datta-Chaudhuri T, Zanos S, Volpe BT. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tAVNS) Delivered During Upper Limb Interactive Robotic Training Demonstrates Novel Antagonist Control for Reaching Movements Following Stroke. Front Neurosci. 2021 Nov 25;15:767302. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.767302. eCollection 2021.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) and Robotic Training to Improve Arm Function After Stroke

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs