Translumbosacral Neuromodulation for FI (TNT)
Primary Purpose
Fecal Incontinence
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Translumbosacral Neuromodulation Therapy (TNT)
Sham TNT Therapy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Fecal Incontinence
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Recurrent episodes of FI for 6 months;
- No mucosal disease (colonoscopy + biopsy); and
- On a 2-week stool diary patients reported at least one episode of solid or liquid FI/week.
Exclusion Criteria:
- severe diarrhea (>6 liquid stools/day, Bristol scale >6);
- on opioids,);
- active depression;
- severe cardiac disease, chronic renal failure or previous GI surgery except cholecystectomy and appendectomy;
- neurologic diseases (e.g. head injury, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, strokes, spinal cord injury) and increased intracranial pressure;
- metal implants (within 30 cm of magnetic coil placement), pacemakers;
- previous pelvic surgery/radiation, radical hysterectomy;
- Ulcerative and Crohn's colitis;
- rectal prolapse;
- active anal fissure, anal abscess, congenital anorectal malformation, fistulae or inflamed hemorrhoids;
- pregnant women
Sites / Locations
- Augusta UniversityRecruiting
- Massachusetts General HospitalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
1 Hz 2400 TNT Treatment
1 Hz 3600 TNT Treatment
Sham TNT Treatment
Arm Description
Intervention: TNT treatment intervention with 2400 total stimulations with the magnetic coil..
Intervention: TNT treatment intervention with 3600 total stimulations with the magnetic coil.
This arm will have the sham treatment session. First we will assess the motor threshold intensity described above. Next, a sham coil is placed on each of 4 regions (2 lumbar & 2 sacral), and 600 stimulations will be given at each site in 2 trains, with a 5 minutes rest period between each site and 3 minutes between trains.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
AIM 1 Primary Outcome measure is the proportion of patients achieving >50% of reduction in fecal incontinence episodes/weeks at the end of 6 weeks compared to baseline.
A responder will be defined as a patient who shows at least 50% reduction in FI episodes/week when compared to baseline.
AIM 2: Latencies for lumbo-anal Magnetic Evoked Potentials (MEP) responses compared to baseline
The bilateral latencies, amplitudes and area under the curve (AUC) for the lumbo-anal MEP responses will be measured.
AIM 2: Latencies for sacro-anal MEP responses compared to baseline
The bilateral latencies, amplitudes and area under the curve (AUC) for the sacro-anal MEP responses will be measured.
AIM 2: Latencies for the ano-cortical Cortical Evoked Potentials (CEP) responsecompared to baseline.
The bilateral latencies, amplitudes and area under the curve (AUC) for the anal CEPs will be averaged to measure the latency of each component, P1, N2, etc, and mean group data.
AIM 3:Primary Outcome measure is the proportion of patients achieving >50% of reduction in fecal incontinence episodes/weeks at the end of 48 weeks compared to baseline.
A responder will be defined as a patient who shows > 50% reduction in FI episodes/week at the end of 48 weeks compared to baseline
AIM 3: Latencies for lumbo-anal MEP responses
The bilateral latencies, amplitudes and area under the curve (AUC) for the lumbo-anal MEP responses will be measured.
AIM 3: Latencies for sacro-anal MEP responses
The bilateral latencies, amplitudes and area under the curve (AUC) for the sacro-anal MEP responses will be measured.
AIM 3: Latencies for the ano-cortical CEP response .
The bilateral latencies, amplitudes and area under the curve (AUC) for the anal CEPs will be averaged to measure the latency of each component, P1, N2, etc, and mean group data
Secondary Outcome Measures
Stool Frequency
Stool frequency-how often subjects have a bowel movement.
Stool consistency
Stool consistency (Bristol Stool scale, 1-7). 1-very hard stool, 4-normal, smooth stool, and 7-watery stool
Bowel Urgency
Severity of Bowel urgency-Unable to postpone BM for more than 15 Minutes? YES/NO
Reduction of Fecal Incontinence (FI) episodes
Percentage of subjects with 100% and 75% reduction in FI episodes compared to baseline
Stool Leakage Characteristics
Leakage characteristics-amount 0. None
Mild
Moderate
Excessive
Global Assessment of bowel satisfaction
using 7 point Likert scale (1. Considerably relieved; 7-considerably worse)
Global Assessment of bowel satisfaction-Visual Analog Scale
0 (absent)-10 (very severe) point visual analog scale (VAS)
FI severity-Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI)
Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI)-assessed on characteristics of accidental bowel leakage: 1: 2 or More times a day and 6: Never any symptom
FI severity-Fecal Incontinence Severity Score (FISS):
Fecal Incontinence Severity Score (FISS): 5 questions asking about severity of their fecal incontinence. Not a scale.
FI severity-International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (IC-IQB):
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (IC-IQB): Questionnaire asking several questions about bowel symptoms. There are scales within each question: 0: never-4:always. How much does this (symptom) bother you? 0 (not at all) and 10 (a great deal).
Change in FI Quality of Life (FI-QOL)
A 4 question questionnaire that assesses the quality of life with FI symptoms. 2 questions have scaled questions: 1 (most of the time) 4 (none of the time) and 1(strongly agree) 4 (Strongly disagree)
Psychological Function PROMIS anxiety Questionnaire
Questionnaire that assesses anxiety symptoms. Asks questions on a scale of 1 (never) and 5 (always).
Psychological Function PROMIS Depression Questionnaire
Questionnaire that assesses Depression symptoms. Asks questions on a scale of 1 (never) and 5 (always).
Psychological Function PROMIS Efficacy Questionnaire
Questionnaire that assesses self-efficacy for managing symptoms. Asks questions on a scale of 1 (I am not at all confident) and 5 (I am very confident).
Amplitudes (Milivolts of the nerve) for lumbo-rectal MEP compared to baseline
of the lumbo-rectal MEP responses.
Amplitudes (Milivolts of the nerve) for sacro-rectal MEP
Milivolts of the nerve for the sacral-rectal MEP compared to baseline.
Amplitudes (Milivolts of the nerve) for recto-cortical CEP responses
Milivolts of the nerve for the recto-cortical CEP responses compared to baseline.
MEP Index The area under the curve of the MEP response
The area under the curve of the MEP response compared to baseline
Anal Sphincter Function-Sustained Squeeze Pressure
Anal sustained squeeze pressure (mm Hg) measure from Anal rectal manometry study compared to baseline.
Anal Sphincter Function-Anal Resting Pressure
Anal resting pressure (mm Hg) measure from Anal rectal manometry study compared to baseline.
Anal Sphincter Function-Squeeze Pressure
Anal squeeze pressure (mm Hg) measure from Anal rectal manometry study.
Rectal Sensation-First Sensation (volume of air)
During anal manometry test, subject tells investigator when they feel a first sensation of the balloon inside their rectum. (measure in mL of air).
Rectal Sensation- Desire to defecate
During anal manometry test, subject tells investigator when they feel a desire to defecate from the balloon that is blown up inside their rectum. (measure in mL of air).
Rectal Sensation-Urgency to Defecate
During anal manometry test, subject tells investigator when they feel an urgency to defecate from the balloon that is blown up inside their rectum. (measure in mL of air).
Rectal Sensation-Maximum tolerable volume
During anal manometry test, subject tells investigator when they feel have a maximum tolerable volume (as much as they can handle) from the balloon that is blown up inside their rectum. (measure in mL of air).
Rectal Compliance
Assessed by dv/dp
Symptoms correlation
Correlate bowel symptoms (FI episodes), severity and physiological changes with MEP and CEP latency.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03899181
First Posted
February 20, 2019
Last Updated
July 19, 2022
Sponsor
Augusta University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), Massachusetts General Hospital, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03899181
Brief Title
Translumbosacral Neuromodulation for FI
Acronym
TNT
Official Title
Translumbosacral Neuromodulation Therapy For Fecal Incontinence: Randomized Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 5, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
February 2025 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Augusta University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), Massachusetts General Hospital, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Fecal Incontinence (FI) affects 40 million Americans, predominantly women and elderly. It is a major health care burden, significantly impairs quality of life and psychosocial function. FI is characterized by multifactorial dysfunction including lumbosacral neuropathy, anorectal sensori-motor dysfunction, and abnormal pelvic floor-brain innervation. A critical barrier to progress in the treatment of FI is the lack of RCTs, absence of mechanistically based non-invasive therapies that modify disease, and a lack of understanding on how treatments affect pathophysiology of FI. Consequently, most current remedies remain ineffective. Our long-term goal is to address the problem of lack of effective treatments for FI by investigating treatments that modulate neuronal perturbations and thereby improve sensory and motor control, and to understand the neurobiologic basis of these treatments. Our central hypothesis is that a novel, non-invasive treatment consisting of Translumbosacral Neuromodulation Therapy (TNT), using repetitive magnetic stimulation, will significantly improve FI in the short-term and long-term, by enhancing neural excitability and inducing neuroplasticity. Our approach is based on compelling pilot study which showed that TNT at 1 Hz frequency, significantly improved FI, by enhancing bidirectional gut- brain signaling, anal sphincter strength and rectal sensation compared to 5 or 15 Hz. Our objectives are to 1) investigate the efficacy, safety and optimal dose of a new treatment, TNT, in a sham controlled, randomized dose-dependent study in 132 FI patients; 2) determine the mechanistic basis for TNT by assessing the efferent and afferent pelvic floor-brain signaling, and sensori-motor function; 3) identify the durability of treatment response and effects of TNT, and whether reinforcement TNT provides augmented improvement, by performing a long-term, sham controlled randomized trial. Our expected outcomes include the demonstration of TNT as a durable, efficacious, safe, mechanistically based, non-invasive, and low risk treatment for FI. The impact of our project includes a novel, disease modifying, non-invasive treatment, a scientific basis for this treatment, and improved understanding of the pathophysiology of FI and how TNT modifies bidirectional gut and brain axes and anorectal function. Ultimately, the knowledge generated by this project will provide new avenues for the development of innovative, evidence-based therapies for FI.
Detailed Description
Fecal incontinence (FI), defined as the involuntary passage of either formed or liquid stool, affects 8-15% of ambulatory Americans, mostly women and elderly and 45% of nursing home residents. It occurs at least weekly in 3% of adults, and in 37% of patients attending primary care clinics. FI has a major impact on quality of life, causes significant distress including anxiety and depression, and carries a considerable health care burden. FI is characterized by multifactorial dysfunctions that include lumbosacral neuropathy, anorectal sensori-motor dysfunction, and decreased rectosigmoid reservoir capacity and maladaptive pelvic floor-brain innervation. Consequently, treatments that help a single dysfunction, for example, anal dextranomer injection or anal sphincteroplasty could improve FI by reinforcing the anal barrier, but unlikely to improve the multidimensional problem of FI. Also, anal sphincteroplasty felt to be effective initially, was disappointing long-term with only 30% remaining continent at 10 years. An-other surgical procedure, sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has been shown to be useful in 54% of FI patients, but has significant complications (33%) and a failure rate of 15%, its mechanism of action is unknown, and lacks rigorous sham-controlled trial. Furthermore, a comparative assessment of the effectiveness of current treatments has not been performed, and none of the current therapies have been shown to improve the multifactorial pathophysiological dysfunction(s) in FI.
A critical barrier to progress in the treatment of FI is the lack of RCTs, and absence of mechanistically based non-invasive therapies that modify the pathophysiology of FI. Consequently, most current remedies have remained ineffective. These findings were highlighted by experts at a recent NIDDK workshop focused on research in FI. Our long-term goal is to address the problem of lack of effective treatments for FI by investigating therapies that modulate peripheral and central neuronal perturbations, and to understand the neurobiologic basis of these treatments. Translumbosacral Neuromodulation Therapy (TNT) is a novel, non-invasive technique that involves the focal delivery of magnetic energy through an insulated coil to the lumbo-sacral nerves that regulate anorectal function. The pulses generated are of the same strength as clin-ical MRI machines. It builds on the concept of neuromodulation therapies such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) that uses a computerized electromechanical medical device to deliver brief pulses of magnetic energy and has been shown to be effective in major depression , refractory auditory hallucinations (AH), and visceral pain, and our studies in post-stroke dysphagia. Our central hypothesis is that TNT will significantly improve FI, both in the short-term and long-term, by enhancing neural excitability and inducing neuroplasticity, and thereby will provide a multidimensional thera-peutic benefit- improve neuropathy, enhance anal strength, improve rectal perception and capacity.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Fecal Incontinence
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
132 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
1 Hz 2400 TNT Treatment
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Intervention: TNT treatment intervention with 2400 total stimulations with the magnetic coil..
Arm Title
1 Hz 3600 TNT Treatment
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Intervention: TNT treatment intervention with 3600 total stimulations with the magnetic coil.
Arm Title
Sham TNT Treatment
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
This arm will have the sham treatment session. First we will assess the motor threshold intensity described above. Next, a sham coil is placed on each of 4 regions (2 lumbar & 2 sacral), and 600 stimulations will be given at each site in 2 trains, with a 5 minutes rest period between each site and 3 minutes between trains.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Translumbosacral Neuromodulation Therapy (TNT)
Intervention Description
A probe with 2 pairs of bipolar steel ring electrodes, will be placed in the rectum. At each site a mapping procedure is performed with single stimulus coil to assess the motor threshold intensity, defined as the minimum level of magnetic stimulation intensity required to achieve an anal and rectal MEP response of 10 microvolts and an anterior tibialis MEP of 20 microvolts with 50% of trials.The intensity for TNT at each site is capped at a maximum of 150% above this threshold to comply with safety guidelines. Thus, intensity of magnetic stimulations will be individualized. Bilateral lumbar stimulations (rTLMS) are administered at L2/L3 disc space, and sacral stimulations (rTSMS) at S2/S3 level. Next a 70 mm double air film self-cooling coil is positioned randomly over one of the 4 sites, held in place by a coil fixator and 300 or 450 stimulations are delivered. After a 5 min rest the cycle is repeated (Total =600-900/site).The coil is moved to the opposite side and it is repeated.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Sham TNT Therapy
Intervention Description
This is the sham TNT treatment as mentioned in the different ARMs using the fake coil with no magnetic stimulations.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
AIM 1 Primary Outcome measure is the proportion of patients achieving >50% of reduction in fecal incontinence episodes/weeks at the end of 6 weeks compared to baseline.
Description
A responder will be defined as a patient who shows at least 50% reduction in FI episodes/week when compared to baseline.
Time Frame
6 weeks (short term)
Title
AIM 2: Latencies for lumbo-anal Magnetic Evoked Potentials (MEP) responses compared to baseline
Description
The bilateral latencies, amplitudes and area under the curve (AUC) for the lumbo-anal MEP responses will be measured.
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
AIM 2: Latencies for sacro-anal MEP responses compared to baseline
Description
The bilateral latencies, amplitudes and area under the curve (AUC) for the sacro-anal MEP responses will be measured.
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
AIM 2: Latencies for the ano-cortical Cortical Evoked Potentials (CEP) responsecompared to baseline.
Description
The bilateral latencies, amplitudes and area under the curve (AUC) for the anal CEPs will be averaged to measure the latency of each component, P1, N2, etc, and mean group data.
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
AIM 3:Primary Outcome measure is the proportion of patients achieving >50% of reduction in fecal incontinence episodes/weeks at the end of 48 weeks compared to baseline.
Description
A responder will be defined as a patient who shows > 50% reduction in FI episodes/week at the end of 48 weeks compared to baseline
Time Frame
48 weeks (long term)
Title
AIM 3: Latencies for lumbo-anal MEP responses
Description
The bilateral latencies, amplitudes and area under the curve (AUC) for the lumbo-anal MEP responses will be measured.
Time Frame
48 weeks
Title
AIM 3: Latencies for sacro-anal MEP responses
Description
The bilateral latencies, amplitudes and area under the curve (AUC) for the sacro-anal MEP responses will be measured.
Time Frame
48 weeks
Title
AIM 3: Latencies for the ano-cortical CEP response .
Description
The bilateral latencies, amplitudes and area under the curve (AUC) for the anal CEPs will be averaged to measure the latency of each component, P1, N2, etc, and mean group data
Time Frame
48 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Stool Frequency
Description
Stool frequency-how often subjects have a bowel movement.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Stool consistency
Description
Stool consistency (Bristol Stool scale, 1-7). 1-very hard stool, 4-normal, smooth stool, and 7-watery stool
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Bowel Urgency
Description
Severity of Bowel urgency-Unable to postpone BM for more than 15 Minutes? YES/NO
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Reduction of Fecal Incontinence (FI) episodes
Description
Percentage of subjects with 100% and 75% reduction in FI episodes compared to baseline
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Stool Leakage Characteristics
Description
Leakage characteristics-amount 0. None
Mild
Moderate
Excessive
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Global Assessment of bowel satisfaction
Description
using 7 point Likert scale (1. Considerably relieved; 7-considerably worse)
Time Frame
6 weeks,, 48 weeks
Title
Global Assessment of bowel satisfaction-Visual Analog Scale
Description
0 (absent)-10 (very severe) point visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
FI severity-Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI)
Description
Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI)-assessed on characteristics of accidental bowel leakage: 1: 2 or More times a day and 6: Never any symptom
Time Frame
6 weeks,4 8 weeks
Title
FI severity-Fecal Incontinence Severity Score (FISS):
Description
Fecal Incontinence Severity Score (FISS): 5 questions asking about severity of their fecal incontinence. Not a scale.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
FI severity-International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (IC-IQB):
Description
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (IC-IQB): Questionnaire asking several questions about bowel symptoms. There are scales within each question: 0: never-4:always. How much does this (symptom) bother you? 0 (not at all) and 10 (a great deal).
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Change in FI Quality of Life (FI-QOL)
Description
A 4 question questionnaire that assesses the quality of life with FI symptoms. 2 questions have scaled questions: 1 (most of the time) 4 (none of the time) and 1(strongly agree) 4 (Strongly disagree)
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Psychological Function PROMIS anxiety Questionnaire
Description
Questionnaire that assesses anxiety symptoms. Asks questions on a scale of 1 (never) and 5 (always).
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Psychological Function PROMIS Depression Questionnaire
Description
Questionnaire that assesses Depression symptoms. Asks questions on a scale of 1 (never) and 5 (always).
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Psychological Function PROMIS Efficacy Questionnaire
Description
Questionnaire that assesses self-efficacy for managing symptoms. Asks questions on a scale of 1 (I am not at all confident) and 5 (I am very confident).
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Amplitudes (Milivolts of the nerve) for lumbo-rectal MEP compared to baseline
Description
of the lumbo-rectal MEP responses.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Amplitudes (Milivolts of the nerve) for sacro-rectal MEP
Description
Milivolts of the nerve for the sacral-rectal MEP compared to baseline.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Amplitudes (Milivolts of the nerve) for recto-cortical CEP responses
Description
Milivolts of the nerve for the recto-cortical CEP responses compared to baseline.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
MEP Index The area under the curve of the MEP response
Description
The area under the curve of the MEP response compared to baseline
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Anal Sphincter Function-Sustained Squeeze Pressure
Description
Anal sustained squeeze pressure (mm Hg) measure from Anal rectal manometry study compared to baseline.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Anal Sphincter Function-Anal Resting Pressure
Description
Anal resting pressure (mm Hg) measure from Anal rectal manometry study compared to baseline.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Anal Sphincter Function-Squeeze Pressure
Description
Anal squeeze pressure (mm Hg) measure from Anal rectal manometry study.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Rectal Sensation-First Sensation (volume of air)
Description
During anal manometry test, subject tells investigator when they feel a first sensation of the balloon inside their rectum. (measure in mL of air).
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Rectal Sensation- Desire to defecate
Description
During anal manometry test, subject tells investigator when they feel a desire to defecate from the balloon that is blown up inside their rectum. (measure in mL of air).
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Rectal Sensation-Urgency to Defecate
Description
During anal manometry test, subject tells investigator when they feel an urgency to defecate from the balloon that is blown up inside their rectum. (measure in mL of air).
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Rectal Sensation-Maximum tolerable volume
Description
During anal manometry test, subject tells investigator when they feel have a maximum tolerable volume (as much as they can handle) from the balloon that is blown up inside their rectum. (measure in mL of air).
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Rectal Compliance
Description
Assessed by dv/dp
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
Title
Symptoms correlation
Description
Correlate bowel symptoms (FI episodes), severity and physiological changes with MEP and CEP latency.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 48 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Recurrent episodes of FI for 6 months;
No mucosal disease (colonoscopy + biopsy); and
On a 2-week stool diary patients reported at least one episode of solid or liquid FI/week.
Exclusion Criteria:
severe diarrhea (>6 liquid stools/day, Bristol scale >6);
on opioids,);
active depression;
severe cardiac disease, chronic renal failure or previous GI surgery except cholecystectomy and appendectomy;
neurologic diseases (e.g. head injury, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, strokes, spinal cord injury) and increased intracranial pressure;
metal implants (within 30 cm of magnetic coil placement), pacemakers;
previous pelvic surgery/radiation, radical hysterectomy;
Ulcerative and Crohn's colitis;
rectal prolapse;
active anal fissure, anal abscess, congenital anorectal malformation, fistulae or inflamed hemorrhoids;
pregnant women
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Satish Rao, MD, PhD
Phone
7067212238
Email
srao@augusta.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Satish Rao, MD,PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Augusta University
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Augusta University
City
Augusta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30912-4810
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Satish Rao, MD, PhD
Phone
706-721-2238
Email
srao@augusta.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tennekoon Karunaratne, MD,PhD
Phone
+1-706-721-1968
Email
tkarunaratne@augusta.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amol Sharma, MD
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114-2621
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ahmad Samad
Phone
617-726-2132
Email
ASAMAD1@mgh.harvard.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kyle Staller, MD
Phone
+1-617-724-6038
Email
KSTALLER@mgh.harvard.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Braden Kuo, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Translumbosacral Neuromodulation for FI
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs