search
Back to results

Treatment Adherence Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Comorbid Depression (TELE-DD)

Primary Purpose

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Depression

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Telephone Intervention Group
Sponsored by
Alicia Monreal Bartolomé
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 focused on measuring Comorbidity, Depression, Type 2 Diabetes, Primary Health Care, Randomized-Controlled Trial, Treatment Adherence, Telephone-Based Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult individuals (21+).
  • Concurrent type 2 diabetes (T2D) and depression diagnose registered in the SALUD clinical computerised system before January 1st, 2016.
  • A duration of both T2D and depression of at least one year.
  • Willingness to follow the TELE-DD research nurse instructions including self-monitoring of blood glucose.
  • Fluent in the Spanish language
  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent prior to any study procedures.
  • No treatment adherence to both T2D and depression, or treatment adherence to both.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of hearing problems, Alzheimer Disease, dementia or another serious cognitive or psychiatric disorder.
  • Use of private health insurance that may influence the RCT intervention outcomes.
  • Absence of pharmacological treatment for T2D or depression according to the CHS-EMR.
  • Change of address or place of residence out of SALUD Zaragoza Region II, or no access to a phone.
  • No Primary Care Specialist (PCS) or inability to identify a reference one.
  • Treatment adherence only for one of the two conditions (D2T or depression).

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    No Intervention

    Arm Label

    Telephone Intervention Group

    Control group

    Arm Description

    Nurse-led, telephone-based, and psychoeducational intervention, centered on motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioural therapy for adherence and depression.

    Control group with treatment as usual (TAU).

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Diabetes control measured by Glycosylated Haemoglobin
    In the Intervention and control group
    Diabetes control measured by Glycosylated Haemoglobin
    In the Intervention and control group
    Diabetes control measured by Glycosylated Haemoglobin
    In the Intervention and Control group
    Diabetes control measured by Glycosylated Haemoglobin
    In the Intervention and Control group
    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
    In the Intervention and Control group. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. PHQ scores ≥ 10 had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represents mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression. The possible range is 0-27.
    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
    In the Intervention and Control group. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. PHQ scores ≥ 10 had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represents mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression. The possible range is 0-27.
    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
    In the Intervention and Control group. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. PHQ scores ≥ 10 had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represents mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression. The possible range is 0-27.
    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
    In the Intervention and Control group. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. PHQ scores ≥ 10 had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represents mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression. The possible range is 0-27.
    Medication possession ratio (MPR)
    In the Intervention and Control group. Medication adherence was assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR). It is calculated as the proportion of the number of days with treatment provided during the intended period of treatment, that is, 100 × (days supplied) / 365. Once TA is computed, a dichotomous variable is created as TA (Yes/No) considering a cut-off ratio of MPR ≥80%.
    Medication possession ratio (MPR)
    In the Intervention and Control group. Medication adherence was assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR). It is calculated as the proportion of the number of days with treatment provided during the intended period of treatment, that is, 100 × (days supplied) / 365. Once TA is computed, a dichotomous variable is created as TA (Yes/No) considering a cut-off ratio of MPR ≥80%.
    Medication possession ratio (MPR)
    In the Intervention and Control group. Medication adherence was assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR). It is calculated as the proportion of the number of days with treatment provided during the intended period of treatment, that is, 100 × (days supplied) / 365. Once TA is computed, a dichotomous variable is created as TA (Yes/No) considering a cut-off ratio of MPR ≥80%.
    Medication possession ratio (MPR)
    In the Intervention and Control group. Medication adherence was assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR). It is calculated as the proportion of the number of days with treatment provided during the intended period of treatment, that is, 100 × (days supplied) / 365. Once TA is computed, a dichotomous variable is created as TA (Yes/No) considering a cut-off ratio of MPR ≥80%.
    MBG questionnaire
    In the Intervention and Control group. The MBG questionnaire includes TA questions related to timely drug intake, diet, PCS visits, physical activity, self-management, and others; prior research showed a Cronbach's alpha of 69% and a total explained variance of 63%.
    MBG questionnaire
    In the Intervention and Control group. The MBG questionnaire includes TA questions related to timely drug intake, diet, PCS visits, physical activity, self-management, and others; prior research showed a Cronbach's alpha of 69% and a total explained variance of 63%.
    MBG questionnaire
    In the Intervention and Control group. The MBG questionnaire includes TA questions related to timely drug intake, diet, PCS visits, physical activity, self-management, and others; prior research showed a Cronbach's alpha of 69% and a total explained variance of 63%.
    MBG questionnaire
    In the Intervention and Control group. The MBG questionnaire includes TA questions related to timely drug intake, diet, PCS visits, physical activity, self-management, and others; prior research showed a Cronbach's alpha of 69% and a total explained variance of 63%.
    LDL-Cholesterol
    In the Intervention and Control group. LDL-C values were registered according to reference values and recommendations from the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (2001): <100 mg/dl optimum, 100-129 mg normal or close to optimal level, 130-159 mg/dl normal-high, 160-189 mg/dl high,> 190 mg/dl very high.
    LDL-Cholesterol
    In the Intervention and Control group. LDL-C values were registered according to reference values and recommendations from the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (2001): <100 mg/dl optimum, 100-129 mg normal or close to optimal level, 130-159 mg/dl normal-high, 160-189 mg/dl high,> 190 mg/dl very high.
    LDL-Cholesterol
    In the Intervention and Control group. LDL-C values were registered according to reference values and recommendations from the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (2001): <100 mg/dl optimum, 100-129 mg normal or close to optimal level, 130-159 mg/dl normal-high, 160-189 mg/dl high,> 190 mg/dl very high.
    LDL-Cholesterol
    In the Intervention and Control group. LDL-C values were registered according to reference values and recommendations from the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (2001): <100 mg/dl optimum, 100-129 mg normal or close to optimal level, 130-159 mg/dl normal-high, 160-189 mg/dl high,> 190 mg/dl very high.
    Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)
    In the Intervention and Control group. Four main domains can be identified in DDS: emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and interpersonal distress, as well as obtaining a total score. Previous analyses identified that DDS had good sensitivity (95%) and specificity (85%), and was considered a reliable (α = 0.93) instrument for clinical practice and research (Polonsky et al., 2005), and has been validated in Spanish language (Ortiz et al., 2013).
    Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)
    In the Intervention and Control group. Four main domains can be identified in DDS: emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and interpersonal distress, as well as obtaining a total score. Previous analyses identified that DDS had good sensitivity (95%) and specificity (85%), and was considered a reliable (α = 0.93) instrument for clinical practice and research (Polonsky et al., 2005), and has been validated in Spanish language (Ortiz et al., 2013).
    Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)
    In the Intervention and Control group. Four main domains can be identified in DDS: emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and interpersonal distress, as well as obtaining a total score. Previous analyses identified that DDS had good sensitivity (95%) and specificity (85%), and was considered a reliable (α = 0.93) instrument for clinical practice and research (Polonsky et al., 2005), and has been validated in Spanish language (Ortiz et al., 2013).
    Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)
    In the Intervention and Control group. Four main domains can be identified in DDS: emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and interpersonal distress, as well as obtaining a total score. Previous analyses identified that DDS had good sensitivity (95%) and specificity (85%), and was considered a reliable (α = 0.93) instrument for clinical practice and research (Polonsky et al., 2005), and has been validated in Spanish language (Ortiz et al., 2013).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Sociodemographic data Gender, age, marital status, education, occupation, economical level
    In the Intervention group and the Control group
    Blood pressure
    Blood pressure was measured according to the Spanish Heart Society (Moliner de la Puente et al., 2008), which is based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines (NICE, 2011).
    Blood pressure
    Blood pressure was measured according to the Spanish Heart Society (Moliner de la Puente et al., 2008), which is based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines (NICE, 2011).
    Blood pressure
    Blood pressure was measured according to the Spanish Heart Society (Moliner de la Puente et al., 2008), which is based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines (NICE, 2011).
    Blood pressure
    Blood pressure was measured according to the Spanish Heart Society (Moliner de la Puente et al., 2008), which is based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines (NICE, 2011).
    Body mass index (BMI)
    Body mass index (BMI) calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height height in square meters. In patients who are overweight or obese, a moderate reduction in body weight (5-10% of weight) is associated with improved insulin sensitivity, better glycemic control, reduced triglycerides and increased serum c-HDL.
    Body mass index (BMI)
    Body mass index (BMI) calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height height in square meters. In patients who are overweight or obese, a moderate reduction in body weight (5-10% of weight) is associated with improved insulin sensitivity, better glycemic control, reduced triglycerides and increased serum c-HDL.
    Body mass index (BMI)
    Body mass index (BMI) calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height height in square meters. In patients who are overweight or obese, a moderate reduction in body weight (5-10% of weight) is associated with improved insulin sensitivity, better glycemic control, reduced triglycerides and increased serum c-HDL.
    Body mass index (BMI)
    Body mass index (BMI) calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height height in square meters. In patients who are overweight or obese, a moderate reduction in body weight (5-10% of weight) is associated with improved insulin sensitivity, better glycemic control, reduced triglycerides and increased serum c-HDL.
    Research nurse qualitative and quantitative evaluation about Treatment Adherence and diseases management.
    The research nurse will record her qualitative and quantitative evaluation on how she thinks the patient is responding to treatment adherence and any detail of both diabetes and depression management. This evaluation will include a quantitative measure containing a 1-5 scale and a qualitative recording. This assessment will serve as a reference to compare with the patients' responses.
    Research nurse qualitative and quantitative evaluation about Treatment Adherence and diseases management.
    The research nurse will record her qualitative and quantitative evaluation on how she thinks the patient is responding to treatment adherence and any detail of both diabetes and depression management. This evaluation will include a quantitative measure containing a 1-5 scale and a qualitative recording. This assessment will serve as a reference to compare with the patients' responses.
    Research nurse qualitative and quantitative evaluation about Treatment Adherence and diseases management.
    The research nurse will record her qualitative and quantitative evaluation on how she thinks the patient is responding to treatment adherence and any detail of both diabetes and depression management. This evaluation will include a quantitative measure containing a 1-5 scale and a qualitative recording. This assessment will serve as a reference to compare with the patients' responses.
    Research nurse qualitative and quantitative evaluation about Treatment Adherence and diseases management.
    The research nurse will record her qualitative and quantitative evaluation on how she thinks the patient is responding to treatment adherence and any detail of both diabetes and depression management. This evaluation will include a quantitative measure containing a 1-5 scale and a qualitative recording. This assessment will serve as a reference to compare with the patients' responses.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    September 16, 2019
    Last Updated
    February 12, 2021
    Sponsor
    Alicia Monreal Bartolomé
    Collaborators
    Universidad de Zaragoza
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04097483
    Brief Title
    Treatment Adherence Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Comorbid Depression
    Acronym
    TELE-DD
    Official Title
    The TELE-DD Project: a Nurse-led Randomised Controlled Trial on Treatment Adherence in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Comorbid Depression
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    February 2021
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    January 2017 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 2018 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    March 2020 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor-Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Alicia Monreal Bartolomé
    Collaborators
    Universidad de Zaragoza

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Patients with diabetes have higher depression rates, impaired QOL and increased mortality rates due to complications and comorbid depression. Nurse-led, telephonic-based, and psychoeducational interventions have separately proved to improve disease prognosis and emotional distress in diabetes, but no study has integrated previous research findings with collaborative care and strong methods centred in treatment adherence outcomes. The Telephonic Monitoring on Diabetes and co-morbid Depression (TELE-DD) Project includes a three-phased population-based cohort study and nurse-led randomised controlled trial. The proposed intervention, based on monthly structured telephone calls, unifies proved techniques like motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioural therapy and patient's healthy behaviours education. The integration in the TELE-DD Project of previous clinical research and a robust epidemiological dual design, will improve treatment adherence and further prognosis in patients with type 2 diabetes and comorbid depression through maximising clinical outcomes improvement, while guaranteeing cost-effectiveness and the long-term sustainability of findings translation to PC clinical practice services and public health programs.
    Detailed Description
    Patients with diabetes mellitus have a depression rate 1.6-2 times higher, impaired quality of life and increased mortality rates due to complications, comorbid depression or both. Prognosis in diabetes and depression comorbidity can be improved by increasing treatment adherence. Nurse-led, telephonic-based, and psychoeducational interventions, centred on motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioural therapy for adherence and depression, have separately improved prognosis and emotional distress in diabetic patients with comorbid depression. The Telephonic Monitoring on Diabetes and co-morbid Depression (TELE-DD) Project aims to integrate prior well-stablished clinical research with collaborative care. A whole population cohort of adults (21+) with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and comorbid depression from twenty-three Health Centres from a whole Health System Region in Spain, will be approached for inclusion in the TELE-DD Project (N=7,271). Patients with confirmed diagnoses and pharmacological treatment for both diseases will be included in Phase I baseline cohort. In Phase II, 400 participants diagnosed with depression and T2D with no treatment adherence will be selected to participate in the randomised controlled trial (RCT). The TELE-DD Project is a three-stage both observational and comparative effectiveness study that includes a population-based cohort study (Phases I and III), and a nurse-led randomised controlled trial (Phase II), aimed to compare a telephonic-based psychoeducational intervention (TIG) vs treatment as usual (TAU) to improve treatment adherence (TA), and a further two- to five-year prognosis and cost-effectiveness study, in T2D patients with comorbid clinical depression from Primary Care (PC) services. The integration in the TELE-DD Project of previous clinical research and a robust epidemiological design, will improve treatment adherence and further prognosis in these through maximising clinical outcomes improvement, while guaranteeing cost-effectiveness and the long-term sustainability of findings translation to PC clinical practice services and public health programs.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Depression
    Keywords
    Comorbidity, Depression, Type 2 Diabetes, Primary Health Care, Randomized-Controlled Trial, Treatment Adherence, Telephone-Based Intervention

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Care ProviderOutcomes Assessor
    Masking Description
    Primary Care specialist will be blind, but the telephonic intervention research nurses will not. For ethical and practical reasons, the trial will be unmasked, and participants will not be blind to the treatment condition once allocated.
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    428 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Telephone Intervention Group
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Nurse-led, telephone-based, and psychoeducational intervention, centered on motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioural therapy for adherence and depression.
    Arm Title
    Control group
    Arm Type
    No Intervention
    Arm Description
    Control group with treatment as usual (TAU).
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Telephone Intervention Group
    Intervention Description
    Nurse-led, telephone-based, and psychoeducational intervention centered on motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy for adherence and depression.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Diabetes control measured by Glycosylated Haemoglobin
    Description
    In the Intervention and control group
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    Diabetes control measured by Glycosylated Haemoglobin
    Description
    In the Intervention and control group
    Time Frame
    6-month follow-up
    Title
    Diabetes control measured by Glycosylated Haemoglobin
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group
    Time Frame
    12-month follow-up
    Title
    Diabetes control measured by Glycosylated Haemoglobin
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group
    Time Frame
    18-month follow-up
    Title
    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. PHQ scores ≥ 10 had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represents mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression. The possible range is 0-27.
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. PHQ scores ≥ 10 had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represents mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression. The possible range is 0-27.
    Time Frame
    6-month follow-up
    Title
    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. PHQ scores ≥ 10 had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represents mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression. The possible range is 0-27.
    Time Frame
    12-month follow-up
    Title
    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. PHQ scores ≥ 10 had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represents mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression. The possible range is 0-27.
    Time Frame
    18-month follow-up
    Title
    Medication possession ratio (MPR)
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. Medication adherence was assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR). It is calculated as the proportion of the number of days with treatment provided during the intended period of treatment, that is, 100 × (days supplied) / 365. Once TA is computed, a dichotomous variable is created as TA (Yes/No) considering a cut-off ratio of MPR ≥80%.
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    Medication possession ratio (MPR)
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. Medication adherence was assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR). It is calculated as the proportion of the number of days with treatment provided during the intended period of treatment, that is, 100 × (days supplied) / 365. Once TA is computed, a dichotomous variable is created as TA (Yes/No) considering a cut-off ratio of MPR ≥80%.
    Time Frame
    6-month follow-up
    Title
    Medication possession ratio (MPR)
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. Medication adherence was assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR). It is calculated as the proportion of the number of days with treatment provided during the intended period of treatment, that is, 100 × (days supplied) / 365. Once TA is computed, a dichotomous variable is created as TA (Yes/No) considering a cut-off ratio of MPR ≥80%.
    Time Frame
    12-month follow-up
    Title
    Medication possession ratio (MPR)
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. Medication adherence was assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR). It is calculated as the proportion of the number of days with treatment provided during the intended period of treatment, that is, 100 × (days supplied) / 365. Once TA is computed, a dichotomous variable is created as TA (Yes/No) considering a cut-off ratio of MPR ≥80%.
    Time Frame
    18-month follow-up
    Title
    MBG questionnaire
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. The MBG questionnaire includes TA questions related to timely drug intake, diet, PCS visits, physical activity, self-management, and others; prior research showed a Cronbach's alpha of 69% and a total explained variance of 63%.
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    MBG questionnaire
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. The MBG questionnaire includes TA questions related to timely drug intake, diet, PCS visits, physical activity, self-management, and others; prior research showed a Cronbach's alpha of 69% and a total explained variance of 63%.
    Time Frame
    6-month follow-up
    Title
    MBG questionnaire
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. The MBG questionnaire includes TA questions related to timely drug intake, diet, PCS visits, physical activity, self-management, and others; prior research showed a Cronbach's alpha of 69% and a total explained variance of 63%.
    Time Frame
    12-month follow-up
    Title
    MBG questionnaire
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. The MBG questionnaire includes TA questions related to timely drug intake, diet, PCS visits, physical activity, self-management, and others; prior research showed a Cronbach's alpha of 69% and a total explained variance of 63%.
    Time Frame
    18-month follow-up
    Title
    LDL-Cholesterol
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. LDL-C values were registered according to reference values and recommendations from the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (2001): <100 mg/dl optimum, 100-129 mg normal or close to optimal level, 130-159 mg/dl normal-high, 160-189 mg/dl high,> 190 mg/dl very high.
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    LDL-Cholesterol
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. LDL-C values were registered according to reference values and recommendations from the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (2001): <100 mg/dl optimum, 100-129 mg normal or close to optimal level, 130-159 mg/dl normal-high, 160-189 mg/dl high,> 190 mg/dl very high.
    Time Frame
    6-month follow-up
    Title
    LDL-Cholesterol
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. LDL-C values were registered according to reference values and recommendations from the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (2001): <100 mg/dl optimum, 100-129 mg normal or close to optimal level, 130-159 mg/dl normal-high, 160-189 mg/dl high,> 190 mg/dl very high.
    Time Frame
    12-month follow-up
    Title
    LDL-Cholesterol
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. LDL-C values were registered according to reference values and recommendations from the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (2001): <100 mg/dl optimum, 100-129 mg normal or close to optimal level, 130-159 mg/dl normal-high, 160-189 mg/dl high,> 190 mg/dl very high.
    Time Frame
    18-month follow-up
    Title
    Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. Four main domains can be identified in DDS: emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and interpersonal distress, as well as obtaining a total score. Previous analyses identified that DDS had good sensitivity (95%) and specificity (85%), and was considered a reliable (α = 0.93) instrument for clinical practice and research (Polonsky et al., 2005), and has been validated in Spanish language (Ortiz et al., 2013).
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. Four main domains can be identified in DDS: emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and interpersonal distress, as well as obtaining a total score. Previous analyses identified that DDS had good sensitivity (95%) and specificity (85%), and was considered a reliable (α = 0.93) instrument for clinical practice and research (Polonsky et al., 2005), and has been validated in Spanish language (Ortiz et al., 2013).
    Time Frame
    6-month follow-up
    Title
    Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. Four main domains can be identified in DDS: emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and interpersonal distress, as well as obtaining a total score. Previous analyses identified that DDS had good sensitivity (95%) and specificity (85%), and was considered a reliable (α = 0.93) instrument for clinical practice and research (Polonsky et al., 2005), and has been validated in Spanish language (Ortiz et al., 2013).
    Time Frame
    12-month follow-up
    Title
    Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)
    Description
    In the Intervention and Control group. Four main domains can be identified in DDS: emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and interpersonal distress, as well as obtaining a total score. Previous analyses identified that DDS had good sensitivity (95%) and specificity (85%), and was considered a reliable (α = 0.93) instrument for clinical practice and research (Polonsky et al., 2005), and has been validated in Spanish language (Ortiz et al., 2013).
    Time Frame
    18-month follow-up
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Sociodemographic data Gender, age, marital status, education, occupation, economical level
    Description
    In the Intervention group and the Control group
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    Blood pressure
    Description
    Blood pressure was measured according to the Spanish Heart Society (Moliner de la Puente et al., 2008), which is based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines (NICE, 2011).
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    Blood pressure
    Description
    Blood pressure was measured according to the Spanish Heart Society (Moliner de la Puente et al., 2008), which is based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines (NICE, 2011).
    Time Frame
    6-month follow-up
    Title
    Blood pressure
    Description
    Blood pressure was measured according to the Spanish Heart Society (Moliner de la Puente et al., 2008), which is based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines (NICE, 2011).
    Time Frame
    12-month follow-up
    Title
    Blood pressure
    Description
    Blood pressure was measured according to the Spanish Heart Society (Moliner de la Puente et al., 2008), which is based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines (NICE, 2011).
    Time Frame
    18-month follow-up
    Title
    Body mass index (BMI)
    Description
    Body mass index (BMI) calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height height in square meters. In patients who are overweight or obese, a moderate reduction in body weight (5-10% of weight) is associated with improved insulin sensitivity, better glycemic control, reduced triglycerides and increased serum c-HDL.
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    Body mass index (BMI)
    Description
    Body mass index (BMI) calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height height in square meters. In patients who are overweight or obese, a moderate reduction in body weight (5-10% of weight) is associated with improved insulin sensitivity, better glycemic control, reduced triglycerides and increased serum c-HDL.
    Time Frame
    6-month follow-up
    Title
    Body mass index (BMI)
    Description
    Body mass index (BMI) calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height height in square meters. In patients who are overweight or obese, a moderate reduction in body weight (5-10% of weight) is associated with improved insulin sensitivity, better glycemic control, reduced triglycerides and increased serum c-HDL.
    Time Frame
    12-month follow-up
    Title
    Body mass index (BMI)
    Description
    Body mass index (BMI) calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height height in square meters. In patients who are overweight or obese, a moderate reduction in body weight (5-10% of weight) is associated with improved insulin sensitivity, better glycemic control, reduced triglycerides and increased serum c-HDL.
    Time Frame
    18-month follow-up
    Title
    Research nurse qualitative and quantitative evaluation about Treatment Adherence and diseases management.
    Description
    The research nurse will record her qualitative and quantitative evaluation on how she thinks the patient is responding to treatment adherence and any detail of both diabetes and depression management. This evaluation will include a quantitative measure containing a 1-5 scale and a qualitative recording. This assessment will serve as a reference to compare with the patients' responses.
    Time Frame
    Baseline
    Title
    Research nurse qualitative and quantitative evaluation about Treatment Adherence and diseases management.
    Description
    The research nurse will record her qualitative and quantitative evaluation on how she thinks the patient is responding to treatment adherence and any detail of both diabetes and depression management. This evaluation will include a quantitative measure containing a 1-5 scale and a qualitative recording. This assessment will serve as a reference to compare with the patients' responses.
    Time Frame
    6-month follow-up
    Title
    Research nurse qualitative and quantitative evaluation about Treatment Adherence and diseases management.
    Description
    The research nurse will record her qualitative and quantitative evaluation on how she thinks the patient is responding to treatment adherence and any detail of both diabetes and depression management. This evaluation will include a quantitative measure containing a 1-5 scale and a qualitative recording. This assessment will serve as a reference to compare with the patients' responses.
    Time Frame
    12-month follow-up
    Title
    Research nurse qualitative and quantitative evaluation about Treatment Adherence and diseases management.
    Description
    The research nurse will record her qualitative and quantitative evaluation on how she thinks the patient is responding to treatment adherence and any detail of both diabetes and depression management. This evaluation will include a quantitative measure containing a 1-5 scale and a qualitative recording. This assessment will serve as a reference to compare with the patients' responses.
    Time Frame
    18-month follow-up

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    21 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Adult individuals (21+). Concurrent type 2 diabetes (T2D) and depression diagnose registered in the SALUD clinical computerised system before January 1st, 2016. A duration of both T2D and depression of at least one year. Willingness to follow the TELE-DD research nurse instructions including self-monitoring of blood glucose. Fluent in the Spanish language Provision of signed and dated informed consent prior to any study procedures. No treatment adherence to both T2D and depression, or treatment adherence to both. Exclusion Criteria: Presence of hearing problems, Alzheimer Disease, dementia or another serious cognitive or psychiatric disorder. Use of private health insurance that may influence the RCT intervention outcomes. Absence of pharmacological treatment for T2D or depression according to the CHS-EMR. Change of address or place of residence out of SALUD Zaragoza Region II, or no access to a phone. No Primary Care Specialist (PCS) or inability to identify a reference one. Treatment adherence only for one of the two conditions (D2T or depression).
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    María-Luisa Lozano-del-Hoyo, MSc
    Organizational Affiliation
    Universidad de Zaragoza
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    María-Teresa Fernández-Rodrigo, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Universidad de Zaragoza
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Juan F Roy, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Camilo Jose Cela University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    Citation
    Agámez Paternina, A.P., Hernández Riera, R., Cervera Estrada, L., Rodríguez García, Y., 2008. Factores relacionados con la no adherencia al tratamiento antihipertensivo. Revista Archivo Médico de Camagüey, 12(5). ISSN 1025-0255.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18852334
    Citation
    Aikens JE, Piette JD. Diabetic patients' medication underuse, illness outcomes, and beliefs about antihyperglycemic and antihypertensive treatments. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32(1):19-24. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1533. Epub 2008 Oct 13.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19084368
    Citation
    Alam R, Sturt J, Lall R, Winkley K. An updated meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of psychological interventions delivered by psychological specialists and generalist clinicians on glycaemic control and on psychological status. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Apr;75(1):25-36. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.026. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    9686693
    Citation
    Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998 Jul;15(7):539-53. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199807)15:73.0.CO;2-S.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18955637
    Citation
    Alexander GC, Sehgal NL, Moloney RM, Stafford RS. National trends in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, 1994-2007. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Oct 27;168(19):2088-94. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.19.2088.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22729127
    Citation
    Al-Hayek AA, Robert AA, Alzaid AA, Nusair HM, Zbaidi NS, Al-Eithan MH, Sam AE. Association between diabetes self-care, medication adherence, anxiety, depression, and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Saudi Med J. 2012 Jun;33(6):681-3. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    20186998
    Citation
    Ali S, Stone M, Skinner TC, Robertson N, Davies M, Khunti K. The association between depression and health-related quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2010 Feb;26(2):75-89. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.1065.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2015. Diabetes Care 2015;38(Suppl. 1), S1-S94. https://doi.org/10.2337/diaclin.33.2.97
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    11375373
    Citation
    Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ. The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2001 Jun;24(6):1069-78. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.6.1069.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    16514590
    Citation
    Andrade SE, Kahler KH, Frech F, Chan KA. Methods for evaluation of medication adherence and persistence using automated databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006 Aug;15(8):565-74; discussion 575-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.1230.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21397776
    Citation
    Asche C, LaFleur J, Conner C. A review of diabetes treatment adherence and the association with clinical and economic outcomes. Clin Ther. 2011 Jan;33(1):74-109. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.01.019.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Baader, M., Tomas, Molina, F., José Luis, Venezian, B., Silvia, Rojas, C., Carmen, Farías, S., Renata, Fierro-Freixenet, Carlos, Backenstrass, Mathias, Mundt, Christoph., 2012. Validación y utilidad de la encuesta PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire) en el diagnóstico de depresión en pacientes usuarios de atención primaria en Chile. Rev. Chil. de neuro-psiquiatr. 50(1), 10-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92272012000100002
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    20123914
    Citation
    Campayo A, de Jonge P, Roy JF, Saz P, de la Camara C, Quintanilla MA, Marcos G, Santabarbara J, Lobo A; ZARADEMP Project. Depressive disorder and incident diabetes mellitus: the effect of characteristics of depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2010 May;167(5):580-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09010038. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21882396
    Citation
    Catapano AL, Reiner Z, De Backer G, Graham I, Taskinen MR, Wiklund O, Agewall S, Alegria E, Chapman M, Durrington P, Erdine S, Halcox J, Hobbs R, Kjekshus J, Filardi PP, Riccardi G, Storey RF, Wood D; European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Atherosclerosis. 2011 Jul;217(1):3-46. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.06.028. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31384422
    Citation
    Chireh B, D'Arcy C. Shared and unique risk factors for depression and diabetes mellitus in a longitudinal study, implications for prevention: an analysis of a longitudinal population sample aged ⩾45 years. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Jul 25;10:2042018819865828. doi: 10.1177/2042018819865828. eCollection 2019.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    De-la-Camara, C.; Gracia-Garcia, P.; Roy, J. F.; et al, 2010. Influence of gender on baseline characteristics of depression and future risk for incident stroke an elderly population: Results from the ZARADEMP project. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 68(6), 618-618. Web of Science (WOS): 000278468200047. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1111/cns.12339
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    17019601
    Citation
    de Jonge P, Roy JF, Saz P, Marcos G, Lobo A; ZARADEMP Investigators. Prevalent and incident depression in community-dwelling elderly persons with diabetes mellitus: results from the ZARADEMP project. Diabetologia. 2006 Nov;49(11):2627-33. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0442-x. Epub 2006 Sep 21.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    17227324
    Citation
    Delahanty LM, Grant RW, Wittenberg E, Bosch JL, Wexler DJ, Cagliero E, Meigs JB. Association of diabetes-related emotional distress with diabetes treatment in primary care patients with Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2007 Jan;24(1):48-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02028.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    11485122
    Citation
    Diez-Quevedo C, Rangil T, Sanchez-Planell L, Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. Validation and utility of the patient health questionnaire in diagnosing mental disorders in 1003 general hospital Spanish inpatients. Psychosom Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;63(4):679-86. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200107000-00021.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    15076819
    Citation
    DiMatteo MR. Variations in patients' adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research. Med Care. 2004 Mar;42(3):200-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000114908.90348.f9.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    15920049
    Citation
    Egede LE, Nietert PJ, Zheng D. Depression and all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality among adults with and without diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005 Jun;28(6):1339-45. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.6.1339.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    20150291
    Citation
    Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA. The relationship between diabetes distress and clinical depression with glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 May;33(5):1034-6. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2175. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22228744
    Citation
    Fisher L, Hessler DM, Polonsky WH, Mullan J. When is diabetes distress clinically meaningful?: establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care. 2012 Feb;35(2):259-64. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1572. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19837786
    Citation
    Fisher L, Mullan JT, Arean P, Glasgow RE, Hessler D, Masharani U. Diabetes distress but not clinical depression or depressive symptoms is associated with glycemic control in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33(1):23-8. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1238. Epub 2009 Oct 16.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19033420
    Citation
    Gonzalez JS, Peyrot M, McCarl LA, Collins EM, Serpa L, Mimiaga MJ, Safren SA. Depression and diabetes treatment nonadherence: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2008 Dec;31(12):2398-403. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1341.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27690483
    Citation
    Gonzalez JS, Tanenbaum ML, Commissariat PV. Psychosocial factors in medication adherence and diabetes self-management: Implications for research and practice. Am Psychol. 2016 Oct;71(7):539-551. doi: 10.1037/a0040388.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30060763
    Citation
    Grant S, Mayo-Wilson E, Montgomery P, Macdonald G, Michie S, Hopewell S, Moher D; , on behalf of the CONSORT-SPI Group. CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials. Trials. 2018 Jul 31;19(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2735-z.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28056987
    Citation
    Grossman A, Grossman E. Blood pressure control in type 2 diabetic patients. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Jan 6;16(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0485-3.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24314355
    Citation
    Expert Dyslipidemia Panel; Grundy SM. An International Atherosclerosis Society Position Paper: global recommendations for the management of dyslipidemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2013 Nov-Dec;7(6):561-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Haynes RB. Determinants of compliance: The disease and the mechanics of treatment. Compliance in health care. Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-0070(84)80012-1
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28815394
    Citation
    Hoogendoorn CJ, Roy JF, Gonzalez JS. Shared Dysregulation of Homeostatic Brain-Body Pathways in Depression and Type 2 Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2017 Aug 16;17(10):90. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0923-y.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30598369
    Citation
    Hoogendoorn CJ, Shapira A, Roy JF, Walker EA, Cohen HW, Gonzalez JS. Depressive symptom dimensions and medication non-adherence in suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2019 Mar;33(3):217-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    17000939
    Citation
    Ho PM, Rumsfeld JS, Masoudi FA, McClure DL, Plomondon ME, Steiner JF, Magid DJ. Effect of medication nonadherence on hospitalization and mortality among patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Sep 25;166(17):1836-41. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.17.1836.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23538175
    Citation
    Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Mauskopf J, Loder E; ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines-CHEERS Good Reporting Practices Task Force. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    20700575
    Citation
    Hutter N, Schnurr A, Baumeister H. Healthcare costs in patients with diabetes mellitus and comorbid mental disorders--a systematic review. Diabetologia. 2010 Dec;53(12):2470-9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1873-y. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    International Diabetes Federation, 2017. IDF Diabetes Atlas (8th edition). International Diabetes Federation. https://www.idf.org/e-library/epidemiology-research/diabetes-atlas.html (accessed 20 April 2019).
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    15145632
    Citation
    Ismail K, Winkley K, Rabe-Hesketh S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2004 May 15;363(9421):1589-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16202-8.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Iverson, C., Christiansen, S., Flanigan, A., et al., 2007. AMA Manual of Style. 10th ed. New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 416-417.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22897901
    Citation
    Johnson JA, Al Sayah F, Wozniak L, Rees S, Soprovich A, Chik CL, Chue P, Florence P, Jacquier J, Lysak P, Opgenorth A, Katon WJ, Majumdar SR. Controlled trial of a collaborative primary care team model for patients with diabetes and depression: rationale and design for a comprehensive evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 16;12:258. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-258.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28160185
    Citation
    Kreider KE. Diabetes Distress or Major Depressive Disorder? A Practical Approach to Diagnosing and Treating Psychological Comorbidities of Diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2017 Feb;8(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0231-1. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    11556941
    Citation
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24851209
    Citation
    Lee YJ, Kang HM, Kim NK, Yang JY, Noh JH, Ko KS, Rhee BD, Kim DJ. Factors associated for mild cognitive impairment in older korean adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab J. 2014 Apr;38(2):150-7. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2014.38.2.150. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    11939969
    Citation
    Lingam R, Scott J. Treatment non-adherence in affective disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002 Mar;105(3):164-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.1r084.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18701829
    Citation
    Lobo-Escolar A, Roy JF, Saz P, De-la-Camara C, Marcos G, Lobo A; ZARADEMP Workgroup. Association of hypertension with depression in community-dwelling elderly persons: results from the ZARADEMP Project. Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77(5):323-5. doi: 10.1159/000147947. Epub 2008 Jul 25. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Martínez, J.W., Villa Perea, J.A., Jaramillo, J., Quintero, A.M., 2011. Validación del cuestionario de adherencia al tratamiento antihipertensivo Martín Bayarré Grau. Revista Médica de Risaralda, 17(2), 101-105. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/http://dx.doi.org/10.22517/25395203.7595
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19184390
    Citation
    Mann DM, Ponieman D, Leventhal H, Halm EA. Predictors of adherence to diabetes medications: the role of disease and medication beliefs. J Behav Med. 2009 Jun;32(3):278-84. doi: 10.1007/s10865-009-9202-y. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Martín Alfonso, Libertad, Bayarre Vea, Héctor D, Grau Ábalo, Jorge A., 2008. Validación del cuestionario MBG (Martín-Bayarre-Grau) para evaluar la adherencia terapéutica en hipertensión arterial. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública, 34(1). [citado 2019-08-11]. ISSN 0864-3466. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-34662008000100012&lng=es&nrm=iso
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21300190
    Citation
    Markowitz SM, Gonzalez JS, Wilkinson JL, Safren SA. A review of treating depression in diabetes: emerging findings. Psychosomatics. 2011 Jan-Feb;52(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2010.11.007.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19033418
    Citation
    Mezuk B, Eaton WW, Albrecht S, Golden SH. Depression and type 2 diabetes over the lifespan: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2008 Dec;31(12):2383-90. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0985.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: helping people change. 3rd edn. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2013.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Moliner de la Puente, J.R, Domínguez Sardiña, M, González Paradela, C, Castiñeira Pérez, C, Cespo Sabarís, J.J, Chayan Zas, L, Gonzálvez Rey, J, Pérez García, M, Ríos Rey, M.T, Rodríguez Fernández, M., 2008. Hipertensión arterial in: Guías para la consulta de Atención Primaria. (3a ed.). A Coruña: Casiterides SL.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    20831305
    Citation
    Mullins CD, Whicher D, Reese ES, Tunis S. Generating evidence for comparative effectiveness research using more pragmatic randomized controlled trials. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):969-76. doi: 10.2165/11536160-000000000-00000.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    8487827
    Citation
    Nathan DM. Long-term complications of diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jun 10;328(23):1676-85. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199306103282306. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    16371630
    Citation
    Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, Genuth SM, Lachin JM, Orchard TJ, Raskin P, Zinman B; Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study Research Group. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 22;353(25):2643-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052187.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18540046
    Citation
    Nathan DM, Kuenen J, Borg R, Zheng H, Schoenfeld D, Heine RJ; A1c-Derived Average Glucose Study Group. Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values. Diabetes Care. 2008 Aug;31(8):1473-8. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0545. Epub 2008 Jun 7. Erratum In: Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32(1):207.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22855971
    Citation
    National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK). Hypertension: The Clinical Management of Primary Hypertension in Adults: Update of Clinical Guidelines 18 and 34 [Internet]. London: Royal College of Physicians (UK); 2011 Aug. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK83274/
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22198261
    Citation
    Nefs G, Pouwer F, Denollet J, Pop V. The course of depressive symptoms in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the Diabetes, Depression, Type D Personality Zuidoost-Brabant (DiaDDZoB) Study. Diabetologia. 2012 Mar;55(3):608-16. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2411-2. Epub 2011 Dec 24.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31215077
    Citation
    Nouwen A, Adriaanse MC, van Dam K, Iversen MM, Viechtbauer W, Peyrot M, Caramlau I, Kokoszka A, Kanc K, de Groot M, Nefs G, Pouwer F; European Depression in Diabetes (EDID) Research Consortium. Longitudinal associations between depression and diabetes complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2019 Dec;36(12):1562-1572. doi: 10.1111/dme.14054. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Ortiz, M. S., Baeza-Rivera, M. J., & Myers, H. F. (2013). Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de estrés para diabéticos en una muestra de pacientes diabéticos tipo II chilenos. Terapia psicológica, 31(3), 281-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082013000300002
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23324517
    Citation
    O'Shea M, Teeling M, Bennett K. The prevalence and ingredient cost of chronic comorbidity in the Irish elderly population with medication treated type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cross-sectional study using a national pharmacy claims database. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jan 16;13:23. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-23.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30350030
    Citation
    Owens-Gary MD, Zhang X, Jawanda S, Bullard KM, Allweiss P, Smith BD. The Importance of Addressing Depression and Diabetes Distress in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Feb;34(2):320-324. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4705-2. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28658094
    Citation
    Patel PJ, Hayward KL, Rudra R, Horsfall LU, Hossain F, Williams S, Johnson T, Brown NN, Saad N, Clouston AD, Stuart KA, Valery PC, Irvine KM, Russell AW, Powell EE. Multimorbidity and polypharmacy in diabetic patients with NAFLD: Implications for disease severity and management. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(26):e6761. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006761.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21478777
    Citation
    Piette JD, Richardson C, Himle J, Duffy S, Torres T, Vogel M, Barber K, Valenstein M. A randomized trial of telephonic counseling plus walking for depressed diabetes patients. Med Care. 2011 Jul;49(7):641-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318215d0c9.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    15735199
    Citation
    Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J, Dudl RJ, Lees J, Mullan J, Jackson RA. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale. Diabetes Care. 2005 Mar;28(3):626-31. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.626.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    12819896
    Citation
    Pouwer F, Beekman AT, Nijpels G, Dekker JM, Snoek FJ, Kostense PJ, Heine RJ, Deeg DJ. Rates and risks for co-morbid depression in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from a community-based study. Diabetologia. 2003 Jul;46(7):892-8. doi: 10.1007/s00125-003-1124-6. Epub 2003 Jun 18.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24011885
    Citation
    Pouwer F, Nefs G, Nouwen A. Adverse effects of depression on glycemic control and health outcomes in people with diabetes: a review. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2013 Sep;42(3):529-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2013.05.002.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27092016
    Citation
    Powers MA, Bardsley J, Cypress M, Duker P, Funnell MM, Fischl AH, Maryniuk MD, Siminerio L, Vivian E. Diabetes Self-management Education and Support in Type 2 Diabetes: A Joint Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Clin Diabetes. 2016 Apr;34(2):70-80. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.34.2.70. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21963669
    Citation
    Renn BN, Feliciano L, Segal DL. The bidirectional relationship of depression and diabetes: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Dec;31(8):1239-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Roy, J. F.; De la Camara, C.; Saz, P.; et al., 2008. Psychosomatic implications in the longitudinal study of late-life depression in the community: The ZARADEMP Project. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 64(6), 671-671. Web of Science (WOS): 000256455300125
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Roy, JF; Saz, P; Lobo, A. A longitudinal study of old-age depression in the community: multivariate modelling of psychopathological symptoms to predict incident depression, 2008. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 59(1), 45-46. Web of Science (WOS): 000232433800096
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Roy, J. F.; Santabarbara, J.; De-la-Camara, C.; et al, 2010. Cardiovascular burden and long-term risk of first-ever depression: Implications for the vascular depression hypothesis from a population-based study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 68(6): 661-661. Web of Science (WOS): 000278468200154
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21824180
    Citation
    Roy T, Lloyd CE, Pouwer F, Holt RI, Sartorius N. Screening tools used for measuring depression among people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabet Med. 2012 Feb;29(2):164-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03401.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Santabarbara, J.; Roy, J. F.; De-la-Camara, C.; et al, 2010. History of stroke, incident depressive disorder and competing risk of death. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 68(6), 662-663. Web of Science (WOS): 000278468200158
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24170758
    Citation
    Safren SA, Gonzalez JS, Wexler DJ, Psaros C, Delahanty LM, Blashill AJ, Margolina AI, Cagliero E. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for adherence and depression (CBT-AD) in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(3):625-33. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0816. Epub 2013 Oct 29. Erratum In: Diabetes Care. 2016 Jun;39(6):1065.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18777491
    Citation
    Saleem T, Mohammad KH, Abdel-Fattah MM, Abbasi AH. Association of glycosylated haemoglobin level and diabetes mellitus duration with the severity of coronary artery disease. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2008 Sep;5(3):184-9. doi: 10.3132/dvdr.2008.030.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24005919
    Citation
    Santos IS, Tavares BF, Munhoz TN, Almeida LS, Silva NT, Tams BD, Patella AM, Matijasevich A. [Sensitivity and specificity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) among adults from the general population]. Cad Saude Publica. 2013 Aug;29(8):1533-43. doi: 10.1590/0102-311x00144612. Portuguese.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22851599
    Citation
    Schechter CB, Cohen HW, Shmukler C, Walker EA. Intervention costs and cost-effectiveness of a successful telephonic intervention to promote diabetes control. Diabetes Care. 2012 Nov;35(11):2156-60. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0048. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    8366922
    Citation
    Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group; Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M, Rand L, Siebert C. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21442429
    Citation
    Trento M, Raballo M, Trevisan M, Sicuro J, Passera P, Cirio L, Charrier L, Cavallo F, Porta M. A cross-sectional survey of depression, anxiety, and cognitive function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2012 Jun;49(3):199-203. doi: 10.1007/s00592-011-0275-z. Epub 2011 Mar 27.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    9742977
    Citation
    Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):854-65. Erratum In: Lancet 1998 Nov 7;352(9139):1558.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    16198213
    Citation
    van Dam HA, van der Horst FG, Knoops L, Ryckman RM, Crebolder HF, van den Borne BH. Social support in diabetes: a systematic review of controlled intervention studies. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Oct;59(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.11.001. Epub 2004 Dec 29.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    20633742
    Citation
    van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Nuyen J, Stoop C, Chan J, Jacobson AM, Katon W, Snoek F, Sartorius N. Effect of interventions for major depressive disorder and significant depressive symptoms in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug;32(4):380-95. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.011. Epub 2010 May 15. Erratum In: Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010 Nov-Dec;32(6):645.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    20636961
    Citation
    van Bastelaar KM, Pouwer F, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn PH, Tack CJ, Bazelmans E, Beekman AT, Heine RJ, Snoek FJ. Diabetes-specific emotional distress mediates the association between depressive symptoms and glycaemic control in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2010 Jul;27(7):798-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03025.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21274488
    Citation
    Verma SK, Luo N, Subramaniam M, Sum CF, Stahl D, Liow PH, Chong SA. Impact of depression on health related quality of life in patients with diabetes. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2010 Dec;39(12):913-7.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    15846672
    Citation
    Vermeire E, Wens J, Van Royen P, Biot Y, Hearnshaw H, Lindenmeyer A. Interventions for improving adherence to treatment recommendations in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD003638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003638.pub2.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19109809
    Citation
    Vink NM, Klungel OH, Stolk RP, Denig P. Comparison of various measures for assessing medication refill adherence using prescription data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Feb;18(2):159-65. doi: 10.1002/pds.1698.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18064739
    Citation
    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    14667488
    Citation
    De Geest S, Sabate E. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003 Dec;2(4):323. doi: 10.1016/S1474-5151(03)00091-4. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    World Health Organization, 2019. Body Mass Index. Extracted from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle/body-mass-index-bmi
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27106263
    Citation
    Yasmin F, Banu B, Zakir SM, Sauerborn R, Ali L, Souares A. Positive influence of short message service and voice call interventions on adherence and health outcomes in case of chronic disease care: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Apr 22;16:46. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0286-3.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Treatment Adherence Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Comorbid Depression

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs