Treatment Efficacy of Low FODMAP Versus Low Lactose Diet in IBS Patients
Primary Purpose
IBS - Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Low Lactose Diet
Low FODMAP Diet
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for IBS - Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- functional bowel symptoms as defined by the Rome IV criteria
- subjective lactose intolerance
Exclusion Criteria:
- pharmacologic agents to alter symptoms (laxatives, antidiarrheal agents)
- smoking
- antibiotic therapy within the last 4 weeks
- gastrointestinal diseases (Celiac disease was excluded by negative serologic testing while on a gluten containing diet
- any type of food allergy
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Group 1
Group 2
Arm Description
Patients starting with a low lactose diet for 3 weeks, followed by a wash out phase of 3 week, before crossing over to the low FODMAP diet for 3 weeks
Patients starting with a low FODMAP diet for 3 weeks, followed by a wash out phase of 3 week, before crossing over to the low lactose diet for 3 weeks.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change from gastrointestinal symptoms in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS symptom severity score) from Baseline to "post intervention diet".
The symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) is a validated score to evaluate the severity of an IBS. The five subscores for abdominal pain (severity and frequency), abdominal distension, satisfaction with stool habits and interference of IBS with daily life were each rated on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale and added up to a maximal sum of 500. A total score of 75 - 175 was regarded as mild, 175 - 300 as moderate and > 300 as severe IBS.
Secondary Outcome Measures
IBS symptom severity subscore "abdominal pain severity"
The subscore (abdominal pain severity was assessed individually, on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
IBS- symptom severity subscore "abdominal pain frequency"
The subscore abdominal pain frequency was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
IBS- symptom severity subscore "abdominal distension"
The subscore abdominal distension was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
IBS symptom severity subscore "satisfaction with stool habits"
The subscore satisfaction with stool habits was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less the better).
IBS symptom severity subscore "interference of IBS with daily life"
The subscore satisfaction with stool habits was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
IBS symptom severity score
The symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) is a validated score to evaluate the severity of an IBS. The five subscores for abdominal pain (severity and frequency), abdominal distension, satisfaction with stool habits and interference of IBS with daily life were each rated on a VAS 0-100 mm scale and added up to a maximal sum of 500. A total score of 75 - 175 was regarded as mild, 175 - 300 as moderate and > 300 as severe IBS.
Stool frequency
Patients recorded stool frequency
Stool consistency
Patients recorded stool consistency according to the Bristol Stool Chart (BSC) Type 1 hard lumps, Type 2 sausage shaped but lumpy, Type 3 sausage with cracks, Type 4 smooth sausage, Type 5 soft blobs, Type 6 fluffy pieces, Type 7 entirely liquid.
Body weight
Body weight in kg.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04543474
First Posted
August 15, 2020
Last Updated
September 2, 2020
Sponsor
Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04543474
Brief Title
Treatment Efficacy of Low FODMAP Versus Low Lactose Diet in IBS Patients
Official Title
Treatment Efficacy of a Low FODMAP Diet Compared to a Low Lactose Diet in IBS Patients: a Randomized, Cross-over Designed Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 11, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 19, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 19, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
A low FODMAP diet (LFD) has become a standard treatment in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. Compliant adherence to a LFD is challenging. The investigator looked at the effect of a LFD compared to a less restrictive low lactose diet (LLD) in a randomized cross-over trial with IBS patients.
Detailed Description
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic gastrointestinal disorder. It affects 10 - 20% of the adult population. Pharmaceutical therapy as bulking agents, anticholinergics, antispasmodics, and antidiarrheals are mostly unsatisfactory and many gastroenterologists recommend therefore dietary management. Most patients note that various foods elicit abdominal symptoms and therefore restrict their diet .
The low fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide and polyol (FODMAP) diet has currently the greatest evidence for efficacy in IBS. The rationale behind the LFD is the exclusion of poorly absorbed short-chain carbohydrates which would create an osmotic load, drag fluid into the small intestine and would be fermented by the colonic microbiome, both leading to abdominal distention and increased luminal influx. FODMAPs do not cause symptoms in healthy adults as they neither show these abnormalities in gut physiology nor suffer from visceral hypersensitivity .
It is not known however whether change in symptoms is induced by a reduction in all FODMAPs or simply a single component as for example lactose. If there is a lactase deficiency, as it is the case in 2-20% of Central- / Northern Europeans, lactose cannot be hydrolysed and causes the above mentioned symptoms. Many IBS patients avoid lactose, even though only few have a lactase deficiency. Lactose intolerance but not lactase deficiency is more frequent in patients with IBS. The investigator wanted to examine if the demanding LFD is more effective than elimination of lactose alone.
Our study, comparing in detail the effects of low FODMAP versus low lactose diet in IBS patients is a novelty, analysing a clinically highly relevant topic.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
IBS - Irritable Bowel Syndrome
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Group 1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients starting with a low lactose diet for 3 weeks, followed by a wash out phase of 3 week, before crossing over to the low FODMAP diet for 3 weeks
Arm Title
Group 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients starting with a low FODMAP diet for 3 weeks, followed by a wash out phase of 3 week, before crossing over to the low lactose diet for 3 weeks.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Low Lactose Diet
Intervention Description
First, there was a run-in period (day 1-14), during which patients were randomly assigned by computer-generated bloc randomization to either the LLD or the LFD for 21 days (day 15-35). A dietician educated the participants on the first interventional diet. This phase was followed by a wash-out period of 21 days (day 36-56) with resumption of a normal balanced daily-life diet before crossing over to the alternate interventional diet (day 57-77). There were visits at the end of the washout phase with an instruction on the second interventional diet and at the end of the study.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Low FODMAP Diet
Intervention Description
First, there was a run-in period (day 1-14), during which patients were randomly assigned by computer-generated bloc randomization to either the LLD or the LFD for 21 days (day 15-35). A dietician educated the participants on the first interventional diet. This phase was followed by a wash-out period of 21 days (day 36-56) with resumption of a normal balanced daily-life diet before crossing over to the alternate interventional diet (day 57-77). There were visits at the end of the washout phase with an instruction on the second interventional diet and at the end of the study.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from gastrointestinal symptoms in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS symptom severity score) from Baseline to "post intervention diet".
Description
The symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) is a validated score to evaluate the severity of an IBS. The five subscores for abdominal pain (severity and frequency), abdominal distension, satisfaction with stool habits and interference of IBS with daily life were each rated on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale and added up to a maximal sum of 500. A total score of 75 - 175 was regarded as mild, 175 - 300 as moderate and > 300 as severe IBS.
Time Frame
The IBS SSS was assessed at the end of the run in period and at the end of the intervention diets (low lactose and low FODMAP diet) at day 14, 35 and 77.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
IBS symptom severity subscore "abdominal pain severity"
Description
The subscore (abdominal pain severity was assessed individually, on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
Time Frame
IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.
Title
IBS- symptom severity subscore "abdominal pain frequency"
Description
The subscore abdominal pain frequency was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
Time Frame
IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.
Title
IBS- symptom severity subscore "abdominal distension"
Description
The subscore abdominal distension was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
Time Frame
IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.
Title
IBS symptom severity subscore "satisfaction with stool habits"
Description
The subscore satisfaction with stool habits was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less the better).
Time Frame
IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.
Title
IBS symptom severity subscore "interference of IBS with daily life"
Description
The subscore satisfaction with stool habits was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
Time Frame
IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.
Title
IBS symptom severity score
Description
The symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) is a validated score to evaluate the severity of an IBS. The five subscores for abdominal pain (severity and frequency), abdominal distension, satisfaction with stool habits and interference of IBS with daily life were each rated on a VAS 0-100 mm scale and added up to a maximal sum of 500. A total score of 75 - 175 was regarded as mild, 175 - 300 as moderate and > 300 as severe IBS.
Time Frame
IBS SSS (total) was assessed at the end of the run-in (day 14), and wash-out phase (day 56).
Title
Stool frequency
Description
Patients recorded stool frequency
Time Frame
Stool frequency was assessed daily throughout the study (day 1-77).
Title
Stool consistency
Description
Patients recorded stool consistency according to the Bristol Stool Chart (BSC) Type 1 hard lumps, Type 2 sausage shaped but lumpy, Type 3 sausage with cracks, Type 4 smooth sausage, Type 5 soft blobs, Type 6 fluffy pieces, Type 7 entirely liquid.
Time Frame
Stool consistency was assessed daily throughout the study (day 1-77).
Title
Body weight
Description
Body weight in kg.
Time Frame
Body weight was assesses at the beginning of the study (day 1) and at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77).
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
functional bowel symptoms as defined by the Rome IV criteria
subjective lactose intolerance
Exclusion Criteria:
pharmacologic agents to alter symptoms (laxatives, antidiarrheal agents)
smoking
antibiotic therapy within the last 4 weeks
gastrointestinal diseases (Celiac disease was excluded by negative serologic testing while on a gluten containing diet
any type of food allergy
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Treatment Efficacy of Low FODMAP Versus Low Lactose Diet in IBS Patients
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs