search
Back to results

Treatment of Chronic Stroke With AMES + EMG Biofeedback (AMES)

Primary Purpose

Stroke, Plegia, Paresis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
AMES Therapy (assisted movement and enhanced sensation)
Sponsored by
AMES Technology
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring AMES device, Cerebrovascular Accident, Chronic Stroke, Rehabilitation, Upper Extremity, Biofeedback

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hemispheric stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), cortical or sub-cortical, documented by either a CT or MRI scan and associated with residual upper extremity weakness.
  • Chronic stroke, occurring ≥12 months prior to subject enrollment.
  • Age 18-80 years old.
  • Inability to move any of the fingers of the affected hand more than 5.0 cm into extension.
  • Finger-and-wrist impedance ≤3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale.
  • Measureable EMG (>2 x baseline) in the long finger extensor muscle during attempted hand opening or closing.
  • Physically and cognitively capable of consenting to and complying with the protocol (based on exam by Study Physician).
  • Subject must be physically capable of communicating informed consent or must be accompanied by legally authorized representative to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Complete flaccidity of the affected arm.
  • Significant upper extremity proprioceptive deficit (<70% correct detection of the direction of passive finger movement with eyes closed).
  • Pathological neurological/physical conditions, other than stroke, impairing the function of the impaired arm or resulting in pain in the arm.
  • Spinal cord injury, arthritis, or fractures of affected arm that have resulted in loss of range of motion.
  • Peripheral nerve injury or neuropathy resulting in significant motor or sensory loss in the tested arm.
  • Cardiopulmonary compromise including but not limited to uncontrolled hypertension or angina, deep vein thrombosis, decompensated congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, heart irregularities, or exercise intolerance.
  • Major active psychiatric disorder.
  • Cognitively or behaviorally unable to follow instructions including severe apraxia; inability to understand verbal (English) directions, or inability to communicate adequately with study personnel.
  • Size of arm incompatible with the AMES device (checked by placing the limb in the device).
  • Severe contractures or decreased range of motion or skin condition that would prohibit comfortable positioning or tolerance of the device or the vibrators.
  • Any progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting the upper extremity motor system.
  • Uncontrolled seizure disorder.
  • Current abuse of alcohol or drugs.
  • Terminal illness with anticipated survival of <12 months.
  • Current or planned concurrent participation in another study involving therapy to the impaired arm
  • Planned initiation of or cessation of any kind of clinical therapy to the impaired limb just prior to or during the AMES treatment period.
  • NIH Stroke Scale, following scores: Sensory Item score of >1; Neglect involving the affected limb score >1.
  • Intent to receive Botox injections (5 months prior to or during enrollment), initiation of antispasmodic medication, or use of any other robotic (e.g., MANUS, Locomat) or electrical or vibratory stimulation device (e.g., Bioness) while participating in the AMES trial.
  • Cognitively or behaviorally unable to follow instructions

Sites / Locations

  • Emory University School of Medicine
  • Northwestern University
  • Oregon Health and Science University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

AMES therapy with EMG biofeedback

AMES therapy with Torque biofeedback

Arm Description

The AMES device provides a 30 minute treatment period of alternating passive flexion and then extension of the hand while vibrators vibrate the muscles of the hand. The subjects job is to attempt to assist the device in the movement. A computer screen will provide visual feedback of the amount of EMG activity the subject is able to generate in the hand. This study will examine whether AMES therapy combined with EMG biofeedback can restore hand opening to plegic stroke subjects.

The AMES device provides a 30 minute treatment period of alternating passive flexion and then extension of the hand while vibrators vibrate the muscles of the hand. The subjects job is to attempt to assist the device in the movement. A computer screen will provide visual feedback of the amount of torque (force) the subject is able to generate in the hand during the movement. This study will examine whether AMES therapy combined with Torque biofeedback can restore hand opening to plegic stroke subjects.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Box and Blocks Test
Measurement of the change in functional movement of the hand associated with 30 AMES training sessions.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Fugl-Meyer (UL) Assessment
Scale: Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Motor Function-Upper Limb Measurement of impairment in the upper limb based on tone, range-of-motion, and synergies. Total score in this study includes only the Upper Limb portion of the Motor Function subscale of the assessment, the Upper Limb subset having a scoring range of 0-66, with 0 representing no function and no visible reflexes (i.e., profound plegia) and 66 representing normal motor function.
Stroke Impact Scale (Physical Problems, Mobility, Hand, ADL)
Four of 8 possible subscales were used: Physical Problems, Mobility, Hand, and Daily Living, consisting of 26 total questions [scored from 1 (least impact) to 5 (most impact)]. The total (summed) raw score for all 4 sub-scales has a minimum of 26 and maximum of 130. The total raw score is then transformed: [(Actual Raw Score-Lowest Possible Raw Score)/Possible Raw Score Range] X 100. The minimum transformed score is 0 and the maximum is 100.
Stroke Impact Scale (Stroke Recovery)
A separate section of the Stroke Impact Scale measures self-perception of stroke recovery. Stroke recovery is based on a scale of 0-100, with 0 representing no recovery and 100 representing full recovery.
Strength Test Flexion
Maximum squeezing (i.e., flexion) strength for thumb and fingers at the end of each training session. The participant squeezed the hand as hard as possible 3 times with a 5-10 second rest period between each effort. A single score was calculated for each training session as the average of the 3 efforts. Baseline score was based on the average of the first 3 session scores (i.e., 9 total efforts over the first 3 training sessions). Final score was based on the average of the last 3 training sessions.
Strength Test Extension
Maximum opening (i.e., extension) strength for thumb and fingers at the end of each training session. The participant squeezed the hand as hard as possible 3 times with a 5-10 second rest period between each effort. A single score was calculated for each training session as the average of the 3 efforts. Baseline score was based on the average of the first 3 session scores (i.e., 9 total efforts over the first 3 training sessions). Final score was based on the average of the last 3 training sessions.

Full Information

First Posted
May 3, 2010
Last Updated
October 29, 2019
Sponsor
AMES Technology
Collaborators
Oregon Health and Science University, Emory University, Northwestern University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01116544
Brief Title
Treatment of Chronic Stroke With AMES + EMG Biofeedback
Acronym
AMES
Official Title
Treatment of Chronic Stroke With AMES + EMG Biofeedback
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 21, 2007 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 28, 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
AMES Technology
Collaborators
Oregon Health and Science University, Emory University, Northwestern University

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if individuals who had a stroke more than one year before entering the study and who remain unable to open their affected hand are better able to sense and move their affected arm after 10-15 weeks of treatment with a new robotic therapy device (the AMES device) and EMG biofeedback.
Detailed Description
Over the last 20 years, the discovery of cortical plasticity in the adult human brain has led to the development of new therapies to rehabilitate stroke survivors whose recovery of motor function has stalled with conventional therapeutic methodology. However, the efficacy of these new therapies appears to be limited to relatively high-functioning chronic stroke patients. A therapeutic approach that may be efficacious in restoring functional movement to low-functioning chronic stroke patients is "AMES," which stands for Assisted Movement with Enhanced Sensation. Despite the efficacy of AMES in restoring movement to low-functioning hemiparetic stroke patients, those with plegia at a joint tend not to recover movement in the plegic direction with AMES treatment or with other rehabilitation therapies. The objective of this study is to determine if AMES treatment in combination with biofeedback can be helpful in restoring functional movement to plegic stroke patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Plegia, Paresis, Cerebrovascular Accident
Keywords
AMES device, Cerebrovascular Accident, Chronic Stroke, Rehabilitation, Upper Extremity, Biofeedback

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
46 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
AMES therapy with EMG biofeedback
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The AMES device provides a 30 minute treatment period of alternating passive flexion and then extension of the hand while vibrators vibrate the muscles of the hand. The subjects job is to attempt to assist the device in the movement. A computer screen will provide visual feedback of the amount of EMG activity the subject is able to generate in the hand. This study will examine whether AMES therapy combined with EMG biofeedback can restore hand opening to plegic stroke subjects.
Arm Title
AMES therapy with Torque biofeedback
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The AMES device provides a 30 minute treatment period of alternating passive flexion and then extension of the hand while vibrators vibrate the muscles of the hand. The subjects job is to attempt to assist the device in the movement. A computer screen will provide visual feedback of the amount of torque (force) the subject is able to generate in the hand during the movement. This study will examine whether AMES therapy combined with Torque biofeedback can restore hand opening to plegic stroke subjects.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
AMES Therapy (assisted movement and enhanced sensation)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Robotic
Intervention Description
Each subject will receive 30 sessions of AMES therapy in the clinic. Each session will consist of 10 min of functional testing (i.e., passive motion and strength tests) followed by 30 min of grasp therapy using the AMES device. One group of subjects will receive AMES therapy only with joint torque biofeedback (without EMG feedback), and the other group will receive AMES therapy with EMG biofeedback. While all test subjects should attempt to open the hand when the grasp mechanism is opening and close the hand when the mechanism is closing, the biofeedback information provided to aid a subject will differ for the 2 subject groups.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Box and Blocks Test
Description
Measurement of the change in functional movement of the hand associated with 30 AMES training sessions.
Time Frame
Within a week of completing all training sessions.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Fugl-Meyer (UL) Assessment
Description
Scale: Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Motor Function-Upper Limb Measurement of impairment in the upper limb based on tone, range-of-motion, and synergies. Total score in this study includes only the Upper Limb portion of the Motor Function subscale of the assessment, the Upper Limb subset having a scoring range of 0-66, with 0 representing no function and no visible reflexes (i.e., profound plegia) and 66 representing normal motor function.
Time Frame
At baseline and again within a week of completing all training sessions. The interval between measurements was 10-12 weeks.
Title
Stroke Impact Scale (Physical Problems, Mobility, Hand, ADL)
Description
Four of 8 possible subscales were used: Physical Problems, Mobility, Hand, and Daily Living, consisting of 26 total questions [scored from 1 (least impact) to 5 (most impact)]. The total (summed) raw score for all 4 sub-scales has a minimum of 26 and maximum of 130. The total raw score is then transformed: [(Actual Raw Score-Lowest Possible Raw Score)/Possible Raw Score Range] X 100. The minimum transformed score is 0 and the maximum is 100.
Time Frame
Within a week of completing all training sessions.
Title
Stroke Impact Scale (Stroke Recovery)
Description
A separate section of the Stroke Impact Scale measures self-perception of stroke recovery. Stroke recovery is based on a scale of 0-100, with 0 representing no recovery and 100 representing full recovery.
Time Frame
Within a week of completing all training sessions.
Title
Strength Test Flexion
Description
Maximum squeezing (i.e., flexion) strength for thumb and fingers at the end of each training session. The participant squeezed the hand as hard as possible 3 times with a 5-10 second rest period between each effort. A single score was calculated for each training session as the average of the 3 efforts. Baseline score was based on the average of the first 3 session scores (i.e., 9 total efforts over the first 3 training sessions). Final score was based on the average of the last 3 training sessions.
Time Frame
At baseline and again within a week of completing all training sessions. The interval between measurements was 10-12 weeks.
Title
Strength Test Extension
Description
Maximum opening (i.e., extension) strength for thumb and fingers at the end of each training session. The participant squeezed the hand as hard as possible 3 times with a 5-10 second rest period between each effort. A single score was calculated for each training session as the average of the 3 efforts. Baseline score was based on the average of the first 3 session scores (i.e., 9 total efforts over the first 3 training sessions). Final score was based on the average of the last 3 training sessions.
Time Frame
At baseline and again within a week of completing all training sessions. The interval between measurements was 10-12 weeks.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Hemispheric stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), cortical or sub-cortical, documented by either a CT or MRI scan and associated with residual upper extremity weakness. Chronic stroke, occurring ≥12 months prior to subject enrollment. Age 18-80 years old. Inability to move any of the fingers of the affected hand more than 5.0 cm into extension. Finger-and-wrist impedance ≤3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale. Measureable EMG (>2 x baseline) in the long finger extensor muscle during attempted hand opening or closing. Physically and cognitively capable of consenting to and complying with the protocol (based on exam by Study Physician). Subject must be physically capable of communicating informed consent or must be accompanied by legally authorized representative to provide informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Complete flaccidity of the affected arm. Significant upper extremity proprioceptive deficit (<70% correct detection of the direction of passive finger movement with eyes closed). Pathological neurological/physical conditions, other than stroke, impairing the function of the impaired arm or resulting in pain in the arm. Spinal cord injury, arthritis, or fractures of affected arm that have resulted in loss of range of motion. Peripheral nerve injury or neuropathy resulting in significant motor or sensory loss in the tested arm. Cardiopulmonary compromise including but not limited to uncontrolled hypertension or angina, deep vein thrombosis, decompensated congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, heart irregularities, or exercise intolerance. Major active psychiatric disorder. Cognitively or behaviorally unable to follow instructions including severe apraxia; inability to understand verbal (English) directions, or inability to communicate adequately with study personnel. Size of arm incompatible with the AMES device (checked by placing the limb in the device). Severe contractures or decreased range of motion or skin condition that would prohibit comfortable positioning or tolerance of the device or the vibrators. Any progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting the upper extremity motor system. Uncontrolled seizure disorder. Current abuse of alcohol or drugs. Terminal illness with anticipated survival of <12 months. Current or planned concurrent participation in another study involving therapy to the impaired arm Planned initiation of or cessation of any kind of clinical therapy to the impaired limb just prior to or during the AMES treatment period. NIH Stroke Scale, following scores: Sensory Item score of >1; Neglect involving the affected limb score >1. Intent to receive Botox injections (5 months prior to or during enrollment), initiation of antispasmodic medication, or use of any other robotic (e.g., MANUS, Locomat) or electrical or vibratory stimulation device (e.g., Bioness) while participating in the AMES trial. Cognitively or behaviorally unable to follow instructions
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul J. Cordo, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Oregon Health and Science University
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Emory University School of Medicine
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwestern University
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oregon Health and Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24232364
Citation
Cordo P, Wolf S, Lou JS, Bogey R, Stevenson M, Hayes J, Roth E. Treatment of severe hand impairment following stroke by combining assisted movement, muscle vibration, and biofeedback. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;37(4):194-203. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000023. Erratum In: J Neurol Phys Ther. 2014 Apr;38(2):147.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Treatment of Chronic Stroke With AMES + EMG Biofeedback

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs