search
Back to results

Treatment of Epicondylitis by Ultrasound-guided Local Injections of PRP (Platelet Rich Plasma)

Primary Purpose

Epicondylitis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ACP
Saline solution
Sponsored by
Arthrex SAS
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Epicondylitis focused on measuring recent lateral humeral epicondylitis, platelet-rich plasma, infiltration, tennis elbow, ultrasonography

Eligibility Criteria

35 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suffering from tennis elbow for less than three months
  • Patients having never received former medical or orthopedic treatment for tennis elbow

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having received any treatment for this specific pathology
  • Evidence of ongoing tumoral affection (controlled by MRI)
  • Tennis elbow history
  • Elbow fracture history
  • Associated elbow pathology
  • Inflammatory rheumatic disorders
  • Bleeding disorders
  • Ongoing anticoagulation therapy
  • Allergy to local anesthetic
  • Ongoing or previous cancer affection
  • Pregnancy
  • Diabetes

Sites / Locations

  • Hôpital Ambroise Paré

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

PRP group

Saline solution group

Arm Description

ACP infiltration: 2 mL at 0 and 4 weeks with ultrasound guidance

Saline solution infiltration: 2mL at 0 and 4 weeks with ultrasound guidance

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Global pain score

Secondary Outcome Measures

Roles and Maudsley score
Pain on ECRB* contraction
% positive
Pain on EDC** contraction
% positive

Full Information

First Posted
February 23, 2015
Last Updated
February 26, 2015
Sponsor
Arthrex SAS
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02378285
Brief Title
Treatment of Epicondylitis by Ultrasound-guided Local Injections of PRP (Platelet Rich Plasma)
Official Title
Treatment of Epicondylitis by Ultrasound-guided Local Injections of Autologous Conditioned Plasma (ACP®): a Double-blind Placebo-controlled Randomized Clinical Trial With One-year Follow-up
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Arthrex SAS

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess efficacy of two intra-tendinous injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on epicondylitis of recent evolution (≤ 3 months) compared compared to two intra-tendinous injections of saline solution (placebo).
Detailed Description
This was a prospective double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Two ultrasound-guided injections of either PRP (ACP®, Arthrex) or saline solution were performed at 4 weeks interval. Exclusion criterion was previous corticosteroid infiltration. All infiltrations were performed by Dr Bernard Montalvan. The selection of patients and the evaluation were conducted by Dr Patrick Le Goux who did not know which treatment had been allocated to which patient. In the facility, no one apart from the investigators had access to full patient data. An independent company represented by Mrs Amandine Ramseyer was hired to design, follow and carry the statistical analysis of the study. The data she got from the investigators were anonymous. Patients were monitored by an independent evaluator blinded to treatment at baseline and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up. Secondary criteria were the Roles-Maudsley score and the assessment of pain on isometric contraction of the extensor carpi radialis brevis and of the extensor digitorum communis. The main evaluation criterion was the relative improvement from baseline to 6 months in pain score on visual analog scale (0-10). Intragroup and intergroup intention-to-treat analyses were performed using Student's t-tests, applying the last-observation carried forward method. Differences of proportions were tested using chi-square. The sample size calculated was 22 patients per group so that this study had a power of 90% with typeI error rate α=0.05 to demonstrate a significant greater improvement of the global pain score of at least 10%, in the PRP over the placebo group with a standard deviation of 0.10. A "p" value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The SPSS software (version 19 for Windows) was used to perform statistics.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Epicondylitis
Keywords
recent lateral humeral epicondylitis, platelet-rich plasma, infiltration, tennis elbow, ultrasonography

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PRP group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
ACP infiltration: 2 mL at 0 and 4 weeks with ultrasound guidance
Arm Title
Saline solution group
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Saline solution infiltration: 2mL at 0 and 4 weeks with ultrasound guidance
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
ACP
Intervention Description
ACP is prepared using the Autologous Conditioned Plasma (ACP®) device from Arthrex (Naples, Florida, USA), following the supplier instructions. 2 mL of ACP are transferred in a standard 2 mL injection syringe by a nurse. The standard 2 mL injection syringe is then given to the physician.The patient is installed on a table with his arm in supine position. A local subcutaneous anesthesia (2 ml of 1% lidocaine) is done just before the infiltration by the physician. The infiltration is then done guided by ultrasound.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Saline solution
Intervention Description
2 mL of saline solution are placed in a standard injection syringe by a nurse. The syringe is then given to the physician. The patient is installed on a table with his arm in supine position. A local subcutaneous anesthesia (2 ml of 1% lidocaine) is done just before the infiltration by the physician. The infiltration is then done guided by ultrasound.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Global pain score
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Roles and Maudsley score
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Pain on ECRB* contraction
Description
% positive
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Pain on EDC** contraction
Description
% positive
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients suffering from tennis elbow for less than three months Patients having never received former medical or orthopedic treatment for tennis elbow Exclusion Criteria: Patients having received any treatment for this specific pathology Evidence of ongoing tumoral affection (controlled by MRI) Tennis elbow history Elbow fracture history Associated elbow pathology Inflammatory rheumatic disorders Bleeding disorders Ongoing anticoagulation therapy Allergy to local anesthetic Ongoing or previous cancer affection Pregnancy Diabetes
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Philippe Hardy, Pr
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital Ambroise Paré Paris
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hôpital Ambroise Paré
City
Boulogne
ZIP/Postal Code
92100
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17616547
Citation
De Smedt T, de Jong A, Van Leemput W, Lieven D, Van Glabbeek F. Lateral epicondylitis in tennis: update on aetiology, biomechanics and treatment. Br J Sports Med. 2007 Nov;41(11):816-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.036723. Epub 2007 Jul 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1423702
Citation
Nirschl RP. Elbow tendinosis/tennis elbow. Clin Sports Med. 1992 Oct;11(4):851-70.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2213764
Citation
McCormack RR Jr, Inman RD, Wells A, Berntsen C, Imbus HR. Prevalence of tendinitis and related disorders of the upper extremity in a manufacturing workforce. J Rheumatol. 1990 Jul;17(7):958-64.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9624268
Citation
Ono Y, Nakamura R, Shimaoka M, Hiruta S, Hattori Y, Ichihara G, Kamijima M, Takeuchi Y. Epicondylitis among cooks in nursery schools. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Mar;55(3):172-9. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.3.172.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21663849
Citation
Shiri R, Viikari-Juntura E. Lateral and medial epicondylitis: role of occupational factors. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Feb;25(1):43-57. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2011.01.013.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3440991
Citation
Hamilton PG. The prevalence of humeral epicondylitis: a survey in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 Oct;36(291):464-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3358752
Citation
Murtagh JE. Tennis elbow. Aust Fam Physician. 1988 Feb;17(2):90-1, 94-5. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15800009
Citation
Smidt N, Lewis M, Hay EM, Van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Croft P. A comparison of two primary care trials on tennis elbow: issues of external validity. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Oct;64(10):1406-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.029363. Epub 2005 Mar 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17012266
Citation
Bisset L, Beller E, Jull G, Brooks P, Darnell R, Vicenzino B. Mobilisation with movement and exercise, corticosteroid injection, or wait and see for tennis elbow: randomised trial. BMJ. 2006 Nov 4;333(7575):939. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38961.584653.AE. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18656765
Citation
Lindenhovius A, Henket M, Gilligan BP, Lozano-Calderon S, Jupiter JB, Ring D. Injection of dexamethasone versus placebo for lateral elbow pain: a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial. J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Jul-Aug;33(6):909-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.02.004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11753057
Citation
Newcomer KL, Laskowski ER, Idank DM, McLean TJ, Egan KS. Corticosteroid injection in early treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Clin J Sport Med. 2001 Oct;11(4):214-22. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200110000-00002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16751155
Citation
Roukis TS, Zgonis T, Tiernan B. Autologous platelet-rich plasma for wound and osseous healing: a review of the literature and commercially available products. Adv Ther. 2006 Mar-Apr;23(2):218-37. doi: 10.1007/BF02850128.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16140821
Citation
Ranly DM, McMillan J, Keller T, Lohmann CH, Meunch T, Cochran DL, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Platelet-derived growth factor inhibits demineralized bone matrix-induced intramuscular cartilage and bone formation. A study of immunocompromised mice. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87(9):2052-64. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02752.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12696985
Citation
Molloy T, Wang Y, Murrell G. The roles of growth factors in tendon and ligament healing. Sports Med. 2003;33(5):381-94. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200333050-00004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16735582
Citation
Mishra A, Pavelko T. Treatment of chronic elbow tendinosis with buffered platelet-rich plasma. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Nov;34(11):1774-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546506288850. Epub 2006 May 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20448192
Citation
Peerbooms JC, Sluimer J, Bruijn DJ, Gosens T. Positive effect of an autologous platelet concentrate in lateral epicondylitis in a double-blind randomized controlled trial: platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection with a 1-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):255-62. doi: 10.1177/0363546509355445.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16271101
Citation
Borzini P, Mazzucco L. Tissue regeneration and in loco administration of platelet derivatives: clinical outcome, heterogeneous products, and heterogeneity of the effector mechanisms. Transfusion. 2005 Nov;45(11):1759-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00600.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18326832
Citation
de Mos M, van der Windt AE, Jahr H, van Schie HT, Weinans H, Verhaar JA, van Osch GJ. Can platelet-rich plasma enhance tendon repair? A cell culture study. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1171-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546508314430. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19875361
Citation
Foster TE, Puskas BL, Mandelbaum BR, Gerhardt MB, Rodeo SA. Platelet-rich plasma: from basic science to clinical applications. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2259-72. doi: 10.1177/0363546509349921.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22336969
Citation
Mazzocca AD, McCarthy MB, Chowaniec DM, Cote MP, Romeo AA, Bradley JP, Arciero RA, Beitzel K. Platelet-rich plasma differs according to preparation method and human variability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Feb 15;94(4):308-16. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00430.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23825183
Citation
Mishra AK, Skrepnik NV, Edwards SG, Jones GL, Sampson S, Vermillion DA, Ramsey ML, Karli DC, Rettig AC. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma for chronic tennis elbow: a double-blind, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of 230 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):463-71. doi: 10.1177/0363546513494359. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21406450
Citation
Creaney L, Wallace A, Curtis M, Connell D. Growth factor-based therapies provide additional benefit beyond physical therapy in resistant elbow tendinopathy: a prospective, single-blind, randomised trial of autologous blood injections versus platelet-rich plasma injections. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Sep;45(12):966-71. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.082503. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21813443
Citation
Thanasas C, Papadimitriou G, Charalambidis C, Paraskevopoulos I, Papanikolaou A. Platelet-rich plasma versus autologous whole blood for the treatment of chronic lateral elbow epicondylitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2130-4. doi: 10.1177/0363546511417113. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24579044
Citation
Raeissadat SA, Sedighipour L, Rayegani SM, Bahrami MH, Bayat M, Rahimi R. Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) versus Autologous Whole Blood on Pain and Function Improvement in Tennis Elbow: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Pain Res Treat. 2014;2014:191525. doi: 10.1155/2014/191525. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19170984
Citation
Giusti I, Rughetti A, D'Ascenzo S, Millimaggi D, Pavan A, Dell'Orso L, Dolo V. Identification of an optimal concentration of platelet gel for promoting angiogenesis in human endothelial cells. Transfusion. 2009 Apr;49(4):771-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.02033.x. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24563387
Citation
de Vos RJ, Windt J, Weir A. Strong evidence against platelet-rich plasma injections for chronic lateral epicondylar tendinopathy: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;48(12):952-6. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093281. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26350485
Citation
Montalvan B, Le Goux P, Klouche S, Borgel D, Hardy P, Breban M. Inefficacy of ultrasound-guided local injections of autologous conditioned plasma for recent epicondylitis: results of a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial with one-year follow-up. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Feb;55(2):279-85. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev326. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Treatment of Epicondylitis by Ultrasound-guided Local Injections of PRP (Platelet Rich Plasma)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs