search
Back to results

Treatment of Hallux Rigidus (HARD)

Primary Purpose

Hallux Rigidus

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Finland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Arthrodesis
Sponsored by
Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hallux Rigidus focused on measuring surgery, foot, hallux, hallux rigidus, arthrodesis

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 40 years or over
  • Diagnosis of hallux rigidus: Persistent pain on movement of the first MTPJ AND Osteoarthritic first MTPJ in plain X-rays
  • Duration of symptoms ≥1 year
  • Pain-NRS during walking of 4 or more on a scale 0-10 (higher is worse)
  • No substantial pain in other joints of the foot in clinical examination
  • Willingness to accept both treatment options
  • Ability to understand trial information and answer outcome assessments in Finnish
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA* physical status classification level III or higher
  • Patients with weak co-operation (dementia, schizophrenia, etc.)
  • Patients with neuropathy, i.e. unable to feel 10g monofilament pressure in less than 8 out of 10 standard testing sites
  • Active bacterial infection or ulcer of the lower limb
  • Diabetes mellitus with insulin treatment
  • Diabetes mellitus and GHb-A1C >64 mmol/mol (regardless of treatment)
  • History of rheumatoid arthritis, gout or other inflammatory arthritis of the foot
  • Hallux valgus angle >15° in weight-bearing X-ray
  • Hallux varus in weight-bearing X-ray
  • Large bone cysts in X-ray probably requiring bone grafting in surgery
  • Pain in passive manipulation of ipsilateral first toe IP joint
  • Patients with severe circulatory disorder of the lower limb: absence of palpable pulses in the foot (both dorsalis pedis artery and tibialis posterior artery)
  • History of surgery of the foot in question
  • Neuropathic pain of the foot in question (i.e., use of neuropathic analgesics)
  • Activity limiting symptoms from an earlier fracture or ligament injury of the foot
  • Patient is not willing to accept the operation within the planned time limits (3 to 12 weeks post-randomisation)

Sites / Locations

  • Helsinki University HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Arthrodesis

Watchful waiting

Arm Description

MTPJ I Arthrodesis

No intervention, patient information leaflet

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pain during walking in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
scale 0-10; 0=no pain, 10=worst pain

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain during rest in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
scale 0-10; 0=no pain, 10=worst pain
Pain during walking in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
scale 0-10; 0=no pain, 10=worst pain
Patient Related Outcome
MOXFQ-score, Scale 0-100
Patient reported quality of life
EQ-5D-5L, Scale 0-100
Complications
Number of minor and major adversary effects
Patient Acceptable Symptom State
Percentage of patients with acceptable symptom state (PASS)
Patients physical activity
FAAM Sports Subscale, Scale 0-100
Use of analgesics and orthoses
The use of analgesics: 1) no use of analgesics or less frequent than weekly, 2) weekly use of analgesics, 3) daily use of NSAIDS or paracetamol, 4) daily use of opioids. The use of orthoses: yes/no

Full Information

First Posted
October 5, 2020
Last Updated
September 22, 2021
Sponsor
Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04590313
Brief Title
Treatment of Hallux Rigidus
Acronym
HARD
Official Title
Treatment of Hallux Rigidus (HARD): A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled Trial of Arthrodesis Versus Watchful Waiting in the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
September 22, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 1, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 1, 2030 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A randomised, controlled trial will be performed by allocating 40 years or older patients with symptomatic hallux rigidus to arthrodesis or watchful waiting group in a ratio of 1:1. Our primary outcome will be pain during walking, assessed by the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at one year after randomisation. Our secondary outcomes will be pain in rest (NRS), physical function (MOXFQ), patient satisfaction in terms of Patient-accepted Symptom State (PASS), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), activity level (The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Sports subscale), use of analgesics or orthoses and rate of complications. Our null hypothesis is that there will be no difference between arthrodesis and watchful waiting in treatment of hallux rigidus. Our primary analysis will be done using intention-to-treat principle.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hallux Rigidus
Keywords
surgery, foot, hallux, hallux rigidus, arthrodesis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
A randomised, controlled trial will be performed by allocating 40 years or older patients with symptomatic hallux rigidus to arthrodesis or watchful waiting group in a ratio of 1:1.
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
To avoid biased interpretation of the trial data, blinded data interpretation will be used in the reporting of the results of this trial (70). Before accessing the primary outcome data, the writing committee will record a 'Background assumptions' document containing our definition of MID of the outcome measures, and a brief summary of the key statistical analysis used in the evaluation of the outcome data. The document will be signed by the members of the writing committee and published as an appendix to the primary publication.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
90 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arthrodesis
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
MTPJ I Arthrodesis
Arm Title
Watchful waiting
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
No intervention, patient information leaflet
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Arthrodesis
Intervention Description
MTPJ I arthrodesis
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain during walking in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Description
scale 0-10; 0=no pain, 10=worst pain
Time Frame
1 year after randomisation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain during rest in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Description
scale 0-10; 0=no pain, 10=worst pain
Time Frame
6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
Title
Pain during walking in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Description
scale 0-10; 0=no pain, 10=worst pain
Time Frame
6 months, 2 years, 5 years
Title
Patient Related Outcome
Description
MOXFQ-score, Scale 0-100
Time Frame
6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
Title
Patient reported quality of life
Description
EQ-5D-5L, Scale 0-100
Time Frame
6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
Title
Complications
Description
Number of minor and major adversary effects
Time Frame
6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
Title
Patient Acceptable Symptom State
Description
Percentage of patients with acceptable symptom state (PASS)
Time Frame
6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
Title
Patients physical activity
Description
FAAM Sports Subscale, Scale 0-100
Time Frame
6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years
Title
Use of analgesics and orthoses
Description
The use of analgesics: 1) no use of analgesics or less frequent than weekly, 2) weekly use of analgesics, 3) daily use of NSAIDS or paracetamol, 4) daily use of opioids. The use of orthoses: yes/no
Time Frame
6 months, 1year, 2 years, 5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 40 years or over Diagnosis of hallux rigidus: Persistent pain on movement of the first MTPJ AND Osteoarthritic first MTPJ in plain X-rays Duration of symptoms ≥1 year Pain-NRS during walking of 4 or more on a scale 0-10 (higher is worse) No substantial pain in other joints of the foot in clinical examination Willingness to accept both treatment options Ability to understand trial information and answer outcome assessments in Finnish Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: ASA* physical status classification level III or higher Patients with weak co-operation (dementia, schizophrenia, etc.) Patients with neuropathy, i.e. unable to feel 10g monofilament pressure in less than 8 out of 10 standard testing sites Active bacterial infection or ulcer of the lower limb Diabetes mellitus with insulin treatment Diabetes mellitus and GHb-A1C >64 mmol/mol (regardless of treatment) History of rheumatoid arthritis, gout or other inflammatory arthritis of the foot Hallux valgus angle >15° in weight-bearing X-ray Hallux varus in weight-bearing X-ray Large bone cysts in X-ray probably requiring bone grafting in surgery Pain in passive manipulation of ipsilateral first toe IP joint Patients with severe circulatory disorder of the lower limb: absence of palpable pulses in the foot (both dorsalis pedis artery and tibialis posterior artery) History of surgery of the foot in question Neuropathic pain of the foot in question (i.e., use of neuropathic analgesics) Activity limiting symptoms from an earlier fracture or ligament injury of the foot Patient is not willing to accept the operation within the planned time limits (3 to 12 weeks post-randomisation)
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Mikko Miettinen, M.D.
Phone
+35894711
Email
mikko.miettinen@hus.fi
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jussi Repo, M.D., Ph.D.
Phone
+35894711
Email
mrjussirepo@gmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jussi Repo, M.D., Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Helsinki University Hospital
City
Helsinki
ZIP/Postal Code
00029 HUS
Country
Finland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mikko Miettinen, M.D.
Phone
+35894711
Email
mikko.miettinen@hus.fi

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34452964
Citation
Miettinen M, Ramo L, Lahdeoja T, Sirola T, Sandelin H, Ponkilainen V, Repo JP. Treatment of hallux rigidus (HARD trial): study protocol of a prospective, randomised, controlled trial of arthrodesis versus watchful waiting in the treatment of a painful osteoarthritic first metatarsophalangeal joint. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 27;11(8):e049298. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049298.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Treatment of Hallux Rigidus

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs