Treatment With Allogeneic Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients With Aqueous Deficient Dry Eye Disease (MESADDE)
Primary Purpose
Dry Eye, Kerato Conjunctivitis Sicca, Aqueous Tear Deficiency
Status
Active
Phase
Early Phase 1
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Dry Eye
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- OSDI-score > 30
- Schirmer's test 2-5 mm in 5 minutes
- TBUT < 10 sec.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previously established allergies to Oxybuprocaine or DMSO (rare)
- Reduced immune response (e.g. HIV positive)
- Pregnancy or planned pregnancy within the next 2 years
- Breastfeeding
- Treatment with an anticoagulant that cannot be stopped during the intervention period
- Treatment with systemic medication known to reduce tear production (with an odds ratio >2,0 (3)): anxiolytics, antipsychotics, and inhaled steroids.
- Topical treatment with eye drops other than lubricants
- Any other disease/condition judged by the investigator to be grounds for exclusion, such as infection in or around the eye
Sites / Locations
- Rigshospitalet
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells
Arm Description
Approximately 11 million ASCs in a 0.5 ml suspension
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Pain at injection site: grade
grade 1: mild pain, grade 2: moderate pain, grade 3: severe pain
Infection at injection site
grade 1: localized; local intervention indicated, grade 2: oral intervention indicated (antibiotic, antifungal, antiviral), grade 3: intravenously administered (IV) antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral agent indicated; or operative intervention indicated, grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention needed.
Bleeding at injection site
Grade 1: Mild bleeding; intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization indicated.
Eyelid function disorder
Grade 1: Asymptomatic; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated;
Grade 2: Symptomatic; nonoperative intervention indicated; limiting instrumental ADL;
Grade 3: Limiting self care ADL; operative intervention indicated.
Periorbital edema
Grade 1: Soft or non-pitting;
Grade 2: Indurated or pitting edema; topical intervention indicated;
Grade 3: Edema associated with visual disturbance; increased intraocular pressure, glaucoma or retinal hemorrhage; optic neuritis; diuretics indicated; operative intervention indicated.
Ocular discomfort
grade 1: mild discomfort,
grade 2: moderate pain,
grade 3: disabling pain.
Flu-like symptoms
grade 1: Mild flu-like symptoms present;
grade 2: Moderate flu-like symptoms, limiting self care ADL;
grade 3: Severe flu-like symptoms, limiting self care ADL)
Fever
grade 1: 38,0-39,0 Cº; grade 2: >39,0-40,0 Cº; grade 3: >40,0 Cº for ≤ 24 hours; grade 4: >40,0 Cº for > 24 hours
Secondary Outcome Measures
OSDI questionnaire
Change in severity of dry eye symptoms as assessed with the OSDI questionnaire with a score of 0-100, where 0 is "no symptoms" and 100 is "severe symptoms"
Schirmer's I test
Change in tear production as evaluated with the Schirmer's I test
Tear osmolarity
Change in tear osmolarity measured with TearLab(TM)
Ocular SICCA Grading Score
Change in objective signs of DED as evaluated with the Ocular SICCA Grading Score from 0-12 where 0 is "no staining of the ocular surface" and 12 is "severe staining of the ocular surface"
HLA anti-bodies
Development of anti-HLA anti-bodies evaluated with Luminex HLA anti-body screening
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03878628
First Posted
March 12, 2019
Last Updated
October 26, 2022
Sponsor
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03878628
Brief Title
Treatment With Allogeneic Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients With Aqueous Deficient Dry Eye Disease
Acronym
MESADDE
Official Title
Treatment With Allogeneic Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients With Aqueous Deficient Dry Eye Disease
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
October 16, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 20, 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to assess the safety and feasibility of allogeneic adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) injected into the lacrimal gland in a smaller groups of 7 patients with Aqueous Deficient Dry Eye Disease (ADDE)
Detailed Description
Dry eye disease (DED) is a very common problem seen in patients all over the world. According to an older study the prevalence of DED in a Danish population 30-60 years of age was 11%. Aqueous tear deficient dry eye (ADDE) is a subtype of DED in which the tear production in the lacrimal gland (LG) is impaired. Current treatment of ADDE is only to relieve symptoms as a curative treatment of ADDE does not exist.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) reside in almost all connective tissues and are multipotent stem cells with the capacity to differentiate into several kinds of tissue. Several studies have shown that MSCs reduces inflammation in various diseases. Adipose tissue-derived MSCs (ASCs) have gained considerable attention, since they are readily available from the abdominal fat where it is most easily collected and expanded. In resting MSCs, MHC class II is not expressed on the surface, which reduces the inherent immunogenicity of the cells. This supreme attribute allows allogeneic MSC transplantation. Treatment with allogeneic MSCs have been investigated in an extensive number of human subjects for various conditions in clinical trials and no documented adverse events related to an anti-donor immune response exist. One potential advantage of treatment with allogeneic cells is the possibility of their use as an "off-the-shelf" therapeutic agent, avoiding the need for tissue collection and culture to delay and increase the cost of treatment. It has also been suggested that the function of autologous MSCs could be impaired in patients with comorbidities or advanced age.
In canines as in humans the most common cause of ADDE is an immune-mediated inflammatory response targeting the LG. Two studies with injection of allogeneic ASCs from healthy donors in a total of 48 eyes in 27 canines with ADDE have been performed with a significant increase in tear production and no observed adverse events to the treatment.
Studies with injection of ASCs into the human LG has never been conducted. This present study will test the hypothesis that injection of allogeneic ASCs into the LG in patients suffering from ADDE is safe and increases tear production and reduces inflammation resulting in increased ocular comfort.
7 patients with severe ADDE from Dept. of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, will be recruited if they are 1: eligible for the study and 2: sign the informed consent form.
At inclusion the participants will fill out the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire and undergo an eye examination in the following order:
measurement of tear osmolarity (TearLab™), tear break-up time (TBUT), ocular surface staining according to the Ocular SICCA Grading Score, and Schirmer's I test.
After a maximum of 14 days from screening all participants will receive an injection with ASCs into the lacrimal gland on one eye. If both eyes fulfill the eligibility criteria the most affected eye with the lowest tear production assessed with the Schirmer's I test will be the study eye; the contralateral eye will not be treated but examined according to the same protocol as the study eye at each follow-up.
The product used is CSCC_ASC(22) and the dose injected contains approximately 11 million ASCs per LG in a suspension with a total volume of 0.5 ml.
1 week (±2 days), 4 weeks (±4 days), and 4 months (±7 days) after intervention the participants are followed up with eye examination as described above, OSDI questionnaire, and blood test. At 4 months the primary outcomes of safety will be evaluated.
End of trial is defined as last participant's last visit (LPLV) at 3 years late follow-up.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dry Eye, Kerato Conjunctivitis Sicca, Aqueous Tear Deficiency
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Early Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
7 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Approximately 11 million ASCs in a 0.5 ml suspension
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells
Intervention Description
CSCC_ASC(22), a ready-to-use suspension containing 22 million adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells per millilitre
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain at injection site: grade
Description
grade 1: mild pain, grade 2: moderate pain, grade 3: severe pain
Time Frame
4 months after treatment
Title
Infection at injection site
Description
grade 1: localized; local intervention indicated, grade 2: oral intervention indicated (antibiotic, antifungal, antiviral), grade 3: intravenously administered (IV) antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral agent indicated; or operative intervention indicated, grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention needed.
Time Frame
4 months after treatment
Title
Bleeding at injection site
Description
Grade 1: Mild bleeding; intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization indicated.
Time Frame
4 months after treatment
Title
Eyelid function disorder
Description
Grade 1: Asymptomatic; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated;
Grade 2: Symptomatic; nonoperative intervention indicated; limiting instrumental ADL;
Grade 3: Limiting self care ADL; operative intervention indicated.
Time Frame
4 months after treatment
Title
Periorbital edema
Description
Grade 1: Soft or non-pitting;
Grade 2: Indurated or pitting edema; topical intervention indicated;
Grade 3: Edema associated with visual disturbance; increased intraocular pressure, glaucoma or retinal hemorrhage; optic neuritis; diuretics indicated; operative intervention indicated.
Time Frame
4 months after treatment
Title
Ocular discomfort
Description
grade 1: mild discomfort,
grade 2: moderate pain,
grade 3: disabling pain.
Time Frame
4 months after treatment
Title
Flu-like symptoms
Description
grade 1: Mild flu-like symptoms present;
grade 2: Moderate flu-like symptoms, limiting self care ADL;
grade 3: Severe flu-like symptoms, limiting self care ADL)
Time Frame
4 months after treatment
Title
Fever
Description
grade 1: 38,0-39,0 Cº; grade 2: >39,0-40,0 Cº; grade 3: >40,0 Cº for ≤ 24 hours; grade 4: >40,0 Cº for > 24 hours
Time Frame
4 months after treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
OSDI questionnaire
Description
Change in severity of dry eye symptoms as assessed with the OSDI questionnaire with a score of 0-100, where 0 is "no symptoms" and 100 is "severe symptoms"
Time Frame
4 months after treatment
Title
Schirmer's I test
Description
Change in tear production as evaluated with the Schirmer's I test
Time Frame
4 months after treatment
Title
Tear osmolarity
Description
Change in tear osmolarity measured with TearLab(TM)
Time Frame
4 months after treatment
Title
Ocular SICCA Grading Score
Description
Change in objective signs of DED as evaluated with the Ocular SICCA Grading Score from 0-12 where 0 is "no staining of the ocular surface" and 12 is "severe staining of the ocular surface"
Time Frame
4 months after treatment
Title
HLA anti-bodies
Description
Development of anti-HLA anti-bodies evaluated with Luminex HLA anti-body screening
Time Frame
4 months after treatment
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
OSDI-score > 30
Schirmer's test 2-5 mm in 5 minutes
TBUT < 10 sec.
Exclusion Criteria:
Previously established allergies to Oxybuprocaine or DMSO (rare)
Reduced immune response (e.g. HIV positive)
Pregnancy or planned pregnancy within the next 2 years
Breastfeeding
Treatment with an anticoagulant that cannot be stopped during the intervention period
Treatment with systemic medication known to reduce tear production (with an odds ratio >2,0 (3)): anxiolytics, antipsychotics, and inhaled steroids.
Topical treatment with eye drops other than lubricants
Any other disease/condition judged by the investigator to be grounds for exclusion, such as infection in or around the eye
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Steffen Heegaard, MD, DMSc
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rigshospitalet
City
Copenhagen
State/Province
DK
ZIP/Postal Code
2200
Country
Denmark
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Treatment With Allogeneic Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients With Aqueous Deficient Dry Eye Disease
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs