Trial Comparing Two Carboplatin Doses in Groups C and D Intraocular Retinoblastoma
Primary Purpose
Intraocular Retinoblastoma
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
India
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
carboplatin
carboplatin
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Intraocular Retinoblastoma focused on measuring intraocular retinoblastoma, chemotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All new cases of retinoblastoma with group C or D tumor as per the ICRB (International classification of retinoblastoma, Table 2) that present at Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences over first 2 years of the study period
Exclusion Criteria:
- Biomicroscopic evidence of iris neovascularization
- Neovascular glaucoma
- Tumor invasion into the anterior chamber, iris, optic nerve, choroid, or extraocular tissues as documented by clinical, ultrasonographic, and neuroimaging modalities.
Systemic exclusion criteria include:
- evidence of systemic metastasis
- prior chemotherapy
- prior treatment for retinoblastoma, or
- inadequate renal or hepatic function
Sites / Locations
- Dr RPC AIIMS
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
group 1
group 2
Arm Description
chemotherapy using carboplatin 560mg/m2
chemotherapy using 750mg/m2 carboplatin
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Ocular salvage rates in two randomly divided groups of group C and D retinoblastomas, treated with primary chemotherapy protocol using 560mg/m2 carboplatin and 750mg/m2 carboplatin respectively
Secondary Outcome Measures
To evaluate the response of subtenon carboplatin injections in cases of group C and D retinoblastomas that fail to respond to primary chemotherapy and local treatment
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00889018
First Posted
April 27, 2009
Last Updated
February 7, 2012
Sponsor
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Collaborators
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00889018
Brief Title
Trial Comparing Two Carboplatin Doses in Groups C and D Intraocular Retinoblastoma
Official Title
Randomized Control Trial Comparing Carboplatin 560mg/m2 With 750mg/m2 for Ocular Salvage in Groups C and D Intraocular Retinoblastoma
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2012 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 2012 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Collaborators
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether an increase in the dose of carboplatin in treatment of advanced intraocular (group C and D) retinoblastoma helps in avoiding radiotherapy and improves the rate of globe salvage.
Detailed Description
Chemoreduction has become an important method in management of retinoblastoma. This technique has been employed in an effort to avoid enucleation and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for children with intraocular retinoblastoma, especially those with bilateral disease. Although an ideal regimen for chemoreduction has not been determined, most authors use a combination of vincristine, etoposide and carboplatin for 2- 6 cycles along with local treatment including cryotherapy, laser photocoagulation, thermotherapy and plaque radiotherapy. Chemoreduction along with local treatment has been shown to have high treatment success in groups A and B of retinoblastoma allowing globe salvage without need of EBRT. But globe salvage rates remain low in groups C and D, which mostly need enucleation, or EBRT in a large number of cases.
In bilateral retinoblastoma where one eye is already lost owing to enucleation or both the eyes have advanced retinoblastoma (group C/D) globe salvage assumes a significant role in the overall treatment. Recurrences of the vitreous seeds or the sub retinal seeds are the main causes of treatment failure with chemoreduction and local treatment, ultimately requiring enucleation or EBRT.
The recurrence of vitreous or subretinal seeds do not necessarily mean a tumor resistance, it may reflect an inadequate penetration of the chemotherapeutic agents in these relatively avascular sites i.e the vitreous cavity or the subretinal space.
The penetration to these sites could be enhanced by (a) increase in the dose of the intravenous chemotherapeutic agents. The IInd Toronto protocol that was started in 2000 explores this option. The initial reports are encouraging but they have used high doses chemotherapy in combination with cyclosporin A. Therefore the effect of high dose chemotherapy on the globe salvage rates in groups C and D cannot be evaluated as an independent factor. (b) Periocular carboplatin injection has proven to deliver much higher levels of the drug in to the vitreous cavity, but several studies have revealed local side effects of this apparently harmless technique.The National Collaborative Retinoblastoma Study funded by the Children's oncology group plans to carry out a single arm trial of 6 cycles of systemic high dose chemotherapy and subtenon carboplatin injections in groups C and D of retinoblastoma. (c) Use of Cryotherapy/thermotherapy along with chemotherapy, has shown to increase the penetration of the chemotherapeutic agents into the vitreous cavity probably by disrupting the blood retinal barrier.
Shield's et al has already shown that the 6 cycle chemotherapy regimen achieves better long-term control of vitreous and subretinal seeds as compared to a 2 cycle regimen.
We planned this study to compare two different dose schedules of carboplatin and compare the rate of globe salvage in group C and D retinoblastoma and also to evaluate the effect of subtenon Carboplatin injections in cases that fail to respond to primary chemotherapy.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Intraocular Retinoblastoma
Keywords
intraocular retinoblastoma, chemotherapy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
group 1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
chemotherapy using carboplatin 560mg/m2
Arm Title
group 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
chemotherapy using 750mg/m2 carboplatin
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
carboplatin
Other Intervention Name(s)
paraplatin
Intervention Description
Table. 1: Chemotherapy protocol Vincristine Etoposide Carboplatin Day1 + + + Day2 ---- + ---- This regimen is repeated once a month for 6 months.Dose:Vincristine: 1.5 mg/m2 (0.05 mg/kg for children £36 months old and maximum dose 2 mg).Etoposide: 150 mg/m2 (5 mg/kg for children £36 months old).Carboplatin: 560 mg/m2 (18.6 mg/kg for children £36 months old). .
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
carboplatin
Other Intervention Name(s)
paraplatin
Intervention Description
Table. 1: Chemotherapy protocol Vincristine Etoposide Carboplatin Day1 + + + Day2 ---- + ---- This regimen is repeated once a month for 6 months.Dose:Vincristine: 1.5 mg/m2 (0.05 mg/kg for children £36 months old and maximum dose 2 mg).Etoposide: 150 mg/m2 (5 mg/kg for children £36 months old).Carboplatin: 750 mg/m2 (25 mg/kg for children £36 months old).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ocular salvage rates in two randomly divided groups of group C and D retinoblastomas, treated with primary chemotherapy protocol using 560mg/m2 carboplatin and 750mg/m2 carboplatin respectively
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To evaluate the response of subtenon carboplatin injections in cases of group C and D retinoblastomas that fail to respond to primary chemotherapy and local treatment
Time Frame
1 year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
All new cases of retinoblastoma with group C or D tumor as per the ICRB (International classification of retinoblastoma, Table 2) that present at Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences over first 2 years of the study period
Exclusion Criteria:
Biomicroscopic evidence of iris neovascularization
Neovascular glaucoma
Tumor invasion into the anterior chamber, iris, optic nerve, choroid, or extraocular tissues as documented by clinical, ultrasonographic, and neuroimaging modalities.
Systemic exclusion criteria include:
evidence of systemic metastasis
prior chemotherapy
prior treatment for retinoblastoma, or
inadequate renal or hepatic function
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rachna Meel, MS Ophthal
Organizational Affiliation
Dr RPC, AIIMS
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Supriyo Ghose, MS Ophthal
Organizational Affiliation
Prof and HOD, Dr RPC, AIIMS
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sameer Bakhshi, MD Paeds
Organizational Affiliation
Associate Prof., IRCH, AIIMS
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Neelam Pushker, MD Ophthal
Organizational Affiliation
Associate Prof., Dr RPC, AIIMS
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Dr RPC AIIMS
City
Delhi
ZIP/Postal Code
110029
Country
India
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25439612
Citation
Meel R, Bakhshi S, Pushker N, Vishnubhatla S. Randomized, controlled trial in groups C and D retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):433-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Oct 22. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Trial Comparing Two Carboplatin Doses in Groups C and D Intraocular Retinoblastoma
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs