Trial of 2 Cycles of Induction Chemo With Abraxane, Cetuximab, Cisplatin, & 5-FU for Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Trial of 2 Cycles of Induction Chemo With Abraxane, Cetuximab, Cisplatin, & 5-FU for Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Trial to Determine the CR Rate at the Primary Tumor Site After 2 Cycles of Induction Chemo With Abraxane, Cetuximab, Cisplatin, & 5-FU for Advanced Head & Neck Carcinoma Treated With Definitive Concurrent Cisplatin & Radiation Therapy

This phase two trial will determine the tumor response rate at the primary site and at involved regional nodes to two cycles of an IC regimen of weekly Abraxane and cetuximab given in combination with cisplatin and 5-FU in patients with local regionally advanced HNSCC.

Primary objective: To determine the clinical CR rate (CR-p) at the primary tumor site to an IC regimen of weekly Abraxane and cetuximab with CF (ACCF) given for two cycles (over 6 weeks) in patients with locally advanced non-metastatic HNSCC. The assessment of primary tumor site response will be performed by the treating physician by careful clinical examination using WHO criteria. Radiographic studies will also be performed to assess primary tumor site response but will be used primarily to confirm lack of disease progression that may not be detected based on clinical examination alone. The secondary objectives include: Document the clinical PR rate (PR-p) at the primary tumor site with this IC regimen Document the clinical CR and PR rates at the involved regional nodes (CR-n and PR-n) with this IC regimen Document the clinical overall CR rate (CR-o) (defined as achievement of a CR at the primary tumor site and at the involved regional nodes) and the clinical overall PR rate (PR-o) with this IC regimen Document the CR (CR-p, CR-n, and CR-o) and PR (PR-p, PR-n, and PR-o) rates by FDG uptake on PET scan after this IC regimen Document radiographic CR (CR-p, CR-n, and CR-o) and PR (PR-p, PR-n, and PR-o) rates as assessed by conventional CT scan using RECIST criteria after this IC regimen. Correlate primary tumor site, nodal and overall tumor response rates based on WHO criteria of assessment with that based on CT scan and FDG-PET/CT. Document and quantify SPARC expression by IHC in primary tumor tissue obtained at baseline in each patient and attempt to correlate these results with primary tumor site response to ACCF. Document and grade AE's with this IC regimen with a pre-planned safety analysis after the first ten patients have completed the IC regimen. Determine the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of this patient population.

Induction chemotherapy followed by Radiation therapy plus Cisplatin Induction chemotherapy: Abraxane 100 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, 8, and 15 of cycles 1, 2, and 3. Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, cycle 1. Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 8 and 15 cycle 1, 2 and 3. Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, cycles 1, 2, and 3. 5-FU 750 mg/m2 CIVI, Day 1, 2 and 3, cycles 1, 2, and 3. Post-Induction: Radiation - Monday-Friday weeks 1-7 with concurrent Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IVPB on radiation day 1, 22, and 42.

Induction chemotherapy followed by Radiation therapy plus Cetuximab Induction chemotherapy: Abraxane 100 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, 8, and 15 of cycles 1, 2, and 3. Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, cycle 1. Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 8 and 15 cycle 1, 2 and 3. Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, cycles 1, 2, and 3. 5-FU 750 mg/m2 CIVI, Day 1, 2 and 3, cycles 1, 2, and 3. Post-Induction: Radiation - Monday-Friday weeks 1-7 with concurrent Cetuximab (for patients who cannot receive cisplatin) will begin (+/- 3 days) before starting radiation therapy at 400 mg/m2 IVPB. Subsequent doses of cetuximab will be given weekly at 250 mg/m2 IVPB

(Post-induction) Cetuximab (for patients who cannot receive cisplatin) will begin (+/- 3 days) before starting radiation therapy at 400 mg/m2 IVPB. Subsequent doses of cetuximab will be given weekly at 250 mg/m2 IVPB

Clinical exam included laryngoscopy in office or operating room. Complete response rate includes complete response (CR) which is defined as 100% decrease in tumor size and it also includes near complete response (near CR) defined as 95-99% decrease in tumor size.

Clinical exam included laryngoscopy in office or operating room. Partial response rate (PR) defined as 50% to 94% decrease in tumor size.

Clinical exam consisted of physical exam of neck in office. Complete response rate includes complete response (CR) which is defined as 100% decrease in tumor size and near complete response (near CR) defined as 95-99% decrease in tumor size. Partial response rate defined as 50% to 94% decrease in tumor size.

Clinical exam included laryngoscopy in office or operating room. Clinical exam consisted of physical exam of neck in office. Complete response rate includes complete response (CR) which is defined as 100% decrease in tumor size and it also includes near complete response (near CR) defined as 95-99% decrease in tumor size. Partial response rate defined as 50% to 94% decrease in tumor size.

Complete response rate defined as complete resolution of the metabolically active primary tumor. Partial response rate defined as 20% or greater decrease in maximum SUV [SUV g/ml) = ROI activity (mCi/ml) / (injected dose (mCi/body weight(g))] from baseline. No unequivocal metabolic progression of non-target disease, and no unequivocal new lesions.

Complete response rate defined as complete resolution of the metabolically active primary tumor. Partial response rate defined as 20% or greater decrease in maximum SUV [SUV g/ml) = ROI activity (mCi/ml) / (injected dose (mCi/body weight(g))] from baseline. No unequivocal metabolic progression of non-target disease, and no unequivocal new lesions.

Radiographic Complete and Partial Response Rates of Primary Tumor as Assessed by Conventional CT Scan Using RECIST Criteria

Complete response rate per RECIST criteria is defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response rate per RECIST criteria is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter.

Radiographic Complete and Partial Response Rates of Involved Lymph Nodes as Assessed by Conventional CT Scan Using RECIST Criteria

Complete response rate per RECIST criteria is defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response rate per RECIST criteria is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter.

Radiographic Overall Complete and Partial Response Rates as Assessed by Conventional CT Scan Using RECIST Criteria

Complete response rate per RECIST criteria is defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response rate per RECIST criteria is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter.

Correlate Primary Tumor Site Response Rates Based on Visual Categorical Criteria of Assessment With That Based on CT Scan and FDG-PET/CT

In the future, primary tumor site, nodal, and OTR by VCR (CR-x or PR-x = Y or N) will be compared with response based on CT scan (CR-x or PR-x = Y or N) using a test for difference in paired, binary values. Median standardized uptake value of FDG measured by PET/CT will be compared among those with or without response (CR-x or PR-x) using nonparametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests. We are releasing results based on comparing actual responses from visual categorical response, CT scan, and FDG-PET/CT scan after 2 cycles.

Correlate Nodal Response Rates Based on Visual Categorical Criteria of Assessment With That Based on CT Scan and FDG-PET/CT

In the future, primary tumor site, nodal, and overall tumor response by visual categorical response (CR-x or PR-x = yes or no) will be compared with response based on CT scan (CR-x or PR-x = yes or no) using a test for difference in paired, binary values (e.g., McNemar's test). Median standardized uptake value of FDG measured by PET/CT will be compared among those with or without response (CR-x or PR-x) using nonparametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests. At this point, we are releasing results based on comparing actual responses from visual categorical response, CT scan, and FDG-PET/CT scan after 2 cycles of induction.

Correlate Overall Tumor Response Rates Based on Visual Categorical Criteria of Assessment With That Based on CT Scan and FDG-PET/CT

In the future, primary tumor site, nodal, and overall tumor response by visual categorical response (CR-x or PR-x = yes or no) will be compared with response based on CT scan (CR-x or PR-x = yes or no) using a test for difference in paired, binary values (e.g., McNemar's test). Median standardized uptake value of FDG measured by PET/CT will be compared among those with or without response (CR-x or PR-x) using nonparametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests. At this point, we are releasing results based on comparing actual responses from visual categorical response, CT scan, and FDG-PET/CT scan after 2 cycles of induction.

Correlate SPARC Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) in Baseline Primary Tumor Tissue With Primary Tumor Site Complete Response Rate to Induction Chemotherapy

Correlate SPARC Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) in Baseline Primary Tumor Tissue With Primary Tumor Site Partial Response Rate to Induction Chemotherapy

Correlate SPARC Expression (Intensity of Staining) by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) in Baseline Primary Tumor Tissue With Primary Tumor Site Complete Response Rate to Induction Chemotherapy

Correlate SPARC Expression (Intensity of Staining) by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) in Baseline Primary Tumor Tissue With Primary Tumor Site Partial Response Rate to Induction Chemotherapy

Adverse Events Experienced During Induction Chemotherapy in the First Ten Patients for a Pre-planned Safety Analysis

Time from complete response to death from any cause, to disease progression or to last follow-up alive.

Time from initiation of induction chemotherapy to death due to disease progression, to disease progression, or to last follow-up alive.

Complete response rate defined as complete resolution of the metabolically active primary tumor. Partial response rate defined as 20% or greater decrease in maximum SUV [SUV g/ml) = ROI activity (mCi/ml) / (injected dose (mCi/body weight(g))] from baseline. No unequivocal metabolic progression of non-target disease, and no unequivocal new lesions.

Inclusion Selected Stages 3 and 4a/b HNSCC: All patients must have T2-T4 primary tumors. Patients with T1 tumors will be excluded. Although most of these patients will have regional nodal disease, patients with no nodal disease will also be eligible. Oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, and oral cavity sub-sites only. Patients with nasopharyngeal, sinus and other sub-sites of the head and neck, or unknown primary SCC of the head and neck will NOT be eligible. Age ≥18 years Signed informed consent. ECOG Performance Status (PS) of 0-2 (Appendix 1). Adequate vital organ function (serum creatinine < 1.8 mg/dl, total bilirubin </= 1.5 mg/dl, ALT and AST </= 2.5 x ULN, alkaline phosphatase </= 2.5 x ULN) and hematopoietic function (ANC >/= 1500/ul, Platelets > 100,000/ul, HGB > 9.0 g/dl). Patients with reproductive potential must use an effective method of contraception to avoid pregnancy for the duration of the trial and for three months after completing treatment. If female of childbearing potential, the patient must have a negative pregnancy test. Exclusion Criteria: Peripheral neuropathy > Grade 1. Prior chemotherapy, EGFR targeted therapy or radiation therapy for HNSCC. History of prior invasive malignancy diagnosed within the last three years other than local stage non-melanoma skin cancer. Be taking cimetidine or allopurinol. Patients must discontinue taking the medication for one week before receiving treatment with Abraxane. Be taking cimetidine or allopurinol. Patients must discontinue taking the medication for one week before receiving treatment with Abraxane.

Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group; Wolf GT, Fisher SG, Hong WK, Hillman R, Spaulding M, Laramore GE, Endicott JW, McClatchey K, Henderson WG. Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jun 13;324(24):1685-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199106133242402.

Hitt R, Lopez-Pousa A, Martinez-Trufero J, Escrig V, Carles J, Rizo A, Isla D, Vega ME, Marti JL, Lobo F, Pastor P, Valenti V, Belon J, Sanchez MA, Chaib C, Pallares C, Anton A, Cervantes A, Paz-Ares L, Cortes-Funes H. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus fluorouracil to paclitaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8636-45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.1990. Epub 2005 Nov 7. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 20;24(6):1015.

Burtness B, Goldwasser MA, Flood W, Mattar B, Forastiere AA; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Phase III randomized trial of cisplatin plus placebo compared with cisplatin plus cetuximab in metastatic/recurrent head and neck cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8646-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.4646. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 1;24(4):724.

ten Tije AJ, Verweij J, Loos WJ, Sparreboom A. Pharmacological effects of formulation vehicles : implications for cancer chemotherapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(7):665-85. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342070-00005.

Sparreboom A, van Zuylen L, Brouwer E, Loos WJ, de Bruijn P, Gelderblom H, Pillay M, Nooter K, Stoter G, Verweij J. Cremophor EL-mediated alteration of paclitaxel distribution in human blood: clinical pharmacokinetic implications. Cancer Res. 1999 Apr 1;59(7):1454-7.

Winer EP, Berry DA, Woolf S, Duggan D, Kornblith A, Harris LN, Michaelson RA, Kirshner JA, Fleming GF, Perry MC, Graham ML, Sharp SA, Keresztes R, Henderson IC, Hudis C, Muss H, Norton L. Failure of higher-dose paclitaxel to improve outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer: cancer and leukemia group B trial 9342. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 1;22(11):2061-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.048.

van Tellingen O, Huizing MT, Panday VR, Schellens JH, Nooijen WJ, Beijnen JH. Cremophor EL causes (pseudo-) non-linear pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients. Br J Cancer. 1999 Sep;81(2):330-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690696.

Gradishar WJ, Tjulandin S, Davidson N, Shaw H, Desai N, Bhar P, Hawkins M, O'Shaughnessy J. Phase III trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 1;23(31):7794-803. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.937. Epub 2005 Sep 19.

Kato Y, Nagashima Y, Baba Y, Kawano T, Furukawa M, Kubota A, Yanoma S, Imagawa-Ishiguro Y, Satake K, Taguchi T, Hata R, Mochimatsu I, Aoki I, Kameda Y, Inayama Y, Tsukuda M. Expression of SPARC in tongue carcinoma of stage II is associated with poor prognosis: an immunohistochemical study of 86 cases. Int J Mol Med. 2005 Aug;16(2):263-8.

Mendez E, Cheng C, Farwell DG, Ricks S, Agoff SN, Futran ND, Weymuller EA Jr, Maronian NC, Zhao LP, Chen C. Transcriptional expression profiles of oral squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer. 2002 Oct 1;95(7):1482-94. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10875.

Adkins D, Ley J, Oppelt P, Wildes TM, Gay HA, Daly M, Rich J, Paniello RC, Jackson R, Pipkorn P, Nussenbaum B, Trinkaus K, Thorstad W. nab-Paclitaxel-based induction chemotherapy with or without cetuximab for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2017 Sep;72:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 8.

Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine