Trial of Inspiratory Muscle Rest and Exercise in Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
Primary Purpose
Lung Diseases, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ventilators, negative pressure
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Lung Diseases
Eligibility Criteria
No eligibility criteria
Sites / Locations
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00000571
First Posted
October 27, 1999
Last Updated
December 28, 2015
Sponsor
McGill University
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00000571
Brief Title
Trial of Inspiratory Muscle Rest and Exercise in Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2001
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 1986 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
McGill University
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
To test the effectiveness of ventilatory muscle rest (VMR) using home negative pressure ventilation (NPV) in improving exercise performance, alleviating dyspnea, and improving the quality of life in patients with severe chronic obstructive lung disease.
Detailed Description
BACKGROUND:
The potential importance of respiratory, chiefly inspiratory-muscle, fatigue had only recently been appreciated. If inspiratory muscles fail, so does ventilation and tissue respiration. There are theoretical reasons to postulate inspiratory muscle failure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and suggestions that it may occur in an acute form with exacerbations and in a chronic form during 'stability'. There are two therapeutic strategies available for prevention and treatment of inspiratory muscle fatigue: training inspiratory muscles to increase their efficiency and resting fatigued muscles. The former should work if chronic fatigue is not present, and the latter should allow recovery from chronic fatigue, so the two approaches are not necessarily mutually exclusive. This proposal was originally designed to test the efficacy of each of these therapies alone and also in combination; however, given the experience of a pretrial period, these goals were scaled back. Since there was reason to believe that VMR may be more effective than IMT, the trial focused on VMR and sham VMR only.
Ventilatory muscle rest was applied using a negative pressure ventilation suit sealed at the patient's hips, arms, and neck. A widebore tube connected to a fitting in the suit above the grid on the chest and upper abdomen transmitted negative pressure to the chest wall from the pump, thereby inflating the lungs.
The evidence for chronic inspiratory muscle fatigue in patients with COLD resided largely in several relatively poorly controlled studies indicating that nocturnal artificial ventilation, which presumably rested the inspiratory muscles, produced improvement in daytime function and blood gases. The trial produced some badly needed data on both the occurrence of inspiratory muscle fatigue in COLD patients and its treatment with VMR.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
Randomized, blinded. A total of 1,231 patients in the metropolitan Montreal area were screened. Of these, 348 were recruited to enter a four week stabilization period, and 184 were subsequently randomized to either active or sham negative pressure ventilation (NPV). A five day in-hospital period was used to train patients in ventilator use and obtain baseline measures of exercise capacity, lung function, respiratory symptoms, and quality of life. Randomization was stratified on the basis of whether or not the patient had been receiving oxygen at home. Home ventilation treatment took place during a following 12-week period. Respirator use was recorded from patient logs and from concealed meters installed in the units. Patients received four home visits by physiotherapists during the 12-week period and returned to the hospital for follow-up at four and twelve weeks post-discharge for reassessment. The principal outcome measure was the distance in meters walked in six minutes. Secondary outcome measures were cycle exercise endurance time, severity of dyspnea, quality of life, arterial blood gas tensions, and respiratory muscle strength.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lung Diseases, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Allocation
Randomized
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
ventilators, negative pressure
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
30 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
No eligibility criteria
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter Macklem
Organizational Affiliation
McGill University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
2037853
Citation
Shapiro SH, Macklem PT, Gray-Donald K, Martin JG, Ernst PP, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hutchinson TA, Spitzer WO. A randomized clinical trial of negative pressure ventilation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: design and methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(6):483-96. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90211-q.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Trial of Inspiratory Muscle Rest and Exercise in Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs