search
Back to results

Trial of Point-of-treatment Xpert MTB/RIF Assay (TBNEATXpert)

Primary Purpose

Tuberculosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Xpert MTB/RIF assay
Smear microscopy
Sponsored by
University of Cape Town
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Tuberculosis focused on measuring Tuberculosis, diagnosis, Xpert MTB/RIF, point-of-treatment, randomized controlled trial

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Able and willing to give informed consent
  2. Ambulant patient presenting to TB clinic

    IF HIV negative requires 2 or more of the following:

    • Cough ≥ 2 weeks
    • loss of weight
    • persistent fever ≥ 2 weeks and/or
    • a single recorded temp > 38°C
    • night sweats
    • generalized fatigue
    • hemoptysis or
    • chest pain

    OR if HIV positive - any one of the following:

    • current cough
    • night sweats
    • fever
    • loss of weight
  3. Patient 18 years or above

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to provide informed consent (e.g. mentally impaired)
  2. Unable to produce 2 sputa of ≥ 1ml
  3. TB treatment within the last 60 days
  4. Unable to potentially return for study follow-up at 2 and 6 months (i.e. leaving community)
  5. Patient not meeting inclusion criteria

Sites / Locations

  • Medical Research Council
  • University of Cape Town
  • University Teaching Hospital of Zambia
  • University of Zimbabwe

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Xpert MTB/RIF

Sputum smear microscopy

Arm Description

Patients in this arm will receive 1 sputum Xpert MTB/RIF test (point-of-treatment) and 1 sputum sample for MGIT liquid TB culture (regional lab)

Patients in this study arm will receive 2 sputum samples for same-day smear microscopy and 1 of the sputum samples will have a MGIT Liquid culture (regional lab).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Difference in TB-related Morbidity
Time-specific (2 month) difference in morbidity between the Xpert MTB/RIF and smear microscopy study arms. Morbidity will be assessed using the TB Score and Karnosky performance scale
Difference in TB-related Morbidity
Time-specific (6 month) difference in morbidity between the Xpert MTB/RIF and smear microscopy study arms. Morbidity will be assessed using the TB Score and Karnosky performance scale

Secondary Outcome Measures

Time-to-diagnosis
Time from study enrollment to TB diagnosis in each study arm A diagnosis of TB will include: i) Smear microscopy: WHO classification for smear grading considered positive ii) Xpert MTB/RIF positive (mtb detected) iii) MGIT liquid culture positive
Drop-out and lost-to-follow up rates
Number of patients that are enrolled, randomized to a study arm, and then do not return to receive a positive test result, and Number of patients that are enrolled, randomized to a study arm, diagnosed with TB, and then are lost-to-follow up prior to completion of prescribed standard TB treatment
Feasibility of clinic-based performance of Xpert MTB/RIF assay performed by nursing staff without formal research training
Feasibility indicators for the performance of Xpert at POT will be recorded. These include indeterminate rates, turn-around-time, user appraisal and assessments and performance comparisons between laboratory and clinic-based Xpert MTB/RIF.
Individual patient-level cost analysis, cost-effectiveness evaluation and quality of health indices evaluation
Detailed documentation of patient and health system costs for TB diagnosis and treatment will be done at baseline, 2 month and 6 month time-points as well as quality of life health questionaires.
Time-to-treatment initiation
The time-to-treatment initiation for TB culture positive patients in each study arm will be compared Treatment commencement will be considered as the initiation of the first dose of anti-TB treatment at a registered DOTs facility

Full Information

First Posted
July 7, 2011
Last Updated
June 4, 2013
Sponsor
University of Cape Town
Collaborators
Biomedical Research and Training Institute, University of Zimbabwe, University of Zambia, Medical Research Council, South Africa, Mbeya medical research program, McGill University, Radboud University Medical Center, University of Cape Town Lung Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01554384
Brief Title
Trial of Point-of-treatment Xpert MTB/RIF Assay
Acronym
TBNEATXpert
Official Title
Multicentre Randomised Control Trial of Point-of-treatment (Clinic-based) Xpert MTB/RIF Assay
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Cape Town
Collaborators
Biomedical Research and Training Institute, University of Zimbabwe, University of Zambia, Medical Research Council, South Africa, Mbeya medical research program, McGill University, Radboud University Medical Center, University of Cape Town Lung Institute

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Xpert MTB/RIF assay is a novel automated molecular tool for the diagnosis of TB. Xpert can detect TB genetic material in sputum samples as well as test for genetic resistance to rifampicin providing results within 2 hours. Xpert received WHO endorsement in December 2010. There is limited data on the impact of Xpert on time-to-treatment and TB-related patient morbidity in primary care clinics. No studies have yet evaluated Xpert performed at the point-of-treatment (POT) i.e. in primary care clinic location. The investigators hypothesize that one sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay performed at the POT will improve time-to-diagnosis, time-to-treatment and TB related patient morbidity for patients with suspected TB presenting to primary level TB clinics in high HIV prevalent settings.
Detailed Description
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the world's most important infectious causes of mortality and continues to kill 1.8 million people annually. Despite intensified standard measure of TB control, TB case detection rates are low, posing major hurdles for TB control. It is estimated that approximately 50% of patients with TB are still not diagnosed and treated appropriately. The problem is compounded by the increasing prevalence of multi drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug resistant (XDR) TB and the close association between TB and HIV infection. Diagnostic tools introduced 100 years ago are still in routine use and increasingly inaccurate if the face of the HIV and TB syndemics. Consequently, many patients with active TB remain undiagnosed and continue to spread the disease within the community. Thus, missed or delayed diagnosis results in ongoing transmission, patient morbidity and mortality, and social and economic consequences. Currently, there is no available point-of-care, or even point-of-treatment test that allows early detection of active tuberculosis at the peripheral health clinic level. Lack of rapid, simple and accurate diagnostic tests at this level is a major hurdle in controlling the global burden of TB. A number of promising new TB diagnostics have shown initial promise but there remains an urgent need to assess their impact when used at the point-of-treatment in primary care level. In 2009, Cepheid released the Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay, which is the only system able to deliver answers directly from unprocessed samples by combining on-board preparation of the sample with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in less than 2 hours. Additionally, the Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay allows for simultaneous on-demand molecular testing for the detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) and rifampicin (frontline anti-TB drug) resistance. . The GeneXpert™ system consists of a GeneXpert instrument, personal computer and disposable fluidic cartridges. The system combines cartridge-based sample preparation with amplification and detection in a fully integrated and automated nucleic acid analysis instrument. Xpert has now been shown to be an accurate tool for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis in both smear-positive and smear-negative samples in both a multicentre evaluation and demonstration study with a sensitivity of approximately 70% in smear negative culture positive TB. Xpert testing in both these studies was performed at microscopy laboratories. In December 2010, on the basis of these results, Xpert was endorsed for TB diagnosis by the World Health Organisation (WHO) but is yet to be integrated into national tuberculosis control programmes. Limited data is available on the impacts of Xpert on patient important outcomes such as TB-related morbidity. No data is available about the feasibility and robustness of performing Xpert in primary care clinics at the POT using minimally trained nursing staff. The objective of this study will be to examine the feasibility and impact of a single point-of-treatment Gene Xpert MTB/RIF Assay performed by clinic staff compared to standard microscopy-centre based diagnostics. Special focus will be on the patient-related outcomes of time-to-treatment initiation, drop out rates and the mean difference in TB-morbidity scores in patients diagnosed with Xpert. The Xpert POT study will be a multicentre patient-level randomised controlled trial comparing a single sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF Assay performed at point-of-treatment with same-day standard fluorescent smear microscopy for TB diagnosis at the primary level of care. A single liquid MGIT culture performed a regional laboratory will be used as the reference standard.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tuberculosis
Keywords
Tuberculosis, diagnosis, Xpert MTB/RIF, point-of-treatment, randomized controlled trial

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1472 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Xpert MTB/RIF
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients in this arm will receive 1 sputum Xpert MTB/RIF test (point-of-treatment) and 1 sputum sample for MGIT liquid TB culture (regional lab)
Arm Title
Sputum smear microscopy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients in this study arm will receive 2 sputum samples for same-day smear microscopy and 1 of the sputum samples will have a MGIT Liquid culture (regional lab).
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Xpert MTB/RIF assay
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF assay
Intervention Description
Automated nucleic-acid amplification test (fully integrated) test for TB
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Smear microscopy
Intervention Description
Smear microscopy involve sputum smear with either ziehl-neelsen or auramine-O staining of slides and light or fluorescence microscopy reading
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference in TB-related Morbidity
Description
Time-specific (2 month) difference in morbidity between the Xpert MTB/RIF and smear microscopy study arms. Morbidity will be assessed using the TB Score and Karnosky performance scale
Time Frame
2 months
Title
Difference in TB-related Morbidity
Description
Time-specific (6 month) difference in morbidity between the Xpert MTB/RIF and smear microscopy study arms. Morbidity will be assessed using the TB Score and Karnosky performance scale
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time-to-diagnosis
Description
Time from study enrollment to TB diagnosis in each study arm A diagnosis of TB will include: i) Smear microscopy: WHO classification for smear grading considered positive ii) Xpert MTB/RIF positive (mtb detected) iii) MGIT liquid culture positive
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Drop-out and lost-to-follow up rates
Description
Number of patients that are enrolled, randomized to a study arm, and then do not return to receive a positive test result, and Number of patients that are enrolled, randomized to a study arm, diagnosed with TB, and then are lost-to-follow up prior to completion of prescribed standard TB treatment
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Feasibility of clinic-based performance of Xpert MTB/RIF assay performed by nursing staff without formal research training
Description
Feasibility indicators for the performance of Xpert at POT will be recorded. These include indeterminate rates, turn-around-time, user appraisal and assessments and performance comparisons between laboratory and clinic-based Xpert MTB/RIF.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Individual patient-level cost analysis, cost-effectiveness evaluation and quality of health indices evaluation
Description
Detailed documentation of patient and health system costs for TB diagnosis and treatment will be done at baseline, 2 month and 6 month time-points as well as quality of life health questionaires.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Time-to-treatment initiation
Description
The time-to-treatment initiation for TB culture positive patients in each study arm will be compared Treatment commencement will be considered as the initiation of the first dose of anti-TB treatment at a registered DOTs facility
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Able and willing to give informed consent Ambulant patient presenting to TB clinic IF HIV negative requires 2 or more of the following: Cough ≥ 2 weeks loss of weight persistent fever ≥ 2 weeks and/or a single recorded temp > 38°C night sweats generalized fatigue hemoptysis or chest pain OR if HIV positive - any one of the following: current cough night sweats fever loss of weight Patient 18 years or above Exclusion Criteria: Inability to provide informed consent (e.g. mentally impaired) Unable to produce 2 sputa of ≥ 1ml TB treatment within the last 60 days Unable to potentially return for study follow-up at 2 and 6 months (i.e. leaving community) Patient not meeting inclusion criteria
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Keertan Dheda, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Cape Town
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Medical Research Council
City
Durban
State/Province
Kwazulu-Natal
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
University of Cape Town
City
Cape Town
State/Province
Western Cape
ZIP/Postal Code
7945
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
University Teaching Hospital of Zambia
City
Lusaka
Country
Zambia
Facility Name
University of Zimbabwe
City
Harare
Country
Zimbabwe

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24176144
Citation
Theron G, Zijenah L, Chanda D, Clowes P, Rachow A, Lesosky M, Bara W, Mungofa S, Pai M, Hoelscher M, Dowdy D, Pym A, Mwaba P, Mason P, Peter J, Dheda K; TB-NEAT team. Feasibility, accuracy, and clinical effect of point-of-care Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis in primary-care settings in Africa: a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2014 Feb 1;383(9915):424-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62073-5. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Trial of Point-of-treatment Xpert MTB/RIF Assay

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs