search
Back to results

Trilaciclib (G1T28), a CDK 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination With Gemcitabine and Carboplatin in Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC)

Primary Purpose

Triple-Negative Breast Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasm, Breast Cancer

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Trilaciclib
Gemcitabine
Carboplatin
Sponsored by
G1 Therapeutics, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Triple-Negative Breast Neoplasms focused on measuring Breast Cancer, CDK 4/6 Inhibitor, Triple Negative Breast Cancer, Metastatic

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of hormone receptor (HR)-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC) breast cancer
  • Available TNBC diagnostic tumor tissue (archived tissue allowed)
  • Evaluable disease
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 1
  • Adequate organ function
  • Predicted life expectancy of 3 or more months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • More than 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC. If > 12 months have elapsed between the date of last adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy administration and first documented local or distant disease recurrence the therapy will not be considered a line of therapy in the locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC setting.
  • CNS metastases or leptomeningeal disease requiring immediate treatment with radiation therapy or steroids.
  • Investigational drug within 30 days of first trilaciclib (G1T28) dose
  • Concurrent radiotherapy, radiotherapy within 14 days of first trilaciclib (G1T28) dose
  • Cytotoxic chemotherapy within 3 weeks of first trilaciclib (G1T28) dose
  • Prior hematopoietic stem cell or bone marrow transplantation

Sites / Locations

  • Arizona Oncology Associates, PC - HOPE
  • Disney Family Cancer Center
  • Sharp Clinical Oncology
  • Innovative Clinical Research Institute
  • Memorial UC Health
  • Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
  • Florida Cancer Research Institute, LLC.
  • Florida Cancer Specialists - North (FCS North)
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
  • Florida Cancer Specialists - East (FCS East)
  • Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center
  • Illinois Cancer Specialists
  • Community Health Network
  • University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • The University of Maryland St. Joseph Medical Center
  • Saint Luke's Cancer Institute
  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
  • Levine Cancer Center
  • Forsyth Memorial Hospital, Novant Health Oncology Specialists
  • Tennessee Oncology
  • Tennessee Oncology
  • Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital
  • Texas Oncology, P.A.
  • Texas Oncology, P.A.
  • Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center
  • Texas Oncology-El Paso Cancer Treatment Center Grandview
  • The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
  • Texas Oncology-San Antonio Northeast
  • Tyler Hematology-Oncology, PA
  • Texas Oncology, P.A.
  • University of Virginia
  • Virginia Cancer Specialists, PC
  • Virginia Oncology Associates
  • Northwest Medical Specialties, PLLC
  • Antwerp University Hospital (UZA)
  • University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment
  • MHAT for Womens Health - Nadezhda OOD
  • Special Hospital For Active Treatment In Oncology
  • Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment
  • University Hospital Centre Osijek
  • General Hospital Varaždin
  • University Hospital Centre "Sestre milosrdnice"
  • University Hospital Centre Zagreb
  • Clinical Hospital Dr. Trifun Panovski
  • University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology
  • Special Hospital for Internal Diseases , Oncomed
  • Clinical Hospital Centre Bezanijska Kosa, Oncology Clinic
  • Center for Oncology and Radiotherapy, Clinical Centre
  • Clinical Centre Nis, Clinic of Oncology
  • Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Clinic for Internal Oncology
  • Mammacentrum, Sv.Agáty
  • Cancer Institute VOU, Rastislavova
  • University Medical Centre Maribor

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)

Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/ Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)

Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)

Arm Description

Participants received Intravenous (IV) infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 milligrams per meter square [mg/m^2] and carboplatin area under the curve [AUC] 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycle. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).

Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycle. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.

Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day Cycle. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Duration of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia (DSN) During Cycle 1
DSN was defined as the number of days from the date of the first absolute neutrophil count (ANC) value of less than (<) 0.5 × 10^9 cells/liter (L) observed between Day 1 Cycle 1 and the end of Cycle 1 to the date of the first ANC value greater than or equal to (>=) 0.5 × 10^9/L that met the following: (1) occurred after the ANC value of < 0.5 × 10^9 cells/L and (2) no other ANC values < 0.5 × 10^9 cells/L occurred between this day and the end of Cycle 1. Severe neutropenia (SN) was set to zero for participants who did not experience severe (Grade 4) neutropenia in Cycle 1, including those who were randomized but never treated.
Number of Participants With Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia (SN)
Number of participants with Grade 4 SN was a binary variable. If a participants had at least 1 ANC value < 0.5 ×10^9/L during the treatment period, the participants was assigned as "yes" to the occurrence of SN. Otherwise, it was "no".

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
BOR was defined as the best response across all time points (RECIST v1.1). The best overall response was determined once all the data for the participant is known. Each participant has been assigned one of the following categories (RECIST 1.1): complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): >= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; progression disease (PD): >= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study); stable disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD); NE: not evaluable and missing.
Duration of Objective Response (DOR) as Per RECIST v1.1 as Determined by Investigator
DOR is the time between first response by RECIST Version 1.1 of CR or PR and the first date that progressive disease is documented by RECIST Version 1.1, or death. Participants who do not experience PD or death was censored at the last tumor assessment date. 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival was defined as the time (months) from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants who do not die during the study were censored at the date last known to be alive. The OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 as Determined by Investigator
PFS was defined as the time (months) from date of randomization until date of documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. PD: >= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study). The PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Relative Dose Intensity of Gemcitabine and Carboplatin
Relative dose intensity was defined as 100% times the actual dose intensity divided by the planned dose intensity. The planned dose intensity was defined as the cumulative planned dose through the study divided by (number of cycles × 3 weeks). Relative dose intensity (%) was calculated as: for gemcitabine (100 * [Dose intensity (mg/m2/week) / (2000/3 (mg/m2/week)]); for carboplatin (100 * [Dose intensity (AUC/week)/ (4/3) (AUC/week)]) and for trilaciclib (100 * [Dose intensity (mg/m2/week)/ (480 /3 (mg/m2/week)] for Group 2 and 100 * [Dose intensity (mg/m2/week) / (960 /3 (mg/m2/week)] for Group 3).
Duration of Exposure
Duration of exposure (days) = First dose date of study drug from the last cycle - first dose date of study drug + 21.
Number of Cycles Participants Received Treatment in Each Treatment Arm
Participants were considered to have started a cycle if they have received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
Cumulative Dose of Gemcitabine
Cumulative dose: Sum of the total doses by cycle administered to a participant in the duration of exposure, i.e. total number of cycles received (milligram per meter square [mg/m^2]).
Cumulative Dose of Carboplatin
Cumulative dose: Sum of the total doses by cycle (AUC) administered to a participant in the duration of exposure, i.e. total number of cycles received (in total prescribed AUC).
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Trilaciclib
The observed peak plasma concentration was determined from the plasma concentration-versus time data.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to t Hours (AUC0-t) of Trilaciclib
AUC0-t was calculated with the linear/log-trapezoidal method, which uses linear interpolation between data points to calculate the AUC. The linear/log-trapezoidal method will be employed for all incremental trapezoids arising from increasing concentrations and the logarithmic trapezoidal method will be used for those arising from decreasing concentrations.
Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Trilaciclib
t1/2 was calculated as 0.693 divided by lambda z. lambda z (terminal phase rate constant) was determined by linear regression of at least 3 points on the terminal phase of the log-linear plasma concentration-time curve, the actual body exposure to drug after administration of a dose of the drug ( in mg*h/L).
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Gemcitabine
The observed peak plasma concentration was determined from the plasma concentration-versus time data.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to t Hours (AUC0-t) of Gemcitabine
AUC0-t was calculated with the linear/log-trapezoidal method.
Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Free Carboplatin
t1/2 was calculated as 0.693 divided by lambda z. lambda z (terminal phase rate constant) was determined by linear regression of at least 3 points on the terminal phase of the log-linear plasma concentration-time curve.
Clearance (CL) of of Free Carboplatin
Clearance after intravenous infusion administration was calculated as: CL=Dose/AUC0-inf. AUC0-inf was calculated as: AUC0-inf=AUClast+Clast/lambdaz where Clast is the last quantifiable concentration in the terminal elimination phase.
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Free Carboplatin
Vss was the volume of distribution at steady state of free carboplatin was reported.
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Hematologic Toxicities
Hematologic toxicities events were defined as any cycle where any hematologic lab value occurs that meets the CTCAE toxicity grade criteria for >= Grade 3 and the value is treatment emergent. The occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities was a binary endpoint. If a participant had at least 1 cycle with at least one Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities during the treatment period, the participant was assigned as Yes to the occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities; otherwise, it was No. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Thrombocytopenia
Hematologic toxicities events are defined as any cycle where any hematologic lab value occurs that meets the CTCAE toxicity grade criteria for >= Grade 3 and the value is treatment emergent. The occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was a binary endpoint. If a participant had at least 1 cycle with at least one Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia during the treatment period, the participant was assigned as "Yes" to the occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia; otherwise, it was "No". If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.
Major Adverse Hematologic Event (MAHE) Rate
MAHE was a composite endpoint incorporating the measurement of several clinically meaningful aspects of myelosuppression into a single endpoint by summing of the total number of events across a set of pre-specified components.The individual components for MAHE were all-cause hospitalizations, all-cause dose reductions, febrile neutropenia, prolonged severe neutropenia (duration > 5 days), RBC transfusion and platelet transfusion. Event rate for MAHE was calculated as the number of events/durations of treatment period divided by 7 days/1 week.
Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN)
The criterion for identifying FN was if the PT was "FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA" the occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of events >=1 was observed, No for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.
Number of Participants With Infection SAEs
Number of participants with infection SAEs during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of events >=1 was observed, No for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant. The criterion for identifying the proper infection SAE records was as follows: If the system organ class (SOC) from Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) takes value "INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS," and the AE was a serious event.
Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions On/After Week 5 (Day 35)
Each RBC transfusion with a unique start date on/after 5 weeks on study during the treatment period was defined as a separate event. Occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if the total number of events >=1 was observed and "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 will be assigned to that participant.
Number of Participants With Platelet Transfusions
Each platelet transfusion with a unique start date during the treatment period was defined as a separate event. The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if the total number of events >=1 was observed and No for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 will be assigned to that participant.
Number of Participants With Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Administration
The criterion for selecting proper records is as follows: If the chemical subgroup from the World Health Organization-Drug Dictionary (WHO-DD) takes value "COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR," the medication was classified as G-CSF. The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if the total number of events >=1 was observed and "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 will be assigned to that participant.
Number of Participants With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent (ESA) Administration
The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if total number of events >=1 was observed, "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant. The criterion to select proper records was as follows: If the chemical subgroup from WHO-DD Version September 2017 (i.e., TEXT4 for CODE4) takes value "OTHER ANTIANEMIC PREPARATIONS", the medication was classified as ESAs.
Number of Participants With Intravenous Antibiotics Use
The criteria for identifying an IV antibiotic administration event was (1) if the Therapeutic subgroup from WHO-DD version takes value "ANTIBACTERIALS FOR SYSTEMIC USE", and (2) the route of medication was "intravenous" or the route was "other" with the detailed specification as "IVPB". The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if total number of events >=1 was observed, "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.
All-cause Dose Reductions, Event Rate (Per Cycle)
Dose reductions were not permitted for trilaciclib. Dose reductions for gemcitabine or carboplatin were collected on the dosing page. No more than 3 dose modifications for toxicity in total were allowed for any participant. All dose reductions were counted as a separate event. Discontinuations of an individual component of the chemotherapy regimen were counted as a dose reduction If the participant continued the other chemotherapy drug as a monotherapy. Event rate was calculated as the total number of cycles with an event divided by the total number of cycles.
Dose Modifications: Number of Participants With Cycle Delays
Dose modifications was summarized for each study drug based on number of cycles received during the treatment period. If the participant was unable to start a new cycle at that next visit, then the cycle is delayed, the reason entered, and the question was asked again at the next visit until the participant either starts a new cycle or discontinues treatment.
Dose Modifications - Number of Participants With Skipped Doses
Dose modifications was summarized for each study drug based on skipped doses not received during the treatment period. Primary reasons for skipped doses included toxicity, investigator decision and administrative reasons (e.g., holidays).
Dose Modifications: Number of Participants With Any Dose Interruptions
Dose interruptions was defined as interruption of infusion, regardless of whether the study drug was continued after the interruption.
Dose Modifications - Number of Participants With Dose Reductions
Dose (mg/m2) reductions were not permitted for trilaciclib. Dose reductions for carboplatin and gemcitabine were determined by comparing the planned dose on the respective drug administration pages between the current cycle and the previous cycle.

Full Information

First Posted
November 18, 2016
Last Updated
February 24, 2022
Sponsor
G1 Therapeutics, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02978716
Brief Title
Trilaciclib (G1T28), a CDK 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination With Gemcitabine and Carboplatin in Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC)
Official Title
Phase 2 Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of G1T28 in Patients With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Gemcitabine and Carboplatin Chemotherapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Primary Analysis and survival follow up completed per protocol. Not stopped due to safety concerns
Study Start Date
February 2, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 28, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
G1 Therapeutics, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This was a study to investigate the potential clinical benefit of trilaciclib (G1T28) in preserving the bone marrow and the immune system, and enhancing chemotherapy antitumor efficacy when administered prior to carboplatin and gemcitabine (GC therapy) for participants with metastatic triple negative breast cancer. The study was an open-label and 102 participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1 fashion) to 1 of the 3 following treatment groups: Group 1: GC therapy (Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles) only (n=34) Group 2: GC therapy (Days 1 and 8) plus trilaciclib (G1T28) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles (n=33) Group 3: GC therapy (Days 2 and 9) plus trilaciclib (G1T28) on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of 21-day cycles (n=35) The study included 3 study phases: Screening Phase, Treatment Phase, and Survival Follow-up Phase. The Treatment Phase begins on the day of first dose with study treatment and completes at the Post-Treatment Visit.
Detailed Description
The posted results represent the final results of Study G1T28-04, a Phase 2 study of the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of trilaciclib (G1T28) in patients with locally recurrent/metastatic triple negative breast cancer receiving gemcitabine and carboplatin chemotherapy. The final myelopreservation efficacy results are reported from database lock 1 ([DBL1], data cut-off [DCO] date of 30 July 2018). Final anti-tumor efficacy (ORR, PFS), and final summary exposure and safety data are reported from database lock 2 ([DBL2], DCO 28 June 2019) which occurred to support filing of the trilaciclib New Drug Application (NDA). Final overall survival (OS) data are reported from the final database lock which occurred on 17 July 2020 (with a last patient last visit date of 28 February 2020).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Triple-Negative Breast Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasm, Breast Cancer, Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Keywords
Breast Cancer, CDK 4/6 Inhibitor, Triple Negative Breast Cancer, Metastatic

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
102 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received Intravenous (IV) infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 milligrams per meter square [mg/m^2] and carboplatin area under the curve [AUC] 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycle. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Arm Title
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/ Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycle. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Arm Title
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day Cycle. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Trilaciclib
Other Intervention Name(s)
G1T28, CDK 4/6 Inhibitor
Intervention Description
G1T28
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Gemcitabine
Intervention Description
Gemcitabine
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Carboplatin
Intervention Description
Carboplatin
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia (DSN) During Cycle 1
Description
DSN was defined as the number of days from the date of the first absolute neutrophil count (ANC) value of less than (<) 0.5 × 10^9 cells/liter (L) observed between Day 1 Cycle 1 and the end of Cycle 1 to the date of the first ANC value greater than or equal to (>=) 0.5 × 10^9/L that met the following: (1) occurred after the ANC value of < 0.5 × 10^9 cells/L and (2) no other ANC values < 0.5 × 10^9 cells/L occurred between this day and the end of Cycle 1. Severe neutropenia (SN) was set to zero for participants who did not experience severe (Grade 4) neutropenia in Cycle 1, including those who were randomized but never treated.
Time Frame
From randomization to the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle= 21 days)
Title
Number of Participants With Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia (SN)
Description
Number of participants with Grade 4 SN was a binary variable. If a participants had at least 1 ANC value < 0.5 ×10^9/L during the treatment period, the participants was assigned as "yes" to the occurrence of SN. Otherwise, it was "no".
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Description
BOR was defined as the best response across all time points (RECIST v1.1). The best overall response was determined once all the data for the participant is known. Each participant has been assigned one of the following categories (RECIST 1.1): complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): >= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; progression disease (PD): >= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study); stable disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD); NE: not evaluable and missing.
Time Frame
From date of randomization until the occurrence of progressive disease or a censoring event, assessed up to a maximum of 875 days
Title
Duration of Objective Response (DOR) as Per RECIST v1.1 as Determined by Investigator
Description
DOR is the time between first response by RECIST Version 1.1 of CR or PR and the first date that progressive disease is documented by RECIST Version 1.1, or death. Participants who do not experience PD or death was censored at the last tumor assessment date. 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
From date of randomization until the occurrence of progressive disease or a censoring event, assessed up to a maximum of 875 days
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
Overall survival was defined as the time (months) from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants who do not die during the study were censored at the date last known to be alive. The OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 1120 days
Title
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 as Determined by Investigator
Description
PFS was defined as the time (months) from date of randomization until date of documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. PD: >= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study). The PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
From date of randomization until the occurrence of disease progression, death due to any cause or a censoring event, assessed up to a maximum of 875 days
Title
Relative Dose Intensity of Gemcitabine and Carboplatin
Description
Relative dose intensity was defined as 100% times the actual dose intensity divided by the planned dose intensity. The planned dose intensity was defined as the cumulative planned dose through the study divided by (number of cycles × 3 weeks). Relative dose intensity (%) was calculated as: for gemcitabine (100 * [Dose intensity (mg/m2/week) / (2000/3 (mg/m2/week)]); for carboplatin (100 * [Dose intensity (AUC/week)/ (4/3) (AUC/week)]) and for trilaciclib (100 * [Dose intensity (mg/m2/week)/ (480 /3 (mg/m2/week)] for Group 2 and 100 * [Dose intensity (mg/m2/week) / (960 /3 (mg/m2/week)] for Group 3).
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days
Title
Duration of Exposure
Description
Duration of exposure (days) = First dose date of study drug from the last cycle - first dose date of study drug + 21.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days
Title
Number of Cycles Participants Received Treatment in Each Treatment Arm
Description
Participants were considered to have started a cycle if they have received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days
Title
Cumulative Dose of Gemcitabine
Description
Cumulative dose: Sum of the total doses by cycle administered to a participant in the duration of exposure, i.e. total number of cycles received (milligram per meter square [mg/m^2]).
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days
Title
Cumulative Dose of Carboplatin
Description
Cumulative dose: Sum of the total doses by cycle (AUC) administered to a participant in the duration of exposure, i.e. total number of cycles received (in total prescribed AUC).
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days
Title
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Trilaciclib
Description
The observed peak plasma concentration was determined from the plasma concentration-versus time data.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to t Hours (AUC0-t) of Trilaciclib
Description
AUC0-t was calculated with the linear/log-trapezoidal method, which uses linear interpolation between data points to calculate the AUC. The linear/log-trapezoidal method will be employed for all incremental trapezoids arising from increasing concentrations and the logarithmic trapezoidal method will be used for those arising from decreasing concentrations.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)
Title
Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Trilaciclib
Description
t1/2 was calculated as 0.693 divided by lambda z. lambda z (terminal phase rate constant) was determined by linear regression of at least 3 points on the terminal phase of the log-linear plasma concentration-time curve, the actual body exposure to drug after administration of a dose of the drug ( in mg*h/L).
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)
Title
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Gemcitabine
Description
The observed peak plasma concentration was determined from the plasma concentration-versus time data.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to t Hours (AUC0-t) of Gemcitabine
Description
AUC0-t was calculated with the linear/log-trapezoidal method.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)
Title
Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Free Carboplatin
Description
t1/2 was calculated as 0.693 divided by lambda z. lambda z (terminal phase rate constant) was determined by linear regression of at least 3 points on the terminal phase of the log-linear plasma concentration-time curve.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)
Title
Clearance (CL) of of Free Carboplatin
Description
Clearance after intravenous infusion administration was calculated as: CL=Dose/AUC0-inf. AUC0-inf was calculated as: AUC0-inf=AUClast+Clast/lambdaz where Clast is the last quantifiable concentration in the terminal elimination phase.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)
Title
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Free Carboplatin
Description
Vss was the volume of distribution at steady state of free carboplatin was reported.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)
Title
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Hematologic Toxicities
Description
Hematologic toxicities events were defined as any cycle where any hematologic lab value occurs that meets the CTCAE toxicity grade criteria for >= Grade 3 and the value is treatment emergent. The occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities was a binary endpoint. If a participant had at least 1 cycle with at least one Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities during the treatment period, the participant was assigned as Yes to the occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities; otherwise, it was No. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days
Title
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Thrombocytopenia
Description
Hematologic toxicities events are defined as any cycle where any hematologic lab value occurs that meets the CTCAE toxicity grade criteria for >= Grade 3 and the value is treatment emergent. The occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was a binary endpoint. If a participant had at least 1 cycle with at least one Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia during the treatment period, the participant was assigned as "Yes" to the occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia; otherwise, it was "No". If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days
Title
Major Adverse Hematologic Event (MAHE) Rate
Description
MAHE was a composite endpoint incorporating the measurement of several clinically meaningful aspects of myelosuppression into a single endpoint by summing of the total number of events across a set of pre-specified components.The individual components for MAHE were all-cause hospitalizations, all-cause dose reductions, febrile neutropenia, prolonged severe neutropenia (duration > 5 days), RBC transfusion and platelet transfusion. Event rate for MAHE was calculated as the number of events/durations of treatment period divided by 7 days/1 week.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days
Title
Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN)
Description
The criterion for identifying FN was if the PT was "FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA" the occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of events >=1 was observed, No for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days
Title
Number of Participants With Infection SAEs
Description
Number of participants with infection SAEs during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of events >=1 was observed, No for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant. The criterion for identifying the proper infection SAE records was as follows: If the system organ class (SOC) from Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) takes value "INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS," and the AE was a serious event.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days
Title
Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions On/After Week 5 (Day 35)
Description
Each RBC transfusion with a unique start date on/after 5 weeks on study during the treatment period was defined as a separate event. Occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if the total number of events >=1 was observed and "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 will be assigned to that participant.
Time Frame
From Day 35 through the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 508 days
Title
Number of Participants With Platelet Transfusions
Description
Each platelet transfusion with a unique start date during the treatment period was defined as a separate event. The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if the total number of events >=1 was observed and No for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 will be assigned to that participant.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days
Title
Number of Participants With Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Administration
Description
The criterion for selecting proper records is as follows: If the chemical subgroup from the World Health Organization-Drug Dictionary (WHO-DD) takes value "COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR," the medication was classified as G-CSF. The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if the total number of events >=1 was observed and "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 will be assigned to that participant.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days
Title
Number of Participants With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent (ESA) Administration
Description
The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if total number of events >=1 was observed, "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant. The criterion to select proper records was as follows: If the chemical subgroup from WHO-DD Version September 2017 (i.e., TEXT4 for CODE4) takes value "OTHER ANTIANEMIC PREPARATIONS", the medication was classified as ESAs.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days
Title
Number of Participants With Intravenous Antibiotics Use
Description
The criteria for identifying an IV antibiotic administration event was (1) if the Therapeutic subgroup from WHO-DD version takes value "ANTIBACTERIALS FOR SYSTEMIC USE", and (2) the route of medication was "intravenous" or the route was "other" with the detailed specification as "IVPB". The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if total number of events >=1 was observed, "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days
Title
All-cause Dose Reductions, Event Rate (Per Cycle)
Description
Dose reductions were not permitted for trilaciclib. Dose reductions for gemcitabine or carboplatin were collected on the dosing page. No more than 3 dose modifications for toxicity in total were allowed for any participant. All dose reductions were counted as a separate event. Discontinuations of an individual component of the chemotherapy regimen were counted as a dose reduction If the participant continued the other chemotherapy drug as a monotherapy. Event rate was calculated as the total number of cycles with an event divided by the total number of cycles.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days
Title
Dose Modifications: Number of Participants With Cycle Delays
Description
Dose modifications was summarized for each study drug based on number of cycles received during the treatment period. If the participant was unable to start a new cycle at that next visit, then the cycle is delayed, the reason entered, and the question was asked again at the next visit until the participant either starts a new cycle or discontinues treatment.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days
Title
Dose Modifications - Number of Participants With Skipped Doses
Description
Dose modifications was summarized for each study drug based on skipped doses not received during the treatment period. Primary reasons for skipped doses included toxicity, investigator decision and administrative reasons (e.g., holidays).
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days
Title
Dose Modifications: Number of Participants With Any Dose Interruptions
Description
Dose interruptions was defined as interruption of infusion, regardless of whether the study drug was continued after the interruption.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days
Title
Dose Modifications - Number of Participants With Dose Reductions
Description
Dose (mg/m2) reductions were not permitted for trilaciclib. Dose reductions for carboplatin and gemcitabine were determined by comparing the planned dose on the respective drug administration pages between the current cycle and the previous cycle.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Description
An Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Any AE that started on or after the first dose of study drugs was included as a TEAE. A Serious AE was defined as any AE, occurring at any dose (including after the informed consent form was signed and prior to dosing) and regardless of causality that met one, more of the following criteria: results in death, life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent, significant disability/incapacity, a congenital abnormality/birth defect, an important medical event. TEAEs included serious and non-serious TEAEs.
Time Frame
During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 1116 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Confirmed diagnosis of hormone receptor (HR)-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC) breast cancer Available TNBC diagnostic tumor tissue (archived tissue allowed) Evaluable disease Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 1 Adequate organ function Predicted life expectancy of 3 or more months Exclusion Criteria: More than 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC. If > 12 months have elapsed between the date of last adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy administration and first documented local or distant disease recurrence the therapy will not be considered a line of therapy in the locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC setting. CNS metastases or leptomeningeal disease requiring immediate treatment with radiation therapy or steroids. Investigational drug within 30 days of first trilaciclib (G1T28) dose Concurrent radiotherapy, radiotherapy within 14 days of first trilaciclib (G1T28) dose Cytotoxic chemotherapy within 3 weeks of first trilaciclib (G1T28) dose Prior hematopoietic stem cell or bone marrow transplantation
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Contact
Organizational Affiliation
G1 Therapeutics, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Arizona Oncology Associates, PC - HOPE
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85704
Country
United States
Facility Name
Disney Family Cancer Center
City
Burbank
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91505
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sharp Clinical Oncology
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92123
Country
United States
Facility Name
Innovative Clinical Research Institute
City
Whittier
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90603
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial UC Health
City
Colorado Springs
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80909
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers
City
Lakewood
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80228
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Cancer Specialists
City
Fort Myers
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33916
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Cancer Research Institute, LLC.
City
Plantation
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33324
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Cancer Specialists - North (FCS North)
City
Saint Petersburg
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Moffitt Cancer Center
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Cancer Specialists - East (FCS East)
City
West Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center
City
Boise
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83706
Country
United States
Facility Name
Illinois Cancer Specialists
City
Arlington Heights
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60005
Country
United States
Facility Name
Community Health Network
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46250
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201-1544
Country
United States
Facility Name
The University of Maryland St. Joseph Medical Center
City
Towson
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21204
Country
United States
Facility Name
Saint Luke's Cancer Institute
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64113
Country
United States
Facility Name
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89128
Country
United States
Facility Name
Levine Cancer Center
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28204
Country
United States
Facility Name
Forsyth Memorial Hospital, Novant Health Oncology Specialists
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tennessee Oncology
City
Chattanooga
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37404
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tennessee Oncology
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Oncology, P.A.
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78745
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Oncology, P.A.
City
Bedford
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76022
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75246
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Oncology-El Paso Cancer Treatment Center Grandview
City
El Paso
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79902
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Oncology-San Antonio Northeast
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78217
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tyler Hematology-Oncology, PA
City
Tyler
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Oncology, P.A.
City
Tyler
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75702
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Virginia
City
Charlottesville
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22908
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia Cancer Specialists, PC
City
Fairfax
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22031
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia Oncology Associates
City
Virginia Beach
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23456
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwest Medical Specialties, PLLC
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Antwerp University Hospital (UZA)
City
Edegem
ZIP/Postal Code
10 2650
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
MHAT for Womens Health - Nadezhda OOD
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1330
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Special Hospital For Active Treatment In Oncology
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1756
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment
City
Varna
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
University Hospital Centre Osijek
City
Osijek
ZIP/Postal Code
31000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
General Hospital Varaždin
City
Varazdin
ZIP/Postal Code
42000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
University Hospital Centre "Sestre milosrdnice"
City
Zagreb
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
University Hospital Centre Zagreb
City
Zagreb
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Clinical Hospital Dr. Trifun Panovski
City
Bitola
ZIP/Postal Code
7000
Country
North Macedonia
Facility Name
University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology
City
Skopje
ZIP/Postal Code
1000
Country
North Macedonia
Facility Name
Special Hospital for Internal Diseases , Oncomed
City
Belgrade
ZIP/Postal Code
11000
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Clinical Hospital Centre Bezanijska Kosa, Oncology Clinic
City
Belgrade
ZIP/Postal Code
11070
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Center for Oncology and Radiotherapy, Clinical Centre
City
Kragujevac
ZIP/Postal Code
34000
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Clinical Centre Nis, Clinic of Oncology
City
Nis
ZIP/Postal Code
18000
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Clinic for Internal Oncology
City
Sremska Kamenica
ZIP/Postal Code
21204
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Mammacentrum, Sv.Agáty
City
Banská Bystrica
ZIP/Postal Code
974 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Cancer Institute VOU, Rastislavova
City
Košice
ZIP/Postal Code
040 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
University Medical Centre Maribor
City
Maribor
ZIP/Postal Code
2000
Country
Slovenia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31575503
Citation
Tan AR, Wright GS, Thummala AR, Danso MA, Popovic L, Pluard TJ, Han HS, Vojnovic Z, Vasev N, Ma L, Richards DA, Wilks ST, Milenkovic D, Yang Z, Antal JM, Morris SR, O'Shaughnessy J. Trilaciclib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1587-1601. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30616-3. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34887261
Citation
Tan AR, Wright GS, Thummala AR, Danso MA, Popovic L, Pluard TJ, Han HS, Vojnovic Z, Vasev N, Ma L, Richards DA, Wilks ST, Milenkovic D, Xiao J, Sorrentino J, Horton J, O'Shaughnessy J. Trilaciclib Prior to Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Final Efficacy and Subgroup Analysis from a Randomized Phase II Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Feb 15;28(4):629-636. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2272.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Trilaciclib (G1T28), a CDK 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination With Gemcitabine and Carboplatin in Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs