search
Back to results

Ultra-Brief Versus Brief Hands Only CPR Video Training With and Without Psychomotor Skill Practice

Primary Purpose

Cardiac Arrest

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
No training, assessed within 60 mins
Ultra-brief video; assessed in 60 mins
Brief video; assessed in 60 mins
Brief video + hands-on; ass'd in 60 mins
Ultra-brief video; assessed at 2 months
Brief video; assessed 2 months later
Brief video + hands-on; ass'd 2 ms later
Sponsored by
Valleywise Health
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Cardiac Arrest focused on measuring hands only, CPR, resuscitation, cardiac arrest, Education of general public regarding resuscitation methods

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Members of a local area church

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 years old
  • formal CPR training or certification within last 2 years
  • Lacks fluency in English
  • Works as a health care provider

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm 4

    Arm 5

    Arm 6

    Arm 7

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    No training, assessed within 60 mins

    Ultra-brief video; assessed in 60 mins

    Brief video; assessed in 60 mins

    Brief video + hands-on; ass'd in 60 mins

    Ultra-brief video; assessed at 2 months

    Brief video; assessed 2 months later

    Brief video + hands-on; ass'd 2 ms later

    Arm Description

    Subjects receive no training

    Subjects receive an ultra-brief (90-second) video on hands-only CPR

    Subjects receive a brief (5-minute) video on hands-only CPR

    Subjects receive a brief (5-minute) video with hands-on manikin practice

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Median Compression Depth (mm)
    Assessment of resuscitation skills using a Laerdal Resusci Annie recording manikin and Laerdal PC Skill Reporting software

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    The Proportion of Subjects Who Assessed the Responsiveness of the Victim (Manikin) as Judged by Expert Raters
    The proportion of the subjects who assessed the responsiveness of the victim (manikin) as judged by expert raters

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 27, 2010
    Last Updated
    March 2, 2011
    Sponsor
    Valleywise Health
    Collaborators
    American Heart Association, University of Arizona
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT01191736
    Brief Title
    Ultra-Brief Versus Brief Hands Only CPR Video Training With and Without Psychomotor Skill Practice
    Official Title
    Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ultra-Brief and Brief Hands-Only CPR Video Training With and Without Psychomotor Skill Practice for Lay Responders: a Controlled Randomized Study
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    March 2011
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    September 2009 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    November 2009 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    November 2009 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Name of the Sponsor
    Valleywise Health
    Collaborators
    American Heart Association, University of Arizona

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Bystander CPR improves survival from Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest. This study examines the efficacy of ultra-brief video training for Hands-Only CPR. Subjects were randomized to one of four training conditions, then assessed for CPR skills retention.
    Detailed Description
    Bystander CPR improves survival from Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest. This study is the first of its kind to examine the efficacy of ultra-brief video training for Hands-Only CPR without the use of a manikin. The results will inform future efforts to mass train citizens in CPR. Subjects were randomized to one of four training conditions, then assessed for CPR skills retention. The four groups were 1) no training; 2) ultra-brief training video (90 seconds); 3) short training video (5 minutes) with no practice; and 4) short training video with hands-on practice. The subjects were then evaluated for CPR skills retention. One half of the subjects were evaluated on the training day, and the other half were evaluated two months later.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Cardiac Arrest
    Keywords
    hands only, CPR, resuscitation, cardiac arrest, Education of general public regarding resuscitation methods

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Prevention
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Outcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    336 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    No training, assessed within 60 mins
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Subjects receive no training
    Arm Title
    Ultra-brief video; assessed in 60 mins
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Subjects receive an ultra-brief (90-second) video on hands-only CPR
    Arm Title
    Brief video; assessed in 60 mins
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Subjects receive a brief (5-minute) video on hands-only CPR
    Arm Title
    Brief video + hands-on; ass'd in 60 mins
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Subjects receive a brief (5-minute) video with hands-on manikin practice
    Arm Title
    Ultra-brief video; assessed at 2 months
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Title
    Brief video; assessed 2 months later
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Title
    Brief video + hands-on; ass'd 2 ms later
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    No training, assessed within 60 mins
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    C-Group
    Intervention Description
    Subjects receive no training in resuscitation
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Ultra-brief video; assessed in 60 mins
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    UBV-Group
    Intervention Description
    Subjects receive an ultra-brief (90-second) video on hands-only CPR
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Brief video; assessed in 60 mins
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    BV-Group
    Intervention Description
    Subjects receive a brief (5-minute) video on hands-only CPR
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Brief video + hands-on; ass'd in 60 mins
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    BVP-Group
    Intervention Description
    Subjects receive a brief (5-minute) video with hands-on manikin practice
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Ultra-brief video; assessed at 2 months
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    UBV-Group
    Intervention Description
    Subjects see ultra-brief video (90-seconds), are assessed two months later
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Brief video; assessed 2 months later
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    BV-Group
    Intervention Description
    Subjects see brief video (5 minutes), are then assessed two months later
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Brief video + hands-on; ass'd 2 ms later
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    BVP-Group
    Intervention Description
    Subjects see brief (5-minute) video, receive hands-on training, and are assessed two months later
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Median Compression Depth (mm)
    Description
    Assessment of resuscitation skills using a Laerdal Resusci Annie recording manikin and Laerdal PC Skill Reporting software
    Time Frame
    60 minutes after intervention or two months after intervention
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    The Proportion of Subjects Who Assessed the Responsiveness of the Victim (Manikin) as Judged by Expert Raters
    Description
    The proportion of the subjects who assessed the responsiveness of the victim (manikin) as judged by expert raters
    Time Frame
    60 minutes after intervention and two months after intervention

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Members of a local area church Exclusion Criteria: Less than 18 years old formal CPR training or certification within last 2 years Lacks fluency in English Works as a health care provider
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Bentley J Bobrow, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Valleywise Health
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    21386066
    Citation
    Bobrow BJ, Vadeboncoeur TF, Spaite DW, Potts J, Denninghoff K, Chikani V, Brazil PR, Ramsey B, Abella BS. The effectiveness of ultrabrief and brief educational videos for training lay responders in hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: implications for the future of citizen cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 Mar;4(2):220-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.959353. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    Ultra-Brief Versus Brief Hands Only CPR Video Training With and Without Psychomotor Skill Practice

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs