search
Back to results

Ultrasound-Assisted Lumbar Puncture

Primary Purpose

Spinal Puncture, Diagnostic Imaging

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Point-of-care ultrasound
Traditional Landmark-based Lumbar Puncture
Sponsored by
Mayo Clinic
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Spinal Puncture focused on measuring Point of Care Ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who registered for an emergency or inpatient encounter between 5/22/2017 and 5/08/2018
  2. Males or females 18 years of age or older
  3. Patients who have been identified as requiring a lumbar puncture for any therapeutic or diagnostic or therapeutic indication, as decided by the neurology staff physicians, residents, or advanced practice providers.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are not capable of providing consent for participation in research and do not have an authorized relative or power of attorney to consent in their stead.
  2. Patients who require lumbar puncture in an emergency, time dependent fashion and in whom a possible delay could conceivable have a negative clinical impact.
  3. Patients with known abnormal lumbar spinal anatomy or prior extensive surgical fusion such that fluoroscopic or CT guidance is determined to be more clinically appropriate by the treating physicians.
  4. BMI greater than 60
  5. Absolute contraindication to lumbar puncture such as uncorrected coagulopathy

Sites / Locations

  • Mayo Clinic in Florida

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Other

Experimental

Arm Label

Control

Experimental (ultrasound)

Arm Description

Traditional landmark-based lumbar puncture technique by palpation

Use of point-of-care ultrasound to identify bony landmarks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean Procedural Duration
This is defined by number of minutes from initiating of patient positioning (prior to evaluation of the anatomical landmarks) to first flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Procedures Considered to be Failures
As defined by inability to obtain cerebrospinal fluid despite multiple attempts, terminated at the discretion of the procedurist as would otherwise be clinically determined.
Number of Fluoroscopically Guided or CT Guided Lumbar Punctures
In the event of ultrasound procedural failure by clinician
Total number of unique skin punctures
This will be defined by the needle bevel completely exiting and skin and being re-inserted, during the duration of the procedure, whether the procedure is ultimately successful or not.
Procedurist reported ease of the procedure
Procedurist reported ease of the procedure will be reported by a 10 cm visual analog scale, with 0=easy and 10=very difficult.
Patient reported discomfort
Patient reported discomfort will be reported by a 10 cm visual analog scale, with 0=no discomfort and 10=extreme discomfort.
Number of red blood cells in collected CSF
This will be abstracted manually from the patient's electronic medical record.
Hospital Length of Stay
This will be abstracted manually from the patient's electronic medical record.

Full Information

First Posted
May 24, 2017
Last Updated
January 6, 2020
Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03167190
Brief Title
Ultrasound-Assisted Lumbar Puncture
Official Title
Ultrasound-localized Landmark Identification in Hospitalized Patients Requiring Lumbar Puncture: Implications for Safety, Quality, and Procedural Success
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Failed to meet target enrollment
Study Start Date
May 25, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Mayo Clinic

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Although the lumbar puncture is a common procedure and has been performed without ultrasound for decades, other research studies suggest that there may be some benefits to using ultrasound. This study intends to see whether by using ultrasound there is increased success rate, decreased need for additional procedures, and less discomfort during the procedure.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spinal Puncture, Diagnostic Imaging
Keywords
Point of Care Ultrasound

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Participants will be enrolled into the control group (Landmark-based palpation and skin marking) vs the experimental group (ultrasound assisted identification of bony landmarks and skin marking).
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
32 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Traditional landmark-based lumbar puncture technique by palpation
Arm Title
Experimental (ultrasound)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Use of point-of-care ultrasound to identify bony landmarks.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Point-of-care ultrasound
Intervention Description
A point-of-care ultrasound machine will be utilized to identify and mark midline and the interspinous space based on visualization of spinous processes.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Traditional Landmark-based Lumbar Puncture
Intervention Description
Palpation of anatomical landmarks to identify midline and interspinous space
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Procedural Duration
Description
This is defined by number of minutes from initiating of patient positioning (prior to evaluation of the anatomical landmarks) to first flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).
Time Frame
Approximately 1 hour
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Procedures Considered to be Failures
Description
As defined by inability to obtain cerebrospinal fluid despite multiple attempts, terminated at the discretion of the procedurist as would otherwise be clinically determined.
Time Frame
Approximately 1 hour
Title
Number of Fluoroscopically Guided or CT Guided Lumbar Punctures
Description
In the event of ultrasound procedural failure by clinician
Time Frame
Approximately 7 days
Title
Total number of unique skin punctures
Description
This will be defined by the needle bevel completely exiting and skin and being re-inserted, during the duration of the procedure, whether the procedure is ultimately successful or not.
Time Frame
Approximately 1 day
Title
Procedurist reported ease of the procedure
Description
Procedurist reported ease of the procedure will be reported by a 10 cm visual analog scale, with 0=easy and 10=very difficult.
Time Frame
Approximately 1 day
Title
Patient reported discomfort
Description
Patient reported discomfort will be reported by a 10 cm visual analog scale, with 0=no discomfort and 10=extreme discomfort.
Time Frame
Approximately 1 day
Title
Number of red blood cells in collected CSF
Description
This will be abstracted manually from the patient's electronic medical record.
Time Frame
Approximately 1 day
Title
Hospital Length of Stay
Description
This will be abstracted manually from the patient's electronic medical record.
Time Frame
Approximately 1 month

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients who registered for an emergency or inpatient encounter between 5/22/2017 and 5/08/2018 Males or females 18 years of age or older Patients who have been identified as requiring a lumbar puncture for any therapeutic or diagnostic or therapeutic indication, as decided by the neurology staff physicians, residents, or advanced practice providers. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who are not capable of providing consent for participation in research and do not have an authorized relative or power of attorney to consent in their stead. Patients who require lumbar puncture in an emergency, time dependent fashion and in whom a possible delay could conceivable have a negative clinical impact. Patients with known abnormal lumbar spinal anatomy or prior extensive surgical fusion such that fluoroscopic or CT guidance is determined to be more clinically appropriate by the treating physicians. BMI greater than 60 Absolute contraindication to lumbar puncture such as uncorrected coagulopathy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael P Boniface, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Mayo Clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic in Florida
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32224
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25754807
Citation
Edwards C, Leira EC, Gonzalez-Alegre P. Residency training: a failed lumbar puncture is more about obesity than lack of ability. Neurology. 2015 Mar 10;84(10):e69-72. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001335.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25590665
Citation
Engedal TS, Ording H, Vilholm OJ. Changing the needle for lumbar punctures: results from a prospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Mar;130:74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.12.020. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17349903
Citation
Ferre RM, Sweeney TW. Emergency physicians can easily obtain ultrasound images of anatomical landmarks relevant to lumbar puncture. Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Mar;25(3):291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.08.013.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11172514
Citation
Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging facilitates localization of the epidural space during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):64-7. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2001.19633. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18926360
Citation
Huang MY, Lin AP, Chang WH. Ultrasound-assisted localization for lumbar puncture in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;26(8):955-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.03.007. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27547275
Citation
Lahham S, Schmalbach P, Wilson SP, Ludeman L, Subeh M, Chao J, Albadawi N, Mohammadi N, Fox JC. Prospective evaluation of point-of-care ultrasound for pre-procedure identification of landmarks versus traditional palpation for lumbar puncture. World J Emerg Med. 2016;7(3):173-7. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2016.03.002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17901137
Citation
Nomura JT, Leech SJ, Shenbagamurthi S, Sierzenski PR, O'Connor RE, Bollinger M, Humphrey M, Gukhool JA. A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted lumbar puncture. J Ultrasound Med. 2007 Oct;26(10):1341-8. doi: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.10.1341.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24673668
Citation
Peterson MA, Pisupati D, Heyming TW, Abele JA, Lewis RJ. Ultrasound for routine lumbar puncture. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;21(2):130-6. doi: 10.1111/acem.12305.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27895189
Citation
Williams S, Khalil M, Weerasinghe A, Sharma A, Davey R. How to do it: bedside ultrasound to assist lumbar puncture. Pract Neurol. 2017 Jan;17(1):47-50. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2016-001463. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
https://www.mayo.edu/research/clinical-trials
Description
Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials

Learn more about this trial

Ultrasound-Assisted Lumbar Puncture

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs