search
Back to results

Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block vs Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block

Primary Purpose

Analgesia, Lumbar Spine Disease

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Propofol
Fentanyl
Rocuronium
Sevoflurane
Erector spinae plane block
Thoracolumbar interfascial plane block
Sponsored by
Tanta University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Analgesia

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification as ASA I-II.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • coagulation abnormality
  • anticoagulant treatment,
  • allergies to local anesthetics,
  • skin infections at the site of block area,
  • pregnancy or lactation,
  • refusal to participate in the study.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm Type

    Placebo Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    control group

    Erector spinae plane block

    Thoracolumbar interfascial plane block

    Arm Description

    Patients will not recieve either erector spinae plane block nor thoracolumbar interfascial plane block

    Patients will recieve ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block.

    Patients will recieve ultrasound guided thoracolumbar interfascial plane block.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Analgesic effect
    Postoperative analgesic effect measured by visual analogue scale of pain . Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10 where ( 0 means no pain while10 indicates the most severe pain).
    Analgesic effect
    Postoperative analgesic effect measured by visual analogue scale of pain. Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10 where ( 0 means no pain while10 indicates the most severe pain).
    Analgesic effect
    Postoperative analgesic effect measured by visual analogue scale of pain. Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10 where ( 0 means no pain while10 indicates the most severe pain).
    Analgesic effect
    Postoperative analgesic effect measured by visual analogue scale of pain. Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10 where ( 0 means no pain while10 indicates the most severe pain).
    Analgesic effect
    Postoperative analgesic effect measured by visual analogue scale of pain. Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10 where ( 0 means no pain while10 indicates the most severe pain).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    September 29, 2022
    Last Updated
    October 26, 2022
    Sponsor
    Tanta University
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05596227
    Brief Title
    Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block vs Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block
    Official Title
    Comparison Between Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block vs Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block in Lumbar Spine Surgeries;Randomized Controlled Trial
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    October 2022
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    October 20, 2022 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    March 20, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    March 20, 2023 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Tanta University

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Aim of this Study will be to compare Ultrasound guided erector spinae block vs thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block in lumbar spine surgeries.
    Detailed Description
    A total of 120 patients who will be scheduled for single-level lumbar discectomy and laminectomy surgery under general anesthesia will be included in this trial between October 2022 to March 2023. Inclusion criteria: The participants will be aged between 20 and 65 years, and will be classified per the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification as ASA I-II. The exclusion criteria Will be a history of coagulation abnormality, anticoagulant treatment, allergies to local anesthetics, skin infections at the site of block area, pregnancy or lactation, and refusal to participate in the study. A computer program will be used to randomize the participants into 3 groups. Each group (mTLIP block, ESPB, and control) will compose of 40 patients. All patients will be monitored with the standard ASA criteria, electrocardiography, noninvasive blood pressure, and pulse oximetry. Midazolam (2 mg) will be administered intravenously (IV) for sedation. Anesthesia induction will be performed with IV propofol (2-2.5 mg/kg), fentanyl (1-1.5 mg/kg), and rocuronium bromide (0.9 mg/ kg). The patients will be placed in the prone position following intubation. Sevoflurane will be used in a mixture of oxygen and fresh air for anesthesia maintenance. Fentanil will be administered for intraoperative analgesia according to the baseline heart rate and mean arterial pressure of the patients. The intraoperative data (heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, noninvasive arterial pressure, and end-tidal carbon dioxide level) will be recorded at 5-minute intervals during the operation. All patients will do lumbar spine surgery by the same surgical team using the same technique. Block Technique After the induction of anesthesia, either the US-guided mTLIP block or ESPB will be performed in the prone position.A 22G sonovisible block needle with a length of 100 mm will be used to create a puncture. The control group will not receive any intervention. ESPB Technique. In the ESPB group, the probe will be placed in the parasagittal plane at the level of the L3 vertebrae. The spinous process will be visualized, and the probe will move 3 cm laterally from the midline. The erector spinae muscle will be visualized above the transverse process. The needle will be punctured in the craniocaudal direction using the in-plane technique. The needle will be directed superior to the transverse process. Then, 2 mL normal saline solution was injected into the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle to confirm the proper injection site. After ensuring the location of the needle, 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine was administered. The same ESPB procedure will be performed on the other side. In total, 40 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine was administered. mTLIP Technique In the mTLIP group, the probe will be placed vertically at the L3 vertebrae level. The spinous process and the interspinous muscles (i.e., multifidus, longissimus, and iliocostalis) will be visualized as the anatomic guide points. The probe will move laterally to identify the longissimus and iliocostalis muscles. The needle will be inserted between the longissimus and iliocostalis in the medial-to-lateral direction using the in-plane technique. After confirming the location of the needle, 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine was administered. The same mTLIP procedure will be performed on the opposite side. In total, 40 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine will be administered. A dose of 1 g paracetamol and 100 mg of tramadol will be administered IV at the end of the surgery to all patients in the mTLIP, ESPB, and control groups. The patients will be extubated after exhibiting sufficient spontaneous respiration and will be transferred to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). After they attained a modified Aldrete score of 12, the patients will be discharged from the PACU. Standard Postoperative Analgesia Protocol and Measurement of Pain. The postoperative analgesic treatment will be managed using the classic protocol of our department. At the PACU, a fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device will be attached to the patients. The PCA device will be prepared with the following protocol: no infusion dose, a 2-mL (10 µ/ml) bolus, a 20-minute lockout time, and a 4-hour limit of 200 mg. IV 1 g paracetamol was ordered every 6 hours postoperatively. A pain nurse anesthetist, who will be blinded to the trial, will evaluate and record the opioid consumption and the pain scores using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain). Passive (at rest) and active (while mobilized) VAS scores were recorded at 2, 4, 6, 8 and16 hours during the postoperative period. If VAS was higher than or equal to 4, IV meperidine (0.5 mg/kg) will be administered as rescue analgesia within the postoperative 24-hour period. The opioid-related adverse effects (itching, nausea, vomiting, etc.) and the block procedure times will be also recorded. The block procedure time is defined as the time interval from the start of the visualization of the sonoanatomy to the injection of the local anesthetic solution.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Analgesia, Lumbar Spine Disease

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Other
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    120 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    control group
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    Patients will not recieve either erector spinae plane block nor thoracolumbar interfascial plane block
    Arm Title
    Erector spinae plane block
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Patients will recieve ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block.
    Arm Title
    Thoracolumbar interfascial plane block
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Patients will recieve ultrasound guided thoracolumbar interfascial plane block.
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Propofol
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Intravenous anesthesia
    Intervention Description
    Induction of anesthesia will be by IV propofol (2-2.5 mg/kg)
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Fentanyl
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Intravenous narcotic
    Intervention Description
    Fentanyl will be injected during the induction of anesthesia (1-1.5 mg/kg)
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Rocuronium
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Muscle relaxant
    Intervention Description
    Rocuronium will be injected during induction of anesthesia (0.6 mg/ kg)
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Sevoflurane
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Inhalational anesthetic
    Intervention Description
    Sevoflurane inhalationa anesthesia will be used for maintainance of anesthesia
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Erector spinae plane block
    Intervention Description
    In the ESPB group, the probe will be placed in the parasagittal plane at the level of the L3 vertebrae. The spinous process will be visualized, and the probe will move 3 cm laterally from the midline. The erector spinae muscle will be visualized above the transverse process. The needle will be punctured in the craniocaudal direction using the in-plane technique. The needle will be directed superior to the transverse process . Then, 2 mL normal saline solution was injected into the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle to confirm the proper injection site. After ensuring the location of the needle, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered. The same ESPB procedure will be performed on the other side. In total, 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Thoracolumbar interfascial plane block
    Intervention Description
    In the mTLIP group, the probe will be placed vertically at the L3 vertebrae level. The spinous process and the interspinous muscles (i.e., multifidus, longissimus, and iliocostalis) will be visualized as the anatomic guide points. The probe will move laterally to identify the longissimus and iliocostalis muscles. The needle will be inserted between the longissimus and iliocostalis in the medial-to-lateral direction using the in-plane technique. After confirming the location of the needle, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered. The same mTLIP procedure will be performed on the opposite side. In total, 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Analgesic effect
    Description
    Postoperative analgesic effect measured by visual analogue scale of pain . Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10 where ( 0 means no pain while10 indicates the most severe pain).
    Time Frame
    2 hours postoperatively
    Title
    Analgesic effect
    Description
    Postoperative analgesic effect measured by visual analogue scale of pain. Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10 where ( 0 means no pain while10 indicates the most severe pain).
    Time Frame
    4 hours postoperatively
    Title
    Analgesic effect
    Description
    Postoperative analgesic effect measured by visual analogue scale of pain. Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10 where ( 0 means no pain while10 indicates the most severe pain).
    Time Frame
    6 hours postoperatively
    Title
    Analgesic effect
    Description
    Postoperative analgesic effect measured by visual analogue scale of pain. Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10 where ( 0 means no pain while10 indicates the most severe pain).
    Time Frame
    8 hours postoperatively
    Title
    Analgesic effect
    Description
    Postoperative analgesic effect measured by visual analogue scale of pain. Visual Analog Scale from 0 to 10 where ( 0 means no pain while10 indicates the most severe pain).
    Time Frame
    16 hours postoperatively

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    20 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    65 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification as ASA I-II. Exclusion Criteria: coagulation abnormality anticoagulant treatment, allergies to local anesthetics, skin infections at the site of block area, pregnancy or lactation, refusal to participate in the study.

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block vs Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs