search
Back to results

Use of Ointments in Prevention of Catheter Related Infections in PD

Primary Purpose

End Stage Renal Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mupirocin ointment
Polysporin Triple
Sponsored by
University Health Network, Toronto
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for End Stage Renal Disease focused on measuring peritonitis, catheter related infection, exit site ointments, mupirocin, Polysporin Triple

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Able and willing to provide informed consent*
  2. Age over 18 years
  3. Has a peritoneal dialysis catheter in situ and

    • Is established on PD for more than 3 months (prevalent patients)
    • Is undergoing training for or has initiated PD within the last 3 months (incident patients)
  4. Medically stable (as defined by primary nephrologist)
  5. Regularly applying mupirocin ointment to catheter exit site

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of acute renal failure
  2. Catheter related infection at the time of recruitment or within the previous 3 months
  3. Use of an oral or IV antibiotic at the time of randomization or within the previous 1 week.
  4. Known allergy to any component of gentamicin or mupirocin

Sites / Locations

  • Scarborough General Hospital
  • University Health Network

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

Polysporin tRIPLE ointment (topical ointment in widespread use for other skin lesions)

Mupirocin

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The primary endpoint is the time to first catheter related infection.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Removal of the catheter to prevent or halt progression of a catheter related infection
Hospitalizations related to catheter related infection
Death due to catheter-related infection
All-cause mortality
Technique failure (i.e. transfer to hemodialysis)
Mupirocin or Polysporin Triple resistance

Full Information

First Posted
November 15, 2006
Last Updated
March 16, 2015
Sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00400595
Brief Title
Use of Ointments in Prevention of Catheter Related Infections in PD
Official Title
A Randomized Controlled Double Blind Study Using Mupirocin Versus Polysporin Triple for the Prevention of Catheter-related Infections in Patients Treated With Peritoneal Dialysis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is used for the treatment of end-stage renal disease in approximately 25% of patients requiring dialysis in Canada. The most common complication is bacterial infection or 'peritonitis'. Peritonitis causes severe acute abdominal pain and may lead to failure of peritoneal dialysis treatment, hospitalization or death, particularly if left untreated. Amongst the strategies used to prevent peritonitis, patients are instructed on the regular use of a prophylactic ointment around the point where the catheter exits from the body. At the present time most centers in Canada routinely prescribe mupirocin ointment for use at the exit site, however newer ointments have become available. One such ointment is Polysporin Triple. The aim of this study is to determine if catheter related infections can be significantly reduced by the routine application of Polysporin Triple in comparison to mupirocin ointment. A multi-centre, randomized, double blind, controlled study is proposed. Participants will be randomized to either mupirocin or Polysporin Triple and followed for 18 months or until the first catheter related infection, death or catheter removal. The difference in catheter related infection rates will be compared between the two groups. We anticipate the results of this study will allow clinicians to prescribe the ointment most likely to reduce infections. By doing so this will reduce the complication rate associated with peritoneal dialysis and, ultimately improve survival.
Detailed Description
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is used for the treatment of end-stage renal disease in approximately 25% of patients requiring dialysis in Canada. The most common PD related complication is infective peritonitis, a syndrome of acute pain, cloudy peritoneal dialysate, and infection. Although many cases of peritonitis can be treated as an outpatient, recurrent or unresolving infections can result in fibrotic changes in the peritoneal membrane, catheter removal or patient death. Gram positive organisms are amongst the commonest causes of PD peritonitis; however, recent trends show an increasing rate of gram negative and fungal infections. Strategies to prevent peritonitis include the use of prophylactic topical mupirocin at the site where the PD catheter exits from the abdominal wall. Despite this and other innovations peritonitis is still diagnosed, on average, in one patient out of every 24 patients followed for a month. The aim of this study is to determine if the incidence of catheter related infections (exit site infection, tunnel infection or peritonitis) is significantly reduced by the routine application of Polysporin Triple in comparison to mupirocin ointment.A multi-centre randomized double blind, controlled study is proposed. Polysporin Triple will be compared against the current standard of care. All patients currently being treated with, or starting onto, peritoneal dialysis will be eligible. Participants will be randomized to one of two treatment arms (mupirocin; Polysporin Triple) and stratified according to a) centre b) vintage (incident versus prevalent), and c) type of PD (chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis vs. automated PD). Patients will be followed for 18 months or until the first catheter related infection, death or catheter removal due to technique failure. Catheter related infections will be strictly defined using current guidelines and categorized into exit site infections, infective peritonitis or tunnel infections.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
End Stage Renal Disease
Keywords
peritonitis, catheter related infection, exit site ointments, mupirocin, Polysporin Triple

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Polysporin tRIPLE ointment (topical ointment in widespread use for other skin lesions)
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Mupirocin
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Mupirocin ointment
Intervention Description
topical ointment (already in widespread clinical use)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Polysporin Triple
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The primary endpoint is the time to first catheter related infection.
Time Frame
2Yrs
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Removal of the catheter to prevent or halt progression of a catheter related infection
Time Frame
2 yrs
Title
Hospitalizations related to catheter related infection
Time Frame
2 yrs
Title
Death due to catheter-related infection
Time Frame
2 yrs
Title
All-cause mortality
Time Frame
2yrs
Title
Technique failure (i.e. transfer to hemodialysis)
Time Frame
2yrs
Title
Mupirocin or Polysporin Triple resistance
Time Frame
2yrs

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Able and willing to provide informed consent* Age over 18 years Has a peritoneal dialysis catheter in situ and Is established on PD for more than 3 months (prevalent patients) Is undergoing training for or has initiated PD within the last 3 months (incident patients) Medically stable (as defined by primary nephrologist) Regularly applying mupirocin ointment to catheter exit site Exclusion Criteria: Presence of acute renal failure Catheter related infection at the time of recruitment or within the previous 3 months Use of an oral or IV antibiotic at the time of randomization or within the previous 1 week. Known allergy to any component of gentamicin or mupirocin
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Vanita Jassal, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University Health Network, Toronto
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Scarborough General Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M1P 2V5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
University Health Network
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2C4
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22134627
Citation
McQuillan RF, Chiu E, Nessim S, Lok CE, Roscoe JM, Tam P, Jassal SV. A randomized controlled trial comparing mupirocin and polysporin triple ointments in peritoneal dialysis patients: the MP3 Study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Feb;7(2):297-303. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07970811. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18178950
Citation
Jassal SV, Lok CE; MP3 Study Group. A randomized controlled trial comparing mupirocin versus Polysporin Triple for the prevention of catheter-related infections in peritoneal dialysis patients (the MP3 study). Perit Dial Int. 2008 Jan-Feb;28(1):67-72.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Use of Ointments in Prevention of Catheter Related Infections in PD

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs