search
Back to results

Use of Perioperative Pain Blocks In Urological Surgery

Primary Purpose

Pain, Postoperative, Nerve Block, Robotic Surgical Procedures

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Bupivacain
Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominus plane block
Laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominus plane block
Sponsored by
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Pain, Postoperative focused on measuring Phase III, Randomized, Single blind, Single Center, Three arm, Non-inferiority

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Undergoing Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy or Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior Partial Nephrectomy or Subtotal Prostatectomy Surgery (organ specific)
  • Conversion to open surgery
  • History of chronic pain
  • History of opiate or alcohol dependence
  • Allergies to local anesthetic
  • Retroperitoneal surgery
  • Single Port Surgery

Sites / Locations

  • Mount Sinai Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Placebo/Local Anesthesia

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominus plane (UTAP) block

Laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominus plane (LTAP) block

Arm Description

Direct injection of 0.25% bupivacaine into surgical wounds

30mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered to bilateral TAP using ultrasound guidance in prostatectomies. 40ml 0.25% bupivacaine unilateral will be administered in nephrectomy patients (weight based dosage permitting).

30mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered to bilateral TAP using laparoscopic guidance in prostatectomies. 40ml 0.25% bupivacaine unilateral will be administered in nephrectomy patients (weight based dosage permitting).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Visual analog scale (VAS) is a pain rating scale, with full scale from 0 to 10, higher score indicating more pain

Secondary Outcome Measures

Intraoperative Time and Block Time
Intraoperative time taken to complete surgical blocks and operative
Intraoperative Narcotic Use
Intraoperative Narcotic Use in morphine equivalents
Intraoperative Ketoralac Use
Intraoperative Ketoralac Use
Postoperative Narcotic Use
Postoperative Narcotic Use in morphine equivalents
Total Analgesic Medications
The 24-hour cumulative postoperative opioid analgesic requirement was calculated using standard tables to morphine equivalents.
The Amount of Ondansetron Use
Use of antiemetic medications during the postoperative course
Number of Days to Return of Bowel Function
Number of days to the return of bowel function
The Length of Hospital Stay
Length of hospital stay from time of surgical completion to time of discharge.
VAS in Obese Patients
24 hour postoperative pain scores recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) in obese patients. Visual analog scale (VAS) is a pain rating scale, with full scale from 0 to 10, higher score indicating more pain. Comparison in patients with BMI >30 and BMI<30
Number of Procedure Related Complications
Procedure related complications and adverse events including bleeding or injection of anesthetic intravascular was determined according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v 4.0).

Full Information

First Posted
June 8, 2020
Last Updated
April 7, 2022
Sponsor
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04426500
Brief Title
Use of Perioperative Pain Blocks In Urological Surgery
Official Title
Use of Perioperative Pain Blocks In Urological Surgery: A Phase III Randomized Single Blind Single Center Three Arm Non-inferiority Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 11, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 13, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 13, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study team aims to prospectively compare Placebo (local administration), ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (UTAP) blocks, and laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane (LTAP) blocks in patients undergoing robotic surgery of the prostate and kidney. The study team expects to be able to equally efficiently administer the blocks using direct visualization and ultrasound guidance. The study team expects that a negative result would obviate the need for longer operative time by eliminating the need for the separate ultrasound guided block while a positive result would demonstrate the increased utility of preoperative ultrasound blocks in managing postoperative pain.
Detailed Description
Currently, ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (UTAP) blocks (regional anesthetic blocks) are being employed for the care of urological surgery patients. Local and regional anesthesia is commonly used throughout surgical fields. However, ultrasound-guidance can be challenging, particularly in larger, obese patients. It is unknown how such techniques compare to laparoscopic-guided blockade, with respect to time to perform, learning curve, and postoperative analgesia. The transversus abdominis plane lies deep within the abdominal wall, potentially allowing for greater ease of access from a laparoscopic approach from within than the ultrasound guided percutaneous approach. Prior randomized studies have been completed comparing UTAP and Placebo. In 2012 Hosgood et al. compared UTAP and placebo (UTAP w/ saline) in 46 live-donor laparoscopic nephrectomy patients (24 UTAP vs. 22 placebo). Pain control (measured using the 0-10 VAS scale) was greater on post-operative day (POD) 1 in patients receiving UTAP than in controls, 19 (15) vs. 37 (20) (presented as mean (SD)), respectively. A similar randomized study in 2014 compared UTAP and placebo (UTAP w/saline) in 21 hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy patients (10 UTAP vs. 11 placebo). The study was initially powered for 50 patients but with decreased accrual secondary to a surgeon taking a leave of absence during the study period. Pain scores were recorded using the 0-10 VAS score. Postoperatively at 24 hours (median (IQR)) UTAP patients demonstrated decreased postoperative pain than placebo patients (1 (0-2) vs. 4 (2-6)) on the VAS score, respectively. A larger study, done in 2016, with 80 randomized patients undergoing retroperitoneal laparoscopic urologic surgery compared UTAP (40) and saline UTAP (40). Pain scores were assessed using the 0-100 VAS score scale. On POD1, UTAP group had lower pain scores (mean (SD)) of 8.4 (5.9) vs. placebo 28.3 (12.2). The most recent study, done in 2018, examined 100 randomized patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies. Fifty patients were given UTAP blocks while the others received no block. A Numerical Rating Scale (assumed to range from 0-10 as not otherwise specified) was used to assess pain. Patients receiving the block at 24 hours had better pain control (mean (SD)) (1.8 (0.82) vs. 3.57 (0.64)). While all of these studies point to potential efficacy of UTAP, no data has been published to date comparing laparoscopic administration of the TAP block (LTAP) to ultrasound guided administration. While these regional anesthetic blocks carry a theoretical risk of hematoma or damage to surrounding structures, none of the above studies report any complications with the injections. The study team aims to prospectively compare Placebo (local administration), UTAP, and LTAP blocks in patients undergoing robotic surgery of the prostate and kidney. The study team expects to be able to equally efficiently administer the blocks using direct visualization and ultrasound guidance. The study team expects that a negative result would obviate the need for longer operative time by eliminating the need for the separate ultrasound guided block while a positive result would demonstrate the increased utility of preoperative ultrasound blocks in managing postoperative pain.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pain, Postoperative, Nerve Block, Robotic Surgical Procedures
Keywords
Phase III, Randomized, Single blind, Single Center, Three arm, Non-inferiority

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This is a single-center, single-blinded, (stratified) randomized placebo-controlled three-arm non-inferiority trial with 2:2:1 allocation ratio. People who meet eligibility requirements and provide informed consent will be randomly allocated to 3 groups to receive either UTAP, LTAP or Placebo with a 2:2:1 allocation ratio. The allocation sequence will be stratified by type of surgery (prostatectomy or partial nephrectomy) using stratified block randomization with randomly varying block sizes. Random permuted blocks sizes within stratification groups will be used to minimize the chance of selection bias. Investigators will be blinded to the size of each block with only the study statistician responsible for generating the randomization list knowing this information.
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
A randomization service called Sealedenvelope.com available at https://www.sealedenvelope.com/simple-randomiser/v1/ will be used for allocation concealment to ensure that retrieval of the treatment group assignment is only revealed to appropriate team members on a real time basis after each new patient has been screened and consented. This service allows for allocation concealment that would not be possible if the entire randomization list was made available to team members at the beginning of the study. The security and integrity of the codes used by Sealedenvelope.com follows the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) standards for electronic records and follows the International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice (ICH GCP) guidelines. Participants will be blinded to group allocation throughout the study. Due to the nature of the intervention, it is not possible to blind the investigator to group allocation.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
148 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo/Local Anesthesia
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Direct injection of 0.25% bupivacaine into surgical wounds
Arm Title
Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominus plane (UTAP) block
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
30mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered to bilateral TAP using ultrasound guidance in prostatectomies. 40ml 0.25% bupivacaine unilateral will be administered in nephrectomy patients (weight based dosage permitting).
Arm Title
Laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominus plane (LTAP) block
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
30mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered to bilateral TAP using laparoscopic guidance in prostatectomies. 40ml 0.25% bupivacaine unilateral will be administered in nephrectomy patients (weight based dosage permitting).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Bupivacain
Other Intervention Name(s)
Local anesthesia
Intervention Description
Direct injection of 0.25% bupivacaine into surgical wounds
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominus plane block
Other Intervention Name(s)
UTAP
Intervention Description
bilateral TAP using ultrasound guidance in prostatectomies
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominus plane block
Other Intervention Name(s)
LTAP
Intervention Description
bilateral TAP using laparoscopic guidance in prostatectomies
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Description
Visual analog scale (VAS) is a pain rating scale, with full scale from 0 to 10, higher score indicating more pain
Time Frame
24 hours post operatively
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Intraoperative Time and Block Time
Description
Intraoperative time taken to complete surgical blocks and operative
Time Frame
up to 420 minutes
Title
Intraoperative Narcotic Use
Description
Intraoperative Narcotic Use in morphine equivalents
Time Frame
up to 420 minutes
Title
Intraoperative Ketoralac Use
Description
Intraoperative Ketoralac Use
Time Frame
up to 420 minutes
Title
Postoperative Narcotic Use
Description
Postoperative Narcotic Use in morphine equivalents
Time Frame
24 hours post operatively
Title
Total Analgesic Medications
Description
The 24-hour cumulative postoperative opioid analgesic requirement was calculated using standard tables to morphine equivalents.
Time Frame
24 hours post operatively
Title
The Amount of Ondansetron Use
Description
Use of antiemetic medications during the postoperative course
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Number of Days to Return of Bowel Function
Description
Number of days to the return of bowel function
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
The Length of Hospital Stay
Description
Length of hospital stay from time of surgical completion to time of discharge.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
VAS in Obese Patients
Description
24 hour postoperative pain scores recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) in obese patients. Visual analog scale (VAS) is a pain rating scale, with full scale from 0 to 10, higher score indicating more pain. Comparison in patients with BMI >30 and BMI<30
Time Frame
24 hours post operatively
Title
Number of Procedure Related Complications
Description
Procedure related complications and adverse events including bleeding or injection of anesthetic intravascular was determined according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v 4.0).
Time Frame
2 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 years or older Undergoing Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy or Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Prior Partial Nephrectomy or Subtotal Prostatectomy Surgery (organ specific) Conversion to open surgery History of chronic pain History of opiate or alcohol dependence Allergies to local anesthetic Retroperitoneal surgery Single Port Surgery
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Reza Mehrazin, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mount Sinai Hospital
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22902793
Citation
Hosgood SA, Thiyagarajan UM, Nicholson HF, Jeyapalan I, Nicholson ML. Randomized clinical trial of transversus abdominis plane block versus placebo control in live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 2012 Sep 15;94(5):520-5. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31825c1697.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24860252
Citation
Aniskevich S, Taner CB, Perry DK, Robards CB, Porter SB, Thomas CS, Logvinov II, Clendenen SR. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks for patients undergoing laparoscopic hand-assisted nephrectomy: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Local Reg Anesth. 2014 May 25;7:11-6. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S61589. eCollection 2014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27733219
Citation
Qu G, Cui XL, Liu HJ, Ji ZG, Huang YG. Ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Improves Postoperative Analgesia and Early Recovery in Patients Undergoing Retroperitoneoscopic Urologic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Trial. Chin Med Sci J. 2016 Sep 20;31(3):137-141. doi: 10.1016/s1001-9294(16)30041-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30056612
Citation
Dal Moro F, Aiello L, Pavarin P, Zattoni F. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block (US-TAPb) for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a novel '4-point' technique-results of a prospective, randomized study. J Robot Surg. 2019 Feb;13(1):147-151. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0858-6. Epub 2018 Jul 28. Erratum In: J Robot Surg. 2018 Aug 14;:
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Use of Perioperative Pain Blocks In Urological Surgery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs