search
Back to results

Use of Perioperative Photograph as a Motivation for Increasing Range of Motion After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Primary Purpose

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Received perioperative photograph
Didn't receive perioperative photograph
Sponsored by
Thammasat University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis, Knee

Eligibility Criteria

55 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary OA of the knee, aged less than 80 years old, and able to understand and comply with the study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Knee range of motion less than 90 degrees
  • Psychotic disorders
  • History of stroke
  • Inability to undergo a spinal block

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Received perioperative photograph

    Didn't receive perioperative photograph

    Arm Description

    Perioperative knee range of motion (ROM) were measured with long arm goniometer immediately after close the wound. Perioperative knee photographs in full flexion and extension positions were taken and gave to experimental group in the day after surgery.

    Perioperative knee range of motion (ROM) were measured with long arm goniometer immediately after close the wound. Perioperative knee photographs in full flexion and extension positions were taken but participants in this group didn't receive perioperative photographs.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Knee range of motion
    Compare flexion and extension angle using long arm goniometer between experimental and active comparator group

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Knee society scores

    Full Information

    First Posted
    March 4, 2017
    Last Updated
    March 9, 2017
    Sponsor
    Thammasat University
    Collaborators
    Boontanapibul, Krit, M.D.
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03075319
    Brief Title
    Use of Perioperative Photograph as a Motivation for Increasing Range of Motion After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Official Title
    Use of Perioperative Photograph as a Motivation for Increasing Range of Motion After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    March 2017
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    March 1, 2015 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    February 29, 2016 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    February 29, 2016 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Thammasat University
    Collaborators
    Boontanapibul, Krit, M.D.

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is recognized as a successful procedure for treating osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. One important factor that make the successful surgery is the degree of knee flexion. Providing more range of motion after TKA impact on the convenience of daily of life such as climbing stairs, sitting on the floor particularly in Asian cultures which require a lot of ground activities. Data are limited on the added benefits of perioperative photograph as motivation for increasing range of motion after TKA. Half of participants received perioperative photograph as motivation, while the other half did not after total knee arthroplasty.
    Detailed Description
    All participants received spinal anesthesia, multimodal local anesthetic infiltration and patient controlled analgesia (PCA) for 24 hours post surgery. The surgical techniques, postoperative medications and rehabilitation protocols were identical in both groups. Perioperative knee range of motion (ROM) were measured with long arm goniometer immediately after close the wound. Perioperative knee photographs in full flexion and extension positions were taken and were given to experimental group in the day after surgery. Postoperative knee ROM were recorded at day 3, 6 week, 3 month and 6 month. The outcome assessors were blinded to treatment groups during the study period.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Osteoarthritis, Knee

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Outcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    60 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Received perioperative photograph
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Perioperative knee range of motion (ROM) were measured with long arm goniometer immediately after close the wound. Perioperative knee photographs in full flexion and extension positions were taken and gave to experimental group in the day after surgery.
    Arm Title
    Didn't receive perioperative photograph
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Perioperative knee range of motion (ROM) were measured with long arm goniometer immediately after close the wound. Perioperative knee photographs in full flexion and extension positions were taken but participants in this group didn't receive perioperative photographs.
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Received perioperative photograph
    Intervention Description
    All participants in experimental group were adviced to see periopertive knee photograph before rehabilitation everyday. Postoperative knee ROM were recorded at day 3, 6 week, 3 month and 6 month. Flexion and extension angle were measured with long arm goniometer. The outcome assessors were blinded to treatment groups.
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Didn't receive perioperative photograph
    Intervention Description
    All participants in active comparator group didn't receive perioperative knee photograph. Postoperative knee ROM were recorded at day 3, 6 week, 3 month and 6 month. Flexion and extension angle were measured with long arm goniometer. The outcome assessors were blinded to treatment groups.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Knee range of motion
    Description
    Compare flexion and extension angle using long arm goniometer between experimental and active comparator group
    Time Frame
    Flexion and extension angle at 6 month
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Knee society scores
    Time Frame
    6 week, 3 month and 6 month

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    55 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    80 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Primary OA of the knee, aged less than 80 years old, and able to understand and comply with the study procedures. Exclusion Criteria: Knee range of motion less than 90 degrees Psychotic disorders History of stroke Inability to undergo a spinal block
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Piya Pinsornsak
    Organizational Affiliation
    Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat university
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    3612145
    Citation
    Ritter MA, Campbell ED. Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2(2):95-7. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(87)80015-3.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    12728419
    Citation
    Miner AL, Lingard EA, Wright EA, Sledge CB, Katz JN; Kinemax Outcomes Group. Knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: how important is this as an outcome measure? J Arthroplasty. 2003 Apr;18(3):286-94. doi: 10.1054/arth.2003.50046.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    17823014
    Citation
    Meneghini RM, Pierson JL, Bagsby D, Ziemba-Davis M, Berend ME, Ritter MA. Is there a functional benefit to obtaining high flexion after total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep;22(6 Suppl 2):43-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.011. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    12068407
    Citation
    Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Mizuno K, Yamamoto T. Maximizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: the need and the pitfalls. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jun;17(4 Suppl 1):59-62. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.32688.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    17823013
    Citation
    Fisher DA, Dierckman B, Watts MR, Davis K. Looks good but feels bad: factors that contribute to poor results after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep;22(6 Suppl 2):39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.011. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    8245090
    Citation
    Harvey IA, Barry K, Kirby SP, Johnson R, Elloy MA. Factors affecting the range of movement of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Nov;75(6):950-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B6.8245090.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    12851353
    Citation
    Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend ME. Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jul;85(7):1278-85. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200307000-00014.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    9802659
    Citation
    Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Stiehl JB, Walker SA, Dennis KN. Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty. 1998 Oct;13(7):748-52. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90025-0.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    8680997
    Citation
    Sharma L, Sinacore J, Daugherty C, Kuesis DT, Stulberg SD, Lewis M, Baumann G, Chang RW. Prognostic factors for functional outcome of total knee replacement: a prospective study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1996 Jul;51(4):M152-7. doi: 10.1093/gerona/51a.4.m152.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    20033676
    Citation
    Bonnin M, Laurent JR, Parratte S, Zadegan F, Badet R, Bissery A. Can patients really do sport after TKA? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Jul;18(7):853-62. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-1009-4. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    21496347
    Citation
    Naylor JM, Ko V, Adie S, Gaskin C, Walker R, Harris IA, Mittal R. Validity and reliability of using photography for measuring knee range of motion: a methodological study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Apr 18;12:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-77.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    3809242
    Citation
    Gogia PP, Braatz JH, Rose SJ, Norton BJ. Reliability and validity of goniometric measurements at the knee. Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):192-5. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.2.192.
    Results Reference
    result

    Learn more about this trial

    Use of Perioperative Photograph as a Motivation for Increasing Range of Motion After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs