search
Back to results

Usefulness of BiClamp Forceps for Liver Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Primary Purpose

Hepatobiliary Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Clamp-Crushing technique
BiClamp forceps
Sponsored by
The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hepatobiliary Disease focused on measuring BiClamp forceps hepatectomy, Clamp crushing technique, Liver parenchyma transection, Randomized controlled trial

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both male and female, aged 18 or older
  • Patients scheduled to undergo hepatic resection for some benign or malignant hepatobiliary disease
  • Child-Pugh class A or B liver function
  • BiClamp forceps hepatectomy and clamp-crushing feasible based on preoperative imaging
  • No tumor invasion the main vein, hepatic artery and vein and major inferior vena cava
  • No extrahepatic metastasis
  • Voluntary participation in the study, and informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years or> 65 years , pregnant or lactating women
  • Preoperative liver function evaluation: Child-Pugh C grade
  • Laparoscopic hepatectomy
  • Extrahepatic metastasis
  • Tumor invasion the main vein, hepatic artery and vein and major inferior vena cava
  • The patient refused to sign the informed consent form

Sites / Locations

  • the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Clamp-Crushing technique

BiClamp forceps hepatectomy

Arm Description

liver transection during hepatectomy by the routine clamp-crushing technical without BiClamp forceps assisted

The BiClamp forceps, a reusable bipolar sealing instrument for use in open surgery, was uniformly employed in all patients randomized to BiClamp forcep hepatectomy group in the present study.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The Total Blood Loss
Blood loss during operation. Blood loss was calculated from the beginning to the end of operation The amount of blood loss was measured from the suction volume after subtraction of rinse fluids and from the weight of soaked gauzes that were used during transection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Liver Transection Time
liver transection time was calculated from the beginning to the end of the liver resection
Mortality
Operative mortality was defined as any death resulting from a complication during surgery
Morbidity
Biliary Leakage
Biliary leakage was documented in line with the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) definitions and grading systems
Duration of Postoperative Hospital Stay
Time from day of operation to day of discharge
Number of Participants Requiring a Blood Transfusion
Administration of blood transfusions is documented for the intraoperative and postoperative period until 48 hours postoperatively
Total Bilirubin
serum total bilirubin on 3 postoperative day (umol/L)

Full Information

First Posted
July 15, 2014
Last Updated
May 6, 2017
Sponsor
The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Collaborators
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02197481
Brief Title
Usefulness of BiClamp Forceps for Liver Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Official Title
BiClamp Forceps Liver Transection Versus Clamp Crushing Technique in Liver Resections: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Collaborators
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare short-term and long-term efficacy of BiClamp forceps hepatectomy and clamp-crushing technique for parenchymal transection during elective hepatic resection.
Detailed Description
Background: Blood loss and the need for blood transfusions during the liver transection have shown to be correlated with higher morbidity and mortality rates and with worsen prognosis. Various devices of liver parenchymal transection have been developed with a view to reducing the intraoperative blood loss. However, to the present there is no randomized controlled trial evaluating the technique of BiClamp forceps during the liver transection. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of BiClamp forceps transection in comparison to the clamp crushing technique in patients offered liver resection. Intervention: One hundred patients with hepatobiliary disease need undergo hepatectomy at Anhui medical university were selected and divided into BiClamp forceps hepatectomy group and clamp-crushing hepatectomy group, each group contains 50 cases. Results: Clinical data include: blood loss during liver transection, total blood loss, blood transfusion, hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, biliary leakage, postoperative liver function, liver transection time, operation time, resection margins, need for portal trial clamping. Statistical method: groups t-test, univariate/multivariate analysis, logistic regression analysis, mixed linear regression and Cox survival analysis were used.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatobiliary Disease
Keywords
BiClamp forceps hepatectomy, Clamp crushing technique, Liver parenchyma transection, Randomized controlled trial

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
105 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Clamp-Crushing technique
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
liver transection during hepatectomy by the routine clamp-crushing technical without BiClamp forceps assisted
Arm Title
BiClamp forceps hepatectomy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The BiClamp forceps, a reusable bipolar sealing instrument for use in open surgery, was uniformly employed in all patients randomized to BiClamp forcep hepatectomy group in the present study.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Clamp-Crushing technique
Intervention Description
Liver transection during hepatectomy by monopole electronicknife and blood vessel forceps, but without BiClamp forceps
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
BiClamp forceps
Intervention Description
liver transection during hepatectomy by BiClamp forceps
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Total Blood Loss
Description
Blood loss during operation. Blood loss was calculated from the beginning to the end of operation The amount of blood loss was measured from the suction volume after subtraction of rinse fluids and from the weight of soaked gauzes that were used during transection
Time Frame
an expected average of 80 minutes
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Liver Transection Time
Description
liver transection time was calculated from the beginning to the end of the liver resection
Time Frame
an expected average of 40 minutes
Title
Mortality
Description
Operative mortality was defined as any death resulting from a complication during surgery
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Morbidity
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Biliary Leakage
Description
Biliary leakage was documented in line with the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) definitions and grading systems
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Duration of Postoperative Hospital Stay
Description
Time from day of operation to day of discharge
Time Frame
an expected average of 12 days
Title
Number of Participants Requiring a Blood Transfusion
Description
Administration of blood transfusions is documented for the intraoperative and postoperative period until 48 hours postoperatively
Time Frame
2 days
Title
Total Bilirubin
Description
serum total bilirubin on 3 postoperative day (umol/L)
Time Frame
3 postoperative day

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Both male and female, aged 18 or older Patients scheduled to undergo hepatic resection for some benign or malignant hepatobiliary disease Child-Pugh class A or B liver function BiClamp forceps hepatectomy and clamp-crushing feasible based on preoperative imaging No tumor invasion the main vein, hepatic artery and vein and major inferior vena cava No extrahepatic metastasis Voluntary participation in the study, and informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Age <18 years or> 65 years , pregnant or lactating women Preoperative liver function evaluation: Child-Pugh C grade Laparoscopic hepatectomy Extrahepatic metastasis Tumor invasion the main vein, hepatic artery and vein and major inferior vena cava The patient refused to sign the informed consent form
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Geng Xiaoping
Organizational Affiliation
The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
City
Hefei
State/Province
Anhui
ZIP/Postal Code
230022
Country
China

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12796583
Citation
Kooby DA, Stockman J, Ben-Porat L, Gonen M, Jarnagin WR, Dematteo RP, Tuorto S, Wuest D, Blumgart LH, Fong Y. Influence of transfusions on perioperative and long-term outcome in patients following hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):860-9; discussion 869-70. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072371.95588.DA.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19160307
Citation
Gurusamy KS, Pamecha V, Sharma D, Davidson BR. Techniques for liver parenchymal transection in liver resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD006880. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006880.pub2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22993104
Citation
Itoh S, Fukuzawa K, Shitomi Y, Okamoto M, Kinoshita T, Taketomi A, Shirabe K, Wakasugi K, Maehara Y. Impact of the VIO system in hepatic resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Today. 2012 Dec;42(12):1176-82. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0306-6. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25925431
Citation
Chen JM, Geng W, Liu FB, Zhao HC, Xie SX, Hou H, Zhao YJ, Wang GB, Geng XP. BiClamp(R) forcep liver transection versus clamp crushing technique for liver resection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Apr 30;16:201. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0722-1.
Results Reference
derived
Available IPD and Supporting Information:
Available IPD/Information Type
Study Protocol
Available IPD/Information URL
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25925431
Available IPD/Information Identifier
PMID:25925431

Learn more about this trial

Usefulness of BiClamp Forceps for Liver Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs