search
Back to results

VDOT for Monitoring Adherence to LTBI Treatment (VMALT)

Primary Purpose

Tuberculosis, Latent Tuberculosis Infection

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Video Directly Observed Therapy
In-Person DOT
Sponsored by
University of California, San Diego
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Tuberculosis focused on measuring Telemedicine, Mobile Phone, Adherence, Latent Tuberculosis Infection, Directly Observed Therapy, Video DOT

Eligibility Criteria

13 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of LTBI and patient's physician determines that they are eligible to receive 3HP
  2. Age ≥13 years;
  3. No plans to move out of the San Diego area within 4 months of enrollment; and
  4. Willing to comply with study procedures and provide informed consent (or assent for minors and parental consent) prior to study enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Are younger than 13 years old;
  2. Plan to move out of San Diego County within 4 months of enrollment;
  3. Refuse to allow study staff to review their medical records;
  4. Are incarcerated;
  5. Have a physical (e.g., blindness) or cognitive disabilities that make VDOT impractical unless someone else in their household can assist them for the duration of the study; or
  6. Are using other medications that preclude the use of 3HP (e.g., antiretroviral medication for HIV).

Sites / Locations

  • San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Video Directly Observed Therapy

In-Person DOT

Arm Description

VDOT arm participants use a smartphone to make a video recording of each weekly medication dose ingested using the VDOT mobile phone app. The VDOT app is programmed to send encrypted, time/date stamped videos to a HIPAA-compliant server as soon as the video recorder is stopped. Clinic staff monitor videos as they arrive using a password protected website and document each medication dose that is taken. Dose 1 is observed in-person; doses 2-12 are observed via videos.

In-Person DOT arm participants follow standard-of-care procedures for monitoring ingestion of all medication doses. Participants take their first medication dose at the enrollment visit and return to the clinic once weekly to be observed taking the remaining 11 doses of medication until they complete the 12-dose regimen.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion of participants completing LTBI treatment
The proportion of participants completing treatment (i.e., taking all 12 prescribed doses within 16 weeks). At the end of 16 weeks, the participant will have either completed the 12-dose treatment or considered defaulted.
Participant satisfaction with method of monitoring LTBI treatment
Compare level of participant satisfaction with treatment by each method of treatment monitoring. After the last dose of medication is taken (or at 16 weeks for those who do not complete treatment), follow-up interviews will collect treatment satisfaction outcome data.
cost-effectiveness of VDOT compared to in-person DOT for administering 3HP
Compare the cost of providing DOT by each method of treatment monitoring. Since this outcome requires program costs for delivery of the VDOT intervention, the time frame for collecting all cost data is 4 years.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Proportion of participants completing LTBI treatment in 12 weeks
Proportion of participants completing LTBI treatment on-schedule (i.e., participants took all 12 doses within 12 weeks, as prescribed). By the end of 12 weeks, participants who ingested 12 doses within 12 weeks will be counted as achieving this outcome; all others will be counted failing this outcome.
Proportion of participants who took all 12 LTBI treatment doses on-schedule
Proportion of participants completing LTBI treatment on-schedule (i.e., participants took all 12 doses on the same day each week for 12 consecutive, as prescribed). By the end of 12 weeks, participants who ingested 12 doses within 12 weeks on the same day each week will be counted as achieving this outcome; all others will be counted failing this outcome.

Full Information

First Posted
December 20, 2015
Last Updated
February 2, 2021
Sponsor
University of California, San Diego
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02641106
Brief Title
VDOT for Monitoring Adherence to LTBI Treatment
Acronym
VMALT
Official Title
Video Directly Observed Therapy (VDOT) to Monitor Short-Course LTBI Treatment
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 8, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, San Diego

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The three-month short-course treatment with isoniazid [H] and rifapentine [P] (3HP) recently recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention could dramatically increase the number of persons starting and completing treatment for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), but TB providers nationwide are hamstrung by the requirement that 3HP only be administered by directly observed therapy (DOT) in which patients are watched taking each medication dose in-person. We developed a novel mHealth application that allows patients to make and send videos of each medication dose ingested that are watched by healthcare providers via a HIPAA-compliant website to remotely monitor LTBI treatment adherence (Video DOT [VDOT]). This study will determine whether monitoring patients with VDOT achieves higher treatment completion rates and greater patient acceptability at lower cost than clinic-based in-person DOT.
Detailed Description
Building on our novel VDOT System that includes text messaging reminders and HIPAA-compliant cloud-based administration, we hypothesize that VDOT can be expanded to provide higher treatment completion rates at a lower cost than in-person DOT for LTBI treatment using 3HP. We propose a randomized controlled trial to address the following specific aims: Aim 1: To determine whether LTBI treatment completion and adherence are greater for patients treated with 3HP administered via VDOT versus in-person DOT, and to identify patient factors associated with these outcomes; Aim 2: To compare acceptability of treatment by patients on VDOT versus in-person DOT, and identify factors associated with differences in acceptability; Aim 3: To calculate the cost-effectiveness of VDOT compared to in-person DOT for administering 3HP. To address the study aims we will conduct a randomized controlled trial in which TB contacts and refugees in San Diego who are prescribed 3HP for LTBI treatment by their physician will be randomly assigned to be monitored for adherence via either VDOT or in-person DOT (Figure 2). Approximately 100 patients per year over three years (n=155/arm) will be recruited through the San Diego County TB Control and Refugee Health Program (TCRHP) clinics for the trial. Patients assigned to VDOT will be given a smartphone with service and taught to send videos of themselves taking each weekly medication dose; patients in the in-person DOT arm will visit the clinic each week to be observed by a healthcare worker taking their LTBI medication. Medication adherence will be monitored for all participants until they have taken all 12 doses or 16 weeks (limit recommended by the CDC to complete treatment), to compare treatment adherence rates and patient acceptance across trial arms. Participants will complete brief (20 minute) baseline and follow-up assessment interviews to obtain information about potential confounders and effect modifiers of adherence and patient acceptance regarding their treatment administration method. Cost-benefit analyses will also be conducted to assist in developing policies around the use of VDOT for 3HP. Since participants will be recruited after they have been prescribed 3HP by their healthcare provider and all patient care will be continued through their provider, no medications will be prescribed or treatment decisions made this study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tuberculosis, Latent Tuberculosis Infection
Keywords
Telemedicine, Mobile Phone, Adherence, Latent Tuberculosis Infection, Directly Observed Therapy, Video DOT

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
129 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Video Directly Observed Therapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
VDOT arm participants use a smartphone to make a video recording of each weekly medication dose ingested using the VDOT mobile phone app. The VDOT app is programmed to send encrypted, time/date stamped videos to a HIPAA-compliant server as soon as the video recorder is stopped. Clinic staff monitor videos as they arrive using a password protected website and document each medication dose that is taken. Dose 1 is observed in-person; doses 2-12 are observed via videos.
Arm Title
In-Person DOT
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
In-Person DOT arm participants follow standard-of-care procedures for monitoring ingestion of all medication doses. Participants take their first medication dose at the enrollment visit and return to the clinic once weekly to be observed taking the remaining 11 doses of medication until they complete the 12-dose regimen.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Video Directly Observed Therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
VDOT
Intervention Description
Video Directly Observed Therapy (VDOT) is a novel means of remotely observing patients ingesting medications using videos sent from a smartphone. VDOT was developed and found to be feasible and acceptable for monitoring daily treatment of active TB in San Diego, CA and Tijuana, B.C., Mexico (R21-AI088326; PI: R. Garfein). Patients are taught how to use the VDOT recording app, record medication ingestion, and contact their physician when side effects occur. Participants are trained at the time of their first LTBI treatment dose to ensure participants know how to record videos. All remaining 11 weekly doses are taken and recorded wherever the participant chooses. Clinic staff monitor videos as they arrive using a password protected website and document each medication dose that is taken.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
In-Person DOT
Other Intervention Name(s)
Control
Intervention Description
Clinic-based, in-person DOT is the standard of care for monitoring adherence for patients taking the 12-dose isoniazid/rifapentine treatment for LTBI. Participants visit the clinic once weekly until all 12 doses are taken or 16 weeks pass, whichever comes first.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of participants completing LTBI treatment
Description
The proportion of participants completing treatment (i.e., taking all 12 prescribed doses within 16 weeks). At the end of 16 weeks, the participant will have either completed the 12-dose treatment or considered defaulted.
Time Frame
16 weeks
Title
Participant satisfaction with method of monitoring LTBI treatment
Description
Compare level of participant satisfaction with treatment by each method of treatment monitoring. After the last dose of medication is taken (or at 16 weeks for those who do not complete treatment), follow-up interviews will collect treatment satisfaction outcome data.
Time Frame
16 weeks
Title
cost-effectiveness of VDOT compared to in-person DOT for administering 3HP
Description
Compare the cost of providing DOT by each method of treatment monitoring. Since this outcome requires program costs for delivery of the VDOT intervention, the time frame for collecting all cost data is 4 years.
Time Frame
5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of participants completing LTBI treatment in 12 weeks
Description
Proportion of participants completing LTBI treatment on-schedule (i.e., participants took all 12 doses within 12 weeks, as prescribed). By the end of 12 weeks, participants who ingested 12 doses within 12 weeks will be counted as achieving this outcome; all others will be counted failing this outcome.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Proportion of participants who took all 12 LTBI treatment doses on-schedule
Description
Proportion of participants completing LTBI treatment on-schedule (i.e., participants took all 12 doses on the same day each week for 12 consecutive, as prescribed). By the end of 12 weeks, participants who ingested 12 doses within 12 weeks on the same day each week will be counted as achieving this outcome; all others will be counted failing this outcome.
Time Frame
12 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
13 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of LTBI and patient's physician determines that they are eligible to receive 3HP Age ≥13 years; No plans to move out of the San Diego area within 4 months of enrollment; and Willing to comply with study procedures and provide informed consent (or assent for minors and parental consent) prior to study enrollment. Exclusion Criteria: Are younger than 13 years old; Plan to move out of San Diego County within 4 months of enrollment; Refuse to allow study staff to review their medical records; Are incarcerated; Have a physical (e.g., blindness) or cognitive disabilities that make VDOT impractical unless someone else in their household can assist them for the duration of the study; or Are using other medications that preclude the use of 3HP (e.g., antiretroviral medication for HIV).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Richard S Garfein, PhD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, San Diego
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92110
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

VDOT for Monitoring Adherence to LTBI Treatment

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs