search
Back to results

Videothoracoscopic (VATS) vs. Robotic Approach for Lobectomy or Anatomical Segmentectomy (ROMAN)

Primary Purpose

Lung Cancer

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
VATS
RATS
Sponsored by
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Lung Cancer focused on measuring Lung cancer, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age older than 18 years old
  • Known or suspected lung cancers
  • Patients in clinical stage T1-T2, N0-N1 candidate to surgery lobectomy or anatomical segmentectomy
  • ASA-1-2-3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical stage >II
  • Severe heart disease
  • Alcohol abuse
  • Renal impairment (creatinine >2.5)
  • Presence of serious comorbidities

Sites / Locations

  • Thoracic surgery Division, Istituto Clinico HumanitasRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

VATS GROUP

RATS GROUP

Arm Description

VATS lobectomy or segmentectomy

Robotic lobectomy or segmentectomy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Intraoperative complications: conversion rate, defined as procedures that start with minimally invasive access and are converted to open surgery due to different reasons (bleeding, anatomical reasons, oncological reasons, technical reasons, other)
Postoperative complications: surgical complications, higher or equal grade II assessed by Clavien-Dindo scale, within 90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Duration of surgery
Number of resected lymph nodes and upstaging
Proportion of patients who undergo complete resection during the procedure
Postoperative hospital stay
Postoperative pain: daily evaluation with visual numeric scale before and after surgery until discharge
Quality of life by EORTC QOL-C30
Duration of analgesic use after discharge and time to return to normal daily activity
Postoperative respiratory function: FEV 1, PEF and CV
Rate of local and distant recurrence and disease free survival
Patient's immune response: analysis of PCR, serum interleukins, lymphocytes subpopulations

Full Information

First Posted
June 15, 2016
Last Updated
December 18, 2018
Sponsor
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Collaborators
Fondazione Umberto Veronesi
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02804893
Brief Title
Videothoracoscopic (VATS) vs. Robotic Approach for Lobectomy or Anatomical Segmentectomy
Acronym
ROMAN
Official Title
Prospective, Randomized, Multicentric Study On Videothoracoscopic (Vats) Vs Robotic Approach For Lobectomy Or Anatomical Segmentectomy In Patients Affected By Early Lung Cancer (ROMAN)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
March 6, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 6, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 6, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Collaborators
Fondazione Umberto Veronesi

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study on 300 patients (150 VATS lobectomies and 150 robotic lobectomies) affected by early stage (I-II) lung cancer. The expected recruitment is one year and two year follow up. Surgeons should have a minimum of 30 major lung resections performed using one of the two techniques for participation in the study. Each participating centers should have the possibility to offer both techniques (Robotics and Vats). The primary end point is a combination of conversion and complication rate. The presence of at least one of the two events is considered a failure. Considering the rate of failure of 35% in the VATS arm, we want to see a failure rate not over 20% in the robot arm, so with a power of 80% and an alpha error of 5%, we need a total of 300 patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lung Cancer
Keywords
Lung cancer, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
300 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
VATS GROUP
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
VATS lobectomy or segmentectomy
Arm Title
RATS GROUP
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Robotic lobectomy or segmentectomy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
VATS
Other Intervention Name(s)
Minimally invasive video-assisted surgery
Intervention Description
Thorax thoracoscopic surgery (lobectomy)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
RATS
Other Intervention Name(s)
Minimally invasive robot-assisted surgery
Intervention Description
Thorax robotic surgery (lobectomy)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Intraoperative complications: conversion rate, defined as procedures that start with minimally invasive access and are converted to open surgery due to different reasons (bleeding, anatomical reasons, oncological reasons, technical reasons, other)
Time Frame
date of Surgery
Title
Postoperative complications: surgical complications, higher or equal grade II assessed by Clavien-Dindo scale, within 90 days
Time Frame
within 90 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of surgery
Time Frame
date of Surgery
Title
Number of resected lymph nodes and upstaging
Time Frame
date of Surgery
Title
Proportion of patients who undergo complete resection during the procedure
Time Frame
date of Surgery
Title
Postoperative hospital stay
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Postoperative pain: daily evaluation with visual numeric scale before and after surgery until discharge
Time Frame
2 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Title
Quality of life by EORTC QOL-C30
Time Frame
2 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
Title
Duration of analgesic use after discharge and time to return to normal daily activity
Time Frame
within 90 days
Title
Postoperative respiratory function: FEV 1, PEF and CV
Time Frame
6 month postoperatively
Title
Rate of local and distant recurrence and disease free survival
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Patient's immune response: analysis of PCR, serum interleukins, lymphocytes subpopulations
Time Frame
before surgery, 2 hours after surgery and at 3rd and 14th postoperative day

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age older than 18 years old Known or suspected lung cancers Patients in clinical stage T1-T2, N0-N1 candidate to surgery lobectomy or anatomical segmentectomy ASA-1-2-3 Exclusion Criteria: Clinical stage >II Severe heart disease Alcohol abuse Renal impairment (creatinine >2.5) Presence of serious comorbidities
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Thoracic surgery Division, Istituto Clinico Humanitas
City
Rozzano
State/Province
Milan
ZIP/Postal Code
20089
Country
Italy
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Giulia Veronesi, MD
Phone
+39 (0)2 82247396
Email
giulia.veronesi@cancercenter.humanitas.it
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elisa Dieci, PhD
Phone
+39(0)282244594
Email
elisa.dieci@cancercenter.humanitas.it
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Giulia Veronesi, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marco Alloisio, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alberto Testori, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
10421140
Citation
Demmy TL, Curtis JJ. Minimally invasive lobectomy directed toward frail and high-risk patients: a case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Jul;68(1):194-200. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00467-1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12632277
Citation
Hoksch B, Ablassmaier B, Walter M, Muller JM. [Complication rate after thoracoscopic and conventional lobectomy]. Zentralbl Chir. 2003 Feb;128(2):106-10. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37763. German.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
11016337
Citation
Nakata M, Saeki H, Yokoyama N, Kurita A, Takiyama W, Takashima S. Pulmonary function after lobectomy: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Sep;70(3):938-41. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01513-7.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12560900
Citation
Nomori H, Ohtsuka T, Horio H, Naruke T, Suemasu K. Difference in the impairment of vital capacity and 6-minute walking after a lobectomy performed by thoracoscopic surgery, an anterior limited thoracotomy, an anteroaxillary thoracotomy, and a posterolateral thoracotomy. Surg Today. 2003;33(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s005950300001.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
10921716
Citation
Yim AP, Wan S, Lee TW, Arifi AA. VATS lobectomy reduces cytokine responses compared with conventional surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Jul;70(1):243-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01258-3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12614812
Citation
Li WW, Lee RL, Lee TW, Ng CS, Sihoe AD, Wan IY, Arifi AA, Yim AP. The impact of thoracic surgical access on early shoulder function: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus posterolateral thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Mar;23(3):390-6. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00795-9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
9930466
Citation
McKenna RJ Jr, Wolf RK, Brenner M, Fischel RJ, Wurnig P. Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation? Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Dec;66(6):1903-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01166-7.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12895606
Citation
Leschber G, Holinka G, Linder A. Video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA)--a method for systematic mediastinal lymphnode dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Aug;24(2):192-5. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00253-7.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
9800798
Citation
Yim AP, Landreneau RJ, Izzat MB, Fung AL, Wan S. Is video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy a unified approach? Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Oct;66(4):1155-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00622-5.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24504007
Citation
Cao C, Tian DH, Wolak K, Oparka J, He J, Dunning J, Walker WS, Yan TD. Cross-sectional survey on lobectomy approach (X-SOLA). Chest. 2014 Aug;146(2):292-298. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-1075.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12238851
Citation
Daniels LJ, Balderson SS, Onaitis MW, D'Amico TA. Thoracoscopic lobectomy: a safe and effective strategy for patients with stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Sep;74(3):860-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03764-5.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12062276
Citation
Melfi FM, Menconi GF, Mariani AM, Angeletti CA. Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002 May;21(5):864-8. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00102-1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16399294
Citation
Park BJ, Flores RM, Rusch VW. Robotic assistance for video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: technique and initial results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Jan;131(1):54-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.07.031.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19632377
Citation
Gharagozloo F, Margolis M, Tempesta B, Strother E, Najam F. Robot-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Aug;88(2):380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.039.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20038475
Citation
Veronesi G, Galetta D, Maisonneuve P, Melfi F, Schmid RA, Borri A, Vannucci F, Spaggiari L. Four-arm robotic lobectomy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.025. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22440364
Citation
Louie BE, Farivar AS, Aye RW, Vallieres E. Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 May;93(5):1598-604; discussion 1604-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.067. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24583699
Citation
Nakamura H. Systematic review of published studies on safety and efficacy of thoracoscopic and robot-assisted lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;20(2):93-8. doi: 10.5761/atcs.ra.13-00314. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
34568057
Citation
Veronesi G, Abbas AE, Muriana P, Lembo R, Bottoni E, Perroni G, Testori A, Dieci E, Bakhos CT, Car S, Luzzi L, Alloisio M, Novellis P. Perioperative Outcome of Robotic Approach Versus Manual Videothoracoscopic Major Resection in Patients Affected by Early Lung Cancer: Results of a Randomized Multicentric Study (ROMAN Study). Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 9;11:726408. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.726408. eCollection 2021.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Videothoracoscopic (VATS) vs. Robotic Approach for Lobectomy or Anatomical Segmentectomy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs