search
Back to results

Vinblastine and Methotrexate in Children With Pulmonary Vein Stenosis

Primary Purpose

Intraluminal Pulmonary Vein Stenosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Vinblastine
Methotrexate
Sponsored by
Boston Children's Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Intraluminal Pulmonary Vein Stenosis focused on measuring vinblastine, methotrexate

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - 21 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis can be based on clinical and radiographic grounds or at the time of biopsy or prior surgical procedures. The diagnosis must be consistent with multivessel pulmonary stenosis. There must be evidence of severe pulmonary vein stenosis in at least two pulmonary veins. Evidence of myofibroblast neo-proliferation, if biopsies were obtained. Staging must include a complete cardiovascular evaluation including echocardiogram, and EKG. Accepted organ function includes: Creatinine < 1.5 x normal for age. SGPT, Bilirubin < 1.5 x normal for age. ANC ³ 1,500/mm3, Hemoglobin ³ 10g/dl, Platelets ³ 100,000/mm3 Placement of a permanent central venous line. CVL access is necessary in all patients as vinblastine is a vesicant and will cause a tissue burn if infiltrated into the skin. Because a CVL may interfere with proper cardiac assessment in this patient population, the study physician will be made aware prior to the placement of a line. Patients may be listed for a lung transplant while enrolled on this study. All patients must have given written informed consent according to institutional guidelines. Exclusion Criteria:

Sites / Locations

  • Children's Hospital Boston
  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Drug

Arm Description

no randomization, all patients receive experimental drugs

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The primary outcome variable for efficacy is patient status one year after the start of treatment, where status is classified as either failure or success. Failure is defined as death or evidence of progressive obstruction at any time over the course of
Clinical status is assessed at one year for efficacy. Additionally, the toxicity are assessed at this time for the safety endpoint.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary outcome variables for efficacy are survival, time from diagnosis of pulmonary vein stenosis until failure, and change in patient classification on a scale measuring the severity of the obstructive disease.
Survival is evaluated one year after starting treatment.

Full Information

First Posted
September 15, 2005
Last Updated
June 22, 2011
Sponsor
Boston Children's Hospital
Collaborators
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00215046
Brief Title
Vinblastine and Methotrexate in Children With Pulmonary Vein Stenosis
Official Title
Vinblastine and Methotrexate in Children With Multivessel Pulmonary Vein Stenosis-A Phase II Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2000 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2006 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2006 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Boston Children's Hospital
Collaborators
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To evaluate the efficacy of the chemotherapeutic agents vinblastine and methotrexate in the treatment of two groups of children with multivessel pulmonary vein stenosis. Group 1 will contain children with multivessel pulmonary vein stenosis who do not have structural heart disease, and Group 2 will consist of children with multivessel pulmonary vein stenosis and concomitant structural heart disease. The primary outcome variable for efficacy is patient status one year after the start of treatment, where status is classified as either failure or success. Failure is defined as death or evidence of progressive obstruction at any time over the course of treatment as defined in the protocol. Success constitutes complete or partial response to treatment or stability of disease. Secondary outcome variables for efficacy are survival, time from diagnosis of pulmonary vein stenosis until failure, and change in patient classification on a scale measuring the severity of the obstructive disease. 1.2 To assess the safety of vinblastine and methotrexate in the treatment of multivessel pulmonary vein stenosis. The primary outcome variable for safety is any occurrence of toxicity related to the administration of the chemotherapeutic agents over the treatment period.
Detailed Description
We sought to develop a regimen that might successfully suppress myofibroblastic proliferation in infants and children with progressive pulmonary vein stenosis. A number of factors need to be considered when proposing novel treatment options for patients with multivessel pulmonary vein stenosis. Specifically: Treatment should be directed against a specific target, in this case excessive proliferation of myofibroblasts. Treatment should have known activity against the target cell. Treatment should be well-tolerated in the patient group. In this case, agents with minimal hemodynamic side effects would be preferred. Treatment should not preclude patients from participation in other potentially effective therapies. Specifically, agents that do not cause significant myelosuppression would allow listing for transplantation. Treatment should not interfere with normal growth and development, and should have minimal if any risk for long-term toxicity or second tumors. After considering these factors, we chose to administer two chemotherapeutic agents, vinblastine and methotrexate. Vinblastine and methotrexate have over 30 years of usage and are well-tolerated. The agents used are given in low-dose and do not usually cause nausea or vomiting, nor do they cause significant immunosuppression which, if present, could lead to a risk of infection and fever. Desmoid tumors, also referred to as infantile fibromatosis, overlap with infantile myofibromatosis. A combination of standard agents that has been successfully used to treat desmoid tumors in infants is vinblastine and methotrexate (24). As opposed to cyclophosphamide-based regimens, this combination has the distinct advantages of few acute side effects and no known long-term toxicities, such as infertility or second malignancy. These agents have been used for over 30 years to treat infant and childhood malignancies. Over the last five years, methotrexate and vinblastine have been used to treat 9 children with recurrent desmoid tumor, a lesion similar although not identical to the abnormality present in patients with pulmonary vein stenosis. This regimen had minimal acute toxicity limited to mild to moderate nausea (which is easily controlled with anti-emetic therapy), minimal alopecia, mild hepatic inflammation, and mild myelosuppression. An addition advantage is that these drugs do not interfere with listing for lung transplantation, an important factor in the overall treatment options for this patient population. Instead of high-dose administration of chemotherapy (that catches only those cells in cycle at the time of administration), the low-dose chronic weekly administration continues to catch proliferating cells as they continually come into cycle. This may explain why the only other trial of chemotherapy (with high-dose cytoxan) was unsuccessful. Of the 9 children with desmoid lesions who received vinblastine and methotrexate therapy, four patients were treated for 18 months or longer. At the time of the last report, no patient had progressive disease during therapy. Two children had radiographically stable disease 1 and 2 years after treatment. Two children had stable disease for 1 and 2 years after treatment and then had disease progression. Thus, this drug combination is well-tolerated, has minimal side effects, and has demonstrated clinical activity against a closely related type of lesion.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Intraluminal Pulmonary Vein Stenosis
Keywords
vinblastine, methotrexate

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
28 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Drug
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
no randomization, all patients receive experimental drugs
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Vinblastine
Other Intervention Name(s)
antimicrotubule drug
Intervention Description
drug - dosage and frequency is based on size of patient and response to treatment.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Methotrexate
Other Intervention Name(s)
Trexall
Intervention Description
drug - dosage is based on size of patient and frequency and duration is based on response to treatment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The primary outcome variable for efficacy is patient status one year after the start of treatment, where status is classified as either failure or success. Failure is defined as death or evidence of progressive obstruction at any time over the course of
Description
Clinical status is assessed at one year for efficacy. Additionally, the toxicity are assessed at this time for the safety endpoint.
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Secondary outcome variables for efficacy are survival, time from diagnosis of pulmonary vein stenosis until failure, and change in patient classification on a scale measuring the severity of the obstructive disease.
Description
Survival is evaluated one year after starting treatment.
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis can be based on clinical and radiographic grounds or at the time of biopsy or prior surgical procedures. The diagnosis must be consistent with multivessel pulmonary stenosis. There must be evidence of severe pulmonary vein stenosis in at least two pulmonary veins. Evidence of myofibroblast neo-proliferation, if biopsies were obtained. Staging must include a complete cardiovascular evaluation including echocardiogram, and EKG. Accepted organ function includes: Creatinine < 1.5 x normal for age. SGPT, Bilirubin < 1.5 x normal for age. ANC ³ 1,500/mm3, Hemoglobin ³ 10g/dl, Platelets ³ 100,000/mm3 Placement of a permanent central venous line. CVL access is necessary in all patients as vinblastine is a vesicant and will cause a tissue burn if infiltrated into the skin. Because a CVL may interfere with proper cardiac assessment in this patient population, the study physician will be made aware prior to the placement of a line. Patients may be listed for a lung transplant while enrolled on this study. All patients must have given written informed consent according to institutional guidelines. Exclusion Criteria:
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mark W Kieran, MD,PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Children's Hospital Boston
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Vinblastine and Methotrexate in Children With Pulmonary Vein Stenosis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs