search
Back to results

Virtual Reality as a New Therapeutic Tool for Chronic Pain

Primary Purpose

Fibromyalgia

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Virtual reality heart
Virtual reality control
Standard therapy
Sponsored by
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Fibromyalgia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • A diagnosis of fibromyalgia according to current diagnostic criteria
  • Aged > 18 years old
  • Capable of judgement
  • Willing to participate in the study (by signing the informed consent form)
  • Able to follow the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of psychosis or major depression with suicidal risk
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, inability to wear head-mounted display
  • Arrythmia, such as atrial fibrillation

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Sham Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    VR heart

    VR control

    Standard control

    Arm Description

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Pain perception using numeric rating scale VR therapy vs. standard therapy
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to standard therapy (single-blinded, randomized clinical trial) after 6 weeks using a numeric rating scale (0-10; 0=no pain, 10= max. pain)
    Pain perception using patient global impression of change VR therapy vs. standard therapy
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to standard therapy (single-blinded, randomized clinical trial) after 6 weeks using the Patient global impression of change questionnaire (1-7; 1=very much improved, 7=very much worse).
    Pain perception (algometry) VR therapy vs. standard therapy
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to standard therapy (single-blinded, randomized clinical trial) after 6 weeks using an Algometer: The Pain pressure detection threshold to determine hypersensitivity to pain is measured with a standard electronic algometer (Somedic Type II) by bilateral testing on the middle fingers. The electronic algometer is calibrated following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer and set to deliver a steadily increasing pressure (50 kilopascal for 1 s). In this method, the investigators check for the threshold at which non-painful perception of pressure changes to painful perception in response to the gradually increased pressure applied. Low thresholds correspond to high pain sensitivity.
    Pain perception (algopeg) VR therapy vs. standard therapy
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to standard therapy (single-blinded, randomized clinical trial) after 6 weeks using Algopeg: The algometric measurement method to detect hyperalgesia will be carried out by means of a pressure pain provocation test. For this type of algometry, we will use a standardized peg with a clamping force of exactly 10 Newton at an extension of 5 mm (Type Algopeg).The pressure is applied on the middle finger and the ear lobes for 10 s each and is invariable. The pegs pressure exerted on an ear lobe is perceived as being consistently and clearly above the pain threshold. The patient indicates the pain intensity on a numerical rating scale (NRS) on which 0 stands for "no pain" and 10 stands for "the most intense pain imaginable". High NRS values correspond with high pain sensitivity/hyperalgesia.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Pain perception (numeric rating scale) VR therapy vs. VR control
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to a VR control condition using Numeric rating scale (0-10; 0=no pain, 10= max. pain).
    Pain perception (patient global impression of change) VR therapy vs. VR control
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to a VR control condition using the Patient global impression of change questionnaire (1-7; 1=very much improved, 7=very much worse)
    Pain perception (algometric) VR therapy vs. VR control
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to a VR control condition using algometry: The Pain pressure detection threshold to determine hypersensitivity to pain is measured with a standard electronic algometer (Somedic Type II) by bilateral testing on the middle fingers. The electronic algometer is calibrated following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer and set to deliver a steadily increasing pressure (50 kilopascal for 1 s). In this method, the investigators check for the threshold at which non-painful perception of pressure changes to painful perception in response to the gradually increased pressure applied. Low thresholds correspond to high pain sensitivity.
    Pain perception (algopeg) VR therapy vs. VR control
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to a VR control condition using algopeg: The algometric measurement method to detect hyperalgesia will be carried out by means of a pressure pain provocation test. For this type of algometry, we will use a standardized peg with a clamping force of exactly 10 Newton at an extension of 5 mm (Type Algopeg).The pressure is applied on the middle finger and the ear lobes for 10 s each and is invariable. The pegs pressure exerted on an ear lobe is perceived as being consistently and clearly above the pain threshold. The patient indicates the pain intensity on a numerical rating scale (NRS) on which 0 stands for "no pain" and 10 stands for "the most intense pain imaginable". High NRS values correspond with high pain sensitivity/hyperalgesia.
    Heart rate variability
    Inter-beat intervals are calculated as the time between two successive R spikes using the ECG signals as acquired during CV stimulation. Raw data are processed in Matlab® (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, USA) with the HRV Analysis Software (HRVAS: HRV Analysis Software). For each subject and each condition, we calculate the square root of the mean squared differences of successive beats intervals (RMSSD), which estimates the short term components of HRV and is commonly used over short recording periods. As HRV pain-related changes occurs mainly in high frequencies (i.e. power spectrum between 0.15 to 0.40 Hz), we then compute frequency-domain HRV analysis and calculated the power spectrum density using Welch's methods for Fast-Fourier Transform.
    Hamilton anxiety and and depression scale (HADS)
    Study the reduction of psychological distress measured through the Hamilton anxiety and depression scale (Score Anxiety 0-7 normal, 8-10 borderline, 11-21 abnormal; Score depression 0-7 normal, 8-10 borderline, 11-21 abnormal)
    Beck depression inventory (BDI II)
    Study the reduction of psychological distress measured through the Beck depression inventory. BDI-II contains 21 questions, each answer being scored on a scale value of 0 to 3. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. The standardized cutoffs used are: 0-13: minimal depression; 14-19: mild depression; 20-28: moderate depression; 29-63: severe depression.
    WHO 5 Well Being Index
    Study well-being through the WHO 5 Well Being Index. The WHO-5 consists of five statements, which respondents rate according to the scale below (in relation to the past two weeks). All of the time = 5, At no time = 0. The total raw score, ranging from 0 to 25, is multiplied by 4 to give the final score, with 0 representing the worst imaginable well-being and 100 representing the best imaginable well-being.
    Pain perception (numeric rating scale)
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to a VR control condition using the numeric rating scale (0-10; 0=no pain, 10= max. pain).
    Pain perception (algometer)
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to a VR control condition using algometry: The Pain pressure detection threshold to determine hypersensitivity to pain is measured with a standard electronic algometer (Somedic Type II) by bilateral testing on the middle fingers. The electronic algometer is calibrated following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer and set to deliver a steadily increasing pressure (50 kilopascal for 1 s). In this method, the investigators check for the threshold at which non-painful perception of pressure changes to painful perception in response to the gradually increased pressure applied. Low thresholds correspond to high pain sensitivity.
    Pain perception (algopeg)
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to a VR control condition using algopeg. The algometric measurement method to detect hyperalgesia will be carried out by means of a pressure pain provocation test. For this type of algometry, we will use a standardized peg with a clamping force of exactly 10 Newton at an extension of 5 mm (Type Algopeg).The pressure is applied on the middle finger and the ear lobes for 10 s each and is invariable. The pegs pressure exerted on an ear lobe is perceived as being consistently and clearly above the pain threshold. The patient indicates the pain intensity on a numerical rating scale (NRS) on which 0 stands for "no pain" and 10 stands for "the most intense pain imaginable". High NRS values correspond with high pain sensitivity/hyperalgesia.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 15, 2019
    Last Updated
    February 9, 2023
    Sponsor
    Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04108702
    Brief Title
    Virtual Reality as a New Therapeutic Tool for Chronic Pain
    Official Title
    Virtual Reality as a New Therapeutic Tool for Chronic Pain
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    February 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Withdrawn
    Why Stopped
    Lack of participants
    Study Start Date
    December 17, 2019 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    August 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    October 1, 2023 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Chronic pain is a major health problem and it has been estimate to account for approximately 40% of all medical visits, costing more than $600 billion annually in the United States alone. Given that pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for chronic pain are often difficult and may be associated with limiting side effects, technology-based interventions using virtual reality (VR) may be a promising alternative treatment option. Recent findings from cognitive neuroscience show that it is possible to manipulate the body schema and to induce a range of well-controlled illusory bodily experiences by exposing participants to conflicting multisensory bodily inputs using VR, that are associated with changes in pain perception and somatosensory processing in healthy subjects and chronic pain patients. In the current project the investigators plan to follow up on these findings in patients suffering from chronic pain affecting the whole body, e.g. fibromyalgia. The project is planned as a single center clinical study at the Department of Neurology and Psychosomatic Medicine, Inselspital Bern, in cooperation with the Pain Center Inselspital Bern, the Department of Biomedical Engineering; University Bern and the Department of Psychology, University of Bern. The investigators want to explore the analgesic effect of a specific multisensory illusion (e.g. the cardio-visual illusion) in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to a control condition (single-blinded, randomized clinical trial) using psychometric and algometric methods. Moreover, the investigators would like to assess the physiological changes associated with pain reduction, study the reduction of psychological distress and improved well-being and assess the subjective acceptance of VR as a possible treatment option for patients with chronic pain. Importantly, the investigators plan to develop and test an easy to use, mobile VR setup as a long-term treatment option for patients with chronic pain. Given that chronic pain is a major health problem, the investigators believe that there is a huge market potential for an easy to use, noninvasive and effective treatment option and a possible technology transfer.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Fibromyalgia

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    0 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    VR heart
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Title
    VR control
    Arm Type
    Sham Comparator
    Arm Title
    Standard control
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Virtual reality heart
    Intervention Description
    Patients will either sit or stand while wearing a head mounted display (HMD, Oculus Rift). A 360° video, showing a neutral body from the back in a neutral room, will be projected onto the HMD. We will record the patients' ECG throughout the entire experiment. Raw data (ECG) are acquired with Arduino and in-house software will detect, in real time, the peak of each R-wave from the recorded ECG data and trigger an additional visual stimulus (e.g. a flashing outline surrounding the virtual body) that flashes on and off SYNCHRONOUSLY with respect to the participant's heartbeat. The silhouette surrounding the virtual body flashes for a duration of 100ms and with a sinusoidal opacity.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Virtual reality control
    Intervention Description
    Patients will either sit or stand while wearing a head mounted display (HMD, Oculus Rift). A 360° video, showing a neutral body from the back in a neutral room, will be projected onto the HMD. We will record the patients' ECG throughout the entire experiment. Raw data (ECG) are acquired with Arduino and in-house software will detect, in real time, the peak of each R-wave from the recorded ECG data and trigger an additional visual stimulus (e.g. a flashing outline surrounding the virtual body) that flashes on and off ASYNCHRONOUSLY with respect to the participant's heartbeat. The silhouette surrounding the virtual body flashes for a duration of 100ms and with a sinusoidal opacity.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Standard therapy
    Intervention Description
    Standard multimodal out-patient therapy program (psychological support, physiotherapy, ergotherapy).
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Pain perception using numeric rating scale VR therapy vs. standard therapy
    Description
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to standard therapy (single-blinded, randomized clinical trial) after 6 weeks using a numeric rating scale (0-10; 0=no pain, 10= max. pain)
    Time Frame
    6 weeks
    Title
    Pain perception using patient global impression of change VR therapy vs. standard therapy
    Description
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to standard therapy (single-blinded, randomized clinical trial) after 6 weeks using the Patient global impression of change questionnaire (1-7; 1=very much improved, 7=very much worse).
    Time Frame
    6 weeks
    Title
    Pain perception (algometry) VR therapy vs. standard therapy
    Description
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to standard therapy (single-blinded, randomized clinical trial) after 6 weeks using an Algometer: The Pain pressure detection threshold to determine hypersensitivity to pain is measured with a standard electronic algometer (Somedic Type II) by bilateral testing on the middle fingers. The electronic algometer is calibrated following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer and set to deliver a steadily increasing pressure (50 kilopascal for 1 s). In this method, the investigators check for the threshold at which non-painful perception of pressure changes to painful perception in response to the gradually increased pressure applied. Low thresholds correspond to high pain sensitivity.
    Time Frame
    6 weeks
    Title
    Pain perception (algopeg) VR therapy vs. standard therapy
    Description
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to standard therapy (single-blinded, randomized clinical trial) after 6 weeks using Algopeg: The algometric measurement method to detect hyperalgesia will be carried out by means of a pressure pain provocation test. For this type of algometry, we will use a standardized peg with a clamping force of exactly 10 Newton at an extension of 5 mm (Type Algopeg).The pressure is applied on the middle finger and the ear lobes for 10 s each and is invariable. The pegs pressure exerted on an ear lobe is perceived as being consistently and clearly above the pain threshold. The patient indicates the pain intensity on a numerical rating scale (NRS) on which 0 stands for "no pain" and 10 stands for "the most intense pain imaginable". High NRS values correspond with high pain sensitivity/hyperalgesia.
    Time Frame
    6 weeks
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Pain perception (numeric rating scale) VR therapy vs. VR control
    Description
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to a VR control condition using Numeric rating scale (0-10; 0=no pain, 10= max. pain).
    Time Frame
    6 weeks and 10 weeks
    Title
    Pain perception (patient global impression of change) VR therapy vs. VR control
    Description
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to a VR control condition using the Patient global impression of change questionnaire (1-7; 1=very much improved, 7=very much worse)
    Time Frame
    6 weeks and 10 weeks
    Title
    Pain perception (algometric) VR therapy vs. VR control
    Description
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to a VR control condition using algometry: The Pain pressure detection threshold to determine hypersensitivity to pain is measured with a standard electronic algometer (Somedic Type II) by bilateral testing on the middle fingers. The electronic algometer is calibrated following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer and set to deliver a steadily increasing pressure (50 kilopascal for 1 s). In this method, the investigators check for the threshold at which non-painful perception of pressure changes to painful perception in response to the gradually increased pressure applied. Low thresholds correspond to high pain sensitivity.
    Time Frame
    6 weeks and 10 weeks
    Title
    Pain perception (algopeg) VR therapy vs. VR control
    Description
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to a VR control condition using algopeg: The algometric measurement method to detect hyperalgesia will be carried out by means of a pressure pain provocation test. For this type of algometry, we will use a standardized peg with a clamping force of exactly 10 Newton at an extension of 5 mm (Type Algopeg).The pressure is applied on the middle finger and the ear lobes for 10 s each and is invariable. The pegs pressure exerted on an ear lobe is perceived as being consistently and clearly above the pain threshold. The patient indicates the pain intensity on a numerical rating scale (NRS) on which 0 stands for "no pain" and 10 stands for "the most intense pain imaginable". High NRS values correspond with high pain sensitivity/hyperalgesia.
    Time Frame
    6 weeks and 10 weeks
    Title
    Heart rate variability
    Description
    Inter-beat intervals are calculated as the time between two successive R spikes using the ECG signals as acquired during CV stimulation. Raw data are processed in Matlab® (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, USA) with the HRV Analysis Software (HRVAS: HRV Analysis Software). For each subject and each condition, we calculate the square root of the mean squared differences of successive beats intervals (RMSSD), which estimates the short term components of HRV and is commonly used over short recording periods. As HRV pain-related changes occurs mainly in high frequencies (i.e. power spectrum between 0.15 to 0.40 Hz), we then compute frequency-domain HRV analysis and calculated the power spectrum density using Welch's methods for Fast-Fourier Transform.
    Time Frame
    During each intervention, up to 6 weeks
    Title
    Hamilton anxiety and and depression scale (HADS)
    Description
    Study the reduction of psychological distress measured through the Hamilton anxiety and depression scale (Score Anxiety 0-7 normal, 8-10 borderline, 11-21 abnormal; Score depression 0-7 normal, 8-10 borderline, 11-21 abnormal)
    Time Frame
    6 weeks and 10 weeks
    Title
    Beck depression inventory (BDI II)
    Description
    Study the reduction of psychological distress measured through the Beck depression inventory. BDI-II contains 21 questions, each answer being scored on a scale value of 0 to 3. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. The standardized cutoffs used are: 0-13: minimal depression; 14-19: mild depression; 20-28: moderate depression; 29-63: severe depression.
    Time Frame
    6 weeks and 10 weeks
    Title
    WHO 5 Well Being Index
    Description
    Study well-being through the WHO 5 Well Being Index. The WHO-5 consists of five statements, which respondents rate according to the scale below (in relation to the past two weeks). All of the time = 5, At no time = 0. The total raw score, ranging from 0 to 25, is multiplied by 4 to give the final score, with 0 representing the worst imaginable well-being and 100 representing the best imaginable well-being.
    Time Frame
    6 weeks and 10 weeks
    Title
    Pain perception (numeric rating scale)
    Description
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to a VR control condition using the numeric rating scale (0-10; 0=no pain, 10= max. pain).
    Time Frame
    After each intervention, up to 6 weeks
    Title
    Pain perception (algometer)
    Description
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to a VR control condition using algometry: The Pain pressure detection threshold to determine hypersensitivity to pain is measured with a standard electronic algometer (Somedic Type II) by bilateral testing on the middle fingers. The electronic algometer is calibrated following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer and set to deliver a steadily increasing pressure (50 kilopascal for 1 s). In this method, the investigators check for the threshold at which non-painful perception of pressure changes to painful perception in response to the gradually increased pressure applied. Low thresholds correspond to high pain sensitivity.
    Time Frame
    After each intervention, up to 6 weeks
    Title
    Pain perception (algopeg)
    Description
    Explore the analgesic effect of the cardio-visual illusion in patients suffering from chronic pain as compared to a VR control condition using algopeg. The algometric measurement method to detect hyperalgesia will be carried out by means of a pressure pain provocation test. For this type of algometry, we will use a standardized peg with a clamping force of exactly 10 Newton at an extension of 5 mm (Type Algopeg).The pressure is applied on the middle finger and the ear lobes for 10 s each and is invariable. The pegs pressure exerted on an ear lobe is perceived as being consistently and clearly above the pain threshold. The patient indicates the pain intensity on a numerical rating scale (NRS) on which 0 stands for "no pain" and 10 stands for "the most intense pain imaginable". High NRS values correspond with high pain sensitivity/hyperalgesia.
    Time Frame
    After each intervention, up to 6 weeks

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion criteria A diagnosis of fibromyalgia according to current diagnostic criteria Aged > 18 years old Capable of judgement Willing to participate in the study (by signing the informed consent form) Able to follow the study protocol Exclusion criteria Presence of psychosis or major depression with suicidal risk History of alcohol or drug abuse Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, inability to wear head-mounted display Arrythmia, such as atrial fibrillation
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Lukas Heydrich, MDPhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Inselspital Bern, University of Bern
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Virtual Reality as a New Therapeutic Tool for Chronic Pain

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs