Virtual Reality Exercise for Stroke Rehabilitation in Inpatients Who Are Unable to Stand
Primary Purpose
Stroke
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
virtual reality training
control
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring stroke, physical therapy specialty, exercise therapy, virtual reality, man-machine systems, randomized control trial, inpatients, rehabilitation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke in the left or right cortical or subcortical regions
- medically stable
- cannot stand independently for >1 minute or cannot stand at all
- can sit for at least 20 minutes with or without trunk support and can sit for at least 1 minute without trunk support
- able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- unstable cardiovascular, respiratory, endocrine, orthopedic or neurological condition that precludes exercise of low to moderate intensity
- vestibular deficits or vertigo
- seizure activity in the previous 6 months
Sites / Locations
- Elisabeth Bruyere Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
VRT
control
Arm Description
sitting balance exercises delivered via virtual reality training
virtual reality training requiring limited arm movements and no challenge to sitting balance
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in the Function In Sitting Test (FIST) from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
assesses static, dynamic and reactional sitting balance
Change in the Function In Sitting Test (FIST) from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
assesses static, dynamic and reactional sitting balance
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in the Ottawa Sitting Scale (OSS) from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
assesses static and dynamic sitting balance
Change in the Ottawa Sitting Scale (OSS) from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
assesses static and dynamic sitting balance
Change in Limits of stability in sitting (LoS) from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
assesses dynamic sitting balance using a force plate or pressure mat
Change in Limits of stability in sitting (LoS) from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
assesses dynamic sitting balance using a force plate or pressure mat
Change in Postural sway in sitting from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
assesses static sitting balance using a force plate or pressure mat
Change in Postural sway in sitting from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
assesses static sitting balance using a force plate or pressure mat
Change in the Reaching Performance Scale (RPS) from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
assesses sitting balance function during reaching
Change in the Reaching Performance Scale (RPS) from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
assesses sitting balance function during reaching
Change in the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
assesses sitting balance function using global arm function
Change in the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
assesses sitting balance function using global arm function
Change in The Motivation for Physical Activity Questionnaire from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
Likert scale from 0-6 to assess motivation to engage in exercise
Change in The Motivation for Physical Activity Questionnaire from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
Likert scale from 0-6 to assess motivation to engage in exercise
Change in the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2) from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
assesses quality of motivation to engage in exercise
Change in the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2) from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
assesses quality of motivation to engage in exercise
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)
assesses the psychosocial impact of assistive devices or technology on "functional independence, well-being and quality of life"
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)
assesses the psychosocial impact of assistive devices or technology on "functional independence, well-being and quality of life"
The ability to enroll an average of five new participants a month, to obtain a consent rate of 60% of eligible patients and a rate of protocol violations resulting in noncompliance with VRT of less than 10%.
assesses the feasibility of performing a larger multicentre trial of VRT with rehabilitation inpatients
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02285933
First Posted
November 3, 2014
Last Updated
April 11, 2017
Sponsor
Bruyere Research Institute
Collaborators
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02285933
Brief Title
Virtual Reality Exercise for Stroke Rehabilitation in Inpatients Who Are Unable to Stand
Official Title
Does the Addition of Virtual Reality Training to a Standard Program of Inpatient Rehabilitation Improve Sitting Balance Ability and Function After Stroke? A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 1, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 30, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Bruyere Research Institute
Collaborators
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if the addition of 10 to 12 sessions of sitting balance exercises using virtual reality training will provide additional gains in balance ability and function over standard inpatient rehabilitation in stroke patients.
Detailed Description
Introduction Sitting balance may be affected by stroke, resulting in functional impairment and reduced mobility. Early return of sitting balance predicts greater return of motor function and mobility after stroke. Task-specific therapy is effective but patients must be motivated to perform the exercises repeatedly for the greatest benefit.
Virtual reality training (VRT) allows patients to do exercises while interacting with a video game interface. It is enjoyable and may encourage repetition of therapeutic exercises. Past work in our laboratory showed that standing balance exercises performed with VRT produced additional improvements in gait speed and leg function over traditional inpatient rehabilitation (1). Because of legislative change in Ontario most stroke rehabilitation inpatients today cannot stand independently. There have been no studies on the effect of VRT on sitting balance.
Purpose To assess whether additional sitting balance exercises performed via VRT can improve sitting balance and sitting function (ex. reaching) in stroke rehabilitation inpatients.
Hypothesis The addition of VRT for sitting balance will significantly improve sitting balance and function, beyond the gains realized from traditional inpatient rehabilitation.
Experimental Approach In this blinded randomized control trial funded by the Heart & Stroke Foundation, 76 participants with stroke will be recruited from an inpatient rehabilitation unit. This number will provide enough power to detect a large effect size (0.83) with the primary outcome measure and accounting for a 20% drop-out rate. Individuals who are medically stable and who can sit for at least 20 minutes with or without trunk support but cannot stand independently for more than one minute will be eligible. These criteria will target our selection to those who need to work most on sitting balance. Participants will be randomized into experimental and control groups.
Participants in both groups will perform VRT for 30-50 minutes daily for 10-12 sessions, in addition to their rehabilitation program. VRT will be delivered with Jintronix software and motion capture technology. Exercises for the experimental group will challenge sitting balance control, reaching and shifting the base of support. Control group exercises will require limited hand and arm movements, to equalize the additional time spent in an engaging activity without working on trunk balance. Control group participants will be strapped into their chair to minimize trunk movement. A CONFORMat pressure mat will be used to monitor centre of pressure changes during the intervention.
Outcome measures will be performed pre-, post- and 1 month post-intervention, by an assessor blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome measure will be the Function in Sitting Test. Secondary outcome measures will be: Ottawa Sitting Scale, Reaching Performance Scale, Wolf Motor Function Test and quantitative measures of postural control performed in sitting. Two-way analyses of variance [factors: time (pre-, post-, 1 month post-)and group(experimental, control)] and Tukey's post-hoc analyses will be used to test the effect of VRT on the outcome measures.
Significance and Knowledge Translation If we show that the addition of sitting balance exercises via VRT to traditional rehabilitation improves sitting balance and function, VRT may be added to inpatients' rehabilitation therapy. The ultimate goal is to improve the quality of patients' lives and decrease the burden on their caregivers. Since the Jintronix system is portable, we hope to acquire funding for several units. We would then be able to assess the use of VRT by therapists for inpatients and outpatients with stroke.
(1) McEwen D et al. Stroke 2014;45:1853-1855
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
Keywords
stroke, physical therapy specialty, exercise therapy, virtual reality, man-machine systems, randomized control trial, inpatients, rehabilitation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
76 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
VRT
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
sitting balance exercises delivered via virtual reality training
Arm Title
control
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
virtual reality training requiring limited arm movements and no challenge to sitting balance
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
virtual reality training
Intervention Description
Each participant will engage in 10-12 sessions of 30-50 minutes each of virtual reality training (VRT) using Jintronix Rehabilitation Software and three-dimensional motion capture technology. A camera captures the movements of the participant and allows him or her to control an avatar, which interacts with the game. Exercises challenge sitting balance control, reaching and shifting the base of support; for example, controlling a ball as it rolls down a maze or reaching to put dishes away in a virtual kitchen. The difficulty of the games is monitored to maintain a challenge to sitting balance. The participant sits on a CONFORMat pressure mat which continuously monitors his or her centre of pressure to ensure that the participant is adequately challenged during the VRT.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
control
Intervention Description
Each participant will engage in 10-12 sessions of 30-50 minutes each of virtual reality training (VRT) using Jintronix Rehabilitation Software and three-dimensional motion capture technology. A camera captures the movements of the participant and allows him or her to control an avatar, which interacts with the game. Control group exercises require limited hand and arm movements; for example, using an arm to move a fish along a simple pathway or using the arms to pop balloons without reaching. Control group participants are strapped into their chair to minimize trunk movement. The participant sits on a CONFORMat pressure mat which continuously monitors his or her centre during the VRT.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the Function In Sitting Test (FIST) from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
Description
assesses static, dynamic and reactional sitting balance
Time Frame
baseline, immediately after 10-12 treatments
Title
Change in the Function In Sitting Test (FIST) from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
Description
assesses static, dynamic and reactional sitting balance
Time Frame
baseline,1 month after second assessment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the Ottawa Sitting Scale (OSS) from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
Description
assesses static and dynamic sitting balance
Time Frame
baseline, immediately after 10-12 treatments
Title
Change in the Ottawa Sitting Scale (OSS) from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
Description
assesses static and dynamic sitting balance
Time Frame
baseline, 1 month after second assement
Title
Change in Limits of stability in sitting (LoS) from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
Description
assesses dynamic sitting balance using a force plate or pressure mat
Time Frame
before treatment, immediately after 10-12 treatments
Title
Change in Limits of stability in sitting (LoS) from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
Description
assesses dynamic sitting balance using a force plate or pressure mat
Time Frame
baseline, 1 month after second assement
Title
Change in Postural sway in sitting from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
Description
assesses static sitting balance using a force plate or pressure mat
Time Frame
baseline, immediately after 10-12 treatments
Title
Change in Postural sway in sitting from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
Description
assesses static sitting balance using a force plate or pressure mat
Time Frame
baseline, 1 month after second assement
Title
Change in the Reaching Performance Scale (RPS) from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
Description
assesses sitting balance function during reaching
Time Frame
baseline, immediately after 10-12 treatments
Title
Change in the Reaching Performance Scale (RPS) from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
Description
assesses sitting balance function during reaching
Time Frame
baseline, 1 month after second assement
Title
Change in the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
Description
assesses sitting balance function using global arm function
Time Frame
baseline, immediately after 10-12 treatments
Title
Change in the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
Description
assesses sitting balance function using global arm function
Time Frame
baseline, 1 month after second assement
Title
Change in The Motivation for Physical Activity Questionnaire from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
Description
Likert scale from 0-6 to assess motivation to engage in exercise
Time Frame
before treatment, immediately after 10-12 treatments
Title
Change in The Motivation for Physical Activity Questionnaire from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
Description
Likert scale from 0-6 to assess motivation to engage in exercise
Time Frame
baseline, 1 month after second assement
Title
Change in the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2) from baseline to after 10-12 treatment sessions
Description
assesses quality of motivation to engage in exercise
Time Frame
baseline, immediately after 10-12 treatments
Title
Change in the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2) from baseline to 1 month after second assessment
Description
assesses quality of motivation to engage in exercise
Time Frame
baseline, 1 month after second assessment
Title
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)
Description
assesses the psychosocial impact of assistive devices or technology on "functional independence, well-being and quality of life"
Time Frame
immediately after 10-12 treatments
Title
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)
Description
assesses the psychosocial impact of assistive devices or technology on "functional independence, well-being and quality of life"
Time Frame
1 month after first assement
Title
The ability to enroll an average of five new participants a month, to obtain a consent rate of 60% of eligible patients and a rate of protocol violations resulting in noncompliance with VRT of less than 10%.
Description
assesses the feasibility of performing a larger multicentre trial of VRT with rehabilitation inpatients
Time Frame
immediately after 76 participants have finished the protocol and assessments
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke in the left or right cortical or subcortical regions
medically stable
cannot stand independently for >1 minute or cannot stand at all
can sit for at least 20 minutes with or without trunk support and can sit for at least 1 minute without trunk support
able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
unstable cardiovascular, respiratory, endocrine, orthopedic or neurological condition that precludes exercise of low to moderate intensity
vestibular deficits or vertigo
seizure activity in the previous 6 months
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hillel M Finestone, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Bruyere Research Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Heidi Sveistrup, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Ottawa
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Martin Bilodeau, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Ottawa
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Elisabeth Bruyere Hospital
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1N 5C8
Country
Canada
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
As this is not part of a larger, multi-centre trial, we do not plan to share our data.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24763929
Citation
McEwen D, Taillon-Hobson A, Bilodeau M, Sveistrup H, Finestone H. Virtual reality exercise improves mobility after stroke: an inpatient randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2014 Jun;45(6):1853-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005362. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27036515
Citation
Sheehy L, Taillon-Hobson A, Sveistrup H, Bilodeau M, Fergusson D, Levac D, Finestone H. Does the addition of virtual reality training to a standard program of inpatient rehabilitation improve sitting balance ability and function after stroke? Protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2016 Mar 31;16:42. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0563-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32617429
Citation
Sheehy L, Taillon-Hobson A, Sveistrup H, Bilodeau M, Finestone H. Implementation of a randomized controlled trial on an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit: Lessons learned. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Apr 6;18:100563. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100563. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31970898
Citation
Sheehy L, Taillon-Hobson A, Sveistrup H, Bilodeau M, Yang C, Finestone H. Sitting Balance Exercise Performed Using Virtual Reality Training on a Stroke Rehabilitation Inpatient Service: A Randomized Controlled Study. PM R. 2020 Aug;12(8):754-765. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12331. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Virtual Reality Exercise for Stroke Rehabilitation in Inpatients Who Are Unable to Stand
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs