VISSIT Intracranial Stent Study for Ischemic Therapy (VISSIT)
Primary Purpose
Ischemic Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System (Stent implantation) + Medical therapy (Aspirin and Clopidogrel)
Aspirin and Clopidogrel (Medical therapy)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Ischemic Stroke focused on measuring Ischemic stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack, Intracranial Stenting
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject has at least one neurovascular lesion (70-99%) stenosis [internal carotid, middle cerebral, vertebral artery (C4-BA), and/or basilar artery] symptomatic with a hard TIA or stroke attributable to the territory of the lesion within the past 30 days. An intracranial tandem lesion (50-99%) stenosis may be treated if normal artery segment is sufficient length to avoid overlapping stents.
Target vessel diameter / lesion length measurements are within one of the below per angiogram:
- Vessel diameter is ≥ 2.0 mm and < 2.5 mm / lesion length is ≤ 16 mm, or
- Vessel diameter is ≥ 2.5 mm and < 3.0 mm / lesion length is ≤ 18 mm, or
- Vessel diameter is ≥ 3.0 mm and < 4.5 mm / lesion length is ≤ 26 mm, or
- Vessel diameter is ≥ 4.5 mm and ≤ 5.0 mm / lesion length is ≤ 31 mm
- Subject has normal artery adjacent to each stenosis; diameter 2.0 mm - 5.0 mm
- Subject age is 18-85 years
- Life expectancy is at least 2 years
- Subject 's mRS score is ≤ 3
- Subject is available for study follow-up visits (e.g., lives within 3 hours of research center)
- Subject is willing and cognitively able to provide Informed Consent (consent may be indicated verbally and signed by neutral witness if stroke has impaired hand or visual function)
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject has contraindications for balloon expandable stent, e.g.
- Extreme tortuosity at, or proximal to, target lesion,
- More than 2 lesions with > 50% stenosis (including vertebral ostia and common carotid disease),
- Carotid or vertebral dissection
CT scan or MRI evidence of any of the following:
- Intracranial hemorrhage of type PH1 or PH2
- Subdural or epidural hemorrhage
- Mass effect, or
- Intracranial tumor (except small meningioma)
- Subject has a previous stent in the territory of the target lesion(s)
- Subject has a previous coil or clip placed in the territory of the target lesion within 6 months
- Subject has a potential source of cardiac embolism requiring anticoagulation therapy (e.g., atrial fibrillation, intracardiac thrombus or vegetation, significant mitral stenosis, mechanical heart valve, congestive heart failure with EF <30%, or endocarditis)
Subject has concurrent intracranial pathology, e.g.
- Moyamoya
- Vasculitis documented by biopsy results
- Ruptured Aneurysm
- Unruptured aneurysm > 7mm
- Subject has uncontrolled hypertension (systolic >185 mmHg or diastolic >110 mmHg)
- Hemoglobin < 10 g/dL; platelet count < 100,000; or INR > 1.5 (e.g., use of warfarin)
- Subject has an uncorrectable bleeding diathesis
- Subject's neurological status is unstable and rapidly declining (NIHSS score increased > 4 points within 48 hours prior to randomization)
- Subject has a contraindication for combination antithrombotic treatment (e.g., clopidogrel and aspirin) such as peptic ulcer disease
- Subject history indicates high risk of non-compliance (e.g., substance abuse, psychosocial issues, etc.)
- Subject has a known history contraindicating contrast dye or iodine (vs. sensitivity which can be safely controlled by antihistamine, steroid, etc.)
- Subject is pregnant or plans to become pregnant in the next 12 months
- Myocardial infarction within past 3 months
- Treatment with tPA or other thrombolytic agent within 48 hours prior to randomization
- Major surgery or trauma within 2 weeks prior to randomization
- Enrollment in another investigational device or drug study that may confound the results
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Stent Group
Medical Therapy Group
Arm Description
Medical therapy + PHAROS Vitesse neurovascular stent ("Stent Group")
Medical therapy alone ("Medical Therapy Group")
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Successful Outcome: No Stroke or Hard TIA in the Same Territory Within 12 Months
The primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of the two following outcomes:
Stroke in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event within 12 months of randomization
Hard Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event from day 2 through month 12 post-randomization
A subject was deemed to be a primary endpoint success if neither of these outcomes occurred.
The Kaplan-Meier success rate at 12-months post-operatively was calculated with Kaplan-Meier time-to-event methodology, where the time variable for patients who were successful (no stroke within 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months) was censored at the time of last follow-up, and the time variable for patients who were not successful (had a stroke within 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months) was censored at the time of the first event (stroke with 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00816166
Brief Title
VISSIT Intracranial Stent Study for Ischemic Therapy
Acronym
VISSIT
Official Title
Phase III Study of Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System Compared to Best Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Ischemic Disease
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Study Start Date
October 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Codman & Shurtleff
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to prospectively evaluate the safety, probable benefit, and effectiveness of the PHAROS Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System in a multicenter, randomized clinical trial.
A secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of stenting in the neurovasculature to treat cerebral ischemia on other outcomes such as hospital length of stay, charges, and costs.
Detailed Description
1.1 Study Hypothesis Treatment of cerebral or retinal ischemia due to plaque in the neurovasculature using the PHAROS Vitesse Stent System plus medical therapy will provide additional clinical benefit over medical therapy alone.
1.2 Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
The primary effectiveness endpoint consists of a composite of the two following outcomes:
Stroke in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event within 12 months of randomization
Hard TIA in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event from day 2 through month 12 post-randomization
1.3 Safety Outcomes
Safety outcomes to be collected and reported as part of the overall risk-to-benefit profile for this device are:
Stroke in any territory within 30 days of randomization
Death from any cause within 30 days of randomization
Hard TIA in any territory occurring after a 24 hour post-procedure stabilization period (days 2-30) since the recovery from anesthesia can mask accurate assessment of possible TIA symptoms.
Intracranial hemorrhage within 30 days of randomization
1.4 Other Outcomes
Stent Success - PHAROS Vitesse stent deployed across target lesion with residual stenosis 0-20%
Percentage of Stent Group Subjects with any (symptomatic or asymptomatic) in-stent restenosis ≥ 70% confirmed by angiogram at 12 months
Percentage of Stent Group Subjects with symptomatic in-stent restenosis ≥ 70% confirmed by angiogram at 12 months
Percentage of Medical Therapy Group Subjects with interventional procedure (e.g., angioplasty or stent) at 12 months
Comparison of NIHSS scores between treatment arms
Comparison of mRS scores between treatment arms
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ischemic Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack
Keywords
Ischemic stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack, Intracranial Stenting
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
125 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Stent Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Medical therapy + PHAROS Vitesse neurovascular stent ("Stent Group")
Arm Title
Medical Therapy Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Medical therapy alone ("Medical Therapy Group")
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System (Stent implantation) + Medical therapy (Aspirin and Clopidogrel)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System, Asprin, Clopidogrel, Plavix(r)
Intervention Description
Implantation of one or more balloon-expandable Pharos Vitesse stents to treat neurovascular ischemic lesions + Medical therapy [Treatment with aspirin (81-325 mg daily for the duration of the study) and Clopidogrel (75 mg daily for first 3 months)]
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Aspirin and Clopidogrel (Medical therapy)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Plavix(r)
Intervention Description
Medical therapy alone [Treatment with aspirin (81-325 mg daily for the duration of the study) and Clopidogrel (75 mg daily for first 3 months)]
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Successful Outcome: No Stroke or Hard TIA in the Same Territory Within 12 Months
Description
The primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of the two following outcomes:
Stroke in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event within 12 months of randomization
Hard Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event from day 2 through month 12 post-randomization
A subject was deemed to be a primary endpoint success if neither of these outcomes occurred.
The Kaplan-Meier success rate at 12-months post-operatively was calculated with Kaplan-Meier time-to-event methodology, where the time variable for patients who were successful (no stroke within 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months) was censored at the time of last follow-up, and the time variable for patients who were not successful (had a stroke within 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months) was censored at the time of the first event (stroke with 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months).
Time Frame
One Year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject has at least one neurovascular lesion (70-99%) stenosis [internal carotid, middle cerebral, vertebral artery (C4-BA), and/or basilar artery] symptomatic with a hard TIA or stroke attributable to the territory of the lesion within the past 30 days. An intracranial tandem lesion (50-99%) stenosis may be treated if normal artery segment is sufficient length to avoid overlapping stents.
Target vessel diameter / lesion length measurements are within one of the below per angiogram:
Vessel diameter is ≥ 2.0 mm and < 2.5 mm / lesion length is ≤ 16 mm, or
Vessel diameter is ≥ 2.5 mm and < 3.0 mm / lesion length is ≤ 18 mm, or
Vessel diameter is ≥ 3.0 mm and < 4.5 mm / lesion length is ≤ 26 mm, or
Vessel diameter is ≥ 4.5 mm and ≤ 5.0 mm / lesion length is ≤ 31 mm
Subject has normal artery adjacent to each stenosis; diameter 2.0 mm - 5.0 mm
Subject age is 18-85 years
Life expectancy is at least 2 years
Subject 's mRS score is ≤ 3
Subject is available for study follow-up visits (e.g., lives within 3 hours of research center)
Subject is willing and cognitively able to provide Informed Consent (consent may be indicated verbally and signed by neutral witness if stroke has impaired hand or visual function)
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject has contraindications for balloon expandable stent, e.g.
Extreme tortuosity at, or proximal to, target lesion,
More than 2 lesions with > 50% stenosis (including vertebral ostia and common carotid disease),
Carotid or vertebral dissection
CT scan or MRI evidence of any of the following:
Intracranial hemorrhage of type PH1 or PH2
Subdural or epidural hemorrhage
Mass effect, or
Intracranial tumor (except small meningioma)
Subject has a previous stent in the territory of the target lesion(s)
Subject has a previous coil or clip placed in the territory of the target lesion within 6 months
Subject has a potential source of cardiac embolism requiring anticoagulation therapy (e.g., atrial fibrillation, intracardiac thrombus or vegetation, significant mitral stenosis, mechanical heart valve, congestive heart failure with EF <30%, or endocarditis)
Subject has concurrent intracranial pathology, e.g.
Moyamoya
Vasculitis documented by biopsy results
Ruptured Aneurysm
Unruptured aneurysm > 7mm
Subject has uncontrolled hypertension (systolic >185 mmHg or diastolic >110 mmHg)
Hemoglobin < 10 g/dL; platelet count < 100,000; or INR > 1.5 (e.g., use of warfarin)
Subject has an uncorrectable bleeding diathesis
Subject's neurological status is unstable and rapidly declining (NIHSS score increased > 4 points within 48 hours prior to randomization)
Subject has a contraindication for combination antithrombotic treatment (e.g., clopidogrel and aspirin) such as peptic ulcer disease
Subject history indicates high risk of non-compliance (e.g., substance abuse, psychosocial issues, etc.)
Subject has a known history contraindicating contrast dye or iodine (vs. sensitivity which can be safely controlled by antihistamine, steroid, etc.)
Subject is pregnant or plans to become pregnant in the next 12 months
Myocardial infarction within past 3 months
Treatment with tPA or other thrombolytic agent within 48 hours prior to randomization
Major surgery or trauma within 2 weeks prior to randomization
Enrollment in another investigational device or drug study that may confound the results
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17119891
Citation
Berkefeld J, Hamann GF, du Mesnil R, Kurre W, Steinmetz H, Zanella FE, Sitzer M. [Endovascular treatment for intracranial stenoses. A common statement by neurologists and neuroradiologists]. Nervenarzt. 2006 Dec;77(12):1444-55. doi: 10.1007/s00115-006-2182-z. German.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15800226
Citation
Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, Stern BJ, Hertzberg VS, Frankel MR, Levine SR, Chaturvedi S, Kasner SE, Benesch CG, Sila CA, Jovin TG, Romano JG; Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial Investigators. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 31;352(13):1305-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043033.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16856032
Citation
Cruz-Flores S, Diamond AL. Angioplasty for intracranial artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD004133. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004133.pub2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17826637
Citation
Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI. Angioplasty and stenting for atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis: rationale for a randomized clinical trial. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2007 Aug;17(3):355-63, viii-ix. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2007.05.001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17762735
Citation
Fiorella D, Chow MM, Anderson M, Woo H, Rasmussen PA, Masaryk TJ. A 7-year experience with balloon-mounted coronary stents for the treatment of symptomatic vertebrobasilar intracranial atheromatous disease. Neurosurgery. 2007 Aug;61(2):236-42; discussion 242-3. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000255521.42579.31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17585085
Citation
Fiorella D, Woo HH. Emerging endovascular therapies for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Stroke. 2007 Aug;38(8):2391-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.482752. Epub 2007 Jun 21. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25803346
Citation
Zaidat OO, Fitzsimmons BF, Woodward BK, Wang Z, Killer-Oberpfalzer M, Wakhloo A, Gupta R, Kirshner H, Megerian JT, Lesko J, Pitzer P, Ramos J, Castonguay AC, Barnwell S, Smith WS, Gress DR; VISSIT Trial Investigators. Effect of a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs medical therapy on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis: the VISSIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015 Mar 24-31;313(12):1240-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1693.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
VISSIT Intracranial Stent Study for Ischemic Therapy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs