search
Back to results

Weekly Cetuximab/RT Versus Weekly Cisplatin/RT in HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HPVOropharynx)

Primary Purpose

HPV Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cetuximab
RT (70 Gy in 35 fractions)
Cisplatin
Sponsored by
Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for HPV Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma focused on measuring Human Papilloma Virus, HPV, Oropharyngeal, Squamous Cell, Carcinoma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 18 years or older
  2. Has provided written Informed Consent for participation in this trial
  3. Histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx with p16 positive status confirmed locally by immunohistochemistry
  4. Stage III (excluding T1-2N1) or stage IV (excluding T4, N3, and distant metastasis) if smoking history of < /=10 pack years. If > 10 pack years nodal disease must be N0 - N2a.
  5. If an excisional biopsy has been performed, patients remain eligible for the study provided there is clinically measurable disease prior to commencing RT. The residual disease should still meet the stage criteria required for the trial e.g. excisional biopsy of a node with residual T3 primary, or tonsillectomy for T1 primary with residual > N2a nodes.
  6. No prior treatment for oropharyngeal cancer
  7. Adequate haematological, renal, and hepatic function as defined by,

    1. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC, segs + bands) > /= 1.5 x 109/L
    2. Platelet count > /= 100 x 109/L
    3. Total bilirubin < /= 1.5 x upper normal limit
    4. ALT < /= 2.5 x upper normal limit
    5. Calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault formula) or isotopic GFR > 55ml/min
  8. ECOG performance status score of 0-1
  9. Participants capable of childbearing are using adequate contraception and intend to continue use of contraception for at least 6 months following completion of treatment
  10. Negative pregnancy test within 72 hours prior to randomisation of women who are of childbearing potential
  11. Suitable for follow-up for at least 24 months as per trial protocol.
  12. Sufficient proficiency in English, cognitive capacity and willingness to complete questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of unknown primary of the head and neck
  2. T4, N3 or distant metastases
  3. Smoking history >10 pack years with N2b or c nodal status
  4. Women who are pregnant or lactating.
  5. Previous radiotherapy to the area to be treated (excluding superficial radiotherapy for a cutaneous malignancy)
  6. Previous cisplatin or carboplatin chemotherapy
  7. Prior EGFR targeted therapy of any kind
  8. Primary surgery to the affected area (excisional biopsy allowed)
  9. Peripheral neuropathy > /= grade 2 (CTCAE v4.0)
  10. Sensori-neural hearing impairment >= grade 2 (CTCAE v4.0, hearing impaired, not enrolled on a monitoring program) which may be exacerbated by cisplatin (Audiometric abnormalities without corresponding clinical deafness will not be grounds for exclusion)
  11. Tinnitus > /= grade 2 (CTCAE v4.0)
  12. History of interstitial lung disease or evidence of interstitial lung disease on pre-registration CT
  13. History of myocardial infarction within 12 months prior to study entry, uncontrolled congestive heart failure, unstable angina, active cardiomyopathy, unstable arrhythmia, uncontrolled psychotic disorders, active serious infections, active peptic ulcer disease, immunosuppression due to post-organ transplantation or use of immunosuppressants for autoimmune disorders
  14. Patients known to be HIV positive
  15. Other cancer that was diagnosed:

    1. more than 5 years prior to current diagnosis with (i) subsequent evidence of disease recurrence or (ii) clinical expectation of recurrence is greater than 10% or
    2. within 5 years of the current diagnosis, with the exception of successfully treated basal cell or squamous cell skin carcinoma, in situ melanoma, or carcinoma in situ of the cervix

Sites / Locations

  • Canberra Hospital
  • Chris O'Brien Lifehouse
  • Liverpool Hospital
  • St George Hospital
  • Riverina Cancer Care Centre
  • Calvary Mater Newcastle
  • Westmead Hospital
  • Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital
  • Townsville Hospital
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital
  • Flinders Medical Centre
  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
  • Austin Hospital
  • Sir Charles Gairdner
  • Auckland City Hospital
  • Palmerston North Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Radiation Therapy + Cetuximab

Radiation Therapy + Cisplatin

Arm Description

RT (70 Gy in 35 fractions, 5 days a week over 7 weeks) with weekly Cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading dose IV prior to radiation, followed by weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m2 for the duration of the radiotherapy)

RT(70 Gy in 35 fractions, 5 days a week over 7 weeks) with weekly Cisplatin (40 mg/m2 IV for the duration of the radiotherapy)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Symptom Severity
The area under curve of symptom severity between weekly cisplatin and Radiotherapy Therapy (RT) versus weekly cetuximab and RT from baseline to week 20 (13 weeks post-completion of radiotherapy) as measured by M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory - Head and Neck Module (MDASI-HN).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Symptom severity
Symptom severity measured by MDASI-HN (Symptom Interference Score, Symptom Score, Symptom Clusters and individual item scores at individual time points)and by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck (FACT-HN).
Interference of symptoms with daily life
To compare interference of symptoms with daily life using the MDASI-HN Symptom Interference Score and Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) using the EQ-5D-5L
Psychological distress
To compare psychological distress measured by FACT-HN domain scores and depression and anxiety scales of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Impact on Health Related Quality of Life
Swallowing dysfunction
To compare swallowing dysfunction by Functional swallowing outcome (video fluoroscopy), CTCAE (v4.0) dysphagia, MDASI and FACT questionnaires, enteral feeding rates.
Speech and dietary function
To compare speech and dietary function as measured by the Performance Status Scale for Head & Neck Cancer Patients (PSS-HN)
Clinician-assessed acute and late toxicity
To compare clinician-assessed acute and late toxicity using toxicity grading (CTCAE v4.0) - reported as worst toxicity and as overall acute toxicity burden (T-score)
Rate of enteral feeding
To compare rate of enteral feeding at 12 months following treatment using Barnard's exact test for the comparison of two proportions
Hearing impairment
To compare hearing impairment, as measured by total score of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for adults, screening version (HHIA-S) and audiometry (results will be evaluated according to CTCAE 3 and 4 criteria, Brock criteria, Chang criteria and SIOP Boston Ototoxicity Scale).
Time to locoregional failure
To compare time to locoregional failure primarily determined by evidence of progression or recurrence clinically or radiologically
Failure-free survival
To compare failure-free survival by clinical and radioloigical assessments
Overall survival
To compare overall survival by clinical assessment.
Pattern of disease failure
Pattern of disease failure (locoregional [recurrence at primary tumour site and/or regional nodes], distant, both) as assessed radiologically.
Complete response rate
To compare FDG-PET-CT complete response rate at week 20
Cost of health resource utilisation
To compare cost of health resource utilisation via questionnaires EQ-5D-5L and RTOG return to work questionnaire.
Work status and time to return to work
To compare work status and time to return to work by RTOG questionnaire
Potential prognostic markers
To correlate several potential prognostic markers (including but not limited to EGFR protein level, EGFR copy number, ERCC1, plasma hepatocyte growth factor level, and plasma IL-8) with failure-free survival, overall survival and time to locoregional failure.

Full Information

First Posted
May 13, 2013
Last Updated
November 16, 2022
Sponsor
Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01855451
Brief Title
Weekly Cetuximab/RT Versus Weekly Cisplatin/RT in HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Acronym
HPVOropharynx
Official Title
TROG12.01 A Randomised Trial of Weekly Cetuximab and Radiation Versus Weekly Cisplatin and Radiation in Good Prognosis Locoregionally Advanced HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
June 3, 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 30, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 23, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A standard treatment for patients with head and neck cancer is radiation given with high doses of a chemotherapy drug called cisplatin, given every 3 weeks during the radiation. This treatment is effective but can significantly increase side effects such as difficulty with swallowing, a sore mouth, fatigue, hearing loss, ringing in the ears and kidney failure. In Australia, a commonly used treatment HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma is a lower dose of cisplatin given weekly during the radiation. The high dose and low dose schedules result in a similar total dose of cisplatin being given during the radiation, but it is thought that the weekly schedule results in fewer side effects while maintaining effectiveness. Another approach widely used around the world for patients with head and neck cancer, is to administer the antibody, cetuximab, weekly during radiation. Cetuximab has a very different side effect profile to cisplatin, and has been reported to result in less exacerbation of radiation related side effects. Both cetuximab and cisplatin can reduce the growth of a cancer and increase the effectiveness of radiation. Both cisplatin and cetuximab appear to be effective treatments in combination with radiation, but have not been directly compared. The purpose of this study is to compare the treatment related side effects (both acute and longer term) between the cisplatin and cetuximab regimens. Both treatments would be given with the same dose of radiation therapy over 7 weeks. The results of this trial will help determine the optimal treatment for patients with HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Detailed Description
Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is increasing in incidence and has an improved prognosis compared to other head and neck malignancies when treated with standard combination chemoradiation. The current standard regimen of high dose cisplatin and Radiation Therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer patients results in significant toxicity and is at the limits of tolerance. The excellent prognosis of patients with HPV-positive OPSCC raises concerns about overtreatment with the current standard of care, resulting in unnecessary acute and late morbidity. Therefore, investigation of chemo-sparing or chemo-modified regimens with RT for HPV-associated OPSCC that do not compromise efficacy is warranted. A number of regimens less intensive than high dose cisplatin are being used in clinical practice for patients with good prognosis HPV OPSCC, but no comparative trials have been performed in this population. The trial population will be restricted to low risk HPV-associated OPSCC. Trial Arms: A- RT (70 Gy in 35 fractions, 5 days a week over 7 weeks) with weekly Cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading dose IV prior to radiation, followed by weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m2 for the duration of the radiotherapy) B- RT(70 Gy in 35 fractions, 5 days a week over 7 weeks) with weekly Cisplatin (40 mg/m2 IV for the duration of the radiotherapy) Hypothesis: In patients with locally advanced HPV-associated OPSCC, those treated with weekly cetuximab and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy will experience less acute symptom severity than patients receiving weekly cisplatin and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Patients will be followed weekly during treatment, then at 1, 3, 5, 9, 13 weeks post-treatment and at months 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 32, 36, 42, 48, 54, and 60 post-completion of treatment. Follow-up for the trial will cease when the last patient accrued has a minimum of 2 years follow-up i.e. has attended the 24 months post-treatment review.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
HPV Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Keywords
Human Papilloma Virus, HPV, Oropharyngeal, Squamous Cell, Carcinoma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
189 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Radiation Therapy + Cetuximab
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
RT (70 Gy in 35 fractions, 5 days a week over 7 weeks) with weekly Cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading dose IV prior to radiation, followed by weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m2 for the duration of the radiotherapy)
Arm Title
Radiation Therapy + Cisplatin
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
RT(70 Gy in 35 fractions, 5 days a week over 7 weeks) with weekly Cisplatin (40 mg/m2 IV for the duration of the radiotherapy)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cetuximab
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
RT (70 Gy in 35 fractions)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cisplatin
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Symptom Severity
Description
The area under curve of symptom severity between weekly cisplatin and Radiotherapy Therapy (RT) versus weekly cetuximab and RT from baseline to week 20 (13 weeks post-completion of radiotherapy) as measured by M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory - Head and Neck Module (MDASI-HN).
Time Frame
20 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Symptom severity
Description
Symptom severity measured by MDASI-HN (Symptom Interference Score, Symptom Score, Symptom Clusters and individual item scores at individual time points)and by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Head and Neck (FACT-HN).
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Interference of symptoms with daily life
Description
To compare interference of symptoms with daily life using the MDASI-HN Symptom Interference Score and Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) using the EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame
24 mths
Title
Psychological distress
Description
To compare psychological distress measured by FACT-HN domain scores and depression and anxiety scales of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Impact on Health Related Quality of Life
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Swallowing dysfunction
Description
To compare swallowing dysfunction by Functional swallowing outcome (video fluoroscopy), CTCAE (v4.0) dysphagia, MDASI and FACT questionnaires, enteral feeding rates.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Speech and dietary function
Description
To compare speech and dietary function as measured by the Performance Status Scale for Head & Neck Cancer Patients (PSS-HN)
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Clinician-assessed acute and late toxicity
Description
To compare clinician-assessed acute and late toxicity using toxicity grading (CTCAE v4.0) - reported as worst toxicity and as overall acute toxicity burden (T-score)
Time Frame
60 months
Title
Rate of enteral feeding
Description
To compare rate of enteral feeding at 12 months following treatment using Barnard's exact test for the comparison of two proportions
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Hearing impairment
Description
To compare hearing impairment, as measured by total score of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for adults, screening version (HHIA-S) and audiometry (results will be evaluated according to CTCAE 3 and 4 criteria, Brock criteria, Chang criteria and SIOP Boston Ototoxicity Scale).
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Time to locoregional failure
Description
To compare time to locoregional failure primarily determined by evidence of progression or recurrence clinically or radiologically
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Failure-free survival
Description
To compare failure-free survival by clinical and radioloigical assessments
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Overall survival
Description
To compare overall survival by clinical assessment.
Time Frame
60 months
Title
Pattern of disease failure
Description
Pattern of disease failure (locoregional [recurrence at primary tumour site and/or regional nodes], distant, both) as assessed radiologically.
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Complete response rate
Description
To compare FDG-PET-CT complete response rate at week 20
Time Frame
20 weeks
Title
Cost of health resource utilisation
Description
To compare cost of health resource utilisation via questionnaires EQ-5D-5L and RTOG return to work questionnaire.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Work status and time to return to work
Description
To compare work status and time to return to work by RTOG questionnaire
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Potential prognostic markers
Description
To correlate several potential prognostic markers (including but not limited to EGFR protein level, EGFR copy number, ERCC1, plasma hepatocyte growth factor level, and plasma IL-8) with failure-free survival, overall survival and time to locoregional failure.
Time Frame
60 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Aged 18 years or older Has provided written Informed Consent for participation in this trial Histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx with p16 positive status confirmed locally by immunohistochemistry Stage III (excluding T1-2N1) or stage IV (excluding T4, N3, and distant metastasis) if smoking history of < /=10 pack years. If > 10 pack years nodal disease must be N0 - N2a. If an excisional biopsy has been performed, patients remain eligible for the study provided there is clinically measurable disease prior to commencing RT. The residual disease should still meet the stage criteria required for the trial e.g. excisional biopsy of a node with residual T3 primary, or tonsillectomy for T1 primary with residual > N2a nodes. No prior treatment for oropharyngeal cancer Adequate haematological, renal, and hepatic function as defined by, Absolute neutrophil count (ANC, segs + bands) > /= 1.5 x 109/L Platelet count > /= 100 x 109/L Total bilirubin < /= 1.5 x upper normal limit ALT < /= 2.5 x upper normal limit Calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault formula) or isotopic GFR > 55ml/min ECOG performance status score of 0-1 Participants capable of childbearing are using adequate contraception and intend to continue use of contraception for at least 6 months following completion of treatment Negative pregnancy test within 72 hours prior to randomisation of women who are of childbearing potential Suitable for follow-up for at least 24 months as per trial protocol. Sufficient proficiency in English, cognitive capacity and willingness to complete questionnaires Exclusion Criteria: History of unknown primary of the head and neck T4, N3 or distant metastases Smoking history >10 pack years with N2b or c nodal status Women who are pregnant or lactating. Previous radiotherapy to the area to be treated (excluding superficial radiotherapy for a cutaneous malignancy) Previous cisplatin or carboplatin chemotherapy Prior EGFR targeted therapy of any kind Primary surgery to the affected area (excisional biopsy allowed) Peripheral neuropathy > /= grade 2 (CTCAE v4.0) Sensori-neural hearing impairment >= grade 2 (CTCAE v4.0, hearing impaired, not enrolled on a monitoring program) which may be exacerbated by cisplatin (Audiometric abnormalities without corresponding clinical deafness will not be grounds for exclusion) Tinnitus > /= grade 2 (CTCAE v4.0) History of interstitial lung disease or evidence of interstitial lung disease on pre-registration CT History of myocardial infarction within 12 months prior to study entry, uncontrolled congestive heart failure, unstable angina, active cardiomyopathy, unstable arrhythmia, uncontrolled psychotic disorders, active serious infections, active peptic ulcer disease, immunosuppression due to post-organ transplantation or use of immunosuppressants for autoimmune disorders Patients known to be HIV positive Other cancer that was diagnosed: more than 5 years prior to current diagnosis with (i) subsequent evidence of disease recurrence or (ii) clinical expectation of recurrence is greater than 10% or within 5 years of the current diagnosis, with the exception of successfully treated basal cell or squamous cell skin carcinoma, in situ melanoma, or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
D Rischin, Dr
Organizational Affiliation
TROG and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Canberra Hospital
City
Canberra
State/Province
Australian Capital Territory
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Chris O'Brien Lifehouse
City
Camperdown
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2050
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Liverpool Hospital
City
Liverpool
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2170
Country
Australia
Facility Name
St George Hospital
City
St George
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2217
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Riverina Cancer Care Centre
City
Wagga Wagga
State/Province
New South Wales
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Calvary Mater Newcastle
City
Waratah
State/Province
New South Wales
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Westmead Hospital
City
Westmead
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2145
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital
City
Herston
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4006
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Townsville Hospital
City
Townsville
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4810
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Princess Alexandra Hospital
City
Woolloongabba
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4102
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Flinders Medical Centre
City
Bedford Park
State/Province
South Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
5042
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
City
East Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3002
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Austin Hospital
City
Melbourne N.
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3084
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Sir Charles Gairdner
City
Nedlands
State/Province
Western Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
6009
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Auckland City Hospital
City
Auckland
ZIP/Postal Code
1344
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Palmerston North Hospital
City
Palmerston
ZIP/Postal Code
4442
Country
New Zealand

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34098030
Citation
Rischin D, King M, Kenny L, Porceddu S, Wratten C, Macann A, Jackson JE, Bressel M, Herschtal A, Fisher R, Fua T, Lin C, Liu C, Hughes BGM, McGrath M, McDowell L, Corry J. Randomized Trial of Radiation Therapy With Weekly Cisplatin or Cetuximab in Low-Risk HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer (TROG 12.01) - A Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Nov 15;111(4):876-886. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Weekly Cetuximab/RT Versus Weekly Cisplatin/RT in HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs