search
Back to results

Zero-fluoroscopic Navigation Versus Conventional Fluoroscopic Navigation for Double-chamber Pacemaker Implantation (ZF-PMDC)

Primary Purpose

Sick Sinus Syndrome, Complete Atrioventricular Block, High Degree Second Degree Atrioventricular Block (Disorder)

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
zero-fluoroscopy 3D navigation
conventional x-ray navigation
Sponsored by
Tongji Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Sick Sinus Syndrome focused on measuring Fluoroscopy, Pacemaker, Three dimensional, Radiation, Imaging

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sick Sinus Syndrome
  • complete Atrioventricular Block
  • high degree second Degree Atrioventricular Block
  • Bradycardia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pacemaker replacement
  • severe structural cardiac malformations
  • severe cardiac enlargement
  • venous malformations

Sites / Locations

  • Tongji HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Zero-fluoroscopy implantation

Conventional fluoroscopy implantation

Arm Description

Pacemaker implantation performed for all patients in this group with zero-fluoroscopy 3D navigation.

Pacemaker implantation performed for all patients with conventional x-ray navigation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Success rate

Secondary Outcome Measures

Total procedure time
Fluoroscopy time
Complications

Full Information

First Posted
April 13, 2017
Last Updated
April 13, 2017
Sponsor
Tongji Hospital
Collaborators
Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China, Xinyang Central Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital, Shenzhen Sun Yat-sen Cardiovascular Hospital, Ningbo No. 1 Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03118427
Brief Title
Zero-fluoroscopic Navigation Versus Conventional Fluoroscopic Navigation for Double-chamber Pacemaker Implantation
Acronym
ZF-PMDC
Official Title
Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled Trial to Compare Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of Zero-Fluoroscopic Navigation With Conventional Fluoroscopic Navigation for Double-chamber Pacemaker Implantation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
January 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Tongji Hospital
Collaborators
Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China, Xinyang Central Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital, Shenzhen Sun Yat-sen Cardiovascular Hospital, Ningbo No. 1 Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is intended to compare the feasibility, safety and efficacy of Ensite-NavX zero-fluoroscopic navigation system to conventional fluoroscopic X-ray approach as to performing double-chamber pacemaker implantation.
Detailed Description
Permanent pacemaker is a well-established treatment to treat patients with a wide range of heart rhythm disturbances. Fluoroscopy is the imaging modality routinely used for cardiac device implantation and electrophysiological procedures.Due to the rising concern regarding the harmful effects of radiation exposure to both the patients and operation staffs, novel 3D mapping systems have been developed and implemented in electrophysiological procedure for the navigation of catheters inside the heart chambers. Ensite NavX system can be used for cardiac imaging as a reliable and safe zero-fluoroscopy approach for implantation of single- or dual-chamber permanent pacemaker in patients. Our method offered a choice for some special population of patient in whom radiation exposure need to be avoided or in the extreme circumstances when the X-ray machine is out-of-order.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sick Sinus Syndrome, Complete Atrioventricular Block, High Degree Second Degree Atrioventricular Block (Disorder), Bradycardia
Keywords
Fluoroscopy, Pacemaker, Three dimensional, Radiation, Imaging

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Zero-fluoroscopy implantation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Pacemaker implantation performed for all patients in this group with zero-fluoroscopy 3D navigation.
Arm Title
Conventional fluoroscopy implantation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Pacemaker implantation performed for all patients with conventional x-ray navigation.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
zero-fluoroscopy 3D navigation
Other Intervention Name(s)
non-fluoroscopy 3D navigation
Intervention Description
Pacemaker implantation will be performed without fluoroscopy using 3D navigation systems.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
conventional x-ray navigation
Other Intervention Name(s)
fluoroscopy navigation
Intervention Description
Pacemaker implantation will be performed with fluoroscopy using conventional X-ray navigation.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Success rate
Time Frame
3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Total procedure time
Time Frame
during procedure
Title
Fluoroscopy time
Time Frame
during procedure
Title
Complications
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Sick Sinus Syndrome complete Atrioventricular Block high degree second Degree Atrioventricular Block Bradycardia Exclusion Criteria: pacemaker replacement severe structural cardiac malformations severe cardiac enlargement venous malformations
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Yan Wang, PhD
Phone
86-027-83663280
Email
newswangyan@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Guangzhi Chen, PhD
Phone
86-027-83662842
Email
chengz2003@163.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yan Wang, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Tongji Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Tongji Hospital
City
Wuhan
State/Province
Hubei
ZIP/Postal Code
430030
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yan Wang, PhD
Phone
86-13697326307
Email
newswangyan@126.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guangzhi Chen, PhD
Phone
86-027-83662842
Email
chengz2003@163.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20959547
Citation
Miller DL, Balter S, Schueler BA, Wagner LK, Strauss KJ, Vano E. Clinical radiation management for fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. Radiology. 2010 Nov;257(2):321-32. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091269.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15485440
Citation
Ventura R, Rostock T, Klemm HU, Lutomsky B, Demir C, Weiss C, Meinertz T, Willems S. Catheter ablation of common-type atrial flutter guided by three-dimensional right atrial geometry reconstruction and catheter tracking using cutaneous patches: a randomized prospective study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004 Oct;15(10):1157-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.04064.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9118532
Citation
Gepstein L, Hayam G, Ben-Haim SA. A novel method for nonfluoroscopic catheter-based electroanatomical mapping of the heart. In vitro and in vivo accuracy results. Circulation. 1997 Mar 18;95(6):1611-22. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.6.1611.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22882722
Citation
Lemery R. Interventional electrophysiology at the crossroads: cardiac mapping, ablation and pacing without fluoroscopy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Oct;23(10):1087-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02373.x. Epub 2012 Aug 6. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24002003
Citation
Richter S, Doring M, Gaspar T, John S, Rolf S, Sommer P, Hindricks G, Piorkowski C. Cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation using a new sensor-based navigation system: results from the first human use study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Oct;6(5):917-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000066. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10077514
Citation
Wittkampf FH, Wever EF, Derksen R, Wilde AA, Ramanna H, Hauer RN, Robles de Medina EO. LocaLisa: new technique for real-time 3-dimensional localization of regular intracardiac electrodes. Circulation. 1999 Mar 16;99(10):1312-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.10.1312.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12520670
Citation
Schreieck J, Ndrepepa G, Zrenner B, Schneider MA, Weyerbrock S, Dong J, Schmitt C. Radiofrequency ablation of cardiac arrhythmias using a three-dimensional real-time position management and mapping system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Dec;25(12):1699-707. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01699.x.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Zero-fluoroscopic Navigation Versus Conventional Fluoroscopic Navigation for Double-chamber Pacemaker Implantation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs