Active clinical trials for "COVID-19"

This study seeks to determine the the impact of COVID-19 on the incidence, characteristics, management and outcome of patients admitted to U.S. hospitals with non-COVID-19 related sepsis.

This is a multi-center, observational study that will enroll 1) patients with severe COVID-19 who have agreed to undergo therapy with Seraph® 100 under the existing EUA; 2) patients (medical record data) that have been previously treated with the Seraph® 100 after the date of the EUA approval (17 April 2020), but before the date that the study is approved at the study site, and 3) a convenience sample of patients (medical record data) in a historical control group who were admitted to the ICU at participating sites with severe COVID-19 infection, meeting the EUA treatment criteria, but not treated with Seraph® 100 up to the time the PURIFY-OBS protocol is approved at the site

The COVID-19 infection primarily manifests itself as a respiratory tract infection, although new evidence indicates that this disease has systemic involvement involving multiple systems including the cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, neurological, hematopoietic and immune systems. Recent studies have shown that in its pathophysiology, inflammation and thrombogenesis predominate, especially in the severe forms of COVID-19. Thus, the investigators hypothesized that the use of heparin and tocilizumab could potencially reduce inflammation and thrombogenesis in patients with severe COVID-19 infection, improving patients outcomes and survival.

The current study was conducted at Qena Governorate, Egypt, during the period from May 2020, to July 2020. The study included 305 COVID-19 cases diagnosed by PCR, patients were randomly assigned to one of three study limps, Azithromycin 500 mg/24 h for 7 days, Clarithromycin 500 /12 h for 7 days, or a control group with no antibiotics, All three groups received only symptomatic treatment for control of fever and cough

The 33-month pregnant patient was followed in the gynecology service with the complaint of shortness of breath after receiving the covid positive diagnosis and was transferred to the intensive care unit due to acute respiratory failure. She was intubated in the intensive care unit and the baby was taken by cesarean section. Pulmonary rehabilitation steps to be applied to the patient with long-term intensive care hospitalization will be examined.

The objective of this study is to compare the impact of the coronavirus disease (SARS-CoV-2, or COVID-19) on cognitive function in the population of patients who have been diagnosed, treated and recovered from the COVID-19 infection versus patients who have not been infected. Primary endpoint is to evaluate the percentage of cognitive decline observed in both study arms (subjects with or without COVID-19 history) using assessments of Cognivue Clarity, MMSE and MoCA. Secondary endpoint is to see the correlation of Depression and anxiety scales (i.e., Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and/or Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)) and Cognivue scores while comparing the trend of difference between both study arms.

The CANCOV study will be the first Canadian study to provide a comprehensive evaluation of early, and 1-year, outcomes of outpatient and hospitalized COVID-19 survivors and their family caregivers, their varied trajectories and associated clinical risk factors. The overall objectives are to determine short- (in hospital) and longer-term (1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-acute hospital discharge) outcomes COVID-19+ patients across the spectrum of symptom severity, including outpatients and inpatients from GIM and ICU wards and their caregivers, and the clinical, sociodemographic, multi-omic predictors of these outcomes. By leveraging expertise from investigators across disciplines and divisions, this study presents a suite of complementary projects that explore the genetic, transcriptomic, epigenomic and immunologic evaluation of COVID-19 infection across the illness and recovery trajectory during the acute illness and in the context of multidimensional long-term outcomes. As there continues to be need for longer term follow up and research on Long-COVID, this study has added an optional extension to include 2-year, 3-year, 4-year and 5 year outcomes.

This retrospective cohort study aims to characterise outcomes for patients treated on an intensive care unit (ICU) with COVID-19 in England and Wales, one year after discharge from hospital. Outcomes will be compared with patients admitted as an emergency to an ICU for other conditions. The study will use existing national audit data linked to routine healthcare datasets.

This observational cohort study will enroll patients in LMICs with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 on oxygen or deemed to require oxygen therapy based on objective criteria. Demographics and risk factor information will be collected from participants. Participants will be followed for 7 days or until outcome (hospital discharge or death). Facility level metrics on oxygen availability will also be collected at the beginning of site enrolment.

This is a prospective, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial. The participants will be randomized into two groups (group A and group B). Patients of group-A are the treatment group. They will be treated with optimal treatment based on the algorithm proposed in National Guidelines on Clinical Management of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Version 7.0, 28 May 2020, along with Colchicine for 14 days. The patients in group-B will be controlled group. They will be treated with optimal treatment based on the algorithm proposed in National Guideline along with a placebo.