Active clinical trials for "COVID-19"

Although management of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often includes mechanical ventilation, the optimal timing of initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation remains unknown. We hypothesise that a randomized controlled trial comparing early intubation as opposed to delayed intubation among patients with COVID-19 suffering from severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is feasible.

The human monoclonal antibody CB6 showed potent neutralization activity in vitro against SARS-CoV-2. CB6-LALA (also called JS016) has been developed for clinical use. Phase I trials among healthy volunteers has demonstrated a tolerable and safe drug profile of JS016. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JS016 in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Rationale: Ivermectin, an inexpensive and available antiparasitic drug, with favourable safety profile, showed inhibitory effect on SARS-CoV2 viral replication in-vitro and in animal models. Several research groups investigated Ivermectin in COVID-19, particularly in mild symptomatic disease. There is high degree of uncertainty on its effects on clinical outcomes and larger studies are needed. Objectives: Plan to study the effect of Ivermectin versus standard treatment in patients with confirmed mild COVID-19. Study design: Multi-centre prospective cohort study Settings: Assiut University Hospital (Assiut University), Aswan and others, Egypt. Study Population: Patients with confirmed mild COVID-19. Intervention: Patients with mild symptomatic COVID-19 attending the participating out-patient clinics in different centers will receive either Ivermectin + Standard treatment or Standard treatment only. All new mild symptomatic COVID-19 patients will receive Ivermectin + Standard treatment for the first two weeks of the study. During the following four weeks, all new patients will receive standard treatment only. These cycles will be repeated until 822 patients are recruited in each arm. Patients assigned to Ivermectin + Standard treatment or standard treatment only will remain as such throughout the study and during the follow- up period. Primary outcome measures: The primary outcome will be rate of intensive care admission. Secondary outcome measures: Secondary outcomes will be time to clinical improvement, the clinical state using 7-point ordinal scale at different time points, need for home oxygenation, hospitalization, hospital supplemental oxygen >24 hours, Non- invasive ventilation ( High- flow nasal cannula, High- velocity nasal insufflation or BiPAP), duration of hospitalization, duration of ICU stay and deaths within 21 days,. Power calculation: With a prospective cohort design, a sample size of 822 cases per group is estimated (1644 for the whole study). This calculation depends on a rate of ICU admission in mild symptomatic COVID-19 cases of 8.5%, an assumption that Ivermectin can reduce this rate by 50%, at a study power of 80%, and confidence limit of 0.95.

Determine the efficacy and safety of COVID19-0001-USR in the treatment of SARS-COV-2 infection in mild to moderate manifestations administered via nebulization/inhalation.

Clinical Role of Testosterone and Dihydrotestosterone and which of them should be inhibited in COVID-19 patients - A double-edged sword? COVID-19 attacks and affects Males significantly more than females [1], [2]. Males with COVID-19 are reported to die at twice the rate of females when they come infected with the virus [3]. The upregulation of TMPRSS2 by androgens could explain the increased susceptibility to COVID-19 in men.Contrary to expected, as a study demonstrated that The expression level of TMPRSS2 increased 6-fold in androgen stimulated LNCaP cells, relative to androgen-deprived cells[4]. But, surprisingly, low levels of testosterone led to the over expression and upregulation of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 receptors, facilitating SARS-CoV-1 entry into the alveolar cells, and deregulating a lung-protective pathway [5].According to literature Dihydrotestosterone is many times more potent than testosterone, and many of the effects that testosterone has in the body only happen after it is converted to dihydrotestosterone [6]. Therefore, we hypothesis that testosterone has better effect than dihydrotestosterone in case of COVID-19, because a study found that DHT significantly induced the expression of TMPRSS2 [7]. And at the same time , decreased testosterone levels in critically diseased males harmfully affect pulmonary endothelial cell functioning, impair the ability to clear the virus , promote systemic . Obesity among males, promote defective immune response, , and also generates more pro-inflammatory cytokines important in cell signaling, emanating in increased, severe disease, worst outcome and vulnerability. Insufficient serum testosterone level is a poor prognostic indicator for patients infected with COVID-19 by downregulation pulmonary protective pathways [5], [8]. On the contrary, high testosterone levels can lead to complication of thrombosis which is also one of the serious manifestations in COVID-19 patients[9]. Thereby we hypothesize that decreased testosterone levels in men have a direct relation with the severity of infection and a worse outcome in COVID-19. In this case we should found an appropriate treatment that induces testosterone level to introduce its protective effect and up regulate pulmonary protective pathways and at the same time protect against thrombosis and works to reduce the impact of dihydrotestosterone on lung cells preventing up regulation of TMPRSS2, Her we shed new light on the appropriate treatment can overcome the challenges that face testosterone therapy in the era of COVID-19 After searching MEDLINE , PubMed, , Google Scholar, preprints and Controlled Trials until September , 2020 we found that the appropriate treatment in this case is aerosolized 13 cis retinoic acid in combination with testosterone therapy, as more than one study found that 13 cis retinoic acid reversibly and potentially inhibit the effect of dihydrotestosterone on different targeted cells. In addition its impact on thrombin.

Observational studies have shown that prone position (PP) in spontaneously breathing patients, may improve oxygenation in individuals with Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF), due to Covid-19 infection. None so far have evaluated the clinical efficacy of this approach on the patients' outcomes and in a randomised control fashion

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of Remdesivir and Baricitinib combination therapy for the treatment of severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) caused by Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our aim is to compare the outcome of the "Remdesivir + Baricitinib" combination against "Remdesivir + Tocilizumab" therapy and find the best option for the management of ARDS in COVID-19 patients.

This is an adaptive, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase II/III study conducted to evaluate the effect of SCTA01 on participant survival and clinical efficacy in participants with severe COVID-19 admitted to high dependence or ICUs. The study duration of subject participation will be up to: 120 days Participants will receive a single intravenous (IV) infusion of SCTA01 at Treatment day 1. Follow up visits will be up to 120 days or early withdrawal visit.

The study aim to test proof of concept of CBD treatment for efficacy and safety in patients suffering with mild COVID-19 infection. The CBD will be delivered via oil droplets not containing THC, compared to placebo.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GX-19N in healthy individuals who have received one of COVID-19 vaccine authorized for emergency use.