Active clinical trials for "COVID-19"

COVID-19, which emerged in China in December 2019, has become a pandemic with its spread to many countries of the world. Mortality rates of COVID-19 pandemics vary between countries. It is known that mortality based on COVID-19 is higher in old population. Therefore the aim of this study to analyze the experience of 7 governmental hospitals in terms of patient characteristics, possible risk factors of mortality based on COVID-19.

COVID-19, which emerged in China in December 2019, has become a pandemic with its spread to many countries of the world. Emergency departments also carried out an important part of the fight against pandemics in our country/Turkey. The emergency department including an intensive care unit is very few in this country/Turkey and the only hospital, which has an Emergency Intensive Care Unit (EICU) in Istanbul, is the study center. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to provide useful information about how an effective EICU should be, especially how to use them during pandemic periods.

This is an observational study designed to learn more about how COVID19 convalescent plasma works in patients with COVID19 compared to those patients who did not receive convalescent plasma treatment. Information about patient recovery will be collected from participants' electronic medical records to evaluate safety, clinical outcomes, and SARS-CoV2 antibody responses in patients who were treated with convalescent plasma under a separate expanded access protocol, NCT04372368.

The present study aims at assessing long-term hemostatic profile of patients recovered from COVID-19 acute infection that remain asymptomatic (POST-COVID) versus patients with residual symptoms (LONG-COVID) through the employment of a commercially available new generation point-of-care viscoelastic device. The primary endpoint is based upon the hypothesis that patients with residual symptoms maintain an abnormal coagulation profile even after recovery from COVID-19.

In 2021 and following the COVID-19 (corona virus disease 2019) pandemic, different vaccines were initially authorized in Italy and Lebanon. Notably, vaccine side effects were poorly recorded. Thus, the investigator performed a survey study to monitor COVID-19 vaccine side effects among Italian and Lebanese citizens according to gender and age through a web-based questionnaire in Italian and Arabic languages including 21 items by "Google Form", investigating 13 symptoms, and employing social-media platforms

The goal of this retrospective analysis is to compare the magnitude of improvement in respiratory and peripheral muscle strength, following the completion of a hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation programme, in men and women with long COVID-19 syndrome. The main question it aims to answer is the following: • does gender limits the effects of a hybrid pulmonary rehabilitation programme on respiratory and peripheral muscle strength?

The newly recognised disease COVID-19 is caused by the Severe-Acute-Respiratory-Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which rapidly spread globally in late 2019, reaching pandemic proportions. The clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 infection is broad, encompassing asymptomatic infection, mild upper respiratory tract illness and mild extrapulmonary symptoms, and severe viral pneumonia with respiratory failure and even death. Given the rising global death toll associated with the pandemic, in the last year we have witnessed a race to find drugs/biological treatments to save the lives of hospitalised, severely ill patients, as well as to develop vaccines. Nonetheless, to limit the number of hospitalisations and deaths due to severe illness, thus avoiding pushing hospitals to their limits and remarkably reducing the tremendous treatment costs for health care providers, it is crucial to also focus on primary care physicians and initial mild symptoms in COVID-19 patients at home. As with other acute viral infections, early initiation of treatment for COVID-19 might improve clinical outcomes. For COVID-19, most primary care physicians have initially treated their patients according to their judgment, with various treatment regimens they believe are most appropriate based on thier experience/expertise. We recently published a note on how we were treating patients at home based on the pathophysiologic and pharmacologic rationale and the available clinical evidence of efficacy in COVID-19 for each of the recommended class of drugs. Because the common early mild symptoms of COVID-19 highlight a systemic inflammatory process, there is the recommendation of using anti-inflammatory agents to limit excessive host inflammatory responses to the viral infection, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids. In a recent academic matched-cohort study, we found that early treatment of COVID-19 patients at home by their family doctors according to the proposed recommendation regimen almost completely prevented the need for hospital admission (the most clinically relevant outcome) due to progression toward more severe illness, compared to patients in the 'control' cohort who were treated at home according to their family physician's assessments. This translated into a reduction of over 90% in the overall numbers of days of hospitalisation and in related treatment costs. Treatment according to the recommended algorithm was safe and well tolerated. However, the rate of hospitalization was a secondary outcome of the study and the possibility of a casual finding cannot be definitely excluded. Thus, we have considered the observed reduction in patient hospitalization an hypothesis generating finding that provides a robust background for the present new cohort study primarily aimed to test the effect on this outcome of COVID-19 treatment at home according to the proposed recommendation algorithm. No randomized clinical trials have been performed so far in COVID-19 patients to compare the effectiveness of different regimens targeting early symptoms at home. Comparative analysis of patient cohorts with long-enough follow-up in everyday clinical practice may offer a good alternative to randomized clinical trials to evaluate effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. Thus, we will use this approach to compare a cohort of COVID-19 patients treated at home by their family physicians according to the proposed recommendation algorithm with another cohort of similar COVID-19 patients treated by their family doctors with various treatment regimens they believe most appropriate based on their experience and expertise, and monitored longitudinally up to 3 months. Our working hypothesis is that following the proposed recommendation algorithm the early COVID-19-related inflammatory process is limited, preventing the need of hospital admission at larger extent than with other therapeutic approaches also targeting early symptoms of the illness at home.

In this study, the effects of the symptoms related to the diseases of patients with fibromyalgia during the COVID-19 pandemic, their limitations in their social and business life, the need for different drugs, stress levels and the effect of the pandemic on the disease activity will be evaluated.

Antiviral efficacy of Ivermectin against Covid-19 in vitro was stated by many stusies all over the world with decreased effecacy in vivo so ,usage of masks impregnated into nano Ivermectin solution will theoretically increase the protective action of the ordinary masks

With the increasing number of COVID-19 infected patients, several studies reported that the liver is the most frequently affected organ after lung damage. The percentage of infected patients who had abnormal levels of transaminases (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)) was about 14.8-53.1%. The elevation in serum bilirubin was mostly mild. Aims of work: To study liver function tests abnormalities in Egyptian patients who infected with COVID19 To evaluate if liver function test abnormalities are related to the severity of the Covid19.