Active clinical trials for "Abdomen, Acute"

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the gastric emptying in adult patients that are going to operatin theatre due to an abdominal acute disease, for instance, intestinal obstruction or cholecystitis. This kind of patients are traditionally considered as a full stomach and the induction of anesthesia include rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in order to decrease the risk of aspiration . However, image technologies, like echography, allow the visualization of the stomach and to measure the amount and characteristics of the content lodged in the stomach. This information is vital to decide if RSI is necesary or not. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: What is the percentages of full stomach in patient who come to the operating room due an abodiminal acute disease? Are different variables, namely, time since diagnosis, use of antibiotics or non steroidal antiinflamatory drugs related with the content of the stomach? Participants will be evaluated with ecography to determinate the amount of content of the stomach before the surgery in the operating room.

There is ample evidence that pain in children is under recognized and under treated. This is especially true for acute abdominal pain, a common complaint in the paediatric emergency department. Clinicians often fear that analgesia will obscure the diagnosis of a potentially surgical condition. As a result, acute abdominal pain goes untreated in many children, as there is no standard of care. Hyoscine N-butylbromide (Buscopan) has been used successfully in adults and children for pain associated with urinary tract infections and kidney stones for over 60 years. However, no study has explored its usefulness in relieving acute abdominal pain in children. The objectives of this study are to investigate to what degree Buscopan is effective in relieving abdominal pain in children compared to acetaminophen.

Acute abdominal pain is a frequent symptom in children admitted to the emergency department . In the past the fear of masking a surgical condition has justified withholding analgesia in patients with acute abdominal pain. By the 2000s, some clinical trials established that opioid analgesia before surgical consultation does not affect diagnostic accuracy or outcome in children with acute abdominal pain. Despite this, acute abdominal pain is still undertreated in this setting. Published paediatric trials studied the effect of opioid analgesia administered by parenteral route or by mouth. To the best of our knowledge no study investigated the effectiveness of sublingual analgesia. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to assess the effectiveness of three different drugs (ketorolac, tramadol, paracetamol), administered by the sublingual route, in children complaining of acute abdominal pain.

Contrast to conventional Western medicine, traditional Chinese medicine is the most common used therapy of complementary and alternative medicine. Taiwan inherits traditional Chinese culture, and the people popularly accept traditional Chinese medicine for general diseases. However, most patients with acute or critical illness are used to admit to emergency department for medical services, and then transfer to the department of related specialist for further treatment. During the course of staying at emergent observation room, some diseases do not meet the criteria of admission and keep for evaluation. The longer of staying at emergent observation room the more waste medical resources. The Chinese medicine department of Changhua Christian hospital has treated patients, who consulted us at their own dispense, with subjective discomfort but remained at the emergent observation room. Detailed contents of this study include the Chinese and Western medicine, pharmaceutical, nursing cooperation mode, monitoring clinical effect of treating of the patients diagnosed with intestinal obstruction or ileus who complain about nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, abdominal distension or constipation.And the patients were assigned to the control and treatment group. Then we give the treatment group with the electroacupuncture treatment,and the control groupe with the Chinese medicine seeds and the transcutaneous nerve stimulation (no power).The patients were diagnosed with objective analysis of tongue diagnosis, pulse diagnosis, heart rate variability, and questionnaire of pain. Hope that we can assess the efficacy of both two different treatment,and also assess the cost of medical care, and try to complete the syndromes statistical analysis of traditional Chinese medicine for abdominal pain, building the relevance of Chinese medicine physical assessment teaching and clinical efficacy. The most important of this clinical teaching is that, this is a good opportunity for Chinese medicine and Western medicine to cooperate with each other at the emergency department to confirm the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine, not only in the field of chronic or geriatric diseases, but also in the field of emergency with the evidence base. This factually achieves communication and integration of Chinese and Western medicine, and benefits the public.

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of intravenous low dose ketamine (LDK) to the industry standard of morphine (MOR) in regards to controlling acute pain in the emergency department. Both LDK and morphine have side effects. The amount and character of these side effects will be compared. Additionally, the degree of sedation or agitation will be specifically measured. The aim of this current study is to make this comparison and shift the evidence for LDK use from the anecdotal to the scientific.

The investigators included all patients who were developed acute perforated peptic ulcer manifestations and were admitted to our hospital between December 2019 to August 2021. The study was approved by the research and Ethics committee of our university and performed in accordance with the code of ethics of the world medical association (Declaration of Helsinki) for studies involving humans. A written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The sample size was calculated using open Epi program using the following data ; confidence interval 95% , power of test 80% , ratio of unexposed/exposed 1, percent of patients with successful management of acute perforated peptic ulcer by surgical intervention 90% and those with successful management by endoscopy 99% , odds ratio 99%, and risk ratio 2 , so the calculated sample size equal 100 patients divided into two equal groups. Group (1) included 50 patients managed by combined endoscopic & radiologic intervention , group (2) included 50 patients managed by surgery.

Selenium is an important trace element for human for its multiple roles such as the antioxidant activity. Previous evidences showed that critically ill patients may benefit from selenium supplement but the dose and results are controversial. Patients after operations for acute abdomen usually suffer from sepsis and stress. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of selenium replacement in critical patients of acute abdomen, to see the impact on prognosis.

Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activation Receptor (SUPAR) is a validated biomarker with applications in the study of inflammation and infection. Elevated levels of SUPAR have recently been linked to a higher mortality in patients suffering from undifferentiated sepsis, pneumonia, and more recently, COVID-19 infection. Large randomized controlled trials have been conducted on patients admitted to the emergency department (ER), regardless of the reason for admittance. These studies have stratified risk based on three cutoffs at initial measurement: Low risk : < 3 ng/mL Intermediate risk : entre 3 et 6 ng/mL High risk : > 6 ng/mL Low levels of SUPAR are associated with low risk of mortality in the short and long term in patients presenting to the ED, no matter the reason for admittance. Risk stratification could be an added decision-making tool for clinicians to comfort hospital discharge. To the best of our knowledge, there is no available data on the added value of SUPAR for predicting mortality in abdominal sepsis and abdominal pain. Abdominal pain is responsible for 10 to 30 % of ER admissions. Consequently, abdominal pain is then responsible for roughly 10 % of admissions into medical and surgical wards. Mortality varies depending on patient factors. Mortality is usually stratified on age. In patients under 50 years of age, it is near 8%, but it reaches 19 % in patients over 50. Diagnostic accuracy also decreases drastically with age, reaching approximately 30 % patients over 75. Taking this into account, integrating a measure of SUPAR levels into the current standard of care could stratify the risk of complications in patients admitted to the ER with abdominal pain.

Acute abdomen is the clinical manifestation of irritation of the peritoneum, due to intra-abdominal generalized infection. With the exception of the primary ones which are the result of a bacterial translocation from the gastro-intestinal tract or an abdominal contamination for hematogenous way sometimes treatable with medical therapy alone, peritonitis represents a complex condition that requires an early surgical treatment. Mortality linked to the peritonitis is extremely high and variable between 42% and 80% when associated with a systemic framework of severe sepsis. This variability is linked to a number of risk factors, including advanced age of the patients, the presence of comorbidity, male sex, a poor nutritional status, and a number of re-operations; as well as specific characteristics related to the type of infection, the timing of surgery, the beginning of an appropriate and early antibiotic therapy.The post-operative treatment of the patient with peritonitis significantly affects the outcome of the same. The presence of peritonitis and then the seizure of large volumes of liquids and the possible state of systemic vasodilation induced by the infectious process, provide a framework of hypovolemia. There is a literature that identifies in abdominal trauma damage patient's volemic aggressive resuscitation an element of pejorative outcomes. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the clinical changes determined by a different volemic strategy.

This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial included all patients who developed the manifestations of appendicular abscess and referred to the Zagazig University Hospital Emergency Department between January 2020 and February 2022. The study was prospectively approved by Zagazig University Faculty of Medicine Institutional Review Board (Approval Number: 55342/24.1.2020). The sample size was 172 patients divided into two equal group group (1) laparoscopic group involved 86 patients & group (2) interventional radiology group involved 86 patients.