Active clinical trials for "Abortion, Threatened"

In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of two drugs used for the threated miscarriage on the miscarriage rate.

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate and compare in pregnant women with threatened miscarriage in the first trimester. The main questions it aims to answer are: What is the correlation between serum C reactive protein (CRP) levels and fetal ultrasound parameters in predicting threatened miscarriage? How accurate are serum C reactive protein (CRP) levels versus ultrasound in predicting pregnancy loss in threatened miscarriage? Participants will have blood tests to measure C reactive protein (CRP) levels and fetal ultrasound exams to assess parameters like crown-rump length. Researchers will compare serum C reactive protein (CRP) levels and fetal ultrasound findings to see if either or both can accurately predict pregnancy loss in women with first trimester threatened miscarriage.

The main objective of this study will be to assess the efficacy of natural progesterone at a daily dose of 25 mg/bid in the maintenance of early pregnancy in women with symptoms of threatened abortion. The secondary objectives will be the efficacy of progesterone in reducing both pain and uterine contractions.

To decide whether progesterone supplementation in threatened abortion is a sound practice.

The aim of this study is to determine whether the dydrogesterone therapy is associated with reduction in miscarriage in women with first trimester threatened miscarriage. The hypothesis is that the dydrogesterone therapy will significantly reduce the risk of miscarriage in women with threatened miscarriage.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of oral dydrogesterone in preventing miscarriage in threatened abortion. Half of participants will receive oral dydrogesterone, while the other half will receive oral placebo.

to identify the relation between maternal serum high sensitivity C reactive protein and total and differential leucocytic count values in healthy pregnant women with threatened abortion and the outcome of pregnancy

The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy of vaginal micronized progesterone in the treatment of threatened miscarriage. All eligible pregnant women will be randomized to either receive vaginal progesterone or no treatment.Evaluation will be two weeks after intervention, then every 4 weeks up to 28 weeks gestation or termination of pregnancy.

Threatened miscarriage is manifested by vaginal bleeding, with or without abdominal pain, while the cervix is closed and the fetus is viable and inside the uterine cavity. Threatened miscarriage is a common complication of pregnancy occurring in 20% of all clinically recognized pregnancies and about half of these will eventually result in pregnancy loss. The goal of this double-bind, randomized and double dummy controlled trial is to determine which of the two oral medications, CHM or micronized progesterone, and will mostly likely result in live birth in women with threatened miscarriage. We will evaluate the efficacy and safety of CHM and micronized progesterone for treating threatened miscarriage in this trial. Our primary outcome of this trial is a live birth. We hypothesize that: 1. treatment with CHM plus micronized progesterone placebo or micronized progesterone plus CHM placebo or CHM plus Micronized progesterone is more likely to result in live birth than the control arm which will be CHM placebo plus micronized progesterone placebo; 2. CHM plus micronized progesterone placebo and micronized progesterone plus CHM placebo will have similar treatment effects.

Non-medical used of misoprostol for abortion is a growing concern in Guadeloupe. Such situation is reasonable for countries in which abortion is not easy to obtain or prohibited. However regarding the risk of complications, it is less understandable in region like Guadeloupe where legal abortion with medical assistance is accessible for all and free. The aim of the study is to investigate on the amount of misoprostol taken by women in Guadeloupe, by doing an analytical measurement. The aim is to evaluate batter this practice in Guadeloupe, when the main objective of the study is to detect the presence or the absence of misoprostol in the urine sample of the woman coming at hospital for threatened miscarriage or miscarriage complications. Moreover, these abortions can be more important than spontaneous miscarriage.