Active clinical trials for "Acne Vulgaris"

This is a single-blind (blinded expert grader), randomized, half-face study being conducted at one clinical site. On 1 side of the face, the subject will apply 1 of the 2 test products, antibiotic and benzoyl peroxide or benzoyl peroxide and adapalene gel and the contra lateral side of the face will remain non-treated to serve as a control. Approximately 25-30 male and female healthy subjects will be randomly assigned to each product

A study to compare the skin irritation potential of two marketed gels for acne treatment, each applied to half of the face of healthy volunteers.

This study is an evaluation of the role of topical dissolved oxygen to lessen visible signs of photodamage using a select regimen of topical dissolved oxygen containing cosmeceutical products. Evaluation of the overall skin tolerability of topical dissolved oxygen (safety) utilizing the regimen of products.

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the effect of short treatment with active OPLON patches on Acne.

Acne is one of the most common skin problems in teenagers and adolescents. There are many lesser known homoeopathic medicines which have been mentioned in the literature for treatment of acne but their potential has not been properly assessed /documented and therefore these medicines don't form a part of many prescriptions. As a part of this study, efficacy of Zingiber officinalis will be studied in the treatment of Acne vulgaris

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical 0.1% and 0.025% ASC-J9 creams applied twice daily for facial acne compared to vehicle control.

The purpose of this study is to provide evidence of the safety, tolerance, and efficacy of ANT-1207 in the treatment of acne.

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study in Japanese subjects with acne vulgaris to demonstrate the efficacy of GI148512 (benzoyl peroxide [BPO] 3% gel) when applied once daily for 12 weeks. This study will also evaluate the safety of GI148512 when applied topically once daily for 12 weeks.

The results of pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment of acne vulgaris published so far are controversial: Whereas Seaton et al. described a marked improvement of mild-to-moderate acne after low-fluence pulsed-dye laser therapy, Orringer et al. were unable to replicate said results in a similar, albeit not identical, study design. More recently published studies failed to resolve the controversy, varying in terms of treatment procedure(s) as well as results. While published results are certainly promising enough to be followed up by independent research, they are insufficient to justify the abdication of methods with proven efficacy. Considering patient treatment ethics and the short 'window of opportunity' for scar prevention when active inflammatory lesions are present, the investigators planned the adjuvant application of the PDL in the present study, providing all patients with the well established and evidentially effective modality of a fixed-combination clindamycin 1%-benzoyl peroxide 5% hydrating gel (C/BPO). The goal of the study was the assessment of the efficacy and safety of a low-fluence PDL treatment in addition to C/BPO in patients with facial inflammatory acne.

The objectives of this clinical trial are to compare the quality of life of the subjects, the efficacy and the tolerance of Duac® Gel (gel formulation with a combination of clindamycin phosphate [equivalent to 1% clindamycin] and 5% benzoyl peroxide), applied once daily, against Differin® Gel (gel with 0.1% adapalene), used once daily, in the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris.