search

Active clinical trials for "Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome"

Results 1051-1060 of 1710

Evaluation of the Effect of Late Boost on HIV-uninfected Vaccines From EV06 Trial

HIV/AIDS

EV07 is an open label phase I clinical trial to evaluate the effect of late boost on HIV-uninfected vaccinees from EV06 trial. The outcome of the EV06 trial has shown that the vaccine regimen is safe and well tolerated. Preliminary antibody immunogenicity analysis has demonstrated that the DNA/gp120 protein vaccine regimen induced strong gp120, gp140 and V1V2 region-focused binding IgG and neutralizing antibody responses. There is also preliminary evidence that S. mansoni infection may modulate antibody responses induced by vaccination1. Based on these preliminary immunogenicity results of the EV06 study, a study with an additional boost with DNA-HIV-PT123 and AIDSVAX®B/E (Late Boost) is warranted in order to better investigate and understand the effects of the late boost on the response rate, magnitude and durability of vaccine induced immune responses. The primary objective of EV07 is to evaluate the ability of the late boost combination of DNA-HIV-PT123 and AIDSVAX® B/E to enhance the pre-existing vaccine induced antibody responses.

Completed37 enrollment criteria

Same-Day Treatment With Genvoya vs. EFV/TDF/3TC

HIV/AIDS

Randomized, open-label study comparing Elvitegravir-Cobicistat-Tenofovir Alafenamide-Emtricitabine (Genvoya) vs. Efavirenz-Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate-Lamivudine (EFV-TDF-3TC) in patients starting ART on the day of HIV diagnosis.

Withdrawn16 enrollment criteria

Assessing the Impact of an Educational HIV Prevention Intervention in Zambia

HIV/AIDS

In Zambia, 13% of the 15 to 49 year old population lives with HIV. The highest number of new HIV infections is among young people. To counter the spread of the disease, developmental and governmental actors are increasingly relying on educational behavior change tools. A particularly widely used tool, implemented by the German Development Corporation (henceforth, GIZ), is the so-called "Join-In-Circuit on AIDS, Love Sexuality" (JIC). The tool aims to improve a) HIV and sexual reproductive health knowledge, b) HIV testing uptake, and c) demand for health services. Previous research has investigated the direct effect of the JIC on knowledge about Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) as well as self-reported sexual behavior in Zimbabwe, and has found positive effects in both domains. The research project evaluates the JIC in Zambia. The study randomly assigns 170 participating schools to five different JIC treatment arms. The first two arms represent control schools. Here, no JIC will be implemented. The third arm implements the JIC among a random subset of students. The fourth arm implements the JIC among indegree central students. The fifth arm implements the JIC among edge betweeness central students. In each school, the JIC will be implemented in one pre-determined grade. Within each school at least 30 students will be selected. For larger schools, 20 percent of students in the selected grade are selected.

Completed4 enrollment criteria

Reaching Out to the UNdiagnosed People Infected With Blood Borne Viral Infections

Hepatitis BHepatitis c1 more

Title Reaching out to the UNdiagnosed people infected with blood-borne viral infections (RUNtoBBV) Objectives 1. To study the efficacy of an outreach methodology to increase the uptake for screening, linkage to care and treatment in (active or former) people who use drugs (PWUD) Trial design Prospective multicenter interventional cohort design Number of subjects 336 inclusions (with prevalence of HCV Ab: 30%) 168 Antwerp 168 Limburg Selection criteria Inclusion criteria: 18 years of age History of/ or active drug use Written informed consent obtained Exclusion criteria Currently enrolled in centralized OST program of Free Clinic or CAD Limburg Endpoints The following endpoints will be compared between the centers in Limburg and Antwerp: (Main outcome in bold) Main objectives: Prevalence of blood-borne viral infections in Belgian (former or active) PWUD: HCV infection (number of HCV Ab+ / number of screened PWUD) HBV infection (number of HBsAg+/number of screened PWUD) HIV infection (number of HIV Ab+/number of screened PWUD) Analysis of linkage to care to hepatologist/ infectiologist (number of patients who adhered to their consultation/number of referred patients) Secondary objectives: Analysis of risk behavior/sociodemographics linked to presence of BBV infections Analysis of uptake of anti(retro)viral treatment (number of patients started on treatment/number of patients needing treatment) Analysis of treatment adherence (adherence to treatment consultations/total planned consultations) Analysis of treatment outcome (total number of cured or virally suppressed patients/total number of treated patients)

Completed5 enrollment criteria

Developing a PrEP Adherence Intervention Targeting At-Risk and Substance Using Women

HIV/AIDS

The purpose of this study is to develop and assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy on adherence of a community-informed intervention for tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) engagement among street-based female sex workers (FSW) in Baltimore, Maryland.

Completed11 enrollment criteria

PrEP My Way: A Novel PrEP Delivery System to Meet the Needs of Young African Women

HIV/AIDS

The investigators will first develop, tailor, and refine PrEP My Way for use with young women in Kisumu, Kenya (Aim 1). The design firm will use a client-centered, iterative approach, involving up to 15 individual interviews and two focus group discussions (with up to 5 women each) to optimally design the PrEP My Way kit (with instructional materials) and peer delivery system (including communication and kit delivery plans). The investigators will then test the intervention for feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact on PrEP adherence and program retention (Aim 2). The study team will randomize 100 Kenyan women to PrEP My Way versus standard of care (i.e., clinic-based delivery of PrEP and sexual health services) and follow them for 6 months. Feasibility will be assessed by receipt of the kit at 1, 3, and 6 months and ability to use its components per protocol. Acceptability will be determined through a mixed-methods interview at 6 months. Preliminary impact will be evaluated by dried blood spot tenofovir levels (adherence) and kit use/clinic attendance at 6 months (retention) as primary outcomes. Mediators and moderators of PrEP use (e.g., empowerment and mental health) will be explored through questionnaires at baseline and 6 months.

Completed7 enrollment criteria

3BNC117-LS First-in-Human Phase 1 Study

Human Immunodeficiency Virus

The proposed study is a phase 1 study of the mAb 3BNC117-LS administered intravenously in HIV uninfected individuals and HIV-infected individuals, and subcutaneously in HIV-uninfected individuals.The objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a single administration of 3BNC117-LS.

Completed52 enrollment criteria

Social Media Based Peer-Led Intervention for HIV Prevention

HIV PreventionPrEP Uptake

The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of E-PrEP on reaching young men of color who have sex with men (YMCSM) at high-risk of HIV infection to reduce HIV acquisition. E-PrEP is a peer-designed social media-based health intervention to increase PrEP awareness, knowledge, and motivation as a tool for HIV prevention and to increase linkage to primary care.

Completed2 enrollment criteria

Digital Star: HIV Prevention for Youth in Mental Health Treatment

Human Immunodeficiency VirusMental Health

Teenagers in mental health treatment are at greater risk for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. This greater risk comes from many factors, some of which are related to poor emotion regulation and low self-confidence. There is a need for an HIV prevention program specifically for these at-risk teens. The goal of this study is to develop a computerized HIV prevention study tailored to adolescents in mental health treatment. The first part of the study will develop core sessions of D*STAR. It will do this by using focus group feedback from approximately 15 adolescents in mental health treatment, and approximately 10 parents of youth in mental health treatment and mental health treatment center staff. Feedback on D*STAR prototype sessions will also be collected from two individual interviews with approximately 15 youth in mental health treatment. Core sessions will then be reviewed in an open trial with approximately 30 adolescents. The second part of the study will develop and refine digital versions of the remaining sessions of STAR and a digital general health promotion intervention. It will do this by using focus group feedback from approximately 20 adolescents in mental health treatment, and approximately 10 community advisory board members which include variety of staff from mental health treatment settings such as administrators, supervisors, therapists, health teachers at therapeutic schools, clinicians at day hospitals and day treatment programs, parents of youth in mental health treatment and from relevant community organizations, such as those serving lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning youth. Feedback on D*STAR prototype sessions will also be collected from two individual interviews with approximately 20 youth in mental health treatment. All developed sessions (from both Phase I and Phase II) will then be reviewed in an open trial with approximately 20 adolescents. A randomized control trial (RCT) will then be conducted to compare D*STAR to a time matched digital general health promotion intervention among approximately 120 adolescents. For the pilot and RCT phases, assessments will be administered prior to randomization, immediately following the last intervention session, and at one month post-intervention (pilot study) or at three month post-intervention (RCT).

Completed9 enrollment criteria

Evaluating Accuracy, Impact, and Operational Challenges of GeneXpert Use for TB Case Finding Among...

TuberculosisHuman Immunodeficiency Virus

Background: In Botswana, as in the rest of sub-Saharan Africa, undiagnosed TB or TB diagnosed late in the course of disease is thought to be the most common cause of death among HIV-infected persons. Interventions for Evaluation: The Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the GeneXpert platform (Xpert) has a TB diagnostic sensitivity of 82.4%, significantly superior to that of smear microscopy (44.6%). In line with WHO guidelines, the Botswana Ministry of Health (MOH) and CDC rapidly rolled out the Xpert device and a new Xpert-based diagnostic algorithm in service of 22 HIV care and treatment clinics. To maximize impact of the Xpert device in improving detection of active TB, Xpert rollout was preceded by strengthening of TB screening procedures by: (1) adopting the WHO-recommended 4-symptom TB screen for adults; (2) situating trained TB case-finding nurses in facilities; and (3) training health facility personnel in TB diagnostic algorithms. The combination of these strengthened TB screening procedures and rollout of the Xpert device is referred to as the "Xpert package" in this protocol. Key Evaluation Objectives: The protocol has two key objectives: (1) to evaluate whether the new MOH-recommended Xpert-based TB diagnostic algorithm for new adult HIV clinic enrollees is more sensitive than the pre-Xpert smear-microscopy-based algorithm in diagnosing culture-positive TB disease; and (2) to evaluate the impact of the whole "Xpert package" on all-cause mortality during the first 6 months of ART, among adult patients. Design: Stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. Sample Size: 6,136 patients were prospectively enrolled to meet the first primary objective. A retrospective cohort of 10,131 persons was also enrolled to meet the second objective. Projected power to meet both objectives is >80%. Time line: Prospective cohort enrollment started in July 2012 and was complete by March 2014. Retrospective cohort enrollment was complete by March 2015. Patient follow-up and data entry will be complete in March 2016 at which time analysis to answer the first two primary study questions will be possible.

Completed6 enrollment criteria
1...105106107...171

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs