Active clinical trials for "Ischemic Stroke"

Studies from our lab indicated that long-term sedation is protective in mice with midbrain infarct. To assess whether post-operative sedation has protective effects on clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (ET), a multi-center, randomized clinical trial will be carried out (POSET study). In POSET study, patients receiving ET for acute ischemic stroke under general anesthesia will be randomly assigned to the control group (Con group) and the post-operative sedation group (POS group). Patients in the Con group will be recovered and extubated immediately after the surgery, whereas those in the POS group will be sedated with propofol and dexmedetomidine for another 6hrs before extubation. The primary endpoint is the score on the modified Rankin Scale assessed at 90±7 days after randomization. The hypothesis is that patients in the POS group will have improved clinical outcome in 3 months after surgery.

This study is designed to determine the efficacy and safety of Cerebrolysin treatment as an add- on therapy to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in reducing global disability in subjects with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The investigators have planned a single centre, prospective, open-label, single-arm study with 12 months follow-up of 50 patients with moderate to severe AIS, with a small established infarct core and with good collateral circulation who achieve significant reperfusion following MT and who receive additional Cerebrolysin within 8 hours of stroke onset compared to 50 historical controls treated with MT alone - matched for age, clinical severity, occlusion location, baseline perfusion lesion volume, onset to reperfusion time and use of iv thrombolytic therapy (rt-PA). The primary outcome measure will be overall proportion of subjects receiving Cerebrolysin comparing to control group experiencing a favorable functional outcome (by modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) at 7 day, 30 days, 90 days and 12 months following stroke onset. The secondary objectives are to determine the efficacy of Cerebrolysin as compared to control group in reducing risk of symptomatic secondary hemorrhagic transformation, improving neurological outcome (NIHSS 0-2 at day 7, day 30 and 90); reducing mortality rates (over the 90-day and 12 months study period); and improving: activities of daily living (by Barthel Index; BI), health-related quality of life (as measured by the EQ-5D-5L) assessed at day 30, 90 and at 12 months. The other measures of efficacy in Cerebrolysin group will include: assessment of final stroke volume and penumbral salvage (measured by CT/CTP at 30 days) and its change compared to baseline volume, changes over time in language function (by the 15-item Boston Naming Test), hemispatial neglect (by line bisection test), global cognitive function (by The Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and depression (by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) between day 30 and day 90 assessments). The patients will receive 30 ml of Cerebrolysin within 8h of AIS stroke onset and continue treatment once daily until day 21 (first cycle) and they will receive a second cycle of treatment (30 ml/d for 21 days given in the Outpatient Department or Neurorehabilitation Clinic) from day 69 to 90 (± 3 days). All the patients (including those from the control group) receive the same standardized rehabilitation program (including speech therapy, occupational and physical therapy) during hospitalization at Stroke Unit and at Neurorehabilitation Clinic until day 90 according to local procedures. Historical data will be obtained by retrospective clinical chart reviews of patients hospitalized in the study center between Jan.2018 and Dec.2020 and fulfilling the same clinical and radiological inclusion criteria in whom 12-month follow-up (including mRS, NIHSS, BI, EQ-5D-5L) could be obtained.

This Early Feasibility Study (EFS) is a multi-center, open-label single-arm study in 10 acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with VitalFlow-IS stimulation within 6 hours of symptom onset. The purpose of the EFS is to evaluate initial clinical safety and device functionality in the clinical workflow setting for treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients that will inform design modifications and/or user interface in preparation for next steps consisting of (1) a full safety/feasibility clinical study and (2) randomized controlled pivotal trial with a surrogate endpoint (expedited Premarket Approval (PMA) pathway).

Evaluation of the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of NR1 administered intracerebrally at a single time-point post-injury to subjects with chronic ISS with or without cortical stroke.

The SUMMIT MAX study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, interventional clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Route 92 Medical MonoPoint® Reperfusion System for aspiration thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients.

This innovative study will address scientific and clinical areas relatively unexplored in chronic stroke that could lead to greater recovery of walking. Ischemic Conditioning (IC) is a non-invasive, simple procedure that improves motor function, exercise performance and cardiovascular function in healthy controls, but it has never been applied to the stroke population. We postulate that IC enhances the recruitment of motoneurons and results in positive neural adaptations, improves vascular endothelial function and peripheral blood flow, and together these improvements result in an increased capacity to exercise and faster walking speed. Future studies will examine the effects of IC and traditional therapy at different time points of recovery post stroke, durability of IC, molecular mechanisms of neural and cardiovascular adaptation and the efficacy compared with other adjuncts.

The main objective of the study will be to investigate whether treatment with non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) on top of best medical practice in acute ischemic stroke patients results in less infarct growth in the penumbra and smaller infarct volumes compared with those of patients not treated with nVNS. The study will be a prospective randomized clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment (PROBE design). 150 patients will be randomized to nVNS with the gammaCore Sapphire™ device on top of best medical practice versus best medical practice alone (including intravenous thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy if indicated). If patients are randomized to nVNS, two stimulations of two minutes each will be applied in the neck every 15 minutes in the first 3 hours. Thereafter two stimulations will be applied every 8 hours over the next 5 days or until discharge, whichever occurs first. The stimulation side in the neck will be the radiological side of the stroke. The primary endpoint will be the final infarct volume on MRI scan on day 5 of patients treated with nVNS compared with those of patients not treated with VNS.

The study's main goal is to determine if clinical and physiological effects of a brain-computer interface intervention for the neurorehabilitation of stroke patients' upper limb are greater than the effects of a sham robotic feedback. For this purpose a randomized controlled trial will be performed to compare somatosensory sham robotic feedback with the same somatosensory feedback controlled with the brain-computer interface output.

The purpose of this research study is to determine whether blood pressure treatment regimens with spironolactone are better than blood pressure treatment regimens without spironolactone at lowering blood pressure in stroke survivors.

This study explores the use of CRP level reduction in patients after suffering from acute ischemic stroke. Using selective CRP-apheresis, the investigators aim to reduce the secondary inflammatory tissue damage in the course of infarction maturation using infarction growth in MRI as the primary outcome as a surrogate.