search

Active clinical trials for "Acute Lung Injury"

Results 381-390 of 969

Safety and Efficacy Study of Depelestat in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Patients

FibrosisLung Disease6 more

The study is aimed to assess safety of Depelestat treatment, as well as efficacy on prevention and treatment of alveolar inflammation in early pulmonary fibrosis in patients suffering from persistent Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Completed7 enrollment criteria

A Phase II Randomized Trial of Fish Oil in Patients With Acute Lung Injury (ALI)

Respiratory Distress SyndromeAdult2 more

The purpose of this study is to determine whether fish oil (containing omega-3 fatty acids) given enterally is safe and effective in reducing lung and systemic inflammation seen in acute lung injury.

Completed15 enrollment criteria

Etanercept for Non-Infectious Lung Injury Following Bone Marrow Transplantation

Respiratory Distress SyndromeAdult2 more

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of etanercept, and define the toxicity, when administered to patients with acute non-infectious lung injury (idiopathic pneumonia syndrome, IPS) and with subacute pulmonary dysfunction after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Completed11 enrollment criteria

Treatment of Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and ARDS With Protection, Paralysis, and Proning (TheraPPP)...

Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeHypoxemic Respiratory Failure2 more

Treatment of patients with Hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is complex. Therapies that have been shown to save the lives of patients with HRF and ARDS are available but they are not always provided. To reduce practice variation and improve adherence to evidence-informed therapies, the investigators developed the Treatment of Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (HRF) and ARDS with Protection, Paralysis, and Proning (TheraPPP) Pathway. The purpose of this pilot study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of the TheraPPP Pathway. To assess feasibility, the investigators will test the ability to measure adherence to the pathway as well as patient and economic outcomes. To assess perceptions about the acceptability of the TheraPPP Pathway, the investigators will conduct a survey to clinicians who used the Pathway.

Completed3 enrollment criteria

Intravenous Aviptadil for Critical COVID-19 With Respiratory Failure

Critical COVID-19 With Respiratory FailureAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)2 more

Novel Corona Virus (SARS-CoV-2) is known to cause Respiratory Failure, which is the hallmark of Acute COVID-19, as defined by the new NIH/FDA classification. Approximately 50% of those who develop Critical COVID-19 die, despite intensive care and mechanical ventilation. Patients with Critical COVID-19 and respiratory failure, currently treated with high flow nasal oxygen, non-invasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation will be treated with ZYESAMI (aviptadil), a synthetic form of Human Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide (VIP) plus maximal intensive care vs. placebo + maximal intensive care. Patients will be randomized to intravenous Aviptadil will receive escalating doses from 50 -150 pmol/kg/hr over 12 hours.

Completed19 enrollment criteria

Polyvalent Immunoglobulin in COVID-19 Related ARds

Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeCOVID-19

As of 30/03/2020, 715600 people have been infected with COVID-19 worldwide and 35500 people died, essentially due to respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) complicated in 25% of the with acute renal failure. No specific pharmacological treatment is available yet. The lung lesions are related to both the viral infection and to an intense inflammatory reaction. Because of it's action, as an immunomodulatory agent that can attenuate the inflammatory reaction and also strengthen the antiviral response, it is proposed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin administration (IGIV) in patients developing ARDS post-SARS-CoV2. IGIV modulates immunity, and this effect results in a decrease of pro-inflammatory activity, key factor in the ARDS related to the COVID-19. It should be noted that IGIV is part of the treatments in various diseases such as autoimmune and inflammatory diffuse interstitial lung diseases. In addition, they have been beneficial in the post-influenza ARDS but also have been in 3 cases of post-SARS-CoV2 ARDS. IGIV is a treatment option because it is well tolerated, especially concerning the kidney. These elements encourage a placebo-controlled trial testing the benefit of IGIV in ARDS post-SARS-CoV2.

Completed11 enrollment criteria

TD-0903 for ALI Associated With COVID-19

Acute Lung Injury (ALI) Associated With COVID-19Lung Inflammation Associated With COVID-19

This Phase 2 study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of inhaled TD-0903 compared with a matching placebo in combination with standard of care (SOC) in hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 associated acute lung injury and impaired oxygenation.

Completed29 enrollment criteria

LSALT Peptide vs. Placebo to Prevent ARDS and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2...

COVIDSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome3 more

To evaluate the proportion of subjects alive and free of respiratory failure (e.g. need for non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, high flow oxygen, or ECMO) and free of the need for continued renal replacement therapy (RRT) on Day 28. The need for continued RRT at Day 28 will be defined as either dialysis in the past 3 days (Day 26, 27, or 28) or an eGFR on Day 28 <10 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Completed37 enrollment criteria

STUDY OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION IN PULMONARY FUNCTION IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

Respiratory Distress SyndromeAdult

Introduction: The Mechanical Ventilation (MV), a support method used in Intensive Care Units (ICU), reaches approximately 90% of critical patients whose withdrawal process represents 40% of the total time of their use. For this purpose Transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation (TEDS), which by means of electrodes placed in motor action points on the phrenic nerve tend to provide improvement of the diaphragm muscle function. Objective: To analyze the effect of two protocols of transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation on the ventilatory and cardiorespiratory parameters of critically ill patients. Method: Clinical, longitudinal, prospective, quantitative, single center trial will be performed with 30 (thirty) participants in invasive mechanical ventilatory support, randomly divided into three groups: Experimental Group 1 (GE-1; n = 10) where they will be submitted to the TEDS protocol; Experimental Group 2 (GE-2; n = 10), where they will be submitted to the TEDS protocol based on the studies of Cancelliero et al. (2012); Control Group (GC; n = 10) where they will not be submitted to TEDS. All groups will receive physiotherapeutic care from the staff of the adult ICU of the FHCGV. The interventions will consist of ten sessions of Physical Therapy in each participant in the afternoon shift, for ten consecutive days, 1 time a day. For the TEDS procedure, the Orion TENS II (Orion-SP-Brazil) model will be used, the Wright analogue respirometer (Spire-SP-Brazil) will be used for the minute volume evaluation (V'). The variables of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) will also be monitored in order to verify if the TEDS application interferes with the hemodynamic variables of these patients. The data collected will be linked to Microsoft Office Excel® 2010 software and later transformed into tables and graphs. The information collected will be submitted to statistical analysis through the statistical package SPSS 22.0, applying the descriptive statistics for the characterization of the sample and then selecting the specific tests for the respective variances, adopting a level of significance of p≤0.05 for statistical inferences.

Completed12 enrollment criteria

Nebulised BromAc in Healthy Volunteers

COVID-19 PneumoniaBromelains Adverse Reaction3 more

COVID-19 is a disease that has multiple facets including an inflammatory storm, it promotes blood clotting and causes kidney damage, mucinous secretions in the lung are of great importance to outcome. Increasingly sticky sputum is associated with critical illness, with considerably raised levels of a specific type of mucous protein (MUC5AC) in sputum in COVID-19 patients. There is a strong link between viral infection and mucus production via multiple inter-cellular signalling pathways including Interleukin (IL)6, IL10 and Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) whereby the inflammatory storm causes sudden secretion of high volumes of dense mucus. An Australian pharmaceutical company has developed BromAc (Bromelain & Acetylcysteine) for the palliative treatment of highly mucinous tumors of the appendix and lung. During pre-clinical development, they found that BromAc® rapidly dissolved and removed tumour mucin, making it a potent mucolytic. In combination, bromelain and acetylcysteine disrupt the architecture of the SARS-COV-2 virus in a way that renders it non-infective, reduced cytokines and chemokines in COVID-19 sputum and is a highly effective respiratory mucolytic. The aim of this study is to assess whether BromAc delivered into the respiratory tract as a nebulised aerosol is tolerated and safe at three specific concentrations in healthy volunteer participants. The investigators will further assess the safety of nebulised BromAc and efficacy of the drug product as a mucolytic and anti-inflammatory, and whether this improves clinical outcome in participants with COVID-19. The hypothesis is that BromAc will be tolerated by patients and will result in mucus clearance, improving oxygenation and compliance in those that are ventilated. This is a phase I study on the safety of BromAc, where 12 healthy volunteers will receive BromAc as a nebulised aerosol into the respiratory tract. BromAc is a product that combines two existing products to be delivered into the respiratory tract via nebulised aerosol delivery through a mask. The participant will be assessed for symptoms and side effects. The participant will receive nebulised BromAc at the allocated dose level for a total of 3 days. The hypothesis is that nebulised airway delivery of BromAc will be safe at the concentrations assessed.

Completed13 enrollment criteria
1...383940...97

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs