Active clinical trials for "Acute Pain"

Adeno-tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgeries in children. The most common complication associated is postoperative pain. If not well controlled, especially in preschool children, it can lead to a longer recovery period, delayed discharge, and nutritional deficiencies resulting in dehydration. These factors will increase hospitalization period and the need for intravenous fluids. For this purpose, a large number of studies has been designed to evaluate the analgesic effects of various drugs during the perioperative period. Opioids are associated with sedation and respiratory depression, NSAIDs increase the risk of reoperation for bleeding while local anesthetics may cause vasoconstriction of the operation site. For several years, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors antagonists, such as ketamine and magnesium, have been used successfully to decrease postoperative pain and analgesic requirements in adult patients undergoing a number of different procedures. Ketamine reduces the needed analgesia after tonsillectomy. Most studies have shown that ketamine administration has no side effects such as hemodynamic, respiratory complications and airway problems. Magnesium is a physiological antagonist of the NMDA receptor ion channel that plays a key role in central sensitization. Many studies have investigated the effect of magnesium sulphate on postoperative pain and opioid consumption. However, results of those studies were variable. Whereas most studies describe the reduction of postoperative analgesic requirements after magnesium sulfate, a few studies show insignificant beneficial effects. A previous study evaluated the effect of low dose ketamine (0.15 mg/kg) and magnesium sulfate (30 mg/kg) on post tonsillectomy pain in children, which did not demonstrate a decrease in pain or analgesic consumption in children undergoing tonsillectomy. In this study, the investigators will increase the dose of ketamine to (0.5 mg/kg) and magnesium sulfate to (40 mg/kg) to evaluate their effect on postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing adeno-tonsillectomy.

To date, the effects of pain on motor learning have not been thoroughly investigated, particularly in older adults. Broadly, the purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of acute pain on locomotor learning and its retention in older adults. The investigators hypothesize that acute pain impairs retention of locomotor learning in young and older adults and that in older adults, these deficits are worsened and are related to the degree of normal age-related cognitive decline.

Primary aim is to compare the effectiveness of the posterior approach Transversus abdominis plane block (P-TAP) and the lateral approach Transversus abdominis plane block (L-TAP) technique on the pain management of the laparoscopic nephrectomy in terms of visual analog pain scale and postoperative opioid consumption. Secondary aim is to compare complication rates of the two techniques.

This is a clinical trial of nabilone for patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) who are undergoing IBD-related surgery (Any abdominal surgery lasting for more than one hour). This study would include a total of 80 patients undergoing general surgery who will have Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia (IVPCA) after surgery. It is the intention to randomize these patients postoperatively into 2 groups of 40 patients: Patients who are chronic opioid users for chronic pain and have been exposed to cannabis or cannabinoid products, treated with IV PCA and nabilone as per protocol. Patients who are chronic opioid users for chronic pain and have been exposed to cannabis or cannabinoid products, treated with IV PCA and placebo as per protocol. The goal is two-fold. One is to demonstrate that patients will benefit from post-operative nabilone administration to achieve/maintain the opioid-sparing and pain modulation effects. Second is to demonstrate patients will benefit from the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of nabilone to alleviate IBD symptoms and enhance recovery.

This clinical trial evaluates whether it is possible to use a single dose of oral liquid ketamine (ingested by mouth) in combination with talk therapy to treat moderate to severe demoralization in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who take opioids for cancer-related pain. PDAC patients often suffer from high rates of psychosocial distress and pain. Symptoms of anxiety are highly prevalent among PDAC patients. While opioid analgesia (pain reliever) succeeds in managing some symptoms, chronic opioid therapy is associated with significant adverse effects, underscoring a need to identify alternative interventions in the treatment of PDAC-associated pain. PDAC patients frequently suffer from existential distress. Demoralization is a form of existential distress that is common among people with serious medical illnesses; it is characterized by poor coping with stressful events, and a loss of meaning and purpose in life. Talk therapy is a form of psychological treatment during which patients discuss problems, thoughts, and feelings. Ketamine has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of depression, suicidality, and pain in non-cancer patients. This study may help researchers learn whether both ketamine and talk therapy may improve psychosocial distress and pain, as well as decreases in opioid analgesic use in patients with PDAC who take opioids for cancer-related pain.

Purpose: It is one of the important nursing interventions for patients in intensive care units with strict glycemic protocol to determine whether glucose values are different for a bedside glucose meter compared to the main clinical laboratory and whether the blood sampling site has a significant effect on glucose values. In this study, it is aimed to compare whether there is a difference between blood samples from venous, arterial, capillary and thumb base region, which is defined as an alternative region to the fingertip, in blood glucose level measurement, and to compare the consistency between the thumb base region and fingertip region and pain and results of the different methods used. Methods: The universe of the research consists of Bursa Uludağ University Health Practice and Patients will be hospitalized in the General Surgery Intensive Care Unit of the Research Center between April and September 2023. 125 patients who meet the sample selection criteria will form the sample of the study. The sample size of the study was determined statistically with the G*Power (3.1.7) program. Comparison of blood glucose measurement taken with different methods in the power analysis to determine the sample size. When the effect size of blood glucose was determined as 0.9, it was calculated that a total of 125 patients should be included for a significance level of 0.05 and a power of 80%. Research '' Ergin E., Zaybak A. (2022). Effects of different methods used to take blood samples on blood glucose measurements. Reference is made to Clinical Nursing Research, 31(1), (p.29-38).DOI: 10.1177/10547738211024782". 125 patients who meet the sample selection criteria will form the sample of the study. The sample size of the study was determined statistically with the G*Power (3.1.7) program. When the effect size of blood glucose was determined as 0.9 in the comparison of blood glucose measurement taken with different methods in the power analysis performed to determine the sample size, it was calculated that a total of 125 patients should be included for a significance level of 0.05 and a power of 80%.

Recent evidence has shown that vitamin C has some analgesic properties and can therefore reduce opioids used during healing. Vitamin C analgesic effect has been explored mostly during the short-term postoperative context or in disease specific chronic pain prevention but not after acute musculoskeletal injuries, which are often seen in the emergency department (ED). The study's primary aim is to compare the total morphine 5 mg equivalent pills consumed during a two-week follow-up between patients receiving vitamin C or a placebo after ED discharge for an acute musculoskeletal pain complaint. The investigators will conduct a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial with 464 participants distributed in two arms, one group receiving 1 000 mg of vitamin C twice a day for 14 days and another one receiving a placebo. Participants will be ≥18 years of age, treated in ED for acute musculoskeletal pain present for less than 2 weeks, and discharged with an opioid prescription for home pain management. Total morphine 5 mg equivalent pills consumed during the two-week follow-up will be assessed via an electronic (or paper) diary. In addition, patients will report their daily pain intensity, pain relief, side effects, and other types of pain medication or other non-pharmacological approach (ice, heat, immobilization, etc.) used. Three months after the injury, participants will also be contacted to evaluate chronic pain development. The investigators hypothesized that vitamin C, compared to a placebo, will reduce opioid consumption during a 14-day follow-up for ED discharged patients treated for acute pain.

Stress and pain control are vital for newborns, especially preterm babies. While painful procedures cause physiological changes in the short term, they negatively affect brain development in the long term. Non-pharmacological interventions with proven efficacy include: fetal position, sucrose, breastfeeding, breast milk, maternal presence, non-nutritive sucking, swaddling (wrapping) and skin-to-skin contact, as well as developmentally supportive positioning. Evaluating the effectiveness of nursing practices to be performed on babies, scientifically proving the most beneficial application that will both alleviate pain and increase their comfort in painful procedures such as aspiration and being more beneficial to babies are among the most basic benefits. Thanks to these applications, it is predicted that your baby will experience less pain and provide more comfort. Therefore, this study aim to comparison the effects of facilitated tucking, swaddling and prone position applied during endotracheal aspiration on pain, comfort and physiological parameters in preterm infants.

Each year, over 3.5 million, mostly, healthy young adults, have their third molar teeth ('wisdom teeth') removed under sedation and are often given opioid prescriptions for managing their pain. Wisdom molar removal is one of the most common reasons for opioid prescriptions to be given to adolescents. There is a national thrust to reduce both the dose and the duration of such opioid prescriptions because even short-term opioid exposures increase risk for narcotic addiction and misuse. Non-opioid options to manage pain will still allow for sufficient pain control without risking addiction, and hence, a fundamental component of our response to combat the current national opioid crisis. The investigators are going to study a promising option- the Twin Block dental anesthetic injection. The Twin block involves injecting the standard dental numbing medication in a way that 'numbs' the 'jaw-clencher' muscles on the side of the face. The investigators found that the Twin block relieved jaw pain stemming from these muscles, in a quick and sustained manner, even in patients whose pain following wisdom tooth removal primarily came from 'taut' and tender jaw-clencher muscles. However, what is not known is- how often do patients who have their wisdom teeth removed under sedation, end up in significant pain from taut and tender jaw-clencher muscles? Will using the twin block effectively reduce pain in such patients? In this pilot study, the investigators will examine wisdom molar extraction patients one day after their procedure. Those with significant pain (pain rated ≥ 5 on a 0-10 scale) in their jaw-clencher muscles, will get either the Twin block injection or a placebo. The investigators will track both 1) pain before and after the injection, and 2) pain medication usage over a 7-day period to see if both pain and opioid dosage come down with the Twin block. This study can support a simple, safe and inexpensive means to reduce pain after a common procedure.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare in different injection techniques. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: Is there a difference between the pain levels due to needle insertion in the injection made with the HST Technique, the ShotBlocker technique and the standard technique? Is there a difference between the hematoma levels of the injection made with the HST Technique, the ShotBlocker technique and the standard technique? Is there a difference between the comfort levels of the injection made with the HST Technique, ShotBlocker technique and standard technique? Is there a difference between the satisfaction levels of the patients with the injection made with the HST Technique, ShotBlocker technique and standard technique? Is there a difference between the injection fear levels of patients with HST Technique, ShotBlocker technique and standard technique?