Active clinical trials for "Acute Kidney Injury"

This is a multicenter, pilot RCT study, aiming to compare intensive dosage and regular dosage of PD for AKI patients with indications for dialysis. Aims of the study are to: Examine the feasibility of the study, which aims to determine the efficacy and safety of intensive PD dose for AKI patients as compared to regular PD dose. Establish the appropriate workflow for PD treatment for AKI patients.

The Recovery After Dialysis-Requiring Acute Kidney Injury (RAD-AKI) Pilot Study is a 2-arm randomized clinical trial of hospitalized patients with dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury (RAD-AKI), comparing conventional thrice-weekly intermittent hemodialysis dialysis (control) to a "conservative dialysis strategy" in which hemodialysis is not continued unless specific metabolic or clinical indications for RRT are present. The overall hypothesis is that the current practice of thrice-weekly acute intermittent hemodialysis for AKI-D masks evidence of renal recovery and may actually delay or preclude recovery. The primary objective of this pilot study is to assess the safety and feasibility of the proposed intervention and study design.

There are currently no therapies to improve the chances of recovering enough kidney function to come off of dialysis after severe acute kidney injury. It is not known if current routine outpatient dialysis treatments are optimized to maximize the chances of recovery. The purpose of this pilot study is to see if we can feasibly and safely provide several changes to the way that dialysis is provided in outpatient dialysis centers which may improve the chances of recovery.

This is a prospective observational cohort study that will aim to recruit 60 participants who have had COVID-19, were admitted to hospital, required intensive care, and/or developed AKI during their hospital stay. Potential participants will be approached either by telephone by a member of the research team or via clinics (nephrology, post-ICU follow up clinics).

Heparin is commonly used for anticoagulation of the extracorporeal circuit during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) but the optimal mode of delivery has not yet been validated. Our study will compare dilute heparin to a standard concentration of heparin. The investigators hypothesize that heparin delivered in a dilute solution will augment coating of the filter fibers with anticoagulants, decreasing clotting events and increasing filter life. By improving delivery of heparin to the filter and circuit, where clotting events can disrupt dialysis, less heparin would be required for the extra-corporeal circuit and thus less heparin would be delivered back to the patient with blood return from the machine. By exposing the patient to less heparin it is hypothesized that fewer bleeding events would occur, making the dialysis treatment safer. If more of the filter's fibers remain patent and the filter is functional for a longer period of time, the CRRT would also be more effective.

Clinical phase 3 study to investigate the effect of recAP on 28 day mortality in patients admitted to the ICU with acute kidney injury that is caused by sepsis. The study has three distinct SA-AKI trial populations: The main trial population: Patients with a pre-AKI reference eGFR ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m2 and no proven or suspected SARS-CoV-2 at time of randomization. A 'moderate' CKD population: Patients with a pre-AKI reference eGFR ≥25 and <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 and no proven or suspected SARS-CoV-2 at time of randomization. A Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) population: Patients with proven or suspected SARS-CoV-2 at time of randomization with or without 'moderate' CKD. For patients in this population, COVID-19 should be the main cause of SA-AKI. In the main study population approximately 1400 patients will be enrolled and in the two cohorts with moderate CKD and COVID-19 each up to 100 patients. There are two arms in the study, one with active treatment and one with an inactive compound (placebo). Treatment is by 1 hour intravenous infusion, for three days. Patients are followed up for 28 days to see if there is an improvement on mortality, and followed for 90 and 180 days for mortality and other outcomes e.g. long-term kidney function and quality of life.

Nephrotoxic medication (NTMx) exposure is one of the most commonly cited causes of acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalized children, and is the primary cause of AKI in 16% of cases. Through initial work at UAB/Children's of Alabama Hospital, NTMx exposure was found to be potentially modifiable and the associated AKI is an avoidable adverse safety event. Currently, only serum Creatinine monitoring is available to monitor for NTMx-associated AKI. The hypothesis of this NINJA NGAL study is that urine NGAL is highly sensitive to detect NTMx-associated AKI. UAB/Children's of Alabama is bringing urine NGAL measurement to the infants in the NICU to detect NTMX-associated AKI.

Subjects entering the study will have undergone cardiac surgery. Those who experience kidney injury within 48 hours of their surgery will be enrolled into the study. Once enrolled, subjects will receive a single administration of AC607 or placebo. Kidney recovery will be evaluated over the subsequent 30 days and death or the need for dialysis will be evaluated within 90 days of dosing. After 90 days (evaluation period), subjects will enter a 3-year extension phase of the study to monitor safety and long-term outcomes (follow-up period).

The immune response to kidney damage during acute kidney injury (AKI) is an important contributor to the prolonged lack of renal function and progression of kidney injury. Most data related to intrarenal and interorgan pathways in AKI stem from animal research with sometimes conflicting results. Accurate evaluation of these processes in humans and identification of early diagnostic tools are critical for the development of strategies to prevent and attenuate AKI-related morbidity and mortality in patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate immune function and miRNA expression in hospitalised patients with and without AKI.

The use of erythropoietin to treat anemia in acute kidney injury (AKI) is controversial. No previous clinical trial has assessed the possible reduction of transfusions when erythropoietin is started very early in a setting of in-hospital acute kidney injury. This randomised multicenter pragmatic clinical trial will compare the need for transfusion in acute kidney injury between two groups: group 1 will receive erythopoietin 4000 UI every other day and group 2 the usual treatment.