Active clinical trials for "Respiratory Distress Syndrome"

Surfactant replacement therapy (SRT) improves oxygenation and survival in NRDS and some infant ARDS. SRT was tried in adult ARDS with conflicting results. Research by Filoche and Grotberg helped to understand the failure of previous clinical trials and yielded a strong scientific rationale for SRT success, now allowing to design a new administration protocol for SRT in adults, to be tested by this clinical trial in COVID-19 adult ARDS patients. Patients will be randomized to receive either a bronchial fibroscopy alone (with aspiration of secretions) or a bronchial fibroscopy with administration of 3 mL/kg of a solution of poractant alpha diluted to 16 mg/mL and distributed into each of the 5 lobar bronchi.

The aim of the study is to evaluate if a check-list including lung ultrasonography can help to identify the etiology of the acute respiratory failure of patients managed at the emergency room. Adult patients admitted to the emergency room for acute respiratory failure will be offered the study. The emergency physician will perform a systematic examination using a checklist, including pulmonary embolism prediction scores, structured clinical examination and lung ultrasound, in order to establish a diagnostic hypothesis. A diagnostic hypothesis will be made after completion of the checklist. The emergency physician can perform additional examinations and treatment after completion of the checklist. The final diagnosis will be checked by an adjudication committee which will have all the documents established during the emergency room consultation and any hospitalization following this hospitalization. The main outcome will be the concordance rate between the diagnosis after the check-list and the final diagnosis.

This study will compare stress, changes in oxygenation and oxidative damage in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) randomized to receive or not remifentanil as an analgesic drug during the administration of porcine surfactant (poractant alfa, Curosurf®) through the traditional (INSURE) or the less invasive (LISA) method.

The purpose of this study is to assess changes in cerebral oxygenation during two different types (beractant and poractant) and two different routes (double lumen or single lumen endotracheal tube) of surfactant administration using near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).

The purpose of this study is to see if stress doses of hydrocortisone improve early outcome in patients who are in early stage of ARDS and with relative adrenal insufficiency.

30% of ARDS patients ventilated according to NIH protocol presents CT scan evidence of hyperinflation. Functional analysis of pressure-time curve (Stress Index=SI) has been shown to identify this condition in experimental settings. We tested the hypothesis that the SI is an accurate predictor of mechanical stress due to overdistention in ARDS patients.

The purpose of this study is to establish if a strategy of EBCPAP application in a subgroup of VLBWI, 800 to 1500g birthweight, decreases the need for mechanical ventilation in this group, without affecting mortality.

This study compares a volume targeted pressure support non-invasive ventilation with an automatic PEP regulation (AVAPS-AE mode) to a pressure support non-invasive ventilation (S/T mode) in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with acidosis. This study focuses on patients at risk of obstructive apneas or obesity-hypoventilation syndrom (BMI≥30 kg/m²). Half of participants (33 patients) will receive non invasive ventilation with AVAPS-AE mode, the other half will receive non-invasive ventilation with S/T mode.

A randomized, concurrent controlled trial to assess if adding sigh breaths to usual invasive mechanical ventilation of victims of trauma who are at risk of developing ARDS will decrease the number of days they require invasive mechanical ventilation.

This study is designed to compare three ultrasound-based aeration scores that were previously validated in specific populations, and to assess their correlation with computed tomographic measurement of pulmonary aeration in a population with different pathologies. Hypothesis: The "Loss of Aeration Score" will be more accurate than a simplified version and another widely used score, the "Lung Ultrasound Score".