A 36-Week Safety Extension Study of ELND005 as a Treatment for Agitation and Aggression in Alzheimer's...
Alzheimer's DiseaseTo evaluate the safety and tolerability of ELND005 treatment with up to 36 weeks exposure, in Moderate to Severe AD patients with agitation and aggression.
Clinical Evaluation of Ropinirole IR (Immediate Release) Tablets in Patients Who Are Diagnosed With...
Restless Legs SyndromeThis is a multicenter, placebo controlled, parallel group, double-blind, randomized comparison study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ropinirole IR tablets orally administered for 12 weeks in patients with symptomatic restless legs syndrome associated with Chronic kidney disease (CKD) managed with haemodialysis (including haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration) (hereinafter referred to as "uRLS"), to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term administration of ropinirole IR tablets, and assess the effect on the steady state pharmacokinetics in the long-term administration period of ropinirole IR tablets.
Haloperidol vs Olanzapine for the Management of ICU Delirium
DeliriumAgitationThe purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to determine whether haloperidol is superior to olanzapine for the treatment of ICU acquired delirium. The hypothesis is that haloperidol is in fact superior to olanzapine in treating ICU acquired delirium and sustaining delirium free time.
Efficacy and Safety Study of Aplindore in Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome
Restless Legs SyndromeThis is a clinical trial to be conducted at multiple sites in the USA. Patients diagnosed with moderate to severe Restless Legs Syndrome will be randomly allocated to one of 5 treatment arms in the study. The 5 arms include 4 arms with different doses of aplindore MR tablets and 1 placebo arm. The treatment will be taken once a day. The study is blinded and neither patients, nor the investigators, will know what treatment the patient is receiving. Patients will be assigned a dose and will be maintained at that dose for several weeks (2 treatment arms include a short titration period). The entire study will take about 6 weeks. The study will measure how effective aplindore is in decreasing symptoms of Restless Legs Syndrome, and will also assess the safety and tolerability of aplindore.
IM Olanzapine Versus Haloperidol or Midazolam
Acute AgitationBehavioural EmergencyThe purpose of this study is to determine whether intramuscular olanzapine is safer (fewer adverse events) and more effective (shorter time to sedation) than conventional haloperidol or midazolam when used in the management of acute agitation in the emergency department.
Clinical Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of BP1.4979 in Restless Legs Syndrome
Restless Legs SyndromeThis is a Group Sequential Test multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled phase II proof of concept trial with parallel groups to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of BP1.4979 15mg BID compared to placebo in RLS patients during 2 weeks double blind treatment.
Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Ferric Carboxymaltose in RLS Patients With Iron-deficiency...
Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)Treatment Phase I and II Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM (750 mg dose x 2) for treatment of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) in patients with iron-deficiency anemia (IDA). Long-Term Extension Phase III Primary Objective: To evaluate the duration of effect of prior FCM treatment and to determine the effectiveness of further iron repletion with FCM when RLS symptoms worsen or reoccur.
Risk Factors for Pediatric Emergence Agitation and Analysis of Serum or Urine Metabonomics in Children...
Emergence AgitationPain1 moreIt is known that some factors are associated with emergence agitation(EA), and investigators are still unable to predict accurately those who undergoing maxillofacial surgery are at great risks.This study intend to identify the risk factors for EA and to explore the mechanism of EA , which is helpful for early prediction, prevention and treatment in children.
Safety and Efficacy of Rasagiline in Restless Legs Syndrome
Restless Legs SyndromeThe purpose of this study is to find out if rasagiline improves RLS symptoms. We also want to make sure rasagiline is safe to give people with RLS.
INP105 Proof-of-concept Study for the Acute Treatment of Agitation in Adolescents and Young Adults...
Agitation in Adolescents and Young Adults With ASDThis is a Phase 2a, proof-of concept, 2-way, 2-period crossover, double-blind study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of INP105 as an acute treatment versus placebo in adolescents and young adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) experiencing agitation. Approximately 32 ASD patients who are currently being treated for agitation/aggression at several inpatient units specializing in behavioral treatment will be enrolled. INP105 is a novel combination product that sprays a powder formulation of olanzapine to the upper nasal space. An earlier formulation showed a similar extent, but faster rate of absorption compared to the approved intramuscular product. In this study, 5 mg of olanzapine or placebo will be delivered nasally by this combination product to moderately or severely agitated participants. Participants will undergo several screening assessments, including observation session(s) of episode(s) of agitation resulting from a frustration task (eg, a non-preferred activity). At least one observation session must result in a documented moderate to severe agitation episode prior to the participant being eligible to enroll in the study and be randomized to treatment. The study will be conducted in 2 phases. A pilot phase will initially enroll at least 6 participants, who will receive both 5 mg INP105 (5 mg olanzapine) and placebo in random order, in the same crossover design as later participants. Participants will be dosed during a documented moderate to severe episode of agitation. Once 6 participants have completed both dosing periods and have at least 48 hours of post-dose safety data collected, a safety and preliminary efficacy analysis will be performed by an independent unblinded statistical group, and a summary report forwarded to a sponsor-led Data and Safety Review Committee (DSRC), who will remain blinded. Enrollment will be paused during the DSRC pilot phase safety and preliminary efficacy results review. Absent any concerning safety signals, the second phase will enroll all remaining participants. The DSRC may suggest revisions to the protocol, and the protocol amended and approved as necessary, prior to further participants being enrolled.