Active clinical trials for "Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive"

This is a 12-week, multicentre, randomized, open-label, 2-arm, parallel-group study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium inhalation powder (62.5 mcg once daily [QD]) administered via a novel Dry Powder Inhaler (nDPI) with glycopyrronium (44 mcg QD) administered via a Breezhaler® inhaler in subjects with COPD over 12 weeks of treatment. At the end of the run-in period, eligible subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive umeclidinium 62.5 mcg administered via nDPI or glycopyrronium 44 mcg administered via BREEZHALER inhaler. There will be up to 8 clinic visits conducted on an outpatient basis at Pre-Screening (Visit 0), Screening (Visit 1), Randomization at Day 1 (Visit 2), and after Randomization at Day 2 (Visit 3), Day 28 (Visit 4), Day 56 (Visit 5), Day 84 (Visit 6) and Day 85 (Visit 7). The total duration of subject participation in the study will be approximately 15 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study is clinic visit trough FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second) on treatment Day 85. All subjects will have spirometry performed at clinic Visits 1 though 7. Trough spirometry will be obtained 23 and 24 hours after the previous day's dose of open-label study medication at Visits 3 to 7. BREEZHALER is a registered trademark of Novartis AG.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the effects of orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol fixed dose combination (2.5/5 µg; 5/5 µg) with placebo on exercise tolerance after 12 weeks of treatment in patients with COPD.

The purpose of the study is to propose that roflumilast is associated with meaningful reductions in biomarkers of pulmonary inflammation and sputum neutrophilia, including confirmation of previously described results, and correlate these findings with improvement in pulmonary function, sputum scores, and quality of life in stable moderate to severe COPD. The investigators aim to demonstrate this regardless of concomitant medication use, including inhaled corticosteroids. Additionally, the investigators hope to provide a mechanistic pathway by which these effects occur.

This project proposes to test the hypothesis that osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) given to patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) enrolled in a 12-week pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP) will result in improved respiratory pump function over and above that seen in sham and control groups. Specifically, we will study the effects of three OMT techniques: (a) thoracic inlet indirect myofascial release; (b) rib raising with continued stretch of the paraspinal muscle to the L2 level; and (c) cervical paraspinal muscle stretch with suboccipital muscle release. The key clinical readouts will include: spirometry, P100 (and index of diaphragm and inspiratory muscle efficiency), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), as well as laser evaluation of chest wall excursion. Supplementing these objective parameters will be several more subjective clinical outcome measures: exercise tolerance (6-minute walk test), dyspnea (shortness of breath questionnaire), and quality of life questionnaire. Finally, an attempt will be made to correlate biochemical alterations that may shed light on the biological mechanism underlying the OMT procedures.

The objective of this study is to compare the long-term (six month) bronchodilator efficacy and safety of tiotropium inhalation capsules, salmeterol inhalation aerosol and placebo inpatients with COPD.

Study to demonstrate the comparability of two puffs of Combivent hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) inhalation aerosol (18 mcg ipratropium bromide/100 mcg albuterol sulfate / per puff) to two puffs of the marketed chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) containing product, Combivent (CFC) inhalation aerosol (18 mcg ipratropium bromide/103 mcg albuterol sulfate / per puff). The dose response profile, safety and pharmacokinetics of Combivent HFA formulation are to be characterized.

Trial to investigate the acute and chronic effect of tiotropium therapy on airway diameter in COPD patients as measured by inspiratory capacity (IC).

The study will be conducted in a respiratory specialist institute in Japan, with standardized techniques and data assurance checks to optimize data quality. The licensed dosage and administration of Adoair in Japan will be applied in this study. Each subject will receive treatment options in a randomized blinded fashion. Subjects will be randomized following a 4-week wash-out phase to take either Adoair 50/250mcg twice daily or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks.

This study assessed the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the co-administration of NVA237 plus indacaterol taken once daily versus indacaterol taken once daily in patients with moderate to severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

This study compared the efficacy and safety of NVA237 with tiotropium in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Tiotropium belongs to the same drug class as NVA237.