Active clinical trials for "Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive"

Phase I/II Randomized Clinical Trial to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetic and efficacy of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 hyperimmune serum. The study will include patients at early stage of COVID-19 with increased risk for severe disease due to underlying medical conditions to determine the utility of an equine heterologous serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 to avoid progression to a severe COVID-19

This study will investigate the effects on the SIMEOX technology on static hyperinflation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

The aim of this multicenter, investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority study is to evaluate a prednisone prescribing strategy, guided by eosinophil blood count compared to the standard (systematic) administration of corticosteroids, in patients with COPD exacerbation requiring ventilatory support. Patients fulfilling inclusion criteria and consenting to participate in the study, will be randomized through a random table generated electronically, to eosinophil-guided group or to control group. In the eosinophil-guided group, prednisone (1mg/kg/day for up to 5 days or during the hospital stay if less than 5 days) is administered only if the eosinophil count is >2%. If blood eosinophil count is ≤2%, no corticosteroids are given. In the control group: a treatment based on prednisone at a daily dose of 1 mg/kg will be routinely administered for a maximum of 5 days, or during the hospital stay, if it is less than 5 days. Corticosteroid treatment is taken in the morning in patients with NIV, and through the gastric tube in intubated patients. The hypothesis tested is a non-inferiority of the "eosinophil-guided strategy" compared to the standard strategy, with less exposure to corticosteroids. The primary endpoint is the proportion of unventilated patients at day 6 which is set to 50% in the control group. A pre-specified difference <10% would be a non-inferiority margin. Secondary endpoints are: Number of ICU days alive without ventilatory support within 28 days after recruitment, length of stay in intensive care Unit, the intubation rate in patients initially under NIV, Mortality in the ICU, Hospital mortality. Safety: New onset of diabetes or worsening of diabetes requiring the start or the increase in insulin therapy, Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (2 g drop of Hb requiring blood transfusion or fibroscopy), Uncontrolled hypertensive crisis requiring the introduction of new antihypertensives, ICU-acquired neuromyopathy, Nosocomial infection, Relapse rate / recurrence defined respectively by the rate of a new hospital consultation and/or admission in the week or the month following index hospitalization. Sample size calculation: In a non-inferiority study, with an incidence of the event (no ventilation at D6) of 50% in the control group ( with 10% of acceptable difference for non-inferiority), a power of 80% and alpha error <0.05, it would take 86 patients per arm by anticipating 2% of lost sight.

Around 20% of the patients requiring hospitalization for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD) develop hypercapnia, which is associated with an increased risk of death. Once Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) has been initiated, a reduction in Respiratory Rate (RR) and improvement in pH within 4 h predicts NIV success. If pH <7.25 and RR >35 breath per minutes persist, NIV failure is likely. Worsening acidosis, after initial improvement with NIV, is also associated with a worse prognosis. In addition, it has been shown that delaying intubation in patients at high risk for NIV failure has a negative impact on patient survival. Hence, assessing the risk of NIV failure is extremely important. NIV has some limitations: a) intolerance, discomfort and claustrophobia requiring frequent interruptions; b) poor patient-ventilator synchrony, especially in presence of air leaks or high ventilatory requirements. Since removing carbon dioxide by means of an artificial lung reduces the minute ventilation required to maintain an acceptable arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), the investigators hypothesize that applying Extra-Corporeal CO2 Removal (ECCO2R) in high-risk AECOPD patients may reduce the incidence of NIV failure and improve patient-ventilator interaction. After the beginning of ECCO2R, NIV could be gradually replaced by High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy (HFNCOT), potentially reducing the risk of ventilator induced lung injury, improving patient's comfort and probably allowing the adoption of a more physiologically "noisy" pattern of spontaneous breathing.

Because of its very high bioavailability and its specific and direct action on protein synthesis, the investigators hypothesize that citrulline supplementation would be an innovative nutritional strategy to improve the peripheral muscle mass and strength in COPD patients with severe chronic respiratory failure. This supplementation would be more effective if the pathology is severe and the chronic systemic inflammation important. The benefits of this supplementation could help the most severe patients break out of the cycle of inactivity and thus optimize their quality of life. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of 45-day nutritional supplementation with Citrulline (10 g / day) on the body composition (lean body mass) in malnourished COPD patients with severe chronic respiratory failure.

The purpose of this study is to research the differences of small airways function between subjects with diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) and asthma-COPD overlap(ACO).The assessment of quality of life is also carried out through questionnaires.

Insufficient energy intake and systematic inflammation lead to malnutrition in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Nutritional supplementation improves the patients'nutritional status by increasing energy intake and providing anti-inflammatory elements，which can relieve the patients' symptoms and delay the disease progression.

This is a PI-initiated study taking place only at UCLA, sponsored by Sunovion. The investigators plan to enroll about 20 subjects who are at least 40 years old and have Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Brovana and Serevent in helping relieve COPD symptoms. Specifically, the investigators are looking at how much and for how long the two drugs can open up the small airways in the lungs. This will be done with breathing tests on all subjects, and with high resolution CT scans on subjects who agree to this optional part of the study. Half of subjects will take Brovana (arformoterol tartrate inhalation solution) for 2 weeks and then Serevent (salmeterol xinafoate inhalation powder) for 2 weeks; the other half will take Serevent the first two weeks and Brovana the second two weeks. All subjects will also take Spiriva (tiotropium) and will be provided with albuterol for immediate relief of symptoms. After a Screening Visit to determine eligibility, subjects will be randomly assigned to receive Brovana or Serevent for the first 2 weeks, complete Test Visit 1, then receive the other study drug for 2 weeks, and finally complete Test Visit 2. Visits will include questionnaires, review of health and medications, and breathing tests before and after taking the study drug. Subjects who agree to be in the sub-study will also undergo CT scans before and after taking the study drug at both test visits.

Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with poor outcome, especially when intubation is required, thus underlining the importance of optimizing non-invasive ventilatory support to avoid intubation. Practically, because of treatment intolerance, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) cannot be administered 24-hour a day for a long period of time and alternative solutions must be found to deliver oxygen as efficiently as possible to allow NIV interruptions. High flow humidified oxygen therapy (HFHO) consists of delivering a high-flow (15-60 L/minute) heated air-oxygen mixture (FIO2 21-100%) through a dedicated nasal cannula and can be interesting in this context. This well tolerated technique improves oxygenation and decreases respiratory rate and dyspnea in patients suffering from acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. In chronic COPD patients, using HFHO can decrease respiratory rate and PaCO2. In COPD exacerbation, using HFHO can conceptually be interesting. First, the high air-oxygen flow delivered well matches the patient's inspiratory demand and should decrease the work of breathing. Second, as during HFHO a high flow is continuously delivered in the airways, a wash-out of the anatomical dead space should occur and CO2 clearance should be enhanced. Despite this strong physiological rational for the use of HFHO in patients suffering from COPD exacerbation, the effects of using HFHO instead of conventional oxygenotherapy in combination with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in this context has never been explored. The main objective of the study is to explore the effects of using HFHO in combination with NIV in acute COPD exacerbation and to assess the underlying mechanisms of action.

Background: Several clinical studies show high rates of anxiety and depressive disorders in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), that suggest common underlying pathogenetic mechanisms of COPD and depressive disorders. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of aerobic exercise, proposed in the context of pulmonary rehabilitation, in a sample of COPD depressed patients without psychopharmacological treatment, through the correlation of some psychopathological variables and physical/pneumological parameters. Methods: The investigators have designed an observational longitudinal trial. The trial will be prospective 6-weeks randomized clinical study to evaluate the impact of aerobic exercise on depressive symptoms in 154 patient affected by COPD and depression, assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). The investigators will also monitor anxiety, quality of life and neurocognitive function. Outcome measures: The investigators compare the variation of HDRS total score, as primary outcome measure, in two groups (A, B) of COPD depressed patients matched for: COPD status; depressive status; age; gender. Only the participants randomized in study group A will receive a 6-weeks aerobic exercise intervention. Statistical analysis: All tests are two-tailed and a p value 0.05 was considered significant. The difference between the two groups will be evaluated with Student's T test for normally distributed data, and with Mann-Whitney's U test, for those with not normal distribution. The normality of distribution will be evaluated with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Any correlations among the variables under evaluation will be assessed by Spearman r correlation. Variables will be compared using the Chi-squared test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Discussion: There is a strong correlation between physical activity and mental health. Several data have suggested that aerobic exercise shows significant effects, comparable to pharmacotherapy and to psychotherapy, on reducing depressive symptomatology. The goal of our study is to propose an effective intervention to reduce the risk of severe depression in this special population, evaluating the variation of HDRS total score after the aerobic exercise intervention.