Active clinical trials for "Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive"

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a common respiratory system disease characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and irreversible airflow restriction, which seriously endangers people's health. Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) refers to individuals who experience continuous deterioration beyond their daily condition and need to change their routine medication. AECOPD is usually caused by viruses and bacteria, and patients require hospitalization, which brings a huge economic burden to society. AECOPD patients often have limited activities. Because long-term chronic hypoxia causes venous blood stasis, siltation causes secondary red blood cell increase, and blood hypercoagulability, AECOPD patients have a high risk of pulmonary embolism (PE). Pulmonary Thrombo Embolism (PTE) refers to a disease caused by blockage of the pulmonary artery or its branches caused by a thrombus from the venous system or right heart. AECOPD patients experience elevated hemoglobin levels and increased blood viscosity due to long-term hypoxia. At the same time, such patients have decreased activity, venous congestion, and are prone to thrombosis. After the thrombus falls off, it can travel up the vein, causing PTE to occur in the right heart PTE is often secondary to low deep vein thrombosis (DVT). About 70% of patients were diagnosed as deep vein thrombosis in lower limb color ultrasound examination. SteinPD conducted a survey on COPD patients and general patients from multiple hospitals. The results showed that by comparing adult COPD patients with non COPD patients, the relative risk of DVT was 1.30, providing evidence for AECOPD being more likely to combine with PTE AECOPD patients with PTE have similarities in their clinical manifestations. It is difficult to distinguish between the two based solely on symptoms, such as cough, increased sputum production, increased shortness of breath, and difficulty breathing. They lack specificity and are difficult to distinguish between the two based solely on symptoms, which can easily lead to missed diagnosis. CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of PTE, but due to the high cost of testing and high equipment prices, its popularity in grassroots hospitals is not high. Therefore, analyzing the risk factors of AECOPD patients complicated with PTE is of great significance for early identification of PTE. At present, although there are reports on the risk factors for concurrent PTE in AECOPD patients, there is no specific predictive model for predicting PTE in AECOPD patients. In clinical practice, risk assessment tools such as the Caprini risk assessment model and the modified Geneva scale are commonly used for VTE, while the Wells score is the PTE diagnostic likelihood score. The evaluation indicators of these tools are mostly clinical symptoms, and laboratory indicators are less involved, It is difficult to comprehensively reflect the patient's condition, so the specificity of AECOPD patients with PTE is not strong. The column chart model established in this study presents a visual prediction model, which is convenient for clinical use and has positive help for the early detection of AECOPD patients with PTE. In addition, medical staff can present the calculation results of the column chart model to patients, making it easier for patients to understand. It helps improve the early identification and treatment of AECOPD combined with PTE patients, thereby improving prognosis.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a debilitating and progressive respiratory condition characterized by irreversible airflow limitation. The overall 5-year survival for COPD patients is 56-92%, depending on disease severity. Considering the recent introduction of the Budesonide, Glycopyrronium bromide and Formoterol fumarate Metered-Dose Inhaler (BGF MDI) in COPD therapeutic arsenal as well as the increasingly important role of real-world (RW) data in health care decisions, as it bridges gaps not addressed by randomized clinical trials, there is a need for RW evidence studies that can serve as inputs for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) submissions. In view of this need, this study is designed to generate RW evidence on the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of treatment with BGF MDI over a 52-week treatment period in routine care settings in Greece as well as to shed light on the reasons for switching from dual to triple therapy with BGF MDI, aiming at further characterizing the multifactorial aspects of inadequate COPD management that lead physicians to step-up treatment. The study is mainly descriptive in nature and is not planned to reject or affirm any formal statistical hypothesis. This is a single-country, non-interventional, multicenter, 52-week prospective cohort study, mainly based on primary data collection, which will include adult patients with moderate to severe COPD newly prescribed maintenance treatment with BGF MDI in routine care settings of Greece. This study design has been selected on the basis that such studies essentially, through collecting data generated in the course of routine clinical care about management practices and their outcomes from both the physician and patient perspective, help to bridge the knowledge gap between clinical research in controlled randomized settings and daily clinical practice. In line with the purely observational and non-interventional nature of the study, no changes to the current standard of care will be required and all aspects of treatment and clinical management of patients will be in accordance with local clinical practice and at the discretion of the participating physicians. The conduct of this study will adhere to the applicable national regulatory requirements governing the conduct of such type of clinical research. In addition, the study has been designed and will be conducted and reported in accordance with the ethical principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, the Guidelines for Good Pharmacoepidemiology Practice (GPP) of the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology, the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines where applicable, the European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and the local rules and regulations. Patients will have been prescribed BGF MDI (Trixeo Aerosphere™) prior to informed consent (IC) obtainment and will be treated according to the local prescribing information (Summary of Product Characteristics [SmPC]) of the study medication and routine medical practice in terms of visit frequency and type of assessments performed. The assignment of the patient to this therapeutic strategy is not decided in advance by the study protocol but falls within current practice and the prescription of BGF MDI is clearly separated from the physician's decision to include the patient in the current study. In addition, every medical decision including the course of treatment will reflect exclusively the decision of the treating physician in a routine clinical situation according to the product's SmPC. Follow-up visit frequency will be determined by the treating physician, however study-related data will be collected at study enrollment and at 12, 24, 36, and 52-week data collection timepoints post-index (i.e., after BGF MDI treatment initiation) with an allowable time window of ±2 weeks for each data collection timepoint. Data collection at the aforementioned timepoints will be performed in the context of on-site routine visits at the private practices/hospital clinics. In addition, a telephone contact will take place at 4 (±1) weeks post-index for the sole purpose of administering COPD Assessment Test (CAT) by phone interview with the patient. Any visits/contacts occurring at other times not pre-planned in the context of the study will not be captured for the purposes of this study, except for safety-related information, exacerbation data, information on BGF MDI and concomitant COPD-related treatments, that will be collected on a continuous basis. Data collection at all indicated timepoints will be performed in the context of on-site routine visits at the private practices/hospital clinics. There are no dose regimens or diagnostic procedures pre-defined within this study plan. Participation in this observational, real-life study and its documentation procedure will not affect the routine treatment situation in any way.

ERASE PH-COPD is a randomized double-blind study, with 2 parallel groups. Patients with severe pulmonary hypertension due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, will be randomly assigned to receive Tadalafil orally or placebo.

Preferred pharmacological management for COPD according to the GOLD guidelines are the long-acting anticholinergic LAMAs (Long-Acting / Short-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists), and long-acting β 2-Agonists LABA (Long-acting LABA) / β2-Long Action Fighters) as well as inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) Other drugs that can be used besides long-acting, are short-acting anticholinergics (SAMA) and β2-agonists (SABA), methylxanthines (Aminophylline and Theophylline), mucolytics and phosphodiesterase inhibitors 4 (Phosphorus) of which is roflumilast

The health care is faced by a growing challenge in the years to come: increasing age and chronic morbidity raising the costs, combined with decreased work participation. Among the conditions on the rise, we find anxiety/depression, musculoskeletal conditions, type 2 diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Recently, the rise of the Corona pandemic has yielded another group of (primarily young) patients with decreased work capacity, the post-Covid syndrome sufferers. The aim of the present study is to establish, describe and summarize the experiences with a novel approach to rehabilitation for five of the most costly conditions; 1) low back pain, 2) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 3) type 2 diabetes mellitus, 4) mixed anxiety/depression and 5) post-Covid fatigue. The concentrated interdisciplinary rehabilitation is characterised by three phases; Pre-intervention preparation (1-2 months): with the aim to mobilize the patients' resources for change Concentrated group intervention (2-5 days): interdisciplinary team - individually tailored training (further described below) Post-intervention follow-up (1 year): digital follow-up with the aim of integrate the changes into everyday living The concentrated intervention: The core intervention is based on trans-diagnostic features of the highly successful 4-day intervention for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, namely: Initiate treatment when the patient is ready for change Focus on the behavioral patterns which maintain the disorder and help the patient to identify situations where they can choose to break the pattern ("micro-choices"). Assist the patient when they practice breaking the patterns. This may pertain to how they do physical training or to the way they walk, sit, eat, talk, take their medication and sleep, or to how they engage in social activities or take care of others. Use long sessions to ensure that they face a broad range of potential micro-choices Work side-by side with others going through an analogous pattern of change Prepare them for taking responsibility for integrating the change into every-day living Main outcomes will be Completion rates Patient satisfaction Changes to perception of illness Patient activation Secondary outcomes will be Level of functioning Qualitative description of participants' experiences

Sleep is a fundamental period in life. In a previous work, the investigators have shown that COPD patients presented on the EEG figures found in patients with chronic pain: Alpha-Delta. The link between dyspnea and pain is very strong and this Alpha-Delta could, in these COPD patients, be the witness of nocturnal dyspnea. Although it is not possible in a non-awake patient to evaluate reliably the dyspnea, sleep offers us a window on the emotions and the feeling of the patient: Dreams. A few studies have shown the link between breathing and dreaming, but none of them has focused on nocturnal dyspnea. Our working hypothesis is that respiratory abnormalities in COPD patients are responsible for nocturnal dyspnea, which is reflected in the content of these patients' dreams.

Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are episodes of acute worsening of respiratory symptoms that require additional therapy. Exacerbations play a pivotal role in the burden and progressive course of COPD (1). Each event contributes to a progressive decline in lung function (2), reduced health status, low physical activity level (3) and increased health care costs (4). As such, disease management is predominantly based on the prevention of these episodes (1). Yet, in the Netherlands, 30.000 people are admitted to the hospital for an AECOPD every year (5). Although most AECOPD have an infectious origin (6), the underlying mechanisms are heterogeneous and predicting their occurrence in individual patients currently remains unsuccessful (7-9). Furthermore, there is a lack of our understanding in the longitudinal alterations in microbial composition and host-microbiome interactions in the stable state, at AECOPD and during recovery in patients with COPD. This knowledge is essential to improve the early and accurate diagnosis of (the different types of) AECOPD, and for the development of novel antimicrobial and other therapeutic targets and subsequent personalized treatment. These challenges need to be addressed in order to reduce the future impact of these events, avoid unnecessary treatments of individual patients, reduce healthcare utilization and improve overall care for patients with COPD. The current 'Early diagnostic BioMARKers in Exacerbations of COPD' (MARKED) study was designed to investigate several of these gaps in the management of COPD exacerbations. It is anticipated that complex biomarker panels, rather than a single biomarker, will be identified. Since AECOPD are heterogeneous events in terms of origin, trigger, severity, duration, need for treatment and overall clinical presentation (1, 6, 10-15), we expect to identify different biomarker panels for different subtypes of AECOPD. Furthermore, AECOPD diagnosis relies heavily on the exclusion of differential diagnoses (1), which further rules out the potential of a single predictive AECOPD biomarker.

The CAREPATH will conduct Technical Validation and Usability (TVU) study by involving ≥ 45 target end users (16 patients with MCI or mild dementia with their informal caregivers and 16 healthcare professionals from various disciplines) and Clinical Investigation (CI) study involving ≥ 200 patients (≥ 100 users to pilot the CAREPATH platform and ≥ 100 patients as reference cases). Both of these pilot studies will be coordinated in four European countries (Spain, Romania, Germany and UK) with diverse health and social care systems, ICT landscape/digital maturity of healthcare provision and dementia national programs, which will allow for strengthening the evidence base on health outcomes and efficiency gains. The CAREPATH outcomes can be summarized as: An Integrated Care Platform that jointly addresses multimorbidity, dementia and diminished intrinsic capacity and optimally manages healthcare interventions for its users (patients, informal caregiver, healthcare providers, etc). Technical Validation and Usability (TVU) study involving over 45 users and Clinical Investigation (CI) involving over 200 patients that will be conducted in four European countries (Spain, Romania, Germany and UK) during two years and mobilizing the other necessary actors, such as caregivers and healthcare professionals, for the validation of healthcare interventions. Dementia / Multimorbidity Guidelines that will be conceived for best healthcare delivery. Health Economics Impact Assessment for healthcare cost effectiveness and care provision equalities. The incremental cost-effectiveness and the incremental cost-utility ratio would allow revealing the incremental cost (or the potential savings) per unit of benefit of switching from usual care to CAREPATH-an integrated patient-centred approach- in multimorbid elderly patients with dementia, and therefore, to determinate whether the CAREPATH approach would be considered as a cost-effective alternative.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the lung function effect from orally inhaled BGF delivered via HFO propellant is equivalent to the lung function effect from orally inhaled BGF delivered via HFA propellant in participants with COPD. The study duration for each participant will be approximately 15 to 16 weeks and consist of: A screening and placebo run-in period of approximately 2 weeks prior to first dosing Three treatment periods of approximately 4 weeks each (one period for each of 3 study interventions) A final safety follow-up visit via telephone contact approximately 1 to 2 weeks after the final dose administration Participants will be provided with rescue SABA (albuterol or salbutamol) to be used as needed throughout the study. Participants will attend in-clinic study visits approximately weekly during the screening/run-in period (Visits 1, 2, and 3), then every 4 weeks (Visits 4, 5, and 6) to receive take-home study treatment, measure their lung function, and assess their health and safety

The London COPD exacerbation (EXCEL) cohort builds on an established cohort started in 1995 and designed to study COPD exacerbations and their impact on health-status and disease progression.