Efficacy and Safety of Glycopyrrolate Bromide of COPD Patients
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CHF 5259 (glycopyrrolate bromide) for the treatment of COPD patients.
Single Ascending Dose Study of TRN-157 in Healthy Subjects
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseThis single ascending dose study is to determine and evaluate the safety and tolerability of TRN-157 in approximately 40 healthy subjects.
Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab in Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease...
Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseThe purpose of the study is to determine if benralizumab reduces COPD exacerbation rate in symptomatic patients with moderate to very severe COPD who are receiving standard of care therapies.
A Study to Investigate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Repeat Doses...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseRV1729 is a new medicine being developed for the potential treatment of asthma and smoking related lung disease (also known as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - COPD). The objective of this study is to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics repeat doses of RV1729 in patients with COPD for 28 days.
Benralizumab Efficacy in Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) With...
Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseThe purpose of the study is to determine if benralizumab reduces COPD exacerbation rate in symptomatic patients with moderate to very severe COPD who are receiving standard of care therapies
Tiotropium Inhalation Capsules and Salmeterol Inhalation Aerosol on Muscular Efficiency and Resting...
Pulmonary DiseaseChronic ObstructiveThe primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of tiotropium on gross muscular efficiency
Dose Ranging Study of Ba 679 BR Inhalation Powder in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)...
Pulmonary DiseaseChronic ObstructiveTo investigate the dose response following single inhalation of Ba 679 BR inhalation powder in COPD patients using pulmonary functions as indicators, and to compare data obtained with overseas study findings
Ipratropium Bromide/Salbutamol Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler Compared to Ipratropium Bromide...
Pulmonary DiseaseChronic ObstructiveThe primary objective of this study was to compare the long-term (12-week) bronchodilator efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide / salbutamol combination administered by the Respimat® 40 mcg / 200 mcg (one inhalation q.i.d.) to COMBIVENT Inhalation Aerosol (two inhalations q.i.d.), ipratropium bromide Respimat® (one inhalation q.i.d.) and Placebo formulations of each in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). An additional objective was to show the superiority of Combivent Respimat as compared to ipratropium bromide (40 mcg) Respimat. Steady state pharmacokinetics over one dosing interval following four weeks of therapy were also characterized.
A 24 Week Efficacy Study of Inhaled Umeclidinium (UMEC) in Patients of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary...
Pulmonary DiseaseChronic ObstructiveStudies to date provides substantial evidence for the effectiveness for UMEC 62.5 microgram (mcg) as a long term maintenance therapy for the treatment of COPD; this study further evaluates the efficacy and safety of UMEC 62.5 mcg administered once-daily (OD) for 24 weeks via a NDPI compared with placebo in Asian subjects with COPD. Over approximate 27 weeks of entire study duration, 10 study clinic visits will be conducted on an outpatient basis. Pre-screening visit will be conducted for the informed consent form, review demography, COPD history and COPD concomitant medications. Subjects meeting the eligibility criteria at screening will complete a 7 to 14 day Run-in period and will be provided with albuterol/salbutamol as rescue medication on an "as-needed" basis. Further, subjects will be randomized to the UMEC 62.5 mcg or matching placebo in a 1:2 ratio for 24 week treatment period. A follow up for adverse event assessment will be scheduled approximately 7 days after the treatment period or the Early Withdrawal Visit.
Low Load, High-repetitive Elastic Band Resistance Training in COPD
Pulmonary DiseaseChronic Obstructive1 moreRecent work have shown that low load, high-repetitive single limb resistance training, if compared to a control, can increase limb muscle function and functional exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) while avoiding the occurrence of limiting exertional symptoms. However, no comparison to another exercise regimen have been performed. In addition neither the intramuscular nor the mechanism of this exercise regimen have been investigated and represents the aim of the proposed project. We will in a prospective, assessor-blind; block randomized controlled, parallel-group trial compare single-limb to two-limb low load, high-repetitive resistance training in patients with severe and very severe COPD The research hypothesizes are: that single-limb low-load high-repetitive resistance training will provide larger gain in the 6-min walking distance than two-limb low-load high- repetitive resistance training in patients with severe to very severe (stage III-IV) COPD. that eight weeks of single limb training should also be associated with larger physiological (increased muscle endurance, less muscle fatigue and deoxygenation) and structural (muscle protein synthesis, fiber-type distribution and capillarization) muscle adaptations to training, lower cardio- respiratory demand, as well a greater increase in health-related quality of life in comparison to two-limbs simultaneous training. We will also compare the groups at baseline to investigate the acute effects and mechanisms of single-limb to two-limb low load, high-repetitive resistance training, a comparison that also will include healthy matched controls. The research hypothesizes are: that involving a large muscle mass during exercise (e.g., two-limb low load, high-repetition resistance training) compared to involving a small muscle mass during training (e.g., single limb low load, high-repetition resistance training) would lead to larger restraints on the cardiorespiratory system in patients with severe to very severe COPD. Conversely, single limb interventions should produce less dyspnea and more muscle deoxygenation and fatigue than two-limb simultaneous exercise while healthy controls will be able to perform both legs/arms exercise without a central constraint, and no negative consequences on muscle fatigue or exercise stimulus.