Active clinical trials for "Hypersensitivity"

Immediate food allergy is , sometimes , a life threatening situation . Diagnosis is done by skin prick test with commercial extracts. Nevertheless, some of the extracts are not optimal and reproduce false negative results (no allergy) in patients with history highly suggestive of allergic reaction. The aim of this study is to compare the reproducibility of different commercial extracts and raw food in patients with convincing history of acute allergic symptoms related to food .

The purpose of this prospective randomised study is to investigate electrocardiographic alterations after intravascular injection of three different test solutions of bupivacaine and epinephrine in anaesthetised children up to 16 years of age.

The purpose of this trial is to study the diagnostic role of skin test in immediate reactions to iodinated radiocontrast media.

Pharyngeal sensitivity is a determinant parameter of pharyngeal functioning, particularly regarding protective dilator reflexes of upper airway. Preliminary results have suggested that the use of this parameter in diagnosis algorithm such as linear discriminant analysis and random forest could predict the presence of sleep apnea syndrome in almost 98% of patients. Our study aims at validating a new diagnosis method of sleep disordered breathing which will be compared with nocturnal polysomnography, the reference method to diagnose sleep disordered breathing. Pharyngeal sensitivity will be measured using the SENSITEST device which allows an automatic measurement of the pharyngeal sensation. The use of this parameter in diagnosis algorithm will be compared with polysomnographic results.

Insulin allergy (IA) is still observed even with recombinant human insulin and insulin analogs. Obviously, the usual attitude facing an allergy, i. e. exclusion of the allergen, poses problems in face of IA because insulin is often vital for the patient. IA is thus a complex situation in which a rigorous diagnostic procedure to identify the exact allergen is necessary to propose a therapeutic answer; the purpose of the study is 1/ to validate a diagnostic algorithm for patients presenting with possible allergy. 2/ to investigate immunogenetic profiles of patient with insulin allergy 3/ cellular mechanisms of IA.

Comparison the results of skin prick testing and Intradermal skin test result of local and imported insect allergen extracts in patients with serious insect sting allergy reactions

Clinical randomized, triple-blind, used to measure the level of tooth sensitivity on volunteers using a modified virtual analog scale (VAS). Sixty-six volunteers will be selected and recruited, following inclusion criteria and pre-established exclusion. All volunteers will be guided and sign a term of clarification and consent. Volunteers will be randomly divided into two groups: the control group to receive placebo capsules and application of desensitizing gel containing 6% potassium nitrate and 0.10% fluoro- (conventional treatment) and the experimental group will receive the anti-inflammatory corticosteroids (dexamethasone, capsule - 8mg) and application of a placebo gel. Patients will be treated in two clinical sessions with an interval of 7 days (one week) between them. The protocol for use of the product is as follows: The volunteers in the experimental group will receive six capsules of dexamethasone 8 mg each to be administered orally, initially two days before the first bleaching query as follows: 8 mg (1 capsule) 9 am in the morning two days before the first clinical session whitening; 8 mg (1 capsule) the 9 am to 1 day before the first practice session whitening, 8 mg (1 capsule) to 9 am on the day of the first practice session of whitening. After 7 days (one week), the same protocol will be held for the second and final practice session office bleaching.

The goal of this study is to compare ten current and readily available FDA approved allergy skin prick devices to determine the most sensitive and specific product and methods used for the diagnosis of allergic disease. The primary outcome will be to determine the analytical sensitivity and specificity of all ten skin prick devices by measuring wheal and flare response to histamine and control diluent in 1mm increments. Secondary outcomes include comparison of skin prick technique, optimum histamine concentration, patient comfort, reproducibility, and the comparability of high-resolution digital images.

Non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) is an emerging clinical entity defined as the presence of intestinal and/or extraintestinal symptoms induced by the ingestion or gluten and relieved by a gluten free diet (GFD) in patients without celiac disease or wheat allergy. The pathologic mechanism of the disorder is unknown, and there are no known biomarkers or associated histopathologic findings. In this prospective, randomized controlled trail, we are investigating the utility of patient reported symptom questionnaires, as well as stool gluten and urine quantification tools in patients with NCGS and healthy controls.

Irritable Bowel syndrome (IBS) is a very frequent condition in children. Its management is difficult, often resulting in a persistence of chronical abdominal pain. In adults, many patients affected by IBS improve under a gluten-free diet, even in the absence of Celiac Disease (CD) or wheat allergy. This condition is called Non Coeliac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS). However, it is still not clear how to diagnose and manage NCGS, and the pathophysiological mechanisms also remain elusive. The aim of this study is to determine if NCGS exists in children with IBS and to identify the clinical, serological, and histological characteristics, which could distinguish patients with NCGS from conventional IBS and CD patients. This is a prospective cohort study in a population of children affected by a moderate to severe IBS for more than 6 months. All children had a Gluten Free Diet (GFD) for 6 weeks. Then, children who improved under GFD were randomized in two groups for a double-blind placebo-controled trial. One group had a reintroduction of gluten followed by a wash-out period, then a placebo reintroduction, whereas the other group had the placebo first, then the wash-out and the gluten reintroduction.