Active clinical trials for "Rhinitis, Allergic"

This was a crossover study designed to see if patients with allergy symptoms preferred Clarinex® or Zyrtec®. Patients were randomized to take 7 days of Clarinex or Zyrtec treatment, followed by a 5 to 28-day washout period (days when no drug is given), followed by 7 days of the opposite treatment. At the end of each 7-day treatment, patients were asked questions to determine which drug, Clarinex or Zyrtec, the patient prefers more.

To characterize the pharmacokinetics of diphenhydramine in two pediatric populations: children, ages 2 to < 12 years, and adolescents, ages 12 to < 18 years.

Investigate safety/tolerability after a single dose intranasal administration of DSP-3025 comparator placebo to healthy male volunteers and seasonal allergic rhinitis male patients out of season.

4 week open study to evaluate the safety of levocetirizine in young children (2 - 6 years) suffering from allergic rhinitis. As secondary objective, this study will assess the efficacy of the treatment by means of the T4SS (Total 4 symptoms scores of allergic rhinitis) and each of the 4 individual rhinitis symptom scores

This study investigates the effects of Allergic Rhinitis (AR) on driving ability and memory functions. Our group has previously shown that patients suffering from AR symptoms perform less well on tasks requiring sustained attention compared to non symptomatic controls. Car driving is a typical behavior that is susceptible for changes in sustained attention and might therefore become worse under conditions when patients suffer from AR symptoms. We will compare the driving performance of untreated, symptomatic AR patients with the performance of symptomatic patients that have been treated with either a systemic AR medication (a pill) or a topical medication (nasal spray)

The EEU has proven effective in multiple studies evaluating various aspects of seasonal allergic rhinitis. All previous EEU clinical trials have utilized ragweed or grass pollen as the allergen of choice for dispersal, due to the local population, but many emerging treatments for allergic rhinitis are allergen specific, thus it is desirable to expand the repertoire of pollen selection for use in the EEU. Ragweed, grass and birch pollen have differing appearances and sizes but essentially, both have characteristics which promote the ability to keep the pollen grains suspended and hence, the ability to maintain proper concentrations within the EEU. Preliminary validation studies conducted in the EEU, absent of human volunteers, have confirmed our ability to release, disperse and maintain birch pollen concentrations in the EEU using the existing technology. This study aims to validate the use of birch pollen on a clinical scale. By adding non- allergic participants into the EEU, the investigators hope to determine if non-allergic persons exhibit differences at baseline in their "epigenetic biomarkers" from those who have pre-existing and established allergic airways inflammation.

The objective is to prospectively explore associations between immunological parameters in blood and clinical effect of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) in children with severe allergy towards pollen. Half of the children will receive SCIT while the other half will start SCIT after the study is finished. Clinical evaluations of symptoms and an immunological survey will be performed before start of SCIT and after one year of treatment. Some of the immunological parameters will also be checked after 6 months of treatment

The specific clinical trial is a part in which ALK- Abelló will directly work to explore human immunological mechanisms of SIT (observed after GRAZAX treatment).

People who have hayfever or allergic rhinitis often complain about eye symptoms associated with their nasal symptoms. How people with hayfever develop eye symptoms is not clear. The purpose of this study is to better understand the generation of eye symptoms in patients with allergic rhinitis. We have previously shown that placing the substance that subjects are allergic to in their nose causes both nose and eye symptoms. This can be explain by a parasympathetic neurogenic reflex from the nose to the eye. Such a reflex would readily explain the tearing and watery eye symptoms, but does not explain the itch. In this study, we are going to address one possible explanation for the itch; does an axonal neurogenic reflex stimulate mast cells in the eye to release histamine, which then causes the itch? We will do this by placing an antihistamine drop in the eye and challenge the nose with allergen. We will also attempt to demonstrate that mast activation isn't effected by blocking the initiating of the reflex with a nasal steroid, as done in our previous study, and showing that the addition of an antihistamine does not add to the reduction of symptoms.

The aim of the study is to establish the maximum tolerated dose of PURETHAL Mites that is achieved by 90% of the patients with less than 20% of the injections giving rise to a swelling of > 5 cm and the optimal regimen to reach this maximum dose will be determined.