Active clinical trials for "Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis"

The purpose of this study is to identify the most promising therapeutic strategy for patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis and inadequate response to standard of care therapy. It will evaluate the efficacy to induce remission of three different salvage strategies including: a combination of rituximab with addition of a conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (either methotrexate, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, but preferentially methotrexate); tocilizumab; or abatacept.

The RENATO trial is a multicenter randomized controlled trial that evaluates the efficacy of pioglitazone to improve renal outcomes in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Patients with biopsy-proven kidney involvement of ANCA vasculitis will be included in this trial at diagnosis. All patients will receive a standard of care immunosuppressive (SOC) therapy combining corticosteroids and rituximab (375 mg/m2/week for 4 consecutive weals followed by 500 mg re-infusion every 6 months). They will be randomized 1:1 to receive either pioglitazone 30 mg/day or placebo for 6 months, on top of SOC. The primary objective of this trial is to demonstrate that pioglitazone reduces kidney damage, reflected by the early improvement of proteinuria and serum creatinine levels. The secondary objectives will be to assess the efficacy of this drug on the reduction of hypertension and metabolic effects of glucocorticoids, to measure its impact on vasculitis activity and to evaluate the safety profile of pioglitazone in this population.

The goal of this multicentre observational study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of rituximab biosimilars to the originator in Canadian patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA) and Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA), two main forms of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). The main questions it aims to answer are: Is there a difference in vasculitis control between originator and biosimilar rituximab? Is there a difference in adverse effects between originator and biosimilar rituximab? In the Canadian healthcare context, are wait times to receive approval (financial coverage) for rituximab shorter for biosimilars compared to originators? Investigators will perform study assessments (including recording disease activity, damage, and adverse events) at the time of participants' usual clinical care visits, at regular intervals for 2 years after starting rituximab (for induction or maintenance treatment) or switching from an originator to a biosimilar as part of their usual care. Researchers will compare outcomes among participants who have received rituximab originators (from 2018 onwards) or biosimilars as part of their usual care, to see if there are differences in relapses, remission rates, damage, serious infections, serious adverse events, and treatment approval wait times.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety of avacopan in participants with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV).

To date, there is no available tool that allows, at individual level, determination of the probability to develop clinically relevant complications of prolonged glucocorticoid therapy. In patients with inflammatory rheumatic disorders requiring prolonged glucocorticoid therapy, such tool could be useful to adapt first-line treatment decisions (in daily practice and in future clinical trials). The main objective of the study is to identify routine clinical, biological and DXA baseline characteristics predictive of the occurrence of clinically relevant complications of glucocorticoid therapy at 1 year, in order to propose a predictive score.

The Avacostar PASS is a non-interventional, multi-national, prospective cohort study that will collect data from 2 cohorts of patients: those treated with avacopan for active severe AAV, and a second cohort treated with a cyclophosphamide or rituximab-based induction regimen without avacopan for active severe AAV. The overall study duration is anticipated to be up to 7 years, including a recruitment period of approximately 3 years.

The incidence in pediatrics is very low (about 0.5 per million according to a French study) and therefore the data on the pathology very poor, especially on the therapeutic level. Without appropriate treatment, the mortality rate of the pathology is very high. Existing treatments are almost exclusively composed of immunomodulatory and/or immunosuppressive treatments. Complications related to pathology and iatrogeny are among the first causes of mortality from this pathology and deserve to be studied in order to be known and if possible avoided. The purpose of the study is to achieve a national comparison of clinical and therapeutic practices.

The purpose of this study is to determine the best management strategy to maintain remission in patients with ANCA vasculitis who have been treated with rituximab induced B cell depletion for at least two years. This study will compare intermittent B Cell depletion upon B cell return or intermittent B cell depletion upon serologic relapse.

The clinical efficacy of double filtration plasmapheresis(DFPP) in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody associated glomerulonephritis(AAGN).

The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of CCX168 (avacopan) to induce and sustain remission in patients with active anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), when used in combination with cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine, or in combination with rituximab.