Active clinical trials for "Angina Pectoris"

To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Reducer system for treatment of patients with refractory angina pectoris treated with maximally tolerated guideline-directed medical therapy who demonstrate objective evidence of reversible myocardial ischemia in the distribution of the left coronary artery and who are deemed unsuitable for revascularization. A non-randomized single-arm will further assess the safety and effectiveness of the Neovasc Reducer System in selected subjects with reversible myocardial ischemia in the distribution of the right coronary artery and who are deemed unsuitable for revascularization, subjects with reversible myocardial ischemia without documented obstructive coronary disease and subjects who cannot complete an exercise tolerance test due to an above-the-ankle amputation.

There are a growing number of patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP). RAP is defined as a 'chronic condition (> three months) characterized by diffuse coronary artery disease in the presence of proven ischemia, which is not amendable to a combination of medical therapy, angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery'. These patients are severely restricted in performing daily activities due to debilitating angina complaints, leading to a decreased quality of life. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a last resort treatment option for patients with RAP. SCS is a device with a lead located in the thoracic epidural space and an Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG) in the abdomen or buttock that provides neurostimulation. Four possible mechanisms explaining the beneficial effects of SCS on RAP have been described: reduction of pain perception, decreased sympathetic tone, reduced myocardial oxygen demand, and improved coronary microcirculatory blood flow. Research into the effect of SCS on RAP up to date have mainly been observational studies, with only four placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials. All studies confirm that treatment with SCS leads to a reduction in the number of angina pectoris attacks. What is currently not clear, is whether there is a placebo effect as results vary between the studies. One study looked at the effect of SCS in patients with RAP on the reduction of ischemia (using MIBI-SPECT) with no control arm. After 12 months myocardial ischemia was reduced, but not after three months of treatment. Leading to the conclusion that the reduction is myocardial ischemia was not a direct effect of SCS, but rather due to better coronary collateralization. The 2020 ESC guideline 'chronic coronary syndromes' mentions non-existing to promising levels of evidence with regard to treatment options in patients with RAP and concludes that SCS may be considered (Class IIB; level of evidence B). It concludes that 'larger RCTs are required to define the role of each treatment modality for specific subgroups, to decrease non-responder rates and ascertain benefit beyond potential placebo effects'. The aim of the current randomized controlled trial (double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled, single center) is to determine if high density spinal cord stimulation, a paresthesia free form of stimulation, leads to a significant reduction in myocardial ischemia (using PET with Rubidium-82 as tracer) in patients with refractory angina pectoris. All patients included in this study will receive an implanted spinal cord stimulator after a positive TENS treadmill outcome and proven ischemia using the imaging modality PET with Rubidium-82 as tracer. Using a cross-over design all patients will have a 6 month period with high density stimulation and 6 month period of no stimulation. Randomization will determine in which order the patient receives these treatments. Both the patient and the treating physicians are blinded for this randomization process. At baseline a 6-minute walking test, the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, the RAND-36 questionnaire, the NRS scale and the CCS class will be performed/filled out. Cross-over takes place at 6 months (switch from high density stimulation to no stimulation or vice versa) prior to which the PET scan is repeated, as well as the 6-minute walking test, the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, the RAND-36 questionnaire, the NRS-scale and the CCS-class. At the end of the study period (12 months) the PET scan is repeated, as well as the 6-minute walking test, the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, the RAND-36 questionnaire, the NRS-scale and the CCS-class.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become one of the main treatments for rapid recovery of revascularization in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). PCI has some advantages, such as easy operation, small trauma and rapid recovery. It can significantly improve myocardial ischemic symptom and reduce the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events in CHD patients. However, many studies have found that the incidence of PCI-related myocardial injury is relatively high, and affect the efficacy of PCI and prognosis in patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP). A meta-analysis of a total of 7578 patients with UAP from 15 studies who underwent PCI was found to have a 28.7% increase in myocardial biomarkers after PCI. The objective of this randomized control trial is to gain a clinical insight on the use of low temperature contrast for the treatment of PCI-related myocardial injury in UAP patients. The primary objective is assess efficacy and safety of low temperature contrast for the treatment of PCI-related myocardial injury in UAP patients.

Objective to evaluate the effect of Shexiang Baoxin Pill on myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (non obstructive coronary heart disease) through a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical multicenter study.At the same time, the effects of exercise tolerance and quality of life were also observed.

Coronary microvascular disease (MVD) refers to exertional angina or myocardial ischemia caused by abnormal structure and/or function of precoronary arterioles and arterioles under the action of various pathogenic factors. The symptoms of patients with coronary microvascular disease are mainly exertion-related chest pain episodes. The basic and clinical researches of the traditional Chinese medicine compound Danshen dropping pills have found that it can improve vascular endothelial function and relieve angina pectoris, and it is widely used in clinical practice. This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical study of Compound Danshen Dropping Pills and blank control in patients with microvascular angina pectoris. The experimental drug and control drug of this clinical trial were selected according to the ratio of 1:1 patients were enrolled in the pre-experiment. After the selected patients signed the informed consent, they were divided into a compound Danshen dripping pill treatment group and a placebo group according to a random, double-blind, placebo-controlled method. Dosage of Compound Danshen Dropping Pills or placebo: 20 capsules each time, 3 times a day, for a total of 6 months. Follow-up was performed every 2 months for a total of 6 months. Primary study endpoints is the difference of the left anterior descending coronary flow reserve (CFR) measured by ultrasound between the two groups compared with the baseline. Secondary study endpoint include the Number of angina attacks per week, the time of angina pectoris and the time of ischemic ST segment depression in exercise test.

Ticagrelor-based De-escalation of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting trial (TOP-CABG trial) is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority, parallel controlled trial. The aim of TOP-CABG is to investigate whether de-escalated dual antiplatelet therapy (De-DAPT) is non-inferior to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in efficacy on inhibiting great saphenous vein (SVG) graft occlusion and is superior in reducing bleeding events in patients accepting coronary artery bypassing grafting.

Randomized registry for the study of CTO PCI as adjunction to optimal medical therapy.

This prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single arm, objective performance goal (OPG) study is designed to evaluate clinical outcomes after complete revascularization by PCI and imaging guidance (OCT) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease including left anterior descending (LAD) presenting with stable angina, or documented silent ischemia, or non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).

The purpose of this study is to determine whether ICD(Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator) implantation on the top of optimal medical therapy in patients with variant angina manifesting as aborted sudden cardiac death reduces the incidence of the death from any cause compared with optimal medical therapy alone.

The overall purpose of Flash FFR Ⅱ is to investigate whether coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (caFFR), compared with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured by a pressure wire, has non-inferior clinical effect and cost benefit in guiding the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with moderate coronary artery stenosis in terms of long-term clinical prognosis.